Let function $f$ be defined by $f(X)$. Prove that $f$ is bijective.












0












$begingroup$


Let function $f: mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}) rightarrow mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ be defined by $f(X) = {2x+y:|:langle x,yrangle in X}$.

Prove that $f$ is bijective.



$mathcal{P}(X)$ is a power set over $X$.



In order for function to be bijective, it has to be:




  • 1-1: $f(langle x_1,y_1rangle) = f(langle x_2,y_2rangle) Rightarrow langle x_1,y_1rangle = langle x_2,y_2rangle$

  • onto: $forall z in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) :exists x,yinmathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}): f(x,y) = z$


To show that $f$ is 1-1, we take any $x_1, x_2in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$; $y_1, y_2in {0,1}$ and we need to show that the first condition is true. Similarly, we need to show that the second condition is true, then it would mean that $f$ is bijective, though I do not know how to prove it step-by-step.

I also thought about other possible way of solving it. Function $h:Arightarrow B$ is bijective iff it has an inverse function $h^{-1}:Brightarrow A$, so I could think of a function which would satisfy this condition, but would it be a sufficient proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:53












  • $begingroup$
    This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
    $endgroup$
    – whiskeyo
    Dec 13 '18 at 18:47
















0












$begingroup$


Let function $f: mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}) rightarrow mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ be defined by $f(X) = {2x+y:|:langle x,yrangle in X}$.

Prove that $f$ is bijective.



$mathcal{P}(X)$ is a power set over $X$.



In order for function to be bijective, it has to be:




  • 1-1: $f(langle x_1,y_1rangle) = f(langle x_2,y_2rangle) Rightarrow langle x_1,y_1rangle = langle x_2,y_2rangle$

  • onto: $forall z in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) :exists x,yinmathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}): f(x,y) = z$


To show that $f$ is 1-1, we take any $x_1, x_2in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$; $y_1, y_2in {0,1}$ and we need to show that the first condition is true. Similarly, we need to show that the second condition is true, then it would mean that $f$ is bijective, though I do not know how to prove it step-by-step.

I also thought about other possible way of solving it. Function $h:Arightarrow B$ is bijective iff it has an inverse function $h^{-1}:Brightarrow A$, so I could think of a function which would satisfy this condition, but would it be a sufficient proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:53












  • $begingroup$
    This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
    $endgroup$
    – whiskeyo
    Dec 13 '18 at 18:47














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let function $f: mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}) rightarrow mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ be defined by $f(X) = {2x+y:|:langle x,yrangle in X}$.

Prove that $f$ is bijective.



$mathcal{P}(X)$ is a power set over $X$.



In order for function to be bijective, it has to be:




  • 1-1: $f(langle x_1,y_1rangle) = f(langle x_2,y_2rangle) Rightarrow langle x_1,y_1rangle = langle x_2,y_2rangle$

  • onto: $forall z in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) :exists x,yinmathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}): f(x,y) = z$


To show that $f$ is 1-1, we take any $x_1, x_2in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$; $y_1, y_2in {0,1}$ and we need to show that the first condition is true. Similarly, we need to show that the second condition is true, then it would mean that $f$ is bijective, though I do not know how to prove it step-by-step.

I also thought about other possible way of solving it. Function $h:Arightarrow B$ is bijective iff it has an inverse function $h^{-1}:Brightarrow A$, so I could think of a function which would satisfy this condition, but would it be a sufficient proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let function $f: mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}) rightarrow mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ be defined by $f(X) = {2x+y:|:langle x,yrangle in X}$.

Prove that $f$ is bijective.



$mathcal{P}(X)$ is a power set over $X$.



In order for function to be bijective, it has to be:




  • 1-1: $f(langle x_1,y_1rangle) = f(langle x_2,y_2rangle) Rightarrow langle x_1,y_1rangle = langle x_2,y_2rangle$

  • onto: $forall z in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) :exists x,yinmathcal{P}(mathbb{N}times{0,1}): f(x,y) = z$


To show that $f$ is 1-1, we take any $x_1, x_2in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$; $y_1, y_2in {0,1}$ and we need to show that the first condition is true. Similarly, we need to show that the second condition is true, then it would mean that $f$ is bijective, though I do not know how to prove it step-by-step.

I also thought about other possible way of solving it. Function $h:Arightarrow B$ is bijective iff it has an inverse function $h^{-1}:Brightarrow A$, so I could think of a function which would satisfy this condition, but would it be a sufficient proof?







functions elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 13 '18 at 17:10









whiskeyowhiskeyo

1368




1368












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:53












  • $begingroup$
    This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
    $endgroup$
    – whiskeyo
    Dec 13 '18 at 18:47


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:53












  • $begingroup$
    This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
    $endgroup$
    – whiskeyo
    Dec 13 '18 at 18:47
















$begingroup$
Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:53






$begingroup$
Yes, both approaches work. But you have to do it. It is not that difficult.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:53














$begingroup$
This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
$endgroup$
– whiskeyo
Dec 13 '18 at 18:47




$begingroup$
This is why I asked for help, I mentioned that I cannot prove it step-by-step using first method, as I do not know how should I start it and what I have to do next (sadly proofs are not my strong point). When it comes to the second method with finding the inverse function, I am trying to get it, but all my ideas were wrong. I was thinking about $f^{-1}(n) = n$ for $nin N$, but it does not contain whole ${0,1}$ set, as it is $f^{-1}(n) = n + 0$ in every case.
$endgroup$
– whiskeyo
Dec 13 '18 at 18:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hint: Each $Y in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has a unique decomposition $Y = Y_0 cup Y_1$ where $Y_0$ contains all even numbers in $Y$ and $Y_1$ contains all odd numbers in $Y$. Define
$$Y_0' = { n/2 mid n in Y_0 } ,$$
$$Y_1' = { (n-1)/2 mid n in Y_1 } ,$$
$$g : mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) to mathcal{P}(mathbb{N} times { 0,1 }), g(Y) = Y_0' times { 0 } cup Y_1' times { 1 } $$
and show that $g$ is an inverse for $f$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038306%2flet-function-f-be-defined-by-fx-prove-that-f-is-bijective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Hint: Each $Y in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has a unique decomposition $Y = Y_0 cup Y_1$ where $Y_0$ contains all even numbers in $Y$ and $Y_1$ contains all odd numbers in $Y$. Define
    $$Y_0' = { n/2 mid n in Y_0 } ,$$
    $$Y_1' = { (n-1)/2 mid n in Y_1 } ,$$
    $$g : mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) to mathcal{P}(mathbb{N} times { 0,1 }), g(Y) = Y_0' times { 0 } cup Y_1' times { 1 } $$
    and show that $g$ is an inverse for $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint: Each $Y in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has a unique decomposition $Y = Y_0 cup Y_1$ where $Y_0$ contains all even numbers in $Y$ and $Y_1$ contains all odd numbers in $Y$. Define
      $$Y_0' = { n/2 mid n in Y_0 } ,$$
      $$Y_1' = { (n-1)/2 mid n in Y_1 } ,$$
      $$g : mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) to mathcal{P}(mathbb{N} times { 0,1 }), g(Y) = Y_0' times { 0 } cup Y_1' times { 1 } $$
      and show that $g$ is an inverse for $f$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Hint: Each $Y in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has a unique decomposition $Y = Y_0 cup Y_1$ where $Y_0$ contains all even numbers in $Y$ and $Y_1$ contains all odd numbers in $Y$. Define
        $$Y_0' = { n/2 mid n in Y_0 } ,$$
        $$Y_1' = { (n-1)/2 mid n in Y_1 } ,$$
        $$g : mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) to mathcal{P}(mathbb{N} times { 0,1 }), g(Y) = Y_0' times { 0 } cup Y_1' times { 1 } $$
        and show that $g$ is an inverse for $f$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Hint: Each $Y in mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has a unique decomposition $Y = Y_0 cup Y_1$ where $Y_0$ contains all even numbers in $Y$ and $Y_1$ contains all odd numbers in $Y$. Define
        $$Y_0' = { n/2 mid n in Y_0 } ,$$
        $$Y_1' = { (n-1)/2 mid n in Y_1 } ,$$
        $$g : mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}) to mathcal{P}(mathbb{N} times { 0,1 }), g(Y) = Y_0' times { 0 } cup Y_1' times { 1 } $$
        and show that $g$ is an inverse for $f$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 13 '18 at 19:19

























        answered Dec 13 '18 at 18:53









        Paul FrostPaul Frost

        11.3k3934




        11.3k3934






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038306%2flet-function-f-be-defined-by-fx-prove-that-f-is-bijective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa