Even if / Even though





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4
















Even if/though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them




The correct answer is "Even if" because (as I understand) only 'even if' can be used in conditional sentences.




Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask them for help, and we wouldn't even if the situation was utterly hopeless which indeed it wasn't.




Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask for help and we wouldn't do it, ever. They did help of their own accord (but we hate them anyway).



Am I right or wrong? If the second one is not grammatically correct, what is the correct way to convey the meaning of the second sentence?



Common mistakes at CAE (2017)

Page 43, Test 8 3.1










share|improve this question

























  • Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

    – Oksana
    2 days ago


















4
















Even if/though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them




The correct answer is "Even if" because (as I understand) only 'even if' can be used in conditional sentences.




Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask them for help, and we wouldn't even if the situation was utterly hopeless which indeed it wasn't.




Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask for help and we wouldn't do it, ever. They did help of their own accord (but we hate them anyway).



Am I right or wrong? If the second one is not grammatically correct, what is the correct way to convey the meaning of the second sentence?



Common mistakes at CAE (2017)

Page 43, Test 8 3.1










share|improve this question

























  • Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

    – Oksana
    2 days ago














4












4








4









Even if/though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them




The correct answer is "Even if" because (as I understand) only 'even if' can be used in conditional sentences.




Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask them for help, and we wouldn't even if the situation was utterly hopeless which indeed it wasn't.




Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask for help and we wouldn't do it, ever. They did help of their own accord (but we hate them anyway).



Am I right or wrong? If the second one is not grammatically correct, what is the correct way to convey the meaning of the second sentence?



Common mistakes at CAE (2017)

Page 43, Test 8 3.1










share|improve this question

















Even if/though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them




The correct answer is "Even if" because (as I understand) only 'even if' can be used in conditional sentences.




Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask them for help, and we wouldn't even if the situation was utterly hopeless which indeed it wasn't.




Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.




We didn't ask for help and we wouldn't do it, ever. They did help of their own accord (but we hate them anyway).



Am I right or wrong? If the second one is not grammatically correct, what is the correct way to convey the meaning of the second sentence?



Common mistakes at CAE (2017)

Page 43, Test 8 3.1







conditionals






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 14 at 5:14









Mari-Lou A

62.7k57226467




62.7k57226467










asked Apr 13 at 7:48









OksanaOksana

234




234













  • Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

    – Oksana
    2 days ago



















  • Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

    – Oksana
    2 days ago

















Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

– Oksana
2 days ago





Thank you, @Mari-Lou A for editing my post!

– Oksana
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3
















  1. Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.


  2. Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.





Both of the sentences above are perfectly fine, and the CAE book is, unfortunately, wrong.



Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical.



There is a clause following the even though/even if in each version. This clause is:





  1. we couldn't manage without their help




The difference between examples (1) and (2) is that in example (1) it is pre-supposed that this clause is true. In example (2) it is not. It is entirely possible in sentence (2), for example, that we might be able to manage perfecty well without their help.



Sentences with even though present their subordinate clauses as given facts, whereas sentences with even if do not. Consider the following sentences:





  1. Even though Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.


  2. Even if Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.





In sentence (4) we know that Tom is here. In sentence (5), he may or may not be.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

    – Oksana
    2 days ago













  • @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

    – Araucaria
    2 days ago



















8














The difference is whether the antecedent is factual (real) or hypothetical.



Even if places the antecedent (we couldn’t manage without their help) in an irrealis mood: perhaps you can manage without their help, perhaps you can’t - but it supposes you can’t (with even complicating things by subsuming the case where you can). Neither is a fact. Either way, your even if version says that you wouldn’t ask for their help.



Even though has it in a realis mood - the antecedent is fact: you can’t manage without their help. Your even though version doesn’t say whether you’ve asked for their help in the past or whether they have helped or will help, or even whether you accept their help at any time past, present or future. It simply states that you need it but wouldn’t ask for it.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:40








  • 1





    Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:41






  • 1





    @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

    – Lawrence
    Apr 14 at 11:37





















2














Both phrases are idiomatic and synonymous.



Dictionary entries prove this.



For example, according to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary :



even if



 idiom



— used to stress that something will happen despite something else that might prevent it 



// I'm going to the party even if it rains.



even though



idiom



—used as a stronger way to say "though" or "although" 



// She stayed with him even though he often mistreated her.
// I'm going even though it may rain.



though



: in spite of the possibility that



 : even if



// though I may fail, I will try






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493732%2feven-if-even-though%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3
















    1. Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.


    2. Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.





    Both of the sentences above are perfectly fine, and the CAE book is, unfortunately, wrong.



    Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical.



    There is a clause following the even though/even if in each version. This clause is:





    1. we couldn't manage without their help




    The difference between examples (1) and (2) is that in example (1) it is pre-supposed that this clause is true. In example (2) it is not. It is entirely possible in sentence (2), for example, that we might be able to manage perfecty well without their help.



    Sentences with even though present their subordinate clauses as given facts, whereas sentences with even if do not. Consider the following sentences:





    1. Even though Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.


    2. Even if Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.





    In sentence (4) we know that Tom is here. In sentence (5), he may or may not be.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

      – Oksana
      2 days ago













    • @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

      – Araucaria
      2 days ago
















    3
















    1. Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.


    2. Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.





    Both of the sentences above are perfectly fine, and the CAE book is, unfortunately, wrong.



    Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical.



    There is a clause following the even though/even if in each version. This clause is:





    1. we couldn't manage without their help




    The difference between examples (1) and (2) is that in example (1) it is pre-supposed that this clause is true. In example (2) it is not. It is entirely possible in sentence (2), for example, that we might be able to manage perfecty well without their help.



    Sentences with even though present their subordinate clauses as given facts, whereas sentences with even if do not. Consider the following sentences:





    1. Even though Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.


    2. Even if Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.





    In sentence (4) we know that Tom is here. In sentence (5), he may or may not be.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

      – Oksana
      2 days ago













    • @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

      – Araucaria
      2 days ago














    3












    3








    3









    1. Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.


    2. Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.





    Both of the sentences above are perfectly fine, and the CAE book is, unfortunately, wrong.



    Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical.



    There is a clause following the even though/even if in each version. This clause is:





    1. we couldn't manage without their help




    The difference between examples (1) and (2) is that in example (1) it is pre-supposed that this clause is true. In example (2) it is not. It is entirely possible in sentence (2), for example, that we might be able to manage perfecty well without their help.



    Sentences with even though present their subordinate clauses as given facts, whereas sentences with even if do not. Consider the following sentences:





    1. Even though Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.


    2. Even if Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.





    In sentence (4) we know that Tom is here. In sentence (5), he may or may not be.






    share|improve this answer

















    1. Even though we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.


    2. Even if we couldn't manage without their help, I wouldn't ask them.





    Both of the sentences above are perfectly fine, and the CAE book is, unfortunately, wrong.



    Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical.



    There is a clause following the even though/even if in each version. This clause is:





    1. we couldn't manage without their help




    The difference between examples (1) and (2) is that in example (1) it is pre-supposed that this clause is true. In example (2) it is not. It is entirely possible in sentence (2), for example, that we might be able to manage perfecty well without their help.



    Sentences with even though present their subordinate clauses as given facts, whereas sentences with even if do not. Consider the following sentences:





    1. Even though Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.


    2. Even if Tom is here, we'll never be able to find him.





    In sentence (4) we know that Tom is here. In sentence (5), he may or may not be.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 14 at 18:08

























    answered Apr 14 at 12:34









    AraucariaAraucaria

    35.8k1071151




    35.8k1071151








    • 1





      "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

      – Oksana
      2 days ago













    • @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

      – Araucaria
      2 days ago














    • 1





      "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

      – Oksana
      2 days ago













    • @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

      – Araucaria
      2 days ago








    1




    1





    "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

    – Oksana
    2 days ago







    "Notice that in both of these examples, it is possible that the not being able to manage situation may never occur, and may be entirely hypothetical." I think I understand. Whether what's presupposed in (1) is true or not has no bearing on the the fact that the whole sentence is still in an irrealis mood. Just like in logic an invalid argument might have true premises and true conclusion. It does sound a little bit counter-intuitive. I wonder, is it due to the fact that I am not a native speaker or native speakers might find it difficult to wrap their mind around the concept as well...

    – Oksana
    2 days ago















    @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

    – Araucaria
    2 days ago





    @Oksana I think it's difficult for native speakers too!

    – Araucaria
    2 days ago













    8














    The difference is whether the antecedent is factual (real) or hypothetical.



    Even if places the antecedent (we couldn’t manage without their help) in an irrealis mood: perhaps you can manage without their help, perhaps you can’t - but it supposes you can’t (with even complicating things by subsuming the case where you can). Neither is a fact. Either way, your even if version says that you wouldn’t ask for their help.



    Even though has it in a realis mood - the antecedent is fact: you can’t manage without their help. Your even though version doesn’t say whether you’ve asked for their help in the past or whether they have helped or will help, or even whether you accept their help at any time past, present or future. It simply states that you need it but wouldn’t ask for it.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:40








    • 1





      Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:41






    • 1





      @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

      – Lawrence
      Apr 14 at 11:37


















    8














    The difference is whether the antecedent is factual (real) or hypothetical.



    Even if places the antecedent (we couldn’t manage without their help) in an irrealis mood: perhaps you can manage without their help, perhaps you can’t - but it supposes you can’t (with even complicating things by subsuming the case where you can). Neither is a fact. Either way, your even if version says that you wouldn’t ask for their help.



    Even though has it in a realis mood - the antecedent is fact: you can’t manage without their help. Your even though version doesn’t say whether you’ve asked for their help in the past or whether they have helped or will help, or even whether you accept their help at any time past, present or future. It simply states that you need it but wouldn’t ask for it.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:40








    • 1





      Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:41






    • 1





      @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

      – Lawrence
      Apr 14 at 11:37
















    8












    8








    8







    The difference is whether the antecedent is factual (real) or hypothetical.



    Even if places the antecedent (we couldn’t manage without their help) in an irrealis mood: perhaps you can manage without their help, perhaps you can’t - but it supposes you can’t (with even complicating things by subsuming the case where you can). Neither is a fact. Either way, your even if version says that you wouldn’t ask for their help.



    Even though has it in a realis mood - the antecedent is fact: you can’t manage without their help. Your even though version doesn’t say whether you’ve asked for their help in the past or whether they have helped or will help, or even whether you accept their help at any time past, present or future. It simply states that you need it but wouldn’t ask for it.






    share|improve this answer















    The difference is whether the antecedent is factual (real) or hypothetical.



    Even if places the antecedent (we couldn’t manage without their help) in an irrealis mood: perhaps you can manage without their help, perhaps you can’t - but it supposes you can’t (with even complicating things by subsuming the case where you can). Neither is a fact. Either way, your even if version says that you wouldn’t ask for their help.



    Even though has it in a realis mood - the antecedent is fact: you can’t manage without their help. Your even though version doesn’t say whether you’ve asked for their help in the past or whether they have helped or will help, or even whether you accept their help at any time past, present or future. It simply states that you need it but wouldn’t ask for it.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 13 at 8:57

























    answered Apr 13 at 8:52









    LawrenceLawrence

    31.8k563113




    31.8k563113








    • 1





      Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:40








    • 1





      Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:41






    • 1





      @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

      – Lawrence
      Apr 14 at 11:37
















    • 1





      Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:40








    • 1





      Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

      – Araucaria
      Apr 14 at 9:41






    • 1





      @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

      – Lawrence
      Apr 14 at 11:37










    1




    1





    Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:40







    Hmm. Problem here though. Even if English had moods, the combination of without plus modal could in the even-version would also constitute an irrealis mood. Consider without legs, I couldn't walk. So your description here is not much help, although I know what you're angling at.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:40






    1




    1





    Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:41





    Perhaps you need to consider the concept of presupposition.

    – Araucaria
    Apr 14 at 9:41




    1




    1





    @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

    – Lawrence
    Apr 14 at 11:37







    @Araucaria Thanks for the interesting counterexample. Both the OP’s examples are irrealis (if I may put it that way) if we consider each sentence as a whole. That doesn’t invalidate the observation that there is a difference in the antecedents. Couching the difference in terms of presuppositions, as you suggest, would be a neat abstraction of those antecedents.

    – Lawrence
    Apr 14 at 11:37













    2














    Both phrases are idiomatic and synonymous.



    Dictionary entries prove this.



    For example, according to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary :



    even if



     idiom



    — used to stress that something will happen despite something else that might prevent it 



    // I'm going to the party even if it rains.



    even though



    idiom



    —used as a stronger way to say "though" or "although" 



    // She stayed with him even though he often mistreated her.
    // I'm going even though it may rain.



    though



    : in spite of the possibility that



     : even if



    // though I may fail, I will try






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      Both phrases are idiomatic and synonymous.



      Dictionary entries prove this.



      For example, according to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary :



      even if



       idiom



      — used to stress that something will happen despite something else that might prevent it 



      // I'm going to the party even if it rains.



      even though



      idiom



      —used as a stronger way to say "though" or "although" 



      // She stayed with him even though he often mistreated her.
      // I'm going even though it may rain.



      though



      : in spite of the possibility that



       : even if



      // though I may fail, I will try






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        Both phrases are idiomatic and synonymous.



        Dictionary entries prove this.



        For example, according to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary :



        even if



         idiom



        — used to stress that something will happen despite something else that might prevent it 



        // I'm going to the party even if it rains.



        even though



        idiom



        —used as a stronger way to say "though" or "although" 



        // She stayed with him even though he often mistreated her.
        // I'm going even though it may rain.



        though



        : in spite of the possibility that



         : even if



        // though I may fail, I will try






        share|improve this answer













        Both phrases are idiomatic and synonymous.



        Dictionary entries prove this.



        For example, according to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary :



        even if



         idiom



        — used to stress that something will happen despite something else that might prevent it 



        // I'm going to the party even if it rains.



        even though



        idiom



        —used as a stronger way to say "though" or "although" 



        // She stayed with him even though he often mistreated her.
        // I'm going even though it may rain.



        though



        : in spite of the possibility that



         : even if



        // though I may fail, I will try







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 13 at 8:05









        user307254user307254

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493732%2feven-if-even-though%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Brian Clough

            Cáceres