When $langle F(x,y)y+u(x)(x-c), G(x,y)y+v(x)(x-c) rangle$ is a maximal ideal of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$?
$begingroup$
Let $F=F(x,y),G=G(x,y) in mathbb{C}[x,y]$, $u=u(x),v=v(x) in mathbb{C}[x]$, $c in mathbb{C}$.
Denote:
$A=F(x,y)y+u(x)(x-c)=Fy+u(x-c)$,
$B=G(x,y)y+v(x)(x-c)=Gy+v(x-c)$.
When $I_{A,B}:=langle A,B rangle$ is a maximal ideal of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$?
It is well-known that maximal ideals of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$ are of the form: $langle x-a,y-b rangle$, $a,b in mathbb{C}$, see this question.
Observe that, for example, $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle$ is maximal, since $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle = langle x-a,y-b rangle$.
Remarks:
1. Notice that $I_{A,B} subseteq langle x-c, y rangle$.
- What if we further assume that $gcd(u,v)=gcd(u(x),v(x))=1$?
Any hints and comments are welcome!
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F=F(x,y),G=G(x,y) in mathbb{C}[x,y]$, $u=u(x),v=v(x) in mathbb{C}[x]$, $c in mathbb{C}$.
Denote:
$A=F(x,y)y+u(x)(x-c)=Fy+u(x-c)$,
$B=G(x,y)y+v(x)(x-c)=Gy+v(x-c)$.
When $I_{A,B}:=langle A,B rangle$ is a maximal ideal of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$?
It is well-known that maximal ideals of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$ are of the form: $langle x-a,y-b rangle$, $a,b in mathbb{C}$, see this question.
Observe that, for example, $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle$ is maximal, since $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle = langle x-a,y-b rangle$.
Remarks:
1. Notice that $I_{A,B} subseteq langle x-c, y rangle$.
- What if we further assume that $gcd(u,v)=gcd(u(x),v(x))=1$?
Any hints and comments are welcome!
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F=F(x,y),G=G(x,y) in mathbb{C}[x,y]$, $u=u(x),v=v(x) in mathbb{C}[x]$, $c in mathbb{C}$.
Denote:
$A=F(x,y)y+u(x)(x-c)=Fy+u(x-c)$,
$B=G(x,y)y+v(x)(x-c)=Gy+v(x-c)$.
When $I_{A,B}:=langle A,B rangle$ is a maximal ideal of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$?
It is well-known that maximal ideals of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$ are of the form: $langle x-a,y-b rangle$, $a,b in mathbb{C}$, see this question.
Observe that, for example, $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle$ is maximal, since $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle = langle x-a,y-b rangle$.
Remarks:
1. Notice that $I_{A,B} subseteq langle x-c, y rangle$.
- What if we further assume that $gcd(u,v)=gcd(u(x),v(x))=1$?
Any hints and comments are welcome!
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra ideals
$endgroup$
Let $F=F(x,y),G=G(x,y) in mathbb{C}[x,y]$, $u=u(x),v=v(x) in mathbb{C}[x]$, $c in mathbb{C}$.
Denote:
$A=F(x,y)y+u(x)(x-c)=Fy+u(x-c)$,
$B=G(x,y)y+v(x)(x-c)=Gy+v(x-c)$.
When $I_{A,B}:=langle A,B rangle$ is a maximal ideal of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$?
It is well-known that maximal ideals of $mathbb{C}[x,y]$ are of the form: $langle x-a,y-b rangle$, $a,b in mathbb{C}$, see this question.
Observe that, for example, $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle$ is maximal, since $langle x-a, y-b+(x-a)^5 rangle = langle x-a,y-b rangle$.
Remarks:
1. Notice that $I_{A,B} subseteq langle x-c, y rangle$.
- What if we further assume that $gcd(u,v)=gcd(u(x),v(x))=1$?
Any hints and comments are welcome!
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra ideals
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra ideals
edited Dec 12 '18 at 19:40
user237522
asked Dec 12 '18 at 19:34
user237522user237522
2,1601617
2,1601617
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is true if and only if $Fv-Guin Bbb{C}$.
To see why, let
$$ M = newcommandbmat{begin{pmatrix}}newcommandemat{end{pmatrix}}bmat F & u\G
& vemat.$$
Then $$bmat A \ B emat = M bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then if $(A,B)=(y,x-c)$, we have that $y=e_{11}A + e_{12}B$ and $(x-c)=e_{21}A + e_{22}B$.
Then the matrix
$$ E = bmat e_{11} & e_{12} \ e_{21} & e_{22} emat $$ satisfies
$$ Ebmat A \ B emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Thus $$ EMbmat y \ x-c emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Expanding this gives
$$ bmat e_{11} F +e_{12} G & e_{11}u+e_{12}v \ e_{21}F+e_{22}G & e_{21}u+e_{22}vematbmat y \ x-cemat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then
$$(e_{11}F+e_{12}G)y+(e_{11}u+e_{12}v)(x-c) = y,$$
which tells us immediately that $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, and thus that
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$.
Similarly, the fact that $$(e_{21}F+e_{22}G)y + (e_{21}u+e_{22}v)(x-c) = (x-c)$$
tells us that $e_{21}F+e_{22}G=0$ and $e_{21}u+e_{22}v=1$.
Hence $F$ and $G$ are relatively prime (and not just relatively prime, they generate the unit ideal), and $u$ and $v$ also generate the unit ideal.
Moreover, since $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, we have $e_{11}u=-e_{12}v$, so since $u$ and $v$ are relatively prime, $e_{11} = h_1v$ and $e_{12}=-h_1u$. Then since
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$, we have $h_1vF-h_1uG=1$. Therefore $Fv-Gu=1/h_1in Bbb{C}$.
Conversely if $Fv-GuinBbb{C}$, then $M$ is invertible, so $A$ and $B$ generate $(y,x-c)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037127%2fwhen-langle-fx-yyuxx-c-gx-yyvxx-c-rangle-is-a-maximal-ideal-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is true if and only if $Fv-Guin Bbb{C}$.
To see why, let
$$ M = newcommandbmat{begin{pmatrix}}newcommandemat{end{pmatrix}}bmat F & u\G
& vemat.$$
Then $$bmat A \ B emat = M bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then if $(A,B)=(y,x-c)$, we have that $y=e_{11}A + e_{12}B$ and $(x-c)=e_{21}A + e_{22}B$.
Then the matrix
$$ E = bmat e_{11} & e_{12} \ e_{21} & e_{22} emat $$ satisfies
$$ Ebmat A \ B emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Thus $$ EMbmat y \ x-c emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Expanding this gives
$$ bmat e_{11} F +e_{12} G & e_{11}u+e_{12}v \ e_{21}F+e_{22}G & e_{21}u+e_{22}vematbmat y \ x-cemat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then
$$(e_{11}F+e_{12}G)y+(e_{11}u+e_{12}v)(x-c) = y,$$
which tells us immediately that $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, and thus that
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$.
Similarly, the fact that $$(e_{21}F+e_{22}G)y + (e_{21}u+e_{22}v)(x-c) = (x-c)$$
tells us that $e_{21}F+e_{22}G=0$ and $e_{21}u+e_{22}v=1$.
Hence $F$ and $G$ are relatively prime (and not just relatively prime, they generate the unit ideal), and $u$ and $v$ also generate the unit ideal.
Moreover, since $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, we have $e_{11}u=-e_{12}v$, so since $u$ and $v$ are relatively prime, $e_{11} = h_1v$ and $e_{12}=-h_1u$. Then since
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$, we have $h_1vF-h_1uG=1$. Therefore $Fv-Gu=1/h_1in Bbb{C}$.
Conversely if $Fv-GuinBbb{C}$, then $M$ is invertible, so $A$ and $B$ generate $(y,x-c)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is true if and only if $Fv-Guin Bbb{C}$.
To see why, let
$$ M = newcommandbmat{begin{pmatrix}}newcommandemat{end{pmatrix}}bmat F & u\G
& vemat.$$
Then $$bmat A \ B emat = M bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then if $(A,B)=(y,x-c)$, we have that $y=e_{11}A + e_{12}B$ and $(x-c)=e_{21}A + e_{22}B$.
Then the matrix
$$ E = bmat e_{11} & e_{12} \ e_{21} & e_{22} emat $$ satisfies
$$ Ebmat A \ B emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Thus $$ EMbmat y \ x-c emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Expanding this gives
$$ bmat e_{11} F +e_{12} G & e_{11}u+e_{12}v \ e_{21}F+e_{22}G & e_{21}u+e_{22}vematbmat y \ x-cemat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then
$$(e_{11}F+e_{12}G)y+(e_{11}u+e_{12}v)(x-c) = y,$$
which tells us immediately that $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, and thus that
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$.
Similarly, the fact that $$(e_{21}F+e_{22}G)y + (e_{21}u+e_{22}v)(x-c) = (x-c)$$
tells us that $e_{21}F+e_{22}G=0$ and $e_{21}u+e_{22}v=1$.
Hence $F$ and $G$ are relatively prime (and not just relatively prime, they generate the unit ideal), and $u$ and $v$ also generate the unit ideal.
Moreover, since $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, we have $e_{11}u=-e_{12}v$, so since $u$ and $v$ are relatively prime, $e_{11} = h_1v$ and $e_{12}=-h_1u$. Then since
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$, we have $h_1vF-h_1uG=1$. Therefore $Fv-Gu=1/h_1in Bbb{C}$.
Conversely if $Fv-GuinBbb{C}$, then $M$ is invertible, so $A$ and $B$ generate $(y,x-c)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is true if and only if $Fv-Guin Bbb{C}$.
To see why, let
$$ M = newcommandbmat{begin{pmatrix}}newcommandemat{end{pmatrix}}bmat F & u\G
& vemat.$$
Then $$bmat A \ B emat = M bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then if $(A,B)=(y,x-c)$, we have that $y=e_{11}A + e_{12}B$ and $(x-c)=e_{21}A + e_{22}B$.
Then the matrix
$$ E = bmat e_{11} & e_{12} \ e_{21} & e_{22} emat $$ satisfies
$$ Ebmat A \ B emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Thus $$ EMbmat y \ x-c emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Expanding this gives
$$ bmat e_{11} F +e_{12} G & e_{11}u+e_{12}v \ e_{21}F+e_{22}G & e_{21}u+e_{22}vematbmat y \ x-cemat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then
$$(e_{11}F+e_{12}G)y+(e_{11}u+e_{12}v)(x-c) = y,$$
which tells us immediately that $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, and thus that
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$.
Similarly, the fact that $$(e_{21}F+e_{22}G)y + (e_{21}u+e_{22}v)(x-c) = (x-c)$$
tells us that $e_{21}F+e_{22}G=0$ and $e_{21}u+e_{22}v=1$.
Hence $F$ and $G$ are relatively prime (and not just relatively prime, they generate the unit ideal), and $u$ and $v$ also generate the unit ideal.
Moreover, since $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, we have $e_{11}u=-e_{12}v$, so since $u$ and $v$ are relatively prime, $e_{11} = h_1v$ and $e_{12}=-h_1u$. Then since
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$, we have $h_1vF-h_1uG=1$. Therefore $Fv-Gu=1/h_1in Bbb{C}$.
Conversely if $Fv-GuinBbb{C}$, then $M$ is invertible, so $A$ and $B$ generate $(y,x-c)$.
$endgroup$
This is true if and only if $Fv-Guin Bbb{C}$.
To see why, let
$$ M = newcommandbmat{begin{pmatrix}}newcommandemat{end{pmatrix}}bmat F & u\G
& vemat.$$
Then $$bmat A \ B emat = M bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then if $(A,B)=(y,x-c)$, we have that $y=e_{11}A + e_{12}B$ and $(x-c)=e_{21}A + e_{22}B$.
Then the matrix
$$ E = bmat e_{11} & e_{12} \ e_{21} & e_{22} emat $$ satisfies
$$ Ebmat A \ B emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Thus $$ EMbmat y \ x-c emat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Expanding this gives
$$ bmat e_{11} F +e_{12} G & e_{11}u+e_{12}v \ e_{21}F+e_{22}G & e_{21}u+e_{22}vematbmat y \ x-cemat = bmat y \ x-c emat.$$
Then
$$(e_{11}F+e_{12}G)y+(e_{11}u+e_{12}v)(x-c) = y,$$
which tells us immediately that $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, and thus that
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$.
Similarly, the fact that $$(e_{21}F+e_{22}G)y + (e_{21}u+e_{22}v)(x-c) = (x-c)$$
tells us that $e_{21}F+e_{22}G=0$ and $e_{21}u+e_{22}v=1$.
Hence $F$ and $G$ are relatively prime (and not just relatively prime, they generate the unit ideal), and $u$ and $v$ also generate the unit ideal.
Moreover, since $e_{11}u+e_{12}v=0$, we have $e_{11}u=-e_{12}v$, so since $u$ and $v$ are relatively prime, $e_{11} = h_1v$ and $e_{12}=-h_1u$. Then since
$e_{11}F+e_{12}G=1$, we have $h_1vF-h_1uG=1$. Therefore $Fv-Gu=1/h_1in Bbb{C}$.
Conversely if $Fv-GuinBbb{C}$, then $M$ is invertible, so $A$ and $B$ generate $(y,x-c)$.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
jgonjgon
14.8k22042
14.8k22042
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Thank you very much! Your answer is very nice.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 12 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
$begingroup$
Please, do you think that it is easy to find a (sufficient and necessary) condition for $I_{A,B}$ to be a radical ideal? where $I$ is a radical ideal if $a^n in I$ implies that $a in I$.
$endgroup$
– user237522
Dec 13 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037127%2fwhen-langle-fx-yyuxx-c-gx-yyvxx-c-rangle-is-a-maximal-ideal-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown