Determining uniform convergence of a sequence of exponential functions
$begingroup$
I am given the sequence of functions $f_n(x)=e^{-nx^2}$ on $[-10,10]$. I must find the pointwise limit function $f(x)$ and decide whether convergence is uniform. If it is, I must find a $B_n$ such that $f_n(x) leq B_n$ for all $n$ and $B_n rightarrow 0$. If not, I must find an $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n$ such that $|f_n(x_n) - f(x_n)| geq epsilon$ for all $n$
I determined the pointwise limit function to be $f(x)=begin{cases}
1 & x = 0 newline
0 & otherwise
end{cases}$
However, I am having trouble with the second step. I presume it is not uniformly convergent, since it will have a jump as $x rightarrow 0$. I do not know what $epsilon$ to work with here. I tried solving it for $x_n$ but I got something like $f_n(x_n) leq -epsilon$ which doesn't seem right.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am given the sequence of functions $f_n(x)=e^{-nx^2}$ on $[-10,10]$. I must find the pointwise limit function $f(x)$ and decide whether convergence is uniform. If it is, I must find a $B_n$ such that $f_n(x) leq B_n$ for all $n$ and $B_n rightarrow 0$. If not, I must find an $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n$ such that $|f_n(x_n) - f(x_n)| geq epsilon$ for all $n$
I determined the pointwise limit function to be $f(x)=begin{cases}
1 & x = 0 newline
0 & otherwise
end{cases}$
However, I am having trouble with the second step. I presume it is not uniformly convergent, since it will have a jump as $x rightarrow 0$. I do not know what $epsilon$ to work with here. I tried solving it for $x_n$ but I got something like $f_n(x_n) leq -epsilon$ which doesn't seem right.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
1
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am given the sequence of functions $f_n(x)=e^{-nx^2}$ on $[-10,10]$. I must find the pointwise limit function $f(x)$ and decide whether convergence is uniform. If it is, I must find a $B_n$ such that $f_n(x) leq B_n$ for all $n$ and $B_n rightarrow 0$. If not, I must find an $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n$ such that $|f_n(x_n) - f(x_n)| geq epsilon$ for all $n$
I determined the pointwise limit function to be $f(x)=begin{cases}
1 & x = 0 newline
0 & otherwise
end{cases}$
However, I am having trouble with the second step. I presume it is not uniformly convergent, since it will have a jump as $x rightarrow 0$. I do not know what $epsilon$ to work with here. I tried solving it for $x_n$ but I got something like $f_n(x_n) leq -epsilon$ which doesn't seem right.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
I am given the sequence of functions $f_n(x)=e^{-nx^2}$ on $[-10,10]$. I must find the pointwise limit function $f(x)$ and decide whether convergence is uniform. If it is, I must find a $B_n$ such that $f_n(x) leq B_n$ for all $n$ and $B_n rightarrow 0$. If not, I must find an $epsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n$ such that $|f_n(x_n) - f(x_n)| geq epsilon$ for all $n$
I determined the pointwise limit function to be $f(x)=begin{cases}
1 & x = 0 newline
0 & otherwise
end{cases}$
However, I am having trouble with the second step. I presume it is not uniformly convergent, since it will have a jump as $x rightarrow 0$. I do not know what $epsilon$ to work with here. I tried solving it for $x_n$ but I got something like $f_n(x_n) leq -epsilon$ which doesn't seem right.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
real-analysis uniform-convergence
edited Dec 13 '18 at 17:31
hkj447
asked Dec 13 '18 at 17:18
hkj447hkj447
575
575
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
1
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
1
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
1
1
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
1
1
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038323%2fdetermining-uniform-convergence-of-a-sequence-of-exponential-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038323%2fdetermining-uniform-convergence-of-a-sequence-of-exponential-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You can basically pick a value for $varepsilon$, e.g., $varepsilon=frac 12$. Observe that $f_n(0)=1>frac 12$ for all $n$ and $f_n(10)<frac 12$. Since $f_n$ is continuous, there must be some $x_nin(0,10)$ such that $f_n(x_n)=frac 12$. Now you should be able to solve for $x_n$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
So would any value for 0 < epsilon < 1 work?
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:41
1
$begingroup$
Strictly speaking you need that $varepsilon > f_1(10)$. Otherwise, the desired statement is only true for all but finitely many $n$. Alternatively, you can let $x_n$ be the minimum of $10$ and the solution of $f_n(y)=varepsilon$. But yes, besides technicalities, any $varepsilonin(0,1)$ will work.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 17:43
$begingroup$
I seem to run into an issue where I am taking the square root of a negative number when solving for Xn since I will be taking the ln of a number less than one
$endgroup$
– hkj447
Dec 13 '18 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
But you also have another minus to make up for it: $e^{-nx^2}=frac 12$ $Rightarrow -nx^2=log(frac 12)$ $Rightarrow x^2=-frac 1nlog(frac 12)>0$.
$endgroup$
– cthl
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45