Why is fsck saying corrupt superblock or partition table and how to fix?












2















I made an image (dd) of a drive and I am trying to run a filesystem check on it:
Filesystem Type: ext3



Here is the Original error from fsck:



 fsck -fv -z ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.$(date
+"%Y-%m-%d.%H.%M.%S").und /dev/loop2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.2019-01-17.13.31.41.und /dev/loop2

The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 122063840 blocks
The physical size of the device is 121604515 blocks
Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!


Info from fdisk -l /dev/sda



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
/dev/sda2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


Info from fdisk -l ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img



Disk ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img: 464 GiB, 498226311168 bytes, 973098264 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


I made a loop device for the Partition Using:



losetup --offset $((512*262144)) /dev/loop2 ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img


From blockdev --getbsz /dev/loop2



4096


From blockdev --getsz /dev/loop2



972836120


From dumpe2fs /dev/loop2:



Filesystem UUID:          f68ccb5a-bcfa-4e8a-8876-45adaa6e6b85
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype sparse_super large_file
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options: user_xattr acl
Filesystem state: clean with errors
Errors behavior: Continue
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Inode count: 30523392
Block count: 122063840
Reserved block count: 6103192
Free blocks: 96939245
Free inodes: 30462657
First block: 0
Block size: 4096
Fragment size: 4096
Reserved GDT blocks: 994
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group: 32768
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group: 512
Filesystem created: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Last mount time: Wed Jan 16 15:59:22 2019
Last write time: Thu Jan 17 18:16:50 2019
Mount count: 17
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Lifetime writes: 10 MB
Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root)
First inode: 11
Inode size: 256
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize: 28
Journal inode: 8
Default directory hash: half_md4
Directory Hash Seed: 162d0daa-7968-48f9-8370-f095c9e19f58
Journal backup: inode blocks
Journal features: journal_incompat_revoke
Journal size: 128M
Journal length: 32768
Journal sequence: 0x000059bd
Journal start: 0


Followed by a lot of:



Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767)
Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-30
Reserved GDT blocks at 31-1024
Block bitmap at 1025 (+1025)
Inode bitmap at 1026 (+1026)
Inode table at 1027-1538 (+1027)
4 free blocks, 8179 free inodes, 2 directories
...
(SKIPPING TO END)
...
Group 3725: (Blocks 122060800-122063839)
Block bitmap at 122060800 (+0)
Inode bitmap at 122060801 (+1)
Inode table at 122060802-122061313 (+2)
0 free blocks, 8192 free inodes, 0 directories


Finished with:



dumpe2fs: /dev/loop2: error reading bitmaps: Can't read a block bitmap


Now I can mount /dev/sda2 just fine and read the files
I cannot however mount /dev/loop2



mount -t ext3 /dev/loop2 ./DriveImage/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop2,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error

In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.


I get the same error trying to mount directly from the image using:



mount -o loop,offset=$((512*262144)) ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img ./DriveImage


Now According to dumpe2fs the superblock is right!

And According to the math:



 Superblock says:
122063840
Filesystem says:
121604515

block size:
4096

Math: Sectors * Sector Size = Size / Block Size = Blocks
Partition 1:
8160 * 512 = 4177920 / 4096 = 1020
Partition 2:
[From fdisk]
976510976 * 512 = 499973619712 / 4096 = 122063872
[From blockdev with /dev/loop2]
972836120 * 512 = 498092093440 / 4096 = 121604515


fdisk is reporting pretty close to the right blocks...(Just 32 more blocks)
But in my book, fsck is getting its blocksize info the same way blockdev does (or uses it), but according to dumpe2fs and checking the actual partition table, the superblock is actually right and so is the partition table.



In fear of losing the original data on the disk (10 years worth of family pictures/videos and important files) I am not willing to run this stuff on the original disk. So I made a copy of the disk to this image, then also, in case I screw up something, I also made a copy of the image. (Don't worry, I have disk space for this).



What am I doing wrong here? and how can I fix this?



NOTE: Due to the old drive starting to fail (assumed, I have had some issues), this is why I am doing this.

ALSO, for some reason the drive lost its partition table and I had to use testdisk to recover it. After it was recovered I was able to mount the large partition and read all my data.

SO I assumed that either testdisk got it right or pretty darn close, since it is all there.



(UPDATE #1) I should also note, that when I run fsck on the original drive I do not get this error...



fsck -nfv /dev/sda2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information

60735 inodes used (0.20%, out of 30523392)
1510 non-contiguous files (2.5%)
49 non-contiguous directories (0.1%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 23779/2425/0
25124595 blocks used (20.58%, out of 122063840)
0 bad blocks
1 large file

56022 regular files
4704 directories
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
------------
60726 files


(UPDATE #2) I found out that the image file is not the same as the drive, the image file is smaller.

Drive Size: 500107862016 (Had a mistake here, I only got the size of the second partition, updated to correct info)

Image Size: 498226311168

The Image file is missing 1881550848 bytes, over 1.88GB of data. (This corrected also)

Seems like dd did not get everything, and that I might be right that the drive has problems, is there a way to make dd fill read-errors with blank space so I can have a matching size?



I am running through fsck on the loop device to see what it does, I guess if I mess it up, I will just restore the back image.



ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a headless server system, no GUI, just CLI.










share|improve this question

























  • I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 22:16






  • 1





    I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

    – Xen2050
    Jan 18 at 22:27











  • Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • @Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

    – davidgo
    Jan 18 at 23:52
















2















I made an image (dd) of a drive and I am trying to run a filesystem check on it:
Filesystem Type: ext3



Here is the Original error from fsck:



 fsck -fv -z ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.$(date
+"%Y-%m-%d.%H.%M.%S").und /dev/loop2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.2019-01-17.13.31.41.und /dev/loop2

The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 122063840 blocks
The physical size of the device is 121604515 blocks
Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!


Info from fdisk -l /dev/sda



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
/dev/sda2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


Info from fdisk -l ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img



Disk ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img: 464 GiB, 498226311168 bytes, 973098264 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


I made a loop device for the Partition Using:



losetup --offset $((512*262144)) /dev/loop2 ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img


From blockdev --getbsz /dev/loop2



4096


From blockdev --getsz /dev/loop2



972836120


From dumpe2fs /dev/loop2:



Filesystem UUID:          f68ccb5a-bcfa-4e8a-8876-45adaa6e6b85
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype sparse_super large_file
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options: user_xattr acl
Filesystem state: clean with errors
Errors behavior: Continue
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Inode count: 30523392
Block count: 122063840
Reserved block count: 6103192
Free blocks: 96939245
Free inodes: 30462657
First block: 0
Block size: 4096
Fragment size: 4096
Reserved GDT blocks: 994
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group: 32768
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group: 512
Filesystem created: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Last mount time: Wed Jan 16 15:59:22 2019
Last write time: Thu Jan 17 18:16:50 2019
Mount count: 17
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Lifetime writes: 10 MB
Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root)
First inode: 11
Inode size: 256
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize: 28
Journal inode: 8
Default directory hash: half_md4
Directory Hash Seed: 162d0daa-7968-48f9-8370-f095c9e19f58
Journal backup: inode blocks
Journal features: journal_incompat_revoke
Journal size: 128M
Journal length: 32768
Journal sequence: 0x000059bd
Journal start: 0


Followed by a lot of:



Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767)
Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-30
Reserved GDT blocks at 31-1024
Block bitmap at 1025 (+1025)
Inode bitmap at 1026 (+1026)
Inode table at 1027-1538 (+1027)
4 free blocks, 8179 free inodes, 2 directories
...
(SKIPPING TO END)
...
Group 3725: (Blocks 122060800-122063839)
Block bitmap at 122060800 (+0)
Inode bitmap at 122060801 (+1)
Inode table at 122060802-122061313 (+2)
0 free blocks, 8192 free inodes, 0 directories


Finished with:



dumpe2fs: /dev/loop2: error reading bitmaps: Can't read a block bitmap


Now I can mount /dev/sda2 just fine and read the files
I cannot however mount /dev/loop2



mount -t ext3 /dev/loop2 ./DriveImage/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop2,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error

In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.


I get the same error trying to mount directly from the image using:



mount -o loop,offset=$((512*262144)) ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img ./DriveImage


Now According to dumpe2fs the superblock is right!

And According to the math:



 Superblock says:
122063840
Filesystem says:
121604515

block size:
4096

Math: Sectors * Sector Size = Size / Block Size = Blocks
Partition 1:
8160 * 512 = 4177920 / 4096 = 1020
Partition 2:
[From fdisk]
976510976 * 512 = 499973619712 / 4096 = 122063872
[From blockdev with /dev/loop2]
972836120 * 512 = 498092093440 / 4096 = 121604515


fdisk is reporting pretty close to the right blocks...(Just 32 more blocks)
But in my book, fsck is getting its blocksize info the same way blockdev does (or uses it), but according to dumpe2fs and checking the actual partition table, the superblock is actually right and so is the partition table.



In fear of losing the original data on the disk (10 years worth of family pictures/videos and important files) I am not willing to run this stuff on the original disk. So I made a copy of the disk to this image, then also, in case I screw up something, I also made a copy of the image. (Don't worry, I have disk space for this).



What am I doing wrong here? and how can I fix this?



NOTE: Due to the old drive starting to fail (assumed, I have had some issues), this is why I am doing this.

ALSO, for some reason the drive lost its partition table and I had to use testdisk to recover it. After it was recovered I was able to mount the large partition and read all my data.

SO I assumed that either testdisk got it right or pretty darn close, since it is all there.



(UPDATE #1) I should also note, that when I run fsck on the original drive I do not get this error...



fsck -nfv /dev/sda2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information

60735 inodes used (0.20%, out of 30523392)
1510 non-contiguous files (2.5%)
49 non-contiguous directories (0.1%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 23779/2425/0
25124595 blocks used (20.58%, out of 122063840)
0 bad blocks
1 large file

56022 regular files
4704 directories
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
------------
60726 files


(UPDATE #2) I found out that the image file is not the same as the drive, the image file is smaller.

Drive Size: 500107862016 (Had a mistake here, I only got the size of the second partition, updated to correct info)

Image Size: 498226311168

The Image file is missing 1881550848 bytes, over 1.88GB of data. (This corrected also)

Seems like dd did not get everything, and that I might be right that the drive has problems, is there a way to make dd fill read-errors with blank space so I can have a matching size?



I am running through fsck on the loop device to see what it does, I guess if I mess it up, I will just restore the back image.



ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a headless server system, no GUI, just CLI.










share|improve this question

























  • I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 22:16






  • 1





    I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

    – Xen2050
    Jan 18 at 22:27











  • Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • @Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

    – davidgo
    Jan 18 at 23:52














2












2








2








I made an image (dd) of a drive and I am trying to run a filesystem check on it:
Filesystem Type: ext3



Here is the Original error from fsck:



 fsck -fv -z ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.$(date
+"%Y-%m-%d.%H.%M.%S").und /dev/loop2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.2019-01-17.13.31.41.und /dev/loop2

The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 122063840 blocks
The physical size of the device is 121604515 blocks
Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!


Info from fdisk -l /dev/sda



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
/dev/sda2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


Info from fdisk -l ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img



Disk ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img: 464 GiB, 498226311168 bytes, 973098264 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


I made a loop device for the Partition Using:



losetup --offset $((512*262144)) /dev/loop2 ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img


From blockdev --getbsz /dev/loop2



4096


From blockdev --getsz /dev/loop2



972836120


From dumpe2fs /dev/loop2:



Filesystem UUID:          f68ccb5a-bcfa-4e8a-8876-45adaa6e6b85
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype sparse_super large_file
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options: user_xattr acl
Filesystem state: clean with errors
Errors behavior: Continue
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Inode count: 30523392
Block count: 122063840
Reserved block count: 6103192
Free blocks: 96939245
Free inodes: 30462657
First block: 0
Block size: 4096
Fragment size: 4096
Reserved GDT blocks: 994
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group: 32768
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group: 512
Filesystem created: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Last mount time: Wed Jan 16 15:59:22 2019
Last write time: Thu Jan 17 18:16:50 2019
Mount count: 17
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Lifetime writes: 10 MB
Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root)
First inode: 11
Inode size: 256
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize: 28
Journal inode: 8
Default directory hash: half_md4
Directory Hash Seed: 162d0daa-7968-48f9-8370-f095c9e19f58
Journal backup: inode blocks
Journal features: journal_incompat_revoke
Journal size: 128M
Journal length: 32768
Journal sequence: 0x000059bd
Journal start: 0


Followed by a lot of:



Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767)
Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-30
Reserved GDT blocks at 31-1024
Block bitmap at 1025 (+1025)
Inode bitmap at 1026 (+1026)
Inode table at 1027-1538 (+1027)
4 free blocks, 8179 free inodes, 2 directories
...
(SKIPPING TO END)
...
Group 3725: (Blocks 122060800-122063839)
Block bitmap at 122060800 (+0)
Inode bitmap at 122060801 (+1)
Inode table at 122060802-122061313 (+2)
0 free blocks, 8192 free inodes, 0 directories


Finished with:



dumpe2fs: /dev/loop2: error reading bitmaps: Can't read a block bitmap


Now I can mount /dev/sda2 just fine and read the files
I cannot however mount /dev/loop2



mount -t ext3 /dev/loop2 ./DriveImage/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop2,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error

In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.


I get the same error trying to mount directly from the image using:



mount -o loop,offset=$((512*262144)) ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img ./DriveImage


Now According to dumpe2fs the superblock is right!

And According to the math:



 Superblock says:
122063840
Filesystem says:
121604515

block size:
4096

Math: Sectors * Sector Size = Size / Block Size = Blocks
Partition 1:
8160 * 512 = 4177920 / 4096 = 1020
Partition 2:
[From fdisk]
976510976 * 512 = 499973619712 / 4096 = 122063872
[From blockdev with /dev/loop2]
972836120 * 512 = 498092093440 / 4096 = 121604515


fdisk is reporting pretty close to the right blocks...(Just 32 more blocks)
But in my book, fsck is getting its blocksize info the same way blockdev does (or uses it), but according to dumpe2fs and checking the actual partition table, the superblock is actually right and so is the partition table.



In fear of losing the original data on the disk (10 years worth of family pictures/videos and important files) I am not willing to run this stuff on the original disk. So I made a copy of the disk to this image, then also, in case I screw up something, I also made a copy of the image. (Don't worry, I have disk space for this).



What am I doing wrong here? and how can I fix this?



NOTE: Due to the old drive starting to fail (assumed, I have had some issues), this is why I am doing this.

ALSO, for some reason the drive lost its partition table and I had to use testdisk to recover it. After it was recovered I was able to mount the large partition and read all my data.

SO I assumed that either testdisk got it right or pretty darn close, since it is all there.



(UPDATE #1) I should also note, that when I run fsck on the original drive I do not get this error...



fsck -nfv /dev/sda2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information

60735 inodes used (0.20%, out of 30523392)
1510 non-contiguous files (2.5%)
49 non-contiguous directories (0.1%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 23779/2425/0
25124595 blocks used (20.58%, out of 122063840)
0 bad blocks
1 large file

56022 regular files
4704 directories
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
------------
60726 files


(UPDATE #2) I found out that the image file is not the same as the drive, the image file is smaller.

Drive Size: 500107862016 (Had a mistake here, I only got the size of the second partition, updated to correct info)

Image Size: 498226311168

The Image file is missing 1881550848 bytes, over 1.88GB of data. (This corrected also)

Seems like dd did not get everything, and that I might be right that the drive has problems, is there a way to make dd fill read-errors with blank space so I can have a matching size?



I am running through fsck on the loop device to see what it does, I guess if I mess it up, I will just restore the back image.



ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a headless server system, no GUI, just CLI.










share|improve this question
















I made an image (dd) of a drive and I am trying to run a filesystem check on it:
Filesystem Type: ext3



Here is the Original error from fsck:



 fsck -fv -z ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.$(date
+"%Y-%m-%d.%H.%M.%S").und /dev/loop2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Overwriting existing filesystem; this can be undone using the command:
e2undo ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.undo.2019-01-17.13.31.41.und /dev/loop2

The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 122063840 blocks
The physical size of the device is 121604515 blocks
Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!


Info from fdisk -l /dev/sda



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
/dev/sda2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


Info from fdisk -l ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img



Disk ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img: 464 GiB, 498226311168 bytes, 973098264 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000794ac

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img1 * 32 8191 8160 4M 4 FAT16 <32M
./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img2 262144 976773119 976510976 465.7G 83 Linux


I made a loop device for the Partition Using:



losetup --offset $((512*262144)) /dev/loop2 ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img


From blockdev --getbsz /dev/loop2



4096


From blockdev --getsz /dev/loop2



972836120


From dumpe2fs /dev/loop2:



Filesystem UUID:          f68ccb5a-bcfa-4e8a-8876-45adaa6e6b85
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype sparse_super large_file
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash
Default mount options: user_xattr acl
Filesystem state: clean with errors
Errors behavior: Continue
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Inode count: 30523392
Block count: 122063840
Reserved block count: 6103192
Free blocks: 96939245
Free inodes: 30462657
First block: 0
Block size: 4096
Fragment size: 4096
Reserved GDT blocks: 994
Blocks per group: 32768
Fragments per group: 32768
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group: 512
Filesystem created: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Last mount time: Wed Jan 16 15:59:22 2019
Last write time: Thu Jan 17 18:16:50 2019
Mount count: 17
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Sat Apr 26 21:28:22 2014
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Lifetime writes: 10 MB
Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root)
First inode: 11
Inode size: 256
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize: 28
Journal inode: 8
Default directory hash: half_md4
Directory Hash Seed: 162d0daa-7968-48f9-8370-f095c9e19f58
Journal backup: inode blocks
Journal features: journal_incompat_revoke
Journal size: 128M
Journal length: 32768
Journal sequence: 0x000059bd
Journal start: 0


Followed by a lot of:



Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767)
Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-30
Reserved GDT blocks at 31-1024
Block bitmap at 1025 (+1025)
Inode bitmap at 1026 (+1026)
Inode table at 1027-1538 (+1027)
4 free blocks, 8179 free inodes, 2 directories
...
(SKIPPING TO END)
...
Group 3725: (Blocks 122060800-122063839)
Block bitmap at 122060800 (+0)
Inode bitmap at 122060801 (+1)
Inode table at 122060802-122061313 (+2)
0 free blocks, 8192 free inodes, 0 directories


Finished with:



dumpe2fs: /dev/loop2: error reading bitmaps: Can't read a block bitmap


Now I can mount /dev/sda2 just fine and read the files
I cannot however mount /dev/loop2



mount -t ext3 /dev/loop2 ./DriveImage/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop2,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error

In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.


I get the same error trying to mount directly from the image using:



mount -o loop,offset=$((512*262144)) ./Seagate.ST3500320NS.SN-9QM5ZHHR.500GB.465GiB.img ./DriveImage


Now According to dumpe2fs the superblock is right!

And According to the math:



 Superblock says:
122063840
Filesystem says:
121604515

block size:
4096

Math: Sectors * Sector Size = Size / Block Size = Blocks
Partition 1:
8160 * 512 = 4177920 / 4096 = 1020
Partition 2:
[From fdisk]
976510976 * 512 = 499973619712 / 4096 = 122063872
[From blockdev with /dev/loop2]
972836120 * 512 = 498092093440 / 4096 = 121604515


fdisk is reporting pretty close to the right blocks...(Just 32 more blocks)
But in my book, fsck is getting its blocksize info the same way blockdev does (or uses it), but according to dumpe2fs and checking the actual partition table, the superblock is actually right and so is the partition table.



In fear of losing the original data on the disk (10 years worth of family pictures/videos and important files) I am not willing to run this stuff on the original disk. So I made a copy of the disk to this image, then also, in case I screw up something, I also made a copy of the image. (Don't worry, I have disk space for this).



What am I doing wrong here? and how can I fix this?



NOTE: Due to the old drive starting to fail (assumed, I have had some issues), this is why I am doing this.

ALSO, for some reason the drive lost its partition table and I had to use testdisk to recover it. After it was recovered I was able to mount the large partition and read all my data.

SO I assumed that either testdisk got it right or pretty darn close, since it is all there.



(UPDATE #1) I should also note, that when I run fsck on the original drive I do not get this error...



fsck -nfv /dev/sda2
fsck from util-linux 2.29.2
e2fsck 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information

60735 inodes used (0.20%, out of 30523392)
1510 non-contiguous files (2.5%)
49 non-contiguous directories (0.1%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 23779/2425/0
25124595 blocks used (20.58%, out of 122063840)
0 bad blocks
1 large file

56022 regular files
4704 directories
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
------------
60726 files


(UPDATE #2) I found out that the image file is not the same as the drive, the image file is smaller.

Drive Size: 500107862016 (Had a mistake here, I only got the size of the second partition, updated to correct info)

Image Size: 498226311168

The Image file is missing 1881550848 bytes, over 1.88GB of data. (This corrected also)

Seems like dd did not get everything, and that I might be right that the drive has problems, is there a way to make dd fill read-errors with blank space so I can have a matching size?



I am running through fsck on the loop device to see what it does, I guess if I mess it up, I will just restore the back image.



ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a headless server system, no GUI, just CLI.







linux filesystems data-recovery filesystem-corruption






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 0:57







asmith

















asked Jan 18 at 22:01









asmithasmith

311112




311112













  • I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 22:16






  • 1





    I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

    – Xen2050
    Jan 18 at 22:27











  • Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • @Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

    – davidgo
    Jan 18 at 23:52



















  • I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 22:16






  • 1





    I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

    – Xen2050
    Jan 18 at 22:27











  • Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

    – asmith
    Jan 18 at 23:51











  • @Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

    – davidgo
    Jan 18 at 23:52

















I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

– asmith
Jan 18 at 22:16





I did find some info saying stuff on doing a filesystem resize might help [resize2fs] but due to it taking almost 3 hours to make a copy of the image file, screw ups would cost me tons of time.. Would this be the right route. Sources: access.redhat.com/solutions/55010 ; wiki.vpsget.com/index.php/…

– asmith
Jan 18 at 22:16




1




1





I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

– Xen2050
Jan 18 at 22:27





I'm seeing /dev/sda2, /dev/loop2, an image file mounted with offsets... is the image of the entire sda drive? There are utilities to automatically create loop devices for each partition without needing to do the math, I think kpartx still works, and I'm sure there's newer ones. Using one of those might give different results. And is the image accurate, a diff or hash matches?

– Xen2050
Jan 18 at 22:27













Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

– asmith
Jan 18 at 23:51





Yes, the fdisk results show you the partition table of both sda and the image file, yes I copied the entire drive, not just the single partition, as I needed to keep the entire drive data, just in case testdisk got the partition table wrong. Which, I assume it did not since I am able to mount the original drive partition without a problem and fsck returns no errors.

– asmith
Jan 18 at 23:51













kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

– asmith
Jan 18 at 23:51





kpartx is not part of the base linux system tools

– asmith
Jan 18 at 23:51













@Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

– davidgo
Jan 18 at 23:52





@Xen2050 is correct, using an offset likely causes problems and does not help you. If you want to backup a disk use /dev/sdx, if you want to back up a partition use /dev/sdx?

– davidgo
Jan 18 at 23:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Errors from a bad disk image



Sounds like you're seeing errors in the image cause by a failing drive. I'd use gddrescue instead, it attempts to handle read errors.



Gddrescue's manual is informative, it's section 10 A small tutorial with examples starts with




Example 1: Fully automatic rescue of a whole disc with two ext2 partitions in /dev/sda to /dev/sdb.

Note: you don't need to partition /dev/sdb beforehand, but if the partition table on /dev/sda is damaged, you'll need to recreate it somehow on /dev/sdb.



ddrescue -f -r3 /dev/sda /dev/sdb mapfile
fdisk /dev/sdb
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb2



Instead of rescuing directly to a device (/dev/sdb), using a file works. And instead of starting with -r 3 to retry bad sectors 3 times, maybe use the default (0) and -n / --no-scrape to "Skip the scraping phase" to get as much as you can quickly first.



There's also a ddrescueview package that gives a graphic view of a gddrescue map file, that might be interesting:



enter image description here



And monitoring syslog or dmesg should have shown read errors earlier, I'd monitor them while using that drive.



Are there that many important files to backup?



If the files are still readable, and especially if the important files you want to backup are much smaller than the entire drive, just copy those files only and forget about the entire drive image. OS's are easy to reinstall.



Mounting full disk images



Looks like losetup -P creates appropriate partition-loop devices itself, or maybe partprobe or gnome-disk-image-mounter, in addition to kpartx.






share|improve this answer


























  • I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:52











  • And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:53











  • If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 1:03






  • 1





    There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:06








  • 1





    Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:50











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1395935%2fwhy-is-fsck-saying-corrupt-superblock-or-partition-table-and-how-to-fix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Errors from a bad disk image



Sounds like you're seeing errors in the image cause by a failing drive. I'd use gddrescue instead, it attempts to handle read errors.



Gddrescue's manual is informative, it's section 10 A small tutorial with examples starts with




Example 1: Fully automatic rescue of a whole disc with two ext2 partitions in /dev/sda to /dev/sdb.

Note: you don't need to partition /dev/sdb beforehand, but if the partition table on /dev/sda is damaged, you'll need to recreate it somehow on /dev/sdb.



ddrescue -f -r3 /dev/sda /dev/sdb mapfile
fdisk /dev/sdb
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb2



Instead of rescuing directly to a device (/dev/sdb), using a file works. And instead of starting with -r 3 to retry bad sectors 3 times, maybe use the default (0) and -n / --no-scrape to "Skip the scraping phase" to get as much as you can quickly first.



There's also a ddrescueview package that gives a graphic view of a gddrescue map file, that might be interesting:



enter image description here



And monitoring syslog or dmesg should have shown read errors earlier, I'd monitor them while using that drive.



Are there that many important files to backup?



If the files are still readable, and especially if the important files you want to backup are much smaller than the entire drive, just copy those files only and forget about the entire drive image. OS's are easy to reinstall.



Mounting full disk images



Looks like losetup -P creates appropriate partition-loop devices itself, or maybe partprobe or gnome-disk-image-mounter, in addition to kpartx.






share|improve this answer


























  • I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:52











  • And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:53











  • If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 1:03






  • 1





    There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:06








  • 1





    Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:50
















2














Errors from a bad disk image



Sounds like you're seeing errors in the image cause by a failing drive. I'd use gddrescue instead, it attempts to handle read errors.



Gddrescue's manual is informative, it's section 10 A small tutorial with examples starts with




Example 1: Fully automatic rescue of a whole disc with two ext2 partitions in /dev/sda to /dev/sdb.

Note: you don't need to partition /dev/sdb beforehand, but if the partition table on /dev/sda is damaged, you'll need to recreate it somehow on /dev/sdb.



ddrescue -f -r3 /dev/sda /dev/sdb mapfile
fdisk /dev/sdb
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb2



Instead of rescuing directly to a device (/dev/sdb), using a file works. And instead of starting with -r 3 to retry bad sectors 3 times, maybe use the default (0) and -n / --no-scrape to "Skip the scraping phase" to get as much as you can quickly first.



There's also a ddrescueview package that gives a graphic view of a gddrescue map file, that might be interesting:



enter image description here



And monitoring syslog or dmesg should have shown read errors earlier, I'd monitor them while using that drive.



Are there that many important files to backup?



If the files are still readable, and especially if the important files you want to backup are much smaller than the entire drive, just copy those files only and forget about the entire drive image. OS's are easy to reinstall.



Mounting full disk images



Looks like losetup -P creates appropriate partition-loop devices itself, or maybe partprobe or gnome-disk-image-mounter, in addition to kpartx.






share|improve this answer


























  • I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:52











  • And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:53











  • If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 1:03






  • 1





    There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:06








  • 1





    Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:50














2












2








2







Errors from a bad disk image



Sounds like you're seeing errors in the image cause by a failing drive. I'd use gddrescue instead, it attempts to handle read errors.



Gddrescue's manual is informative, it's section 10 A small tutorial with examples starts with




Example 1: Fully automatic rescue of a whole disc with two ext2 partitions in /dev/sda to /dev/sdb.

Note: you don't need to partition /dev/sdb beforehand, but if the partition table on /dev/sda is damaged, you'll need to recreate it somehow on /dev/sdb.



ddrescue -f -r3 /dev/sda /dev/sdb mapfile
fdisk /dev/sdb
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb2



Instead of rescuing directly to a device (/dev/sdb), using a file works. And instead of starting with -r 3 to retry bad sectors 3 times, maybe use the default (0) and -n / --no-scrape to "Skip the scraping phase" to get as much as you can quickly first.



There's also a ddrescueview package that gives a graphic view of a gddrescue map file, that might be interesting:



enter image description here



And monitoring syslog or dmesg should have shown read errors earlier, I'd monitor them while using that drive.



Are there that many important files to backup?



If the files are still readable, and especially if the important files you want to backup are much smaller than the entire drive, just copy those files only and forget about the entire drive image. OS's are easy to reinstall.



Mounting full disk images



Looks like losetup -P creates appropriate partition-loop devices itself, or maybe partprobe or gnome-disk-image-mounter, in addition to kpartx.






share|improve this answer















Errors from a bad disk image



Sounds like you're seeing errors in the image cause by a failing drive. I'd use gddrescue instead, it attempts to handle read errors.



Gddrescue's manual is informative, it's section 10 A small tutorial with examples starts with




Example 1: Fully automatic rescue of a whole disc with two ext2 partitions in /dev/sda to /dev/sdb.

Note: you don't need to partition /dev/sdb beforehand, but if the partition table on /dev/sda is damaged, you'll need to recreate it somehow on /dev/sdb.



ddrescue -f -r3 /dev/sda /dev/sdb mapfile
fdisk /dev/sdb
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1
e2fsck -v -f /dev/sdb2



Instead of rescuing directly to a device (/dev/sdb), using a file works. And instead of starting with -r 3 to retry bad sectors 3 times, maybe use the default (0) and -n / --no-scrape to "Skip the scraping phase" to get as much as you can quickly first.



There's also a ddrescueview package that gives a graphic view of a gddrescue map file, that might be interesting:



enter image description here



And monitoring syslog or dmesg should have shown read errors earlier, I'd monitor them while using that drive.



Are there that many important files to backup?



If the files are still readable, and especially if the important files you want to backup are much smaller than the entire drive, just copy those files only and forget about the entire drive image. OS's are easy to reinstall.



Mounting full disk images



Looks like losetup -P creates appropriate partition-loop devices itself, or maybe partprobe or gnome-disk-image-mounter, in addition to kpartx.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 19 at 1:24

























answered Jan 19 at 0:40









Xen2050Xen2050

10.9k31536




10.9k31536













  • I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:52











  • And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:53











  • If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 1:03






  • 1





    There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:06








  • 1





    Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:50



















  • I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:52











  • And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 0:53











  • If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

    – asmith
    Jan 19 at 1:03






  • 1





    There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:06








  • 1





    Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

    – Xen2050
    Jan 19 at 1:50

















I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 0:52





I should probably have mentioned that this is a headless server system I am working under. No GUI, only CLI. As for the gddrescue, I just came across a forum talking about using ddrescue (the non-gui) and not dd to fill in the gaps, since one of the things is dd is not doing that. I am going to try that and see if that works.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 0:52













And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 0:53





And Yes, many important files. and no, it does not have an os, just files.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 0:53













If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 1:03





If ddresue works for my case, I would be willing to accept this answer if you update it to fit my case scenario of only CLI. Could you also put in some example commands on how to use ddrescue along with the link to the man page, I personally know, but for future visitors.

– asmith
Jan 19 at 1:03




1




1





There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

– Xen2050
Jan 19 at 1:06







There is an older different program also called ddrescue (it's binary is dd_rescue) that I wouldn't use. Confusingly the gddrescue package's binary is also called ddrescue. gddrescue is a terminal program, along with losetup, kpartx, gnome-disk-image-mounter (but that one's part of gnome-disk-utility that does have a GUI). (Also potentially confusing, when losetup -P creates partition loops (like loop0p1) they're not listed by losetup -a (at least in Debian stable they're not).)

– Xen2050
Jan 19 at 1:06






1




1





Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

– Xen2050
Jan 19 at 1:50





Welcome :) It gets tricky comparing block sizes & sectors & image sizes in bytes, and I learned that even mounting a disk as read-only (ro) might still write to the device, changing it's hash & making an image no longer identical. (see man mount for -r and noload, also blockdev --setro). -- By far the best advice is: Have backups now, so you don't need to rescue data later!

– Xen2050
Jan 19 at 1:50


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1395935%2fwhy-is-fsck-saying-corrupt-superblock-or-partition-table-and-how-to-fix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...