Convergence to Riemann-Stieltjes integral of sequence of Riemann-Stieltjes-like sums with changing integrand...












2












$begingroup$


I am considering the limiting behavior of a sequence of Riemann-Stieltjes (RS) (or at least RS-like) sums in the sense of their convergence to a Riemann-Stieltjes integral. The general term has the form



begin{equation}
sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] ,,
end{equation}



where $x_{-1}^{(N)} := 0$ for every value of $N$, every partition ${ x_n^{(N)} }_{n=-1}^N$ is of the unit real interval $[0,1]$ with $x_N^{(N)} = 1$, the argument $t_n^{(N)}$ belongs to the subinterval $[x_{n-1}^{(N)}, x_n^{(N)}]$ of $[0,1]$ (actually, in my more specific setting it is $t_n^{(N)} = x_n^{(N)}$), and the partition for $N+1$ is a refinement of that for $N$. I think everything is as usual for an RS sum except for the particularity that there is no fixed function having the role of integrator, but rather a sequence $(F_N)_N$ thereof, and similarly for the integrand, which is defined in terms of the sequence $(f_N)_N$.



As for the functions, they are all real of a single real variable. Those in the sequence $(f_N)_N$ are continuous and bounded in $[0,1]$, and the sequence converges to a continuous function f bounded in the same interval. In turn, those in $(F_N)_N$ are monotonically increasing step functions bounded in $[0,1]$ and the sequence is uniformly convergent to a function F that is a cumulative distribution function. My overall objective is to prove that the sequence of sums converges to the RS integral $int_0^1 , f(x) , mathrm{d}F(x)$.



Any hints on how to proceed will be welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am considering the limiting behavior of a sequence of Riemann-Stieltjes (RS) (or at least RS-like) sums in the sense of their convergence to a Riemann-Stieltjes integral. The general term has the form



    begin{equation}
    sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] ,,
    end{equation}



    where $x_{-1}^{(N)} := 0$ for every value of $N$, every partition ${ x_n^{(N)} }_{n=-1}^N$ is of the unit real interval $[0,1]$ with $x_N^{(N)} = 1$, the argument $t_n^{(N)}$ belongs to the subinterval $[x_{n-1}^{(N)}, x_n^{(N)}]$ of $[0,1]$ (actually, in my more specific setting it is $t_n^{(N)} = x_n^{(N)}$), and the partition for $N+1$ is a refinement of that for $N$. I think everything is as usual for an RS sum except for the particularity that there is no fixed function having the role of integrator, but rather a sequence $(F_N)_N$ thereof, and similarly for the integrand, which is defined in terms of the sequence $(f_N)_N$.



    As for the functions, they are all real of a single real variable. Those in the sequence $(f_N)_N$ are continuous and bounded in $[0,1]$, and the sequence converges to a continuous function f bounded in the same interval. In turn, those in $(F_N)_N$ are monotonically increasing step functions bounded in $[0,1]$ and the sequence is uniformly convergent to a function F that is a cumulative distribution function. My overall objective is to prove that the sequence of sums converges to the RS integral $int_0^1 , f(x) , mathrm{d}F(x)$.



    Any hints on how to proceed will be welcome.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am considering the limiting behavior of a sequence of Riemann-Stieltjes (RS) (or at least RS-like) sums in the sense of their convergence to a Riemann-Stieltjes integral. The general term has the form



      begin{equation}
      sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] ,,
      end{equation}



      where $x_{-1}^{(N)} := 0$ for every value of $N$, every partition ${ x_n^{(N)} }_{n=-1}^N$ is of the unit real interval $[0,1]$ with $x_N^{(N)} = 1$, the argument $t_n^{(N)}$ belongs to the subinterval $[x_{n-1}^{(N)}, x_n^{(N)}]$ of $[0,1]$ (actually, in my more specific setting it is $t_n^{(N)} = x_n^{(N)}$), and the partition for $N+1$ is a refinement of that for $N$. I think everything is as usual for an RS sum except for the particularity that there is no fixed function having the role of integrator, but rather a sequence $(F_N)_N$ thereof, and similarly for the integrand, which is defined in terms of the sequence $(f_N)_N$.



      As for the functions, they are all real of a single real variable. Those in the sequence $(f_N)_N$ are continuous and bounded in $[0,1]$, and the sequence converges to a continuous function f bounded in the same interval. In turn, those in $(F_N)_N$ are monotonically increasing step functions bounded in $[0,1]$ and the sequence is uniformly convergent to a function F that is a cumulative distribution function. My overall objective is to prove that the sequence of sums converges to the RS integral $int_0^1 , f(x) , mathrm{d}F(x)$.



      Any hints on how to proceed will be welcome.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am considering the limiting behavior of a sequence of Riemann-Stieltjes (RS) (or at least RS-like) sums in the sense of their convergence to a Riemann-Stieltjes integral. The general term has the form



      begin{equation}
      sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] ,,
      end{equation}



      where $x_{-1}^{(N)} := 0$ for every value of $N$, every partition ${ x_n^{(N)} }_{n=-1}^N$ is of the unit real interval $[0,1]$ with $x_N^{(N)} = 1$, the argument $t_n^{(N)}$ belongs to the subinterval $[x_{n-1}^{(N)}, x_n^{(N)}]$ of $[0,1]$ (actually, in my more specific setting it is $t_n^{(N)} = x_n^{(N)}$), and the partition for $N+1$ is a refinement of that for $N$. I think everything is as usual for an RS sum except for the particularity that there is no fixed function having the role of integrator, but rather a sequence $(F_N)_N$ thereof, and similarly for the integrand, which is defined in terms of the sequence $(f_N)_N$.



      As for the functions, they are all real of a single real variable. Those in the sequence $(f_N)_N$ are continuous and bounded in $[0,1]$, and the sequence converges to a continuous function f bounded in the same interval. In turn, those in $(F_N)_N$ are monotonically increasing step functions bounded in $[0,1]$ and the sequence is uniformly convergent to a function F that is a cumulative distribution function. My overall objective is to prove that the sequence of sums converges to the RS integral $int_0^1 , f(x) , mathrm{d}F(x)$.



      Any hints on how to proceed will be welcome.







      integration sequences-and-series sequence-of-function






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:41







      Marcos

















      asked Dec 3 '18 at 5:49









      MarcosMarcos

      1236




      1236






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Start by writing



          $$tag{*}left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right| \ leqslant left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \ + left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \+ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right|,$$



          and try to estimate each term as $N to infty.$



          Uniform convergence of both $f_N to f$ and $F_N to F$ would be helpful.



          For the first term on the RHS of (*) , with uniform convergence, we have for sufficiently large $N$ and all $x in [0,1]$,



          $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| < epsilon, ,,, F_N(1) < F(1) + epsilon, ,,, F_N(0) > F(0) - epsilon$$



          Hence,



          $$ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right|\ leqslant sum_{n=0}^N , |f_N(t_n^{(N)})- f(t_n^{(N)}) | , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ leqslant epsilon sum_{n=0}^N , , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ = epsilon[F_N(1) - F_N(0)] \ leqslant epsilon[F(1) - F(0) + 2epsilon$$



          The convergence of the last term on the RHS of (*) is not always guaranteed when $f$ is R-S integrable with respect to $F$ except under strong conditions. It seems you have that part -- both because the partitions in the sequence are refinements and $f$ is continuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:48










          • $begingroup$
            @Marco: Where is the typo?
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:50










          • $begingroup$
            The entire first line.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:51










          • $begingroup$
            The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:53








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 7:25











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023699%2fconvergence-to-riemann-stieltjes-integral-of-sequence-of-riemann-stieltjes-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Start by writing



          $$tag{*}left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right| \ leqslant left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \ + left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \+ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right|,$$



          and try to estimate each term as $N to infty.$



          Uniform convergence of both $f_N to f$ and $F_N to F$ would be helpful.



          For the first term on the RHS of (*) , with uniform convergence, we have for sufficiently large $N$ and all $x in [0,1]$,



          $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| < epsilon, ,,, F_N(1) < F(1) + epsilon, ,,, F_N(0) > F(0) - epsilon$$



          Hence,



          $$ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right|\ leqslant sum_{n=0}^N , |f_N(t_n^{(N)})- f(t_n^{(N)}) | , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ leqslant epsilon sum_{n=0}^N , , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ = epsilon[F_N(1) - F_N(0)] \ leqslant epsilon[F(1) - F(0) + 2epsilon$$



          The convergence of the last term on the RHS of (*) is not always guaranteed when $f$ is R-S integrable with respect to $F$ except under strong conditions. It seems you have that part -- both because the partitions in the sequence are refinements and $f$ is continuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:48










          • $begingroup$
            @Marco: Where is the typo?
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:50










          • $begingroup$
            The entire first line.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:51










          • $begingroup$
            The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:53








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 7:25
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Start by writing



          $$tag{*}left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right| \ leqslant left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \ + left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \+ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right|,$$



          and try to estimate each term as $N to infty.$



          Uniform convergence of both $f_N to f$ and $F_N to F$ would be helpful.



          For the first term on the RHS of (*) , with uniform convergence, we have for sufficiently large $N$ and all $x in [0,1]$,



          $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| < epsilon, ,,, F_N(1) < F(1) + epsilon, ,,, F_N(0) > F(0) - epsilon$$



          Hence,



          $$ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right|\ leqslant sum_{n=0}^N , |f_N(t_n^{(N)})- f(t_n^{(N)}) | , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ leqslant epsilon sum_{n=0}^N , , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ = epsilon[F_N(1) - F_N(0)] \ leqslant epsilon[F(1) - F(0) + 2epsilon$$



          The convergence of the last term on the RHS of (*) is not always guaranteed when $f$ is R-S integrable with respect to $F$ except under strong conditions. It seems you have that part -- both because the partitions in the sequence are refinements and $f$ is continuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:48










          • $begingroup$
            @Marco: Where is the typo?
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:50










          • $begingroup$
            The entire first line.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:51










          • $begingroup$
            The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:53








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 7:25














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Start by writing



          $$tag{*}left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right| \ leqslant left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \ + left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \+ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right|,$$



          and try to estimate each term as $N to infty.$



          Uniform convergence of both $f_N to f$ and $F_N to F$ would be helpful.



          For the first term on the RHS of (*) , with uniform convergence, we have for sufficiently large $N$ and all $x in [0,1]$,



          $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| < epsilon, ,,, F_N(1) < F(1) + epsilon, ,,, F_N(0) > F(0) - epsilon$$



          Hence,



          $$ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right|\ leqslant sum_{n=0}^N , |f_N(t_n^{(N)})- f(t_n^{(N)}) | , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ leqslant epsilon sum_{n=0}^N , , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ = epsilon[F_N(1) - F_N(0)] \ leqslant epsilon[F(1) - F(0) + 2epsilon$$



          The convergence of the last term on the RHS of (*) is not always guaranteed when $f$ is R-S integrable with respect to $F$ except under strong conditions. It seems you have that part -- both because the partitions in the sequence are refinements and $f$ is continuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Start by writing



          $$tag{*}left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right| \ leqslant left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \ + left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right| \+ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F(x_n^{(N)}) - F(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- int_0^1 f , dF right|,$$



          and try to estimate each term as $N to infty.$



          Uniform convergence of both $f_N to f$ and $F_N to F$ would be helpful.



          For the first term on the RHS of (*) , with uniform convergence, we have for sufficiently large $N$ and all $x in [0,1]$,



          $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| < epsilon, ,,, F_N(1) < F(1) + epsilon, ,,, F_N(0) > F(0) - epsilon$$



          Hence,



          $$ left| sum_{n=0}^N , f_N(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})]- sum_{n=0}^N , f(t_n^{(N)}) , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] right|\ leqslant sum_{n=0}^N , |f_N(t_n^{(N)})- f(t_n^{(N)}) | , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ leqslant epsilon sum_{n=0}^N , , [F_N(x_n^{(N)}) - F_N(x_{n-1}^{(N)})] \ = epsilon[F_N(1) - F_N(0)] \ leqslant epsilon[F(1) - F(0) + 2epsilon$$



          The convergence of the last term on the RHS of (*) is not always guaranteed when $f$ is R-S integrable with respect to $F$ except under strong conditions. It seems you have that part -- both because the partitions in the sequence are refinements and $f$ is continuous.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 3 '18 at 7:23

























          answered Dec 3 '18 at 6:34









          RRLRRL

          50.4k42573




          50.4k42573












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:48










          • $begingroup$
            @Marco: Where is the typo?
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:50










          • $begingroup$
            The entire first line.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:51










          • $begingroup$
            The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:53








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 7:25


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:48










          • $begingroup$
            @Marco: Where is the typo?
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:50










          • $begingroup$
            The entire first line.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcos
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:51










          • $begingroup$
            The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 6:53








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Dec 3 '18 at 7:25
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcos
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:48




          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much for your answer. I guess that you first line in the RHS is a typo to be removed, though. I'll try as you suggest and see how far I can go.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcos
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:48












          $begingroup$
          @Marco: Where is the typo?
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:50




          $begingroup$
          @Marco: Where is the typo?
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:50












          $begingroup$
          The entire first line.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcos
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:51




          $begingroup$
          The entire first line.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcos
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:51












          $begingroup$
          The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:53






          $begingroup$
          The first line is $|S(P_N,f_N,F_N) - int_0^1 f , dF|$ with $S(...)$ shorthand for the sum. This is the very thing you want to show converges to $0$.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 6:53






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 7:25




          $begingroup$
          No problem. I just showed how the first term on the RHS is small for large $N$ when we have uniform convergence. The third term converges as I said under your hypotheses. All you have to do is handle the second term which should be easy because $f$ is bounded and $F_N to F$ uniformly.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Dec 3 '18 at 7:25


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023699%2fconvergence-to-riemann-stieltjes-integral-of-sequence-of-riemann-stieltjes-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...