Can Laplace Transform be understood as “Area under the curve”?












3












$begingroup$


Since Laplace Transform is basically a definite integral of multiplication of two functions $f(t)$ and $e^{-st}$. Can we interpret Laplace Transform as the area under the curve $f(t)e^{-st}$ from $-infty$ to $infty$ ?



For example, we know Laplace Transform of $f(t)=t$ for $t>0$ is equal to $F(s)=frac{1}{s^2}$. Can we interpret this graphically?






integration fourier-analysis laplace-transform harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:57












  • $begingroup$
    @mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
    $endgroup$
    – Simba
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:00












  • $begingroup$
    Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:34
















3












$begingroup$


Since Laplace Transform is basically a definite integral of multiplication of two functions $f(t)$ and $e^{-st}$. Can we interpret Laplace Transform as the area under the curve $f(t)e^{-st}$ from $-infty$ to $infty$ ?



For example, we know Laplace Transform of $f(t)=t$ for $t>0$ is equal to $F(s)=frac{1}{s^2}$. Can we interpret this graphically?






integration fourier-analysis laplace-transform harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:57












  • $begingroup$
    @mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
    $endgroup$
    – Simba
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:00












  • $begingroup$
    Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:34














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Since Laplace Transform is basically a definite integral of multiplication of two functions $f(t)$ and $e^{-st}$. Can we interpret Laplace Transform as the area under the curve $f(t)e^{-st}$ from $-infty$ to $infty$ ?



For example, we know Laplace Transform of $f(t)=t$ for $t>0$ is equal to $F(s)=frac{1}{s^2}$. Can we interpret this graphically?






integration fourier-analysis laplace-transform harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Since Laplace Transform is basically a definite integral of multiplication of two functions $f(t)$ and $e^{-st}$. Can we interpret Laplace Transform as the area under the curve $f(t)e^{-st}$ from $-infty$ to $infty$ ?



For example, we know Laplace Transform of $f(t)=t$ for $t>0$ is equal to $F(s)=frac{1}{s^2}$. Can we interpret this graphically?






integration fourier-analysis laplace-transform harmonic-analysis




integration fourier-analysis laplace-transform harmonic-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 18:58







Simba

















asked Dec 12 '18 at 18:50









SimbaSimba

1163




1163












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:57












  • $begingroup$
    @mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
    $endgroup$
    – Simba
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:00












  • $begingroup$
    Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:34


















  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:57












  • $begingroup$
    @mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
    $endgroup$
    – Simba
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:00












  • $begingroup$
    Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:34
















$begingroup$
Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 12 '18 at 18:57






$begingroup$
Are you sure about your stated interval from $-infty$ to $infty$? The Laplace Transform is defined as the interal over $$ the interval $[0,infty)$!
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 12 '18 at 18:57














$begingroup$
@mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
$endgroup$
– Simba
Dec 12 '18 at 19:00






$begingroup$
@mrtaurho there are two types of Laplace Transforms, Unilateral and Bilateral.. Even if you consider from $0$ to $infty$ can you interpret it graphically?
$endgroup$
– Simba
Dec 12 '18 at 19:00














$begingroup$
Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 12 '18 at 19:02




$begingroup$
Well obviously I have forgot about this one. Anyway I would say the unilateral version is more common thus it confused me that you stated the interval $(-infty,infty)$.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 12 '18 at 19:02












$begingroup$
I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:15




$begingroup$
I am almost certain that there is no interest (even heuristical) to try to give an interpretation of Laplace Transform using areas.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:15












$begingroup$
@JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 12 '18 at 19:34




$begingroup$
@JeanMarie Do you mean "no pratical interest"?
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 12 '18 at 19:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I think the best way is to think in analogy to Fourier transforms. In Fourier transforms you think as your time dependent signal as a superposition of simple sinusoidal functions with different frequencies. This works well for periodic signals. The Laplace transformation is used to describe transitions. You turn on something at $t=0$ and wait to equilibrate, at $t=infty$. You can write your time dependence as a superposition of exponential functions with different decay rates.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:21












  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:46











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037079%2fcan-laplace-transform-be-understood-as-area-under-the-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

I think the best way is to think in analogy to Fourier transforms. In Fourier transforms you think as your time dependent signal as a superposition of simple sinusoidal functions with different frequencies. This works well for periodic signals. The Laplace transformation is used to describe transitions. You turn on something at $t=0$ and wait to equilibrate, at $t=infty$. You can write your time dependence as a superposition of exponential functions with different decay rates.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:21












  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:46
















2












$begingroup$

I think the best way is to think in analogy to Fourier transforms. In Fourier transforms you think as your time dependent signal as a superposition of simple sinusoidal functions with different frequencies. This works well for periodic signals. The Laplace transformation is used to describe transitions. You turn on something at $t=0$ and wait to equilibrate, at $t=infty$. You can write your time dependence as a superposition of exponential functions with different decay rates.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:21












  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:46














2












2








2





$begingroup$

I think the best way is to think in analogy to Fourier transforms. In Fourier transforms you think as your time dependent signal as a superposition of simple sinusoidal functions with different frequencies. This works well for periodic signals. The Laplace transformation is used to describe transitions. You turn on something at $t=0$ and wait to equilibrate, at $t=infty$. You can write your time dependence as a superposition of exponential functions with different decay rates.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I think the best way is to think in analogy to Fourier transforms. In Fourier transforms you think as your time dependent signal as a superposition of simple sinusoidal functions with different frequencies. This works well for periodic signals. The Laplace transformation is used to describe transitions. You turn on something at $t=0$ and wait to equilibrate, at $t=infty$. You can write your time dependence as a superposition of exponential functions with different decay rates.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:02









AndreiAndrei

12.4k21128




12.4k21128












  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:21












  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:46


















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:21












  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:46
















$begingroup$
I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:21






$begingroup$
I am sorry but you certainly want to speak about Fourier series not Fourier transform as you write "This works well for periodic signals". Fourier transform does not assume any periodicity of the signals.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:21














$begingroup$
@JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 12 '18 at 19:46




$begingroup$
@JeanMarie Indeed. I was thinking of the series when I've made the connection with periodicity.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 12 '18 at 19:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037079%2fcan-laplace-transform-be-understood-as-area-under-the-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
Read more

Puebla de Zaragoza

Image
Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc
Read more

Musa

Image
Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo
Read more