$operatorname{supp}(f_{X,Y})={(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2||x|+|y|leq1}$ then $X,Y$ are not independent












0












$begingroup$


Let $Z=(X,Y)$ be a absolutely coninuous random variable such that
$$
\operatorname{supp}(f_Z)={(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2||x|+|y|leq1}
$$

Show that $X,Y$ are not independent.





I don't have a good idea how to continue the proof. I need to find $(t,s)inmathbb{R}^2$ that setasfies
$$
\ int_{-1}^{s}int_{-1}^{t}f_Z(x,y)dx dy=int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dycdotint_{-1}^{1}f_Z(x,s)dx
$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $Z=(X,Y)$ be a absolutely coninuous random variable such that
    $$
    \operatorname{supp}(f_Z)={(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2||x|+|y|leq1}
    $$

    Show that $X,Y$ are not independent.





    I don't have a good idea how to continue the proof. I need to find $(t,s)inmathbb{R}^2$ that setasfies
    $$
    \ int_{-1}^{s}int_{-1}^{t}f_Z(x,y)dx dy=int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dycdotint_{-1}^{1}f_Z(x,s)dx
    $$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $Z=(X,Y)$ be a absolutely coninuous random variable such that
      $$
      \operatorname{supp}(f_Z)={(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2||x|+|y|leq1}
      $$

      Show that $X,Y$ are not independent.





      I don't have a good idea how to continue the proof. I need to find $(t,s)inmathbb{R}^2$ that setasfies
      $$
      \ int_{-1}^{s}int_{-1}^{t}f_Z(x,y)dx dy=int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dycdotint_{-1}^{1}f_Z(x,s)dx
      $$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $Z=(X,Y)$ be a absolutely coninuous random variable such that
      $$
      \operatorname{supp}(f_Z)={(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2||x|+|y|leq1}
      $$

      Show that $X,Y$ are not independent.





      I don't have a good idea how to continue the proof. I need to find $(t,s)inmathbb{R}^2$ that setasfies
      $$
      \ int_{-1}^{s}int_{-1}^{t}f_Z(x,y)dx dy=int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dycdotint_{-1}^{1}f_Z(x,s)dx
      $$







      probability integration random-variables absolute-continuity






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 12 '18 at 19:00









      J. DoeJ. Doe

      16111




      16111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Can $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously be close to $1$? Can you show that each individually has a positive probability of being close to $1$?





          Hint 2: I mean the following. Note that since the set ${x > frac{1}{2}, y > frac{1}{2}}$ intersects the support of $f_Z$ trivially, we must have that $P[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}] = 0,.$ To show that they're not independent, you'd just now need to show that $P[X > frac{1}{2}] > 0$ and $P[Y > frac{1}{2}] > 0$, since we'd then have $$Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}right] neq Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}right] cdot Pleft[Y > frac{1}{2}right],. $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
            $endgroup$
            – J. Doe
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:40








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcus M
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:53











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037089%2foperatornamesuppf-x-y-x-y-in-mathbbr2xy-leq1-then-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Can $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously be close to $1$? Can you show that each individually has a positive probability of being close to $1$?





          Hint 2: I mean the following. Note that since the set ${x > frac{1}{2}, y > frac{1}{2}}$ intersects the support of $f_Z$ trivially, we must have that $P[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}] = 0,.$ To show that they're not independent, you'd just now need to show that $P[X > frac{1}{2}] > 0$ and $P[Y > frac{1}{2}] > 0$, since we'd then have $$Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}right] neq Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}right] cdot Pleft[Y > frac{1}{2}right],. $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
            $endgroup$
            – J. Doe
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:40








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcus M
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:53
















          4












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Can $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously be close to $1$? Can you show that each individually has a positive probability of being close to $1$?





          Hint 2: I mean the following. Note that since the set ${x > frac{1}{2}, y > frac{1}{2}}$ intersects the support of $f_Z$ trivially, we must have that $P[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}] = 0,.$ To show that they're not independent, you'd just now need to show that $P[X > frac{1}{2}] > 0$ and $P[Y > frac{1}{2}] > 0$, since we'd then have $$Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}right] neq Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}right] cdot Pleft[Y > frac{1}{2}right],. $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
            $endgroup$
            – J. Doe
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:40








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcus M
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:53














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Hint: Can $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously be close to $1$? Can you show that each individually has a positive probability of being close to $1$?





          Hint 2: I mean the following. Note that since the set ${x > frac{1}{2}, y > frac{1}{2}}$ intersects the support of $f_Z$ trivially, we must have that $P[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}] = 0,.$ To show that they're not independent, you'd just now need to show that $P[X > frac{1}{2}] > 0$ and $P[Y > frac{1}{2}] > 0$, since we'd then have $$Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}right] neq Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}right] cdot Pleft[Y > frac{1}{2}right],. $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint: Can $X$ and $Y$ simultaneously be close to $1$? Can you show that each individually has a positive probability of being close to $1$?





          Hint 2: I mean the following. Note that since the set ${x > frac{1}{2}, y > frac{1}{2}}$ intersects the support of $f_Z$ trivially, we must have that $P[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}] = 0,.$ To show that they're not independent, you'd just now need to show that $P[X > frac{1}{2}] > 0$ and $P[Y > frac{1}{2}] > 0$, since we'd then have $$Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}, Y > frac{1}{2}right] neq Pleft[X > frac{1}{2}right] cdot Pleft[Y > frac{1}{2}right],. $$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 12 '18 at 19:52

























          answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:09









          Marcus MMarcus M

          8,80311047




          8,80311047












          • $begingroup$
            Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
            $endgroup$
            – J. Doe
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:40








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcus M
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:53


















          • $begingroup$
            Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
            $endgroup$
            – J. Doe
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:40








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
            $endgroup$
            – Marcus M
            Dec 12 '18 at 19:53
















          $begingroup$
          Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
          $endgroup$
          – J. Doe
          Dec 12 '18 at 19:40






          $begingroup$
          Do you mean $lim_{tto1}int_{-1}^{1}f_Z(t,y)dy=int_{-1}^1f_Z(1,y)dy=mathbb{P}(-1<Yleq1)$ and same for $X$? Not sure how it helps me. @Marcuus
          $endgroup$
          – J. Doe
          Dec 12 '18 at 19:40






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcus M
          Dec 12 '18 at 19:53




          $begingroup$
          @J.Doe, no that's not what I mean. I added a second, more involved hint that puts you nearly all the way there.
          $endgroup$
          – Marcus M
          Dec 12 '18 at 19:53


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037089%2foperatornamesuppf-x-y-x-y-in-mathbbr2xy-leq1-then-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa