Deriving the formula of the surface of a sphere using triangles.












2












$begingroup$


My friend tried to find the formula of the surface of a sphere using the following reasoning, but we can't see the mistake:



Let's first take half a sphere and divide the sphere into infinitely small triangles like this:



https://imgur.com/a/JgvfHWQ Bad drawing, but I hope you understand the idea.



Then, we can unwrap it and arrange the hemisphere into half a rectangle: https://imgur.com/uKasGWW The height will be $frac{pi r}{2}$ because it is a quarter of the length of a circumference and the base will be $2 pi r$.



We can now insert the other half rectangle of the other hemisphere divided in infinitely small triangles in this way: http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=jfx94i&s=9



It will nicely create a rectangle (if we rearrange the side triangles) and to get the area of the rectangle, just multiply the base times height, ending with $pi^2 r^2$.
We know that that the correct answer is $4 pi r^2$, but we can't figure out the error.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    My friend tried to find the formula of the surface of a sphere using the following reasoning, but we can't see the mistake:



    Let's first take half a sphere and divide the sphere into infinitely small triangles like this:



    https://imgur.com/a/JgvfHWQ Bad drawing, but I hope you understand the idea.



    Then, we can unwrap it and arrange the hemisphere into half a rectangle: https://imgur.com/uKasGWW The height will be $frac{pi r}{2}$ because it is a quarter of the length of a circumference and the base will be $2 pi r$.



    We can now insert the other half rectangle of the other hemisphere divided in infinitely small triangles in this way: http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=jfx94i&s=9



    It will nicely create a rectangle (if we rearrange the side triangles) and to get the area of the rectangle, just multiply the base times height, ending with $pi^2 r^2$.
    We know that that the correct answer is $4 pi r^2$, but we can't figure out the error.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      My friend tried to find the formula of the surface of a sphere using the following reasoning, but we can't see the mistake:



      Let's first take half a sphere and divide the sphere into infinitely small triangles like this:



      https://imgur.com/a/JgvfHWQ Bad drawing, but I hope you understand the idea.



      Then, we can unwrap it and arrange the hemisphere into half a rectangle: https://imgur.com/uKasGWW The height will be $frac{pi r}{2}$ because it is a quarter of the length of a circumference and the base will be $2 pi r$.



      We can now insert the other half rectangle of the other hemisphere divided in infinitely small triangles in this way: http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=jfx94i&s=9



      It will nicely create a rectangle (if we rearrange the side triangles) and to get the area of the rectangle, just multiply the base times height, ending with $pi^2 r^2$.
      We know that that the correct answer is $4 pi r^2$, but we can't figure out the error.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My friend tried to find the formula of the surface of a sphere using the following reasoning, but we can't see the mistake:



      Let's first take half a sphere and divide the sphere into infinitely small triangles like this:



      https://imgur.com/a/JgvfHWQ Bad drawing, but I hope you understand the idea.



      Then, we can unwrap it and arrange the hemisphere into half a rectangle: https://imgur.com/uKasGWW The height will be $frac{pi r}{2}$ because it is a quarter of the length of a circumference and the base will be $2 pi r$.



      We can now insert the other half rectangle of the other hemisphere divided in infinitely small triangles in this way: http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=jfx94i&s=9



      It will nicely create a rectangle (if we rearrange the side triangles) and to get the area of the rectangle, just multiply the base times height, ending with $pi^2 r^2$.
      We know that that the correct answer is $4 pi r^2$, but we can't figure out the error.







      geometry area spheres






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 8 '18 at 17:25









      Alex Vong

      1,309819




      1,309819










      asked Dec 8 '18 at 16:34









      Matemagia D13G0Matemagia D13G0

      132




      132






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          At the most abstract level, the discrepancy is due to the sphere not being a developable surface: it cannot be projected onto a plane while preserving areas and angles at once. Thus, it is not correct to say that the triangle on the unit sphere with angles $fracpi2$, $fracpi2$ and $dx$ – the "infinitely small triangles" in the argument – has the same area as the planar right triangle of leg lengths $dx$ and $fracpi2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031320%2fderiving-the-formula-of-the-surface-of-a-sphere-using-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            At the most abstract level, the discrepancy is due to the sphere not being a developable surface: it cannot be projected onto a plane while preserving areas and angles at once. Thus, it is not correct to say that the triangle on the unit sphere with angles $fracpi2$, $fracpi2$ and $dx$ – the "infinitely small triangles" in the argument – has the same area as the planar right triangle of leg lengths $dx$ and $fracpi2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              At the most abstract level, the discrepancy is due to the sphere not being a developable surface: it cannot be projected onto a plane while preserving areas and angles at once. Thus, it is not correct to say that the triangle on the unit sphere with angles $fracpi2$, $fracpi2$ and $dx$ – the "infinitely small triangles" in the argument – has the same area as the planar right triangle of leg lengths $dx$ and $fracpi2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                At the most abstract level, the discrepancy is due to the sphere not being a developable surface: it cannot be projected onto a plane while preserving areas and angles at once. Thus, it is not correct to say that the triangle on the unit sphere with angles $fracpi2$, $fracpi2$ and $dx$ – the "infinitely small triangles" in the argument – has the same area as the planar right triangle of leg lengths $dx$ and $fracpi2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                At the most abstract level, the discrepancy is due to the sphere not being a developable surface: it cannot be projected onto a plane while preserving areas and angles at once. Thus, it is not correct to say that the triangle on the unit sphere with angles $fracpi2$, $fracpi2$ and $dx$ – the "infinitely small triangles" in the argument – has the same area as the planar right triangle of leg lengths $dx$ and $fracpi2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 8 '18 at 17:00









                Parcly TaxelParcly Taxel

                41.8k1372101




                41.8k1372101






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031320%2fderiving-the-formula-of-the-surface-of-a-sphere-using-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...