Open space vs offices. Which one is better for a new team according to studies? [on hold]












13















I want to create a new workspace for a small software development team (4-15 developers).



From your experience, which type of workspaces is better: open space or small offices?



Is there any research into the topic?










share|improve this question















put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Dukeling, Victor S, Seth R, Snow 52 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















  • For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

    – DaveG
    20 hours ago











  • @DaveG yes I mean offices

    – H. Ilyas
    20 hours ago






  • 22





    "Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

    – Abigail
    18 hours ago






  • 4





    Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

    – Seth R
    10 hours ago






  • 2





    @SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

    – Kevin
    7 hours ago


















13















I want to create a new workspace for a small software development team (4-15 developers).



From your experience, which type of workspaces is better: open space or small offices?



Is there any research into the topic?










share|improve this question















put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Dukeling, Victor S, Seth R, Snow 52 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















  • For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

    – DaveG
    20 hours ago











  • @DaveG yes I mean offices

    – H. Ilyas
    20 hours ago






  • 22





    "Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

    – Abigail
    18 hours ago






  • 4





    Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

    – Seth R
    10 hours ago






  • 2





    @SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

    – Kevin
    7 hours ago
















13












13








13


4






I want to create a new workspace for a small software development team (4-15 developers).



From your experience, which type of workspaces is better: open space or small offices?



Is there any research into the topic?










share|improve this question
















I want to create a new workspace for a small software development team (4-15 developers).



From your experience, which type of workspaces is better: open space or small offices?



Is there any research into the topic?







startup workspace






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 mins ago







H. Ilyas

















asked 20 hours ago









H. IlyasH. Ilyas

9022316




9022316




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Dukeling, Victor S, Seth R, Snow 52 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Dukeling, Victor S, Seth R, Snow 52 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

    – DaveG
    20 hours ago











  • @DaveG yes I mean offices

    – H. Ilyas
    20 hours ago






  • 22





    "Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

    – Abigail
    18 hours ago






  • 4





    Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

    – Seth R
    10 hours ago






  • 2





    @SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

    – Kevin
    7 hours ago





















  • For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

    – DaveG
    20 hours ago











  • @DaveG yes I mean offices

    – H. Ilyas
    20 hours ago






  • 22





    "Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

    – Abigail
    18 hours ago






  • 4





    Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

    – Seth R
    10 hours ago






  • 2





    @SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

    – Kevin
    7 hours ago



















For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

– DaveG
20 hours ago





For open / closed, you mean a completely open space with no separation between developers vs separately cubicles or offices?

– DaveG
20 hours ago













@DaveG yes I mean offices

– H. Ilyas
20 hours ago





@DaveG yes I mean offices

– H. Ilyas
20 hours ago




22




22





"Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

– Abigail
18 hours ago





"Better" in which aspect? Cost? Flexibility? Employee production? Employee happiness?

– Abigail
18 hours ago




4




4





Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

– Seth R
10 hours ago





Vote to close as too opinion-based, as I think we can all see from the comments here. As a software developer, who is also a huge introvert, I enjoy my open office space and would be reluctant to go back to a cubicle. Even introverts need to collaborate and the lack of high walls makes that easier. This directly contradicts several comments here. You aren't going to get a definitive answer.

– Seth R
10 hours ago




2




2





@SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

– Kevin
7 hours ago







@SethR there have been actual objective studies of this question (see the accepted answer, for example), closing it as opinion-based is inappropriate. Downvote answers that don't include citations if you like.

– Kevin
7 hours ago












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















49














The problem is that different people work better in different environments. What you should do is have plenty of private spaces and a few usable public spaces for groups. Your spaces will not effectively work at 15 people; try to design spaces for 6 or fewer.



I’ve worked in cubicles, a private office, a shared office, and a open area. I disliked the open area because of a lack of privacy. And basically all the open space pioneers backed away from the idea quite long ago.



EDIT; Here are some interesting reads:



Harvard Study



Chicago Tribune



Forbes






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

    – Kilisi
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

    – jwenting
    3 hours ago



















32














Contrary to the original (claimed) intentions behind the open-plan office philosophy, namely the improvement of collaboration and communication research has shown that they actually cause a significant decrease in both face to face interactions and productivity.



They also appear to lead to a negative impact on employee health, one study showing a staggering 62% increase in the number of sick days taken by employees in an open plan environment vs having closed offices.



The only real benefit to open-plan is that it allows for reduced expenditure on office space, now in some locations where space is at a premium this trade off may actually make more financial sense:



An approximation for the cost savings in using open-plan can be done:




(Square feet per person saved via open offices * # of employees * Cost/square foot of office space)




So as the number of employees goes up - so does the value of potential cost reductions.



If the lost productivity of the open-plan model results in lost revenue of less than the additional cost of having closed plan offices then it can still make sense.






share|improve this answer



















  • 5





    Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

    – SeldomNeedy
    11 hours ago








  • 1





    Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

    – Wayne Werner
    8 hours ago



















9














4-15 developers.. that's a lot of variance, it's difficult to get something liked by everyone.



To add to what has already covered by UnhandledExcepSean's answer, I'd say, even for the same person, not everyday work requires same working condition.



Example: In a design review meeting, I'd like a open workplace where I sit face to face and discuss. Same me, would like to have a semi-private workplace when I'm trying to read, understand and debug someone else's code.



What I'd say, organize the available place into three categories




  • Open working space : For collaborative works

  • Head-down cubicles : Semi-private space for small period of high-focus individual work.

  • AV Room (Audio-Video Privacy Room): For Conference calls.


Even if you can't get the third one, it's okay. Have spaces for both 1 and 2, and let people choose what they prefer.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

    – DaveG
    17 hours ago



















8














This is just my experience about what I found worked best.
In one company we were in an old big house. Each room was large enough for 6 people, so each team had a room to themselves. The volume and "fun" were controlled for how busy each team were.



The team members could just ask a question to the room and the correct person could now answer. Without disturbing other teams to who this question was irrelevant.



I now work in one room with the entire company, not a single sound barrier. Everyone is sat with headphones on, so nobody can add their own information which is relevant but you didn't know existed to ask about. But i guess they are cheaper for the company.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Anecdotally: I've worked at companies that have had shared offices (usually 2 people per office) and that have had an open office arrangement.



    Ironically, I've found myself collaborating less in open office arrangements.




    • To deal with the extra noise created by open office layouts, many people end up wearing headphones all the time. However, people wearing headphones provide a (possibly unintended) cue that they don't want to be disturbed. I avoid talking to them too.

    • I want to avoid disturbing bystanders, so I usually avoid talking to people in general.


    In contrast, with private offices:




    • There is a clear visual cue whether the occupants are okay with visitors or if the occupants don't want to be disturbed: whether the door is open or closed.

    • I worried less about disturbing others since if discussion in the office gets too loud, we (or the people disturbed) could close doors.






    share|improve this answer































      -10














      Open space is better in my opinion.



      Offices have their risks. The enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity.



      Offices also make it harder for communication, team building and approach-ability.



      Open space promotes discussion, team building, knowledge sharing. If it is easier for me to call Tim 3 desks away, I will call Tim. If I have to get up and knock on a door and open it to ask Tim for help. I will ask Google for help instead. It also helps with keeping the workplace bright, with air circulation, with standardized workplace. It also allows more room to be used (as no walls = more usable space).



      Again this is opinion-based, but you can probably find studies done in the matter.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 23





        Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

        – UnhandledExcepSean
        20 hours ago






      • 4





        I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

        – Sourav Ghosh
        19 hours ago






      • 12





        If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

        – Abigail
        18 hours ago






      • 13





        The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

        – DaveG
        17 hours ago






      • 6





        and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

        – Patrice
        14 hours ago


















      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      49














      The problem is that different people work better in different environments. What you should do is have plenty of private spaces and a few usable public spaces for groups. Your spaces will not effectively work at 15 people; try to design spaces for 6 or fewer.



      I’ve worked in cubicles, a private office, a shared office, and a open area. I disliked the open area because of a lack of privacy. And basically all the open space pioneers backed away from the idea quite long ago.



      EDIT; Here are some interesting reads:



      Harvard Study



      Chicago Tribune



      Forbes






      share|improve this answer


























      • Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

        – Kilisi
        20 hours ago






      • 1





        worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

        – jwenting
        3 hours ago
















      49














      The problem is that different people work better in different environments. What you should do is have plenty of private spaces and a few usable public spaces for groups. Your spaces will not effectively work at 15 people; try to design spaces for 6 or fewer.



      I’ve worked in cubicles, a private office, a shared office, and a open area. I disliked the open area because of a lack of privacy. And basically all the open space pioneers backed away from the idea quite long ago.



      EDIT; Here are some interesting reads:



      Harvard Study



      Chicago Tribune



      Forbes






      share|improve this answer


























      • Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

        – Kilisi
        20 hours ago






      • 1





        worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

        – jwenting
        3 hours ago














      49












      49








      49







      The problem is that different people work better in different environments. What you should do is have plenty of private spaces and a few usable public spaces for groups. Your spaces will not effectively work at 15 people; try to design spaces for 6 or fewer.



      I’ve worked in cubicles, a private office, a shared office, and a open area. I disliked the open area because of a lack of privacy. And basically all the open space pioneers backed away from the idea quite long ago.



      EDIT; Here are some interesting reads:



      Harvard Study



      Chicago Tribune



      Forbes






      share|improve this answer















      The problem is that different people work better in different environments. What you should do is have plenty of private spaces and a few usable public spaces for groups. Your spaces will not effectively work at 15 people; try to design spaces for 6 or fewer.



      I’ve worked in cubicles, a private office, a shared office, and a open area. I disliked the open area because of a lack of privacy. And basically all the open space pioneers backed away from the idea quite long ago.



      EDIT; Here are some interesting reads:



      Harvard Study



      Chicago Tribune



      Forbes







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 17 hours ago

























      answered 20 hours ago









      UnhandledExcepSeanUnhandledExcepSean

      2,97811323




      2,97811323













      • Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

        – Kilisi
        20 hours ago






      • 1





        worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

        – jwenting
        3 hours ago



















      • Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

        – Kilisi
        20 hours ago






      • 1





        worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

        – jwenting
        3 hours ago

















      Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

      – Kilisi
      20 hours ago





      Yes, 15 is too many for an open area

      – Kilisi
      20 hours ago




      1




      1





      worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

      – jwenting
      3 hours ago





      worst place I worked in had an open plan office space designed for about 40 people but that due to the department growing without them getting funding for more office space now housed 80 people. I literally got ill, seriously ill, from the noise and people moving around me constantly.

      – jwenting
      3 hours ago













      32














      Contrary to the original (claimed) intentions behind the open-plan office philosophy, namely the improvement of collaboration and communication research has shown that they actually cause a significant decrease in both face to face interactions and productivity.



      They also appear to lead to a negative impact on employee health, one study showing a staggering 62% increase in the number of sick days taken by employees in an open plan environment vs having closed offices.



      The only real benefit to open-plan is that it allows for reduced expenditure on office space, now in some locations where space is at a premium this trade off may actually make more financial sense:



      An approximation for the cost savings in using open-plan can be done:




      (Square feet per person saved via open offices * # of employees * Cost/square foot of office space)




      So as the number of employees goes up - so does the value of potential cost reductions.



      If the lost productivity of the open-plan model results in lost revenue of less than the additional cost of having closed plan offices then it can still make sense.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 5





        Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

        – SeldomNeedy
        11 hours ago








      • 1





        Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

        – Wayne Werner
        8 hours ago
















      32














      Contrary to the original (claimed) intentions behind the open-plan office philosophy, namely the improvement of collaboration and communication research has shown that they actually cause a significant decrease in both face to face interactions and productivity.



      They also appear to lead to a negative impact on employee health, one study showing a staggering 62% increase in the number of sick days taken by employees in an open plan environment vs having closed offices.



      The only real benefit to open-plan is that it allows for reduced expenditure on office space, now in some locations where space is at a premium this trade off may actually make more financial sense:



      An approximation for the cost savings in using open-plan can be done:




      (Square feet per person saved via open offices * # of employees * Cost/square foot of office space)




      So as the number of employees goes up - so does the value of potential cost reductions.



      If the lost productivity of the open-plan model results in lost revenue of less than the additional cost of having closed plan offices then it can still make sense.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 5





        Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

        – SeldomNeedy
        11 hours ago








      • 1





        Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

        – Wayne Werner
        8 hours ago














      32












      32








      32







      Contrary to the original (claimed) intentions behind the open-plan office philosophy, namely the improvement of collaboration and communication research has shown that they actually cause a significant decrease in both face to face interactions and productivity.



      They also appear to lead to a negative impact on employee health, one study showing a staggering 62% increase in the number of sick days taken by employees in an open plan environment vs having closed offices.



      The only real benefit to open-plan is that it allows for reduced expenditure on office space, now in some locations where space is at a premium this trade off may actually make more financial sense:



      An approximation for the cost savings in using open-plan can be done:




      (Square feet per person saved via open offices * # of employees * Cost/square foot of office space)




      So as the number of employees goes up - so does the value of potential cost reductions.



      If the lost productivity of the open-plan model results in lost revenue of less than the additional cost of having closed plan offices then it can still make sense.






      share|improve this answer













      Contrary to the original (claimed) intentions behind the open-plan office philosophy, namely the improvement of collaboration and communication research has shown that they actually cause a significant decrease in both face to face interactions and productivity.



      They also appear to lead to a negative impact on employee health, one study showing a staggering 62% increase in the number of sick days taken by employees in an open plan environment vs having closed offices.



      The only real benefit to open-plan is that it allows for reduced expenditure on office space, now in some locations where space is at a premium this trade off may actually make more financial sense:



      An approximation for the cost savings in using open-plan can be done:




      (Square feet per person saved via open offices * # of employees * Cost/square foot of office space)




      So as the number of employees goes up - so does the value of potential cost reductions.



      If the lost productivity of the open-plan model results in lost revenue of less than the additional cost of having closed plan offices then it can still make sense.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 15 hours ago









      motosubatsumotosubatsu

      48.5k27130190




      48.5k27130190








      • 5





        Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

        – SeldomNeedy
        11 hours ago








      • 1





        Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

        – Wayne Werner
        8 hours ago














      • 5





        Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

        – SeldomNeedy
        11 hours ago








      • 1





        Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

        – Wayne Werner
        8 hours ago








      5




      5





      Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

      – SeldomNeedy
      11 hours ago







      Don't forget that "lost productivity" may also include increased turnover and potential employees turning down your job-offers, in favor of companies that offer them better (non-shared) workspace.

      – SeldomNeedy
      11 hours ago






      1




      1





      Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

      – Wayne Werner
      8 hours ago





      Empirically, when someone can see what's on my screen at all times I spend so much time worrying about making sure that what's on my screen looks like work that I never get any work done.

      – Wayne Werner
      8 hours ago











      9














      4-15 developers.. that's a lot of variance, it's difficult to get something liked by everyone.



      To add to what has already covered by UnhandledExcepSean's answer, I'd say, even for the same person, not everyday work requires same working condition.



      Example: In a design review meeting, I'd like a open workplace where I sit face to face and discuss. Same me, would like to have a semi-private workplace when I'm trying to read, understand and debug someone else's code.



      What I'd say, organize the available place into three categories




      • Open working space : For collaborative works

      • Head-down cubicles : Semi-private space for small period of high-focus individual work.

      • AV Room (Audio-Video Privacy Room): For Conference calls.


      Even if you can't get the third one, it's okay. Have spaces for both 1 and 2, and let people choose what they prefer.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

        – DaveG
        17 hours ago
















      9














      4-15 developers.. that's a lot of variance, it's difficult to get something liked by everyone.



      To add to what has already covered by UnhandledExcepSean's answer, I'd say, even for the same person, not everyday work requires same working condition.



      Example: In a design review meeting, I'd like a open workplace where I sit face to face and discuss. Same me, would like to have a semi-private workplace when I'm trying to read, understand and debug someone else's code.



      What I'd say, organize the available place into three categories




      • Open working space : For collaborative works

      • Head-down cubicles : Semi-private space for small period of high-focus individual work.

      • AV Room (Audio-Video Privacy Room): For Conference calls.


      Even if you can't get the third one, it's okay. Have spaces for both 1 and 2, and let people choose what they prefer.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

        – DaveG
        17 hours ago














      9












      9








      9







      4-15 developers.. that's a lot of variance, it's difficult to get something liked by everyone.



      To add to what has already covered by UnhandledExcepSean's answer, I'd say, even for the same person, not everyday work requires same working condition.



      Example: In a design review meeting, I'd like a open workplace where I sit face to face and discuss. Same me, would like to have a semi-private workplace when I'm trying to read, understand and debug someone else's code.



      What I'd say, organize the available place into three categories




      • Open working space : For collaborative works

      • Head-down cubicles : Semi-private space for small period of high-focus individual work.

      • AV Room (Audio-Video Privacy Room): For Conference calls.


      Even if you can't get the third one, it's okay. Have spaces for both 1 and 2, and let people choose what they prefer.






      share|improve this answer















      4-15 developers.. that's a lot of variance, it's difficult to get something liked by everyone.



      To add to what has already covered by UnhandledExcepSean's answer, I'd say, even for the same person, not everyday work requires same working condition.



      Example: In a design review meeting, I'd like a open workplace where I sit face to face and discuss. Same me, would like to have a semi-private workplace when I'm trying to read, understand and debug someone else's code.



      What I'd say, organize the available place into three categories




      • Open working space : For collaborative works

      • Head-down cubicles : Semi-private space for small period of high-focus individual work.

      • AV Room (Audio-Video Privacy Room): For Conference calls.


      Even if you can't get the third one, it's okay. Have spaces for both 1 and 2, and let people choose what they prefer.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 19 hours ago

























      answered 20 hours ago









      Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

      2,48911225




      2,48911225








      • 2





        I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

        – DaveG
        17 hours ago














      • 2





        I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

        – DaveG
        17 hours ago








      2




      2





      I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

      – DaveG
      17 hours ago





      I think #3 is quite important. In fact, it could double as #1 (open working space / design space). I'd go with #2 & #3.

      – DaveG
      17 hours ago











      8














      This is just my experience about what I found worked best.
      In one company we were in an old big house. Each room was large enough for 6 people, so each team had a room to themselves. The volume and "fun" were controlled for how busy each team were.



      The team members could just ask a question to the room and the correct person could now answer. Without disturbing other teams to who this question was irrelevant.



      I now work in one room with the entire company, not a single sound barrier. Everyone is sat with headphones on, so nobody can add their own information which is relevant but you didn't know existed to ask about. But i guess they are cheaper for the company.






      share|improve this answer




























        8














        This is just my experience about what I found worked best.
        In one company we were in an old big house. Each room was large enough for 6 people, so each team had a room to themselves. The volume and "fun" were controlled for how busy each team were.



        The team members could just ask a question to the room and the correct person could now answer. Without disturbing other teams to who this question was irrelevant.



        I now work in one room with the entire company, not a single sound barrier. Everyone is sat with headphones on, so nobody can add their own information which is relevant but you didn't know existed to ask about. But i guess they are cheaper for the company.






        share|improve this answer


























          8












          8








          8







          This is just my experience about what I found worked best.
          In one company we were in an old big house. Each room was large enough for 6 people, so each team had a room to themselves. The volume and "fun" were controlled for how busy each team were.



          The team members could just ask a question to the room and the correct person could now answer. Without disturbing other teams to who this question was irrelevant.



          I now work in one room with the entire company, not a single sound barrier. Everyone is sat with headphones on, so nobody can add their own information which is relevant but you didn't know existed to ask about. But i guess they are cheaper for the company.






          share|improve this answer













          This is just my experience about what I found worked best.
          In one company we were in an old big house. Each room was large enough for 6 people, so each team had a room to themselves. The volume and "fun" were controlled for how busy each team were.



          The team members could just ask a question to the room and the correct person could now answer. Without disturbing other teams to who this question was irrelevant.



