Calculate path length of solution to differential equation












2














Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
$$gamma'(t)=uBig(igamma(t)-gamma(t)Big)=expBig(frac{3pi}{4}iBig)frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
where $u:mathbb C^*rightarrowmathbb D$ denotes the unit vector function. In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
$$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



Questions:




  1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


  2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



Edit: Originally we had $gamma'(t)=s(i-1)frac{gamma(y)}{|gamma(t)|}$ but without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










share|cite|improve this question





























    2














    Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
    $$gamma'(t)=uBig(igamma(t)-gamma(t)Big)=expBig(frac{3pi}{4}iBig)frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
    where $u:mathbb C^*rightarrowmathbb D$ denotes the unit vector function. In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
    $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



    Questions:




    1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


    2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



    Edit: Originally we had $gamma'(t)=s(i-1)frac{gamma(y)}{|gamma(t)|}$ but without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2


      1





      Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
      $$gamma'(t)=uBig(igamma(t)-gamma(t)Big)=expBig(frac{3pi}{4}iBig)frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
      where $u:mathbb C^*rightarrowmathbb D$ denotes the unit vector function. In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
      $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


      2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



      Edit: Originally we had $gamma'(t)=s(i-1)frac{gamma(y)}{|gamma(t)|}$ but without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
      $$gamma'(t)=uBig(igamma(t)-gamma(t)Big)=expBig(frac{3pi}{4}iBig)frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
      where $u:mathbb C^*rightarrowmathbb D$ denotes the unit vector function. In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
      $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


      2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



      Edit: Originally we had $gamma'(t)=s(i-1)frac{gamma(y)}{|gamma(t)|}$ but without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 19 '18 at 3:28

























      asked Dec 9 '18 at 3:01









      M. Nestor

      74913




      74913






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$



          As concerns our OP M. Nestor's final remarks:



          The curve $gamma(t)$ (1), expressed as a function of the independent variable $theta$ is, in polar coordiates, given by (23); it is easy to see this curve is a spiral which approaches the origin as $theta to infty$.



          Now, as for item (1), there is indeed a formula for $gamma(t)$; in polar coordinates the equations are given in (12) and (16); from these we may derive
          cartesian equations for $x(t)$, $y(t)$ by setting



          $x(t) = r(t) cos theta (t), ; y(t) = r(t) sin theta(t); tag{28}$



          and as for item (2), we have shown above ca. (12) that



          $displaystyle lim_{t to t_0 + r_0/s} r(t) = 0, tag{29}$



          where $gamma(t_0) = (r_0, theta_0)$; but it should be noted that $gamma(t)$ never "reaches the origin", though it does become arbitrarily close as $t to (t_0 + r_0 / s)^-$.



          Finally, in response to M. Nestor's final edit, we remark that the integral



          $displaystyle int_{t_0}^infty vert gamma'(t) vert ; dt tag{30}$



          is not defined, since $gamma(t)$ can't be extended past $t = t_0 + r_0/s$; the length may instead be found via (27).






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:00












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:04








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:17











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031948%2fcalculate-path-length-of-solution-to-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$



          As concerns our OP M. Nestor's final remarks:



          The curve $gamma(t)$ (1), expressed as a function of the independent variable $theta$ is, in polar coordiates, given by (23); it is easy to see this curve is a spiral which approaches the origin as $theta to infty$.



          Now, as for item (1), there is indeed a formula for $gamma(t)$; in polar coordinates the equations are given in (12) and (16); from these we may derive
          cartesian equations for $x(t)$, $y(t)$ by setting



          $x(t) = r(t) cos theta (t), ; y(t) = r(t) sin theta(t); tag{28}$



          and as for item (2), we have shown above ca. (12) that



          $displaystyle lim_{t to t_0 + r_0/s} r(t) = 0, tag{29}$



          where $gamma(t_0) = (r_0, theta_0)$; but it should be noted that $gamma(t)$ never "reaches the origin", though it does become arbitrarily close as $t to (t_0 + r_0 / s)^-$.



          Finally, in response to M. Nestor's final edit, we remark that the integral



          $displaystyle int_{t_0}^infty vert gamma'(t) vert ; dt tag{30}$



          is not defined, since $gamma(t)$ can't be extended past $t = t_0 + r_0/s$; the length may instead be found via (27).






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:00












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:04








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:17
















          5














          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$



          As concerns our OP M. Nestor's final remarks:



          The curve $gamma(t)$ (1), expressed as a function of the independent variable $theta$ is, in polar coordiates, given by (23); it is easy to see this curve is a spiral which approaches the origin as $theta to infty$.



          Now, as for item (1), there is indeed a formula for $gamma(t)$; in polar coordinates the equations are given in (12) and (16); from these we may derive
          cartesian equations for $x(t)$, $y(t)$ by setting



          $x(t) = r(t) cos theta (t), ; y(t) = r(t) sin theta(t); tag{28}$



          and as for item (2), we have shown above ca. (12) that



          $displaystyle lim_{t to t_0 + r_0/s} r(t) = 0, tag{29}$



          where $gamma(t_0) = (r_0, theta_0)$; but it should be noted that $gamma(t)$ never "reaches the origin", though it does become arbitrarily close as $t to (t_0 + r_0 / s)^-$.



          Finally, in response to M. Nestor's final edit, we remark that the integral



          $displaystyle int_{t_0}^infty vert gamma'(t) vert ; dt tag{30}$



          is not defined, since $gamma(t)$ can't be extended past $t = t_0 + r_0/s$; the length may instead be found via (27).






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:00












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:04








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:17














          5












          5








          5






          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$



          As concerns our OP M. Nestor's final remarks:



          The curve $gamma(t)$ (1), expressed as a function of the independent variable $theta$ is, in polar coordiates, given by (23); it is easy to see this curve is a spiral which approaches the origin as $theta to infty$.



          Now, as for item (1), there is indeed a formula for $gamma(t)$; in polar coordinates the equations are given in (12) and (16); from these we may derive
          cartesian equations for $x(t)$, $y(t)$ by setting



          $x(t) = r(t) cos theta (t), ; y(t) = r(t) sin theta(t); tag{28}$



          and as for item (2), we have shown above ca. (12) that



          $displaystyle lim_{t to t_0 + r_0/s} r(t) = 0, tag{29}$



          where $gamma(t_0) = (r_0, theta_0)$; but it should be noted that $gamma(t)$ never "reaches the origin", though it does become arbitrarily close as $t to (t_0 + r_0 / s)^-$.



          Finally, in response to M. Nestor's final edit, we remark that the integral



          $displaystyle int_{t_0}^infty vert gamma'(t) vert ; dt tag{30}$



          is not defined, since $gamma(t)$ can't be extended past $t = t_0 + r_0/s$; the length may instead be found via (27).






          share|cite|improve this answer














          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$



          As concerns our OP M. Nestor's final remarks:



          The curve $gamma(t)$ (1), expressed as a function of the independent variable $theta$ is, in polar coordiates, given by (23); it is easy to see this curve is a spiral which approaches the origin as $theta to infty$.



          Now, as for item (1), there is indeed a formula for $gamma(t)$; in polar coordinates the equations are given in (12) and (16); from these we may derive
          cartesian equations for $x(t)$, $y(t)$ by setting



          $x(t) = r(t) cos theta (t), ; y(t) = r(t) sin theta(t); tag{28}$



          and as for item (2), we have shown above ca. (12) that



          $displaystyle lim_{t to t_0 + r_0/s} r(t) = 0, tag{29}$



          where $gamma(t_0) = (r_0, theta_0)$; but it should be noted that $gamma(t)$ never "reaches the origin", though it does become arbitrarily close as $t to (t_0 + r_0 / s)^-$.



          Finally, in response to M. Nestor's final edit, we remark that the integral



          $displaystyle int_{t_0}^infty vert gamma'(t) vert ; dt tag{30}$



          is not defined, since $gamma(t)$ can't be extended past $t = t_0 + r_0/s$; the length may instead be found via (27).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 16 '18 at 2:09

























          answered Dec 9 '18 at 5:23









          Robert Lewis

          43.7k22963




          43.7k22963








          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:00












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:04








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:17














          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:00












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:04








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:17








          1




          1




          Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
          – M. Nestor
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:00






          Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
          – M. Nestor
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:00














          @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
          – Robert Lewis
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:04






          @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
          – Robert Lewis
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:04






          1




          1




          @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
          – Robert Lewis
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:17




          @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
          – Robert Lewis
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:17


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031948%2fcalculate-path-length-of-solution-to-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...