Skew-symmetry on Lie algebras over a field with characteristic not 2 [closed]












-2












$begingroup$


I´d like to see the proof (I know it could be elemental) of this fact:



Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.



Thank you all










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste Jan 14 at 19:53


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:53
















-2












$begingroup$


I´d like to see the proof (I know it could be elemental) of this fact:



Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.



Thank you all










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste Jan 14 at 19:53


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:53














-2












-2








-2


1



$begingroup$


I´d like to see the proof (I know it could be elemental) of this fact:



Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.



Thank you all










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I´d like to see the proof (I know it could be elemental) of this fact:



Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.



Thank you all







lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 17:18









LH8LH8

1438




1438




closed as off-topic by Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste Jan 14 at 19:53


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste Jan 14 at 19:53


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Michael Rozenberg, Lee David Chung Lin, A. Pongrácz, José Carlos Santos, Namaste

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:53














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Jan 14 at 19:53








1




1




$begingroup$
I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 14 at 19:49




$begingroup$
I'd like to see your work (I know it could be elemental) on this fact: Let $L$ be a Lie algebra over a field $mathbb{F}$ with characteristic not 2. Then $[x,x]=0$ for any $x in L$ if and only if$ [x,y]=−[y,x]$.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 14 at 19:49




2




2




$begingroup$
... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 14 at 19:53




$begingroup$
... and/or the source of the question (text (name and author and publication date)) and the subject you are studying, and your mathematical background, and/or an explanation as ti what motivated you to ask this question and how it is relevant to you and users on this site. Actually, please read How to ask a good question on math.se, as it well help you edit and improve this question after it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 14 at 19:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

I suppose that this not what you really want to ask, since the equivalence of those two conditions holds by the simple fact that both conditions hold for any Lie algebra.



However, for any algebra $(A,star)$ over a field $F$ whose characteristic is not $2$, it is true that the conditions





  1. $(forall x,yin A):xstar x=0$;

  2. $(forall x,yin A):xstar y=-ystar x$


are equivalent. In fact, if the second conditions holds and if $xin A$, then $xstar x=-xstar x$, which means that $2xstar x=0$. SInce the characteistic is not $2$, it follows from this that $xstar x=0$. And if the first condition holds, then, if $x,yin A$,begin{align}0&=(x+y)star(x+y)\&=xstar x+xstar y+ystar x+ystar y\&=xstar y+ystar xend{align}and therefore $xstar y=-ystar x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    If $[x,x]=0$ for al $x$ then $0=[x+y,x+y]=[x,x]+[x,y]+[y,x]+[y,y]=[x,y]+[y,x],$ so $[x,y]=-[y,x].$



    Conversely, if $[x,y]=-[y,x]$ for all $x,y$ then $[x,x]=-[x,x],$ so $2[x,x]=0.$ Since $F$ has characteristic not 2 then $[x,x]=0.$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      I suppose that this not what you really want to ask, since the equivalence of those two conditions holds by the simple fact that both conditions hold for any Lie algebra.



      However, for any algebra $(A,star)$ over a field $F$ whose characteristic is not $2$, it is true that the conditions





      1. $(forall x,yin A):xstar x=0$;

      2. $(forall x,yin A):xstar y=-ystar x$


      are equivalent. In fact, if the second conditions holds and if $xin A$, then $xstar x=-xstar x$, which means that $2xstar x=0$. SInce the characteistic is not $2$, it follows from this that $xstar x=0$. And if the first condition holds, then, if $x,yin A$,begin{align}0&=(x+y)star(x+y)\&=xstar x+xstar y+ystar x+ystar y\&=xstar y+ystar xend{align}and therefore $xstar y=-ystar x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        I suppose that this not what you really want to ask, since the equivalence of those two conditions holds by the simple fact that both conditions hold for any Lie algebra.



        However, for any algebra $(A,star)$ over a field $F$ whose characteristic is not $2$, it is true that the conditions





        1. $(forall x,yin A):xstar x=0$;

        2. $(forall x,yin A):xstar y=-ystar x$


        are equivalent. In fact, if the second conditions holds and if $xin A$, then $xstar x=-xstar x$, which means that $2xstar x=0$. SInce the characteistic is not $2$, it follows from this that $xstar x=0$. And if the first condition holds, then, if $x,yin A$,begin{align}0&=(x+y)star(x+y)\&=xstar x+xstar y+ystar x+ystar y\&=xstar y+ystar xend{align}and therefore $xstar y=-ystar x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          I suppose that this not what you really want to ask, since the equivalence of those two conditions holds by the simple fact that both conditions hold for any Lie algebra.



          However, for any algebra $(A,star)$ over a field $F$ whose characteristic is not $2$, it is true that the conditions





          1. $(forall x,yin A):xstar x=0$;

          2. $(forall x,yin A):xstar y=-ystar x$


          are equivalent. In fact, if the second conditions holds and if $xin A$, then $xstar x=-xstar x$, which means that $2xstar x=0$. SInce the characteistic is not $2$, it follows from this that $xstar x=0$. And if the first condition holds, then, if $x,yin A$,begin{align}0&=(x+y)star(x+y)\&=xstar x+xstar y+ystar x+ystar y\&=xstar y+ystar xend{align}and therefore $xstar y=-ystar x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I suppose that this not what you really want to ask, since the equivalence of those two conditions holds by the simple fact that both conditions hold for any Lie algebra.



          However, for any algebra $(A,star)$ over a field $F$ whose characteristic is not $2$, it is true that the conditions





          1. $(forall x,yin A):xstar x=0$;

          2. $(forall x,yin A):xstar y=-ystar x$


          are equivalent. In fact, if the second conditions holds and if $xin A$, then $xstar x=-xstar x$, which means that $2xstar x=0$. SInce the characteistic is not $2$, it follows from this that $xstar x=0$. And if the first condition holds, then, if $x,yin A$,begin{align}0&=(x+y)star(x+y)\&=xstar x+xstar y+ystar x+ystar y\&=xstar y+ystar xend{align}and therefore $xstar y=-ystar x$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 18 '18 at 17:27









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          171k23132240




          171k23132240























              4












              $begingroup$

              If $[x,x]=0$ for al $x$ then $0=[x+y,x+y]=[x,x]+[x,y]+[y,x]+[y,y]=[x,y]+[y,x],$ so $[x,y]=-[y,x].$



              Conversely, if $[x,y]=-[y,x]$ for all $x,y$ then $[x,x]=-[x,x],$ so $2[x,x]=0.$ Since $F$ has characteristic not 2 then $[x,x]=0.$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                If $[x,x]=0$ for al $x$ then $0=[x+y,x+y]=[x,x]+[x,y]+[y,x]+[y,y]=[x,y]+[y,x],$ so $[x,y]=-[y,x].$



                Conversely, if $[x,y]=-[y,x]$ for all $x,y$ then $[x,x]=-[x,x],$ so $2[x,x]=0.$ Since $F$ has characteristic not 2 then $[x,x]=0.$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  If $[x,x]=0$ for al $x$ then $0=[x+y,x+y]=[x,x]+[x,y]+[y,x]+[y,y]=[x,y]+[y,x],$ so $[x,y]=-[y,x].$



                  Conversely, if $[x,y]=-[y,x]$ for all $x,y$ then $[x,x]=-[x,x],$ so $2[x,x]=0.$ Since $F$ has characteristic not 2 then $[x,x]=0.$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If $[x,x]=0$ for al $x$ then $0=[x+y,x+y]=[x,x]+[x,y]+[y,x]+[y,y]=[x,y]+[y,x],$ so $[x,y]=-[y,x].$



                  Conversely, if $[x,y]=-[y,x]$ for all $x,y$ then $[x,x]=-[x,x],$ so $2[x,x]=0.$ Since $F$ has characteristic not 2 then $[x,x]=0.$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 18 '18 at 17:28









                  positrón0802positrón0802

                  4,513520




                  4,513520















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa