Where does integral concept come from?
$begingroup$
I have been searching for days to find why Newton offered an anti-derivative function to find the area under the curve. What was the reason for searching such a function? Was it just mathematical curiosity or was there a solid reason for that?
calculus integration definite-integrals
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I have been searching for days to find why Newton offered an anti-derivative function to find the area under the curve. What was the reason for searching such a function? Was it just mathematical curiosity or was there a solid reason for that?
calculus integration definite-integrals
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
1
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
1
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I have been searching for days to find why Newton offered an anti-derivative function to find the area under the curve. What was the reason for searching such a function? Was it just mathematical curiosity or was there a solid reason for that?
calculus integration definite-integrals
$endgroup$
I have been searching for days to find why Newton offered an anti-derivative function to find the area under the curve. What was the reason for searching such a function? Was it just mathematical curiosity or was there a solid reason for that?
calculus integration definite-integrals
calculus integration definite-integrals
edited Dec 16 '18 at 6:07
Eric Wofsey
189k14216347
189k14216347
asked Dec 16 '18 at 6:04
Arif RustamovArif Rustamov
367
367
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
1
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
1
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
1
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
1
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
1
1
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042288%2fwhere-does-integral-concept-come-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042288%2fwhere-does-integral-concept-come-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are you asking for an explanation of the mathematical concept itself or a historical explanation of how Newton came upon it?
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 16 '18 at 6:06
$begingroup$
I was watching a bunch of videos where it says that in order to find the area under the curve Newton started to think about an anti-derivative of that function. I am just trying to understand what was the reason for searching an anti-derivative?
$endgroup$
– Arif Rustamov
Dec 16 '18 at 6:17
1
$begingroup$
I would say the theory of integration in Newton's time was a development beyond the quadrature technique known to the ancient Greeks. His achievement -- with the concept of a derivative already understood -- was to observe that the area $A(x)$ under the "curve" $y = f(x)$ above the segment $[a,x]$ had the property $frac{dA}{dx}(x) = f(x)$. I don't know the precise "reason for searching" but it is clear that Newton was exceptional in terms of scientific observation.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 16 '18 at 6:21
$begingroup$
Historically when searching for the area $A(f(x),[0,t])$ under $f(x)=x^n,x in [0,t]$ or $f(x)=frac{1}{1+x}$ it is natural to search how $A(f(x),[0,t])$ transforms under $t mapsto t+1$ or $t mapsto 2t$. When those transformations are fully understood they give an explicit formula for the area.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 16 '18 at 6:25
1
$begingroup$
Newton was not the first mathematician to do so. Go back in the history, Cavalieri, Torricelli, and before ...
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 16 '18 at 20:09