Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?












2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    Apr 9 at 0:34






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    Apr 9 at 0:50











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:29











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:36
















2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    Apr 9 at 0:34






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    Apr 9 at 0:50











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:29











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:36














2












2








2








Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question
















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch




shulchan-aruch






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 9 at 7:27









Al Berko

6,5642529




6,5642529










asked Apr 8 at 23:22









DonielFDonielF

17.3k12690




17.3k12690













  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    Apr 9 at 0:34






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    Apr 9 at 0:50











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:29











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:36



















  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    Apr 9 at 0:34






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    Apr 9 at 0:50











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:29











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    Apr 9 at 7:36

















I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34





I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34




2




2





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50













In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29





In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29













Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36





Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






share|improve this answer































    5














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer
























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      Apr 9 at 0:22













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      Apr 9 at 0:24











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA♦
      Apr 9 at 0:53






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      Apr 9 at 0:55



















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



    In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




    סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




    In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




    ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




    In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




    הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




    O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




    והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




    There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






    share|improve this answer




























      7














      It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



      In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




      סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




      In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




      ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




      In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




      הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




      O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




      והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




      There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






      share|improve this answer


























        7












        7








        7







        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






        share|improve this answer













        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 9 at 0:56









        AlexAlex

        23.6k157134




        23.6k157134























            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:22













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              Apr 9 at 0:24











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              Apr 9 at 0:53






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:55
















            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:22













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              Apr 9 at 0:24











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              Apr 9 at 0:53






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:55














            5












            5








            5







            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer













            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 9 at 0:18









            user6591user6591

            25.8k12758




            25.8k12758













            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:22













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              Apr 9 at 0:24











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              Apr 9 at 0:53






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:55



















            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:22













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              Apr 9 at 0:24











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              Apr 9 at 0:53






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              Apr 9 at 0:55

















            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            Apr 9 at 0:22







            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            Apr 9 at 0:22















            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            Apr 9 at 0:24





            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            Apr 9 at 0:24













            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            Apr 9 at 0:53





            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            Apr 9 at 0:53




            1




            1





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            Apr 9 at 0:55





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            Apr 9 at 0:55



            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more