Solving for integrand from integrated quantities.












0












$begingroup$


Given equations of the form:



$A(r) = int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}F(r,t)dt$



$B(t) = int_a^b F(r,t)r^2dr$



where $A(r)$, $B(t)$, and all of the limits on the integrals are known, is there enough information to solve for F(r,t)? If so how would one do this?



For more context this is a scenario where there is a quantity, $F(r,t)$, that varies in space and time but is measured as only a function of time and a function of space separately. I am trying to figure out if the full space and time dependence can be reconstructed from these two measurements alone.



EDIT:
Perhaps a better way of stating the question.



Is $F(r,t)$ uniquely constrained given $A(r)$ and $B(t)$?






integral-equations constraints







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
    $endgroup$
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:58










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 8 '18 at 17:01
















0












$begingroup$


Given equations of the form:



$A(r) = int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}F(r,t)dt$



$B(t) = int_a^b F(r,t)r^2dr$



where $A(r)$, $B(t)$, and all of the limits on the integrals are known, is there enough information to solve for F(r,t)? If so how would one do this?



For more context this is a scenario where there is a quantity, $F(r,t)$, that varies in space and time but is measured as only a function of time and a function of space separately. I am trying to figure out if the full space and time dependence can be reconstructed from these two measurements alone.



EDIT:
Perhaps a better way of stating the question.



Is $F(r,t)$ uniquely constrained given $A(r)$ and $B(t)$?






integral-equations constraints







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
    $endgroup$
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:58










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 8 '18 at 17:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Given equations of the form:



$A(r) = int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}F(r,t)dt$



$B(t) = int_a^b F(r,t)r^2dr$



where $A(r)$, $B(t)$, and all of the limits on the integrals are known, is there enough information to solve for F(r,t)? If so how would one do this?



For more context this is a scenario where there is a quantity, $F(r,t)$, that varies in space and time but is measured as only a function of time and a function of space separately. I am trying to figure out if the full space and time dependence can be reconstructed from these two measurements alone.



EDIT:
Perhaps a better way of stating the question.



Is $F(r,t)$ uniquely constrained given $A(r)$ and $B(t)$?






integral-equations constraints







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given equations of the form:



$A(r) = int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}F(r,t)dt$



$B(t) = int_a^b F(r,t)r^2dr$



where $A(r)$, $B(t)$, and all of the limits on the integrals are known, is there enough information to solve for F(r,t)? If so how would one do this?



For more context this is a scenario where there is a quantity, $F(r,t)$, that varies in space and time but is measured as only a function of time and a function of space separately. I am trying to figure out if the full space and time dependence can be reconstructed from these two measurements alone.



EDIT:
Perhaps a better way of stating the question.



Is $F(r,t)$ uniquely constrained given $A(r)$ and $B(t)$?






integral-equations constraints




integral-equations constraints






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 15:40







JJR4

















asked Dec 8 '18 at 16:47









JJR4JJR4

12




12












  • $begingroup$
    Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
    $endgroup$
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:58










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 8 '18 at 17:01


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
    $endgroup$
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:58










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 8 '18 at 17:01
















$begingroup$
Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Dec 8 '18 at 16:58




$begingroup$
Do you have the actual function $F$? Looks like something to do with the second moment of mass/area...
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Dec 8 '18 at 16:58












$begingroup$
I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
$endgroup$
– JJR4
Dec 8 '18 at 17:01




$begingroup$
I do not have the function F. It is actually an x-ray flux of a plasma with unknown temperature and density distributions (which is what would set F).
$endgroup$
– JJR4
Dec 8 '18 at 17:01










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

What I would do is to find
$$A(r,t) = int_{t_1}^t F(r,t) dt$$
so that
$$A'_t(r,t) = F(r,t)$$
Hence,
$$A'_t(r,t_1)=F(r,t_1), A'_t(r,t_2)=F(r,t_2), A'_t(r,t_3)=F(r,t_3), dots$$
which means you should be able reconstruct numerically the function $F$ by finding $A$ as a function of $r$ and different time $t_i$ endpoints if you have enough data taken and are able to find a time gradient of $A$. We can also apply an analogous trick to $B$ and make sure the two reconstructions match.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:39











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031340%2fsolving-for-integrand-from-integrated-quantities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

What I would do is to find
$$A(r,t) = int_{t_1}^t F(r,t) dt$$
so that
$$A'_t(r,t) = F(r,t)$$
Hence,
$$A'_t(r,t_1)=F(r,t_1), A'_t(r,t_2)=F(r,t_2), A'_t(r,t_3)=F(r,t_3), dots$$
which means you should be able reconstruct numerically the function $F$ by finding $A$ as a function of $r$ and different time $t_i$ endpoints if you have enough data taken and are able to find a time gradient of $A$. We can also apply an analogous trick to $B$ and make sure the two reconstructions match.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:39
















1












$begingroup$

What I would do is to find
$$A(r,t) = int_{t_1}^t F(r,t) dt$$
so that
$$A'_t(r,t) = F(r,t)$$
Hence,
$$A'_t(r,t_1)=F(r,t_1), A'_t(r,t_2)=F(r,t_2), A'_t(r,t_3)=F(r,t_3), dots$$
which means you should be able reconstruct numerically the function $F$ by finding $A$ as a function of $r$ and different time $t_i$ endpoints if you have enough data taken and are able to find a time gradient of $A$. We can also apply an analogous trick to $B$ and make sure the two reconstructions match.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:39














1












1








1





$begingroup$

What I would do is to find
$$A(r,t) = int_{t_1}^t F(r,t) dt$$
so that
$$A'_t(r,t) = F(r,t)$$
Hence,
$$A'_t(r,t_1)=F(r,t_1), A'_t(r,t_2)=F(r,t_2), A'_t(r,t_3)=F(r,t_3), dots$$
which means you should be able reconstruct numerically the function $F$ by finding $A$ as a function of $r$ and different time $t_i$ endpoints if you have enough data taken and are able to find a time gradient of $A$. We can also apply an analogous trick to $B$ and make sure the two reconstructions match.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



What I would do is to find
$$A(r,t) = int_{t_1}^t F(r,t) dt$$
so that
$$A'_t(r,t) = F(r,t)$$
Hence,
$$A'_t(r,t_1)=F(r,t_1), A'_t(r,t_2)=F(r,t_2), A'_t(r,t_3)=F(r,t_3), dots$$
which means you should be able reconstruct numerically the function $F$ by finding $A$ as a function of $r$ and different time $t_i$ endpoints if you have enough data taken and are able to find a time gradient of $A$. We can also apply an analogous trick to $B$ and make sure the two reconstructions match.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 '18 at 17:09









Karn WatcharasupatKarn Watcharasupat

3,9642526




3,9642526












  • $begingroup$
    Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:39


















  • $begingroup$
    Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
    $endgroup$
    – JJR4
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:39
















$begingroup$
Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
$endgroup$
– JJR4
Dec 10 '18 at 13:39




$begingroup$
Although this is a good suggestion unfortunately the measurement is such that it is not a tenable option.
$endgroup$
– JJR4
Dec 10 '18 at 13:39


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031340%2fsolving-for-integrand-from-integrated-quantities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l...
Read more

Puebla de Zaragoza

Image
Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc...
Read more

Musa

Image
Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo...
Read more