          I now work in one room with the entire company, not a single sound barrier. Everyone is sat with headphones on, so nobody can add their own information which is relevant but you didn't know existed to ask about. But i guess they are cheaper for the company.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 19 hours ago









          WendyGWendyG

          593110




          593110























              0














              Anecdotally: I've worked at companies that have had shared offices (usually 2 people per office) and that have had an open office arrangement.



              Ironically, I've found myself collaborating less in open office arrangements.




              • To deal with the extra noise created by open office layouts, many people end up wearing headphones all the time. However, people wearing headphones provide a (possibly unintended) cue that they don't want to be disturbed. I avoid talking to them too.

              • I want to avoid disturbing bystanders, so I usually avoid talking to people in general.


              In contrast, with private offices:




              • There is a clear visual cue whether the occupants are okay with visitors or if the occupants don't want to be disturbed: whether the door is open or closed.

              • I worried less about disturbing others since if discussion in the office gets too loud, we (or the people disturbed) could close doors.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Anecdotally: I've worked at companies that have had shared offices (usually 2 people per office) and that have had an open office arrangement.



                Ironically, I've found myself collaborating less in open office arrangements.




                • To deal with the extra noise created by open office layouts, many people end up wearing headphones all the time. However, people wearing headphones provide a (possibly unintended) cue that they don't want to be disturbed. I avoid talking to them too.

                • I want to avoid disturbing bystanders, so I usually avoid talking to people in general.


                In contrast, with private offices:




                • There is a clear visual cue whether the occupants are okay with visitors or if the occupants don't want to be disturbed: whether the door is open or closed.

                • I worried less about disturbing others since if discussion in the office gets too loud, we (or the people disturbed) could close doors.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Anecdotally: I've worked at companies that have had shared offices (usually 2 people per office) and that have had an open office arrangement.



                  Ironically, I've found myself collaborating less in open office arrangements.




                  • To deal with the extra noise created by open office layouts, many people end up wearing headphones all the time. However, people wearing headphones provide a (possibly unintended) cue that they don't want to be disturbed. I avoid talking to them too.

                  • I want to avoid disturbing bystanders, so I usually avoid talking to people in general.


                  In contrast, with private offices:




                  • There is a clear visual cue whether the occupants are okay with visitors or if the occupants don't want to be disturbed: whether the door is open or closed.

                  • I worried less about disturbing others since if discussion in the office gets too loud, we (or the people disturbed) could close doors.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Anecdotally: I've worked at companies that have had shared offices (usually 2 people per office) and that have had an open office arrangement.



                  Ironically, I've found myself collaborating less in open office arrangements.




                  • To deal with the extra noise created by open office layouts, many people end up wearing headphones all the time. However, people wearing headphones provide a (possibly unintended) cue that they don't want to be disturbed. I avoid talking to them too.

                  • I want to avoid disturbing bystanders, so I usually avoid talking to people in general.


                  In contrast, with private offices:




                  • There is a clear visual cue whether the occupants are okay with visitors or if the occupants don't want to be disturbed: whether the door is open or closed.

                  • I worried less about disturbing others since if discussion in the office gets too loud, we (or the people disturbed) could close doors.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 46 mins ago









                  jamesdlinjamesdlin

                  1604




                  1604























                      -10














                      Open space is better in my opinion.



                      Offices have their risks. The enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity.



                      Offices also make it harder for communication, team building and approach-ability.



                      Open space promotes discussion, team building, knowledge sharing. If it is easier for me to call Tim 3 desks away, I will call Tim. If I have to get up and knock on a door and open it to ask Tim for help. I will ask Google for help instead. It also helps with keeping the workplace bright, with air circulation, with standardized workplace. It also allows more room to be used (as no walls = more usable space).



                      Again this is opinion-based, but you can probably find studies done in the matter.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 23





                        Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                        – UnhandledExcepSean
                        20 hours ago






                      • 4





                        I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                        – Sourav Ghosh
                        19 hours ago






                      • 12





                        If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                        – Abigail
                        18 hours ago






                      • 13





                        The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                        – DaveG
                        17 hours ago






                      • 6





                        and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                        – Patrice
                        14 hours ago
















                      -10














                      Open space is better in my opinion.



                      Offices have their risks. The enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity.



                      Offices also make it harder for communication, team building and approach-ability.



                      Open space promotes discussion, team building, knowledge sharing. If it is easier for me to call Tim 3 desks away, I will call Tim. If I have to get up and knock on a door and open it to ask Tim for help. I will ask Google for help instead. It also helps with keeping the workplace bright, with air circulation, with standardized workplace. It also allows more room to be used (as no walls = more usable space).



                      Again this is opinion-based, but you can probably find studies done in the matter.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 23





                        Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                        – UnhandledExcepSean
                        20 hours ago






                      • 4





                        I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                        – Sourav Ghosh
                        19 hours ago






                      • 12





                        If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                        – Abigail
                        18 hours ago






                      • 13





                        The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                        – DaveG
                        17 hours ago






                      • 6





                        and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                        – Patrice
                        14 hours ago














                      -10












                      -10








                      -10







                      Open space is better in my opinion.



                      Offices have their risks. The enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity.



                      Offices also make it harder for communication, team building and approach-ability.



                      Open space promotes discussion, team building, knowledge sharing. If it is easier for me to call Tim 3 desks away, I will call Tim. If I have to get up and knock on a door and open it to ask Tim for help. I will ask Google for help instead. It also helps with keeping the workplace bright, with air circulation, with standardized workplace. It also allows more room to be used (as no walls = more usable space).



                      Again this is opinion-based, but you can probably find studies done in the matter.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Open space is better in my opinion.



                      Offices have their risks. The enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity.



                      Offices also make it harder for communication, team building and approach-ability.



                      Open space promotes discussion, team building, knowledge sharing. If it is easier for me to call Tim 3 desks away, I will call Tim. If I have to get up and knock on a door and open it to ask Tim for help. I will ask Google for help instead. It also helps with keeping the workplace bright, with air circulation, with standardized workplace. It also allows more room to be used (as no walls = more usable space).



                      Again this is opinion-based, but you can probably find studies done in the matter.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 20 hours ago









                      fireshark519fireshark519

                      662110




                      662110








                      • 23





                        Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                        – UnhandledExcepSean
                        20 hours ago






                      • 4





                        I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                        – Sourav Ghosh
                        19 hours ago






                      • 12





                        If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                        – Abigail
                        18 hours ago






                      • 13





                        The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                        – DaveG
                        17 hours ago






                      • 6





                        and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                        – Patrice
                        14 hours ago














                      • 23





                        Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                        – UnhandledExcepSean
                        20 hours ago






                      • 4





                        I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                        – Sourav Ghosh
                        19 hours ago






                      • 12





                        If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                        – Abigail
                        18 hours ago






                      • 13





                        The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                        – DaveG
                        17 hours ago






                      • 6





                        and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                        – Patrice
                        14 hours ago








                      23




                      23





                      Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                      – UnhandledExcepSean
                      20 hours ago





                      Have you worked in an open space? This sounds like the hype behind why the trend started. The reality is that when you turn to talk to Tim, you talk loudly past other coworkers disrupting their flow and anyone else not wearing headphones. Also, if your developers are going to other developers before using resources like the internet, they are doing it wrong.

                      – UnhandledExcepSean
                      20 hours ago




                      4




                      4





                      I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                      – Sourav Ghosh
                      19 hours ago





                      I agree completely with @UnhandledExcepSean , more often than less, open workspace is a problem.

                      – Sourav Ghosh
                      19 hours ago




                      12




                      12





                      If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                      – Abigail
                      18 hours ago





                      If it's a question which can be answered by Google, why would distract Tim, regardless of the which space you work in?

                      – Abigail
                      18 hours ago




                      13




                      13





                      The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                      – DaveG
                      17 hours ago





                      The implication of "enhanced privacy allows for...lower productivity" is that management needs to be monitoring devs constantly to make sure they are on the ball. That's a characteristic of really bad organizations.

                      – DaveG
                      17 hours ago




                      6




                      6





                      and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                      – Patrice
                      14 hours ago





                      and the reaction we see here is why it's "different people need different things" is the correct answer. I would literally lose my mind if you and Tim kept having conversations that would break my focus.

                      – Patrice
                      14 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa