P Pr Pre Pref Prefi Prefix Prefixe Prefixes












32














Given some finite list, return a list of all its prefixes, including an empty list, in ascending order of their length.



(Basically implementing the Haskell function inits.)



Details




  • The input list contains numbers (or another type if more convenient).

  • The output must be a list of lists.

  • The submission can, but does not have to be a function, any default I/O can be used.

  • There is a CW answer for all trivial solutions.


Example



 -> []
[42] -> [,[42]]
[1,2,3,4] -> [, [1], [1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]]
[4,3,2,1] -> [, [4], [4,3], [4,3,2], [4,3,2,1]]









share|improve this question
























  • If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
    – NieDzejkob
    Dec 8 at 20:37










  • @NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
    – flawr
    Dec 8 at 21:18










  • Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
    – Rogem
    Dec 9 at 10:02










  • It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
    – Rogem
    Dec 13 at 14:46










  • @Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
    – flawr
    Dec 13 at 14:49
















32














Given some finite list, return a list of all its prefixes, including an empty list, in ascending order of their length.



(Basically implementing the Haskell function inits.)



Details




  • The input list contains numbers (or another type if more convenient).

  • The output must be a list of lists.

  • The submission can, but does not have to be a function, any default I/O can be used.

  • There is a CW answer for all trivial solutions.


Example



 -> []
[42] -> [,[42]]
[1,2,3,4] -> [, [1], [1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]]
[4,3,2,1] -> [, [4], [4,3], [4,3,2], [4,3,2,1]]









share|improve this question
























  • If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
    – NieDzejkob
    Dec 8 at 20:37










  • @NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
    – flawr
    Dec 8 at 21:18










  • Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
    – Rogem
    Dec 9 at 10:02










  • It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
    – Rogem
    Dec 13 at 14:46










  • @Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
    – flawr
    Dec 13 at 14:49














32












32








32


2





Given some finite list, return a list of all its prefixes, including an empty list, in ascending order of their length.



(Basically implementing the Haskell function inits.)



Details




  • The input list contains numbers (or another type if more convenient).

  • The output must be a list of lists.

  • The submission can, but does not have to be a function, any default I/O can be used.

  • There is a CW answer for all trivial solutions.


Example



 -> []
[42] -> [,[42]]
[1,2,3,4] -> [, [1], [1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]]
[4,3,2,1] -> [, [4], [4,3], [4,3,2], [4,3,2,1]]









share|improve this question















Given some finite list, return a list of all its prefixes, including an empty list, in ascending order of their length.



(Basically implementing the Haskell function inits.)



Details




  • The input list contains numbers (or another type if more convenient).

  • The output must be a list of lists.

  • The submission can, but does not have to be a function, any default I/O can be used.

  • There is a CW answer for all trivial solutions.


Example



 -> []
[42] -> [,[42]]
[1,2,3,4] -> [, [1], [1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]]
[4,3,2,1] -> [, [4], [4,3], [4,3,2], [4,3,2,1]]






code-golf array-manipulation function functional-programming






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 7 at 21:52

























asked Dec 7 at 19:16









flawr

26.6k665188




26.6k665188












  • If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
    – NieDzejkob
    Dec 8 at 20:37










  • @NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
    – flawr
    Dec 8 at 21:18










  • Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
    – Rogem
    Dec 9 at 10:02










  • It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
    – Rogem
    Dec 13 at 14:46










  • @Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
    – flawr
    Dec 13 at 14:49


















  • If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
    – NieDzejkob
    Dec 8 at 20:37










  • @NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
    – flawr
    Dec 8 at 21:18










  • Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
    – Rogem
    Dec 9 at 10:02










  • It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
    – Rogem
    Dec 13 at 14:46










  • @Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
    – flawr
    Dec 13 at 14:49
















If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
– NieDzejkob
Dec 8 at 20:37




If a language does not define any types except for characters, can I take input as a string and separate the input by newlines, in the case of a full program?
– NieDzejkob
Dec 8 at 20:37












@NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
– flawr
Dec 8 at 21:18




@NieDzejkob I'm not sure what consensus there is for this case, but the Brainfuck answer seems to do something like that.
– flawr
Dec 8 at 21:18












Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
– Rogem
Dec 9 at 10:02




Can we expect the list to be null-terminated?
– Rogem
Dec 9 at 10:02












It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
– Rogem
Dec 13 at 14:46




It's especially common in C/C++, main use being strings.
– Rogem
Dec 13 at 14:46












@Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
– flawr
Dec 13 at 14:49




@Rogem If it is that common I think allowing it is reasonable.
– flawr
Dec 13 at 14:49










63 Answers
63






active

oldest

votes













1 2
3
next












15















Haskell, 20 bytes



Edit: Yet a byte shorter with a completely different scan.



An anonymous function slightly beating the trivial import.





scanr(_->init)=<<id


Try it online!




  • Uses =<< for the abbreviation (scanr(_->init)=<<id) l = scanr(_->init) l l.

  • Scans a list l from right to left, collecting intermediate results with the function _->init.

  • That function ignores the elements scanned through (they're only used to get the right total length for the collected results), so really iterates applying init to the initial value of the scan, which is also l.






share|improve this answer































    13















    brainfuck, 21 12 bytes



    -9 bytes thanks to Arnauld suggesting the separator ÿ instead of newlines



    -[[<]>[.>],]


    Try it online!



    Takes bytes through STDIN with no null bytes and prints a series of prefixes separated by the ÿ character with a leading ÿ character. For example, for the input Prefixes, the output is ÿÿPÿPrÿPreÿPrefÿPrefiÿPrefixÿPrefixeÿPrefixes.



    For readability, here's a version with newlines instead.



    Explanation:



    -              Create a ÿ character in cell 0
    [ ,] While input, starting with the ÿ
    [<]> Go to the start of the string
    [.>] Print the string
    , Append the input to the end of the string





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
      – Dev
      Dec 10 at 3:11



















    10














    JavaScript (ES6), 33 bytes



    a=>[b=,...a.map(n=>b=[...b,n])]


    Try it online!



    How?



    +--- a = input array
    |
    | +--- initialize b to an empty array and include it as the first entry
    | | of the output (whatever the input is)
    | |
    | | +--- for each value n in a:
    | | |
    | | | +--- append n to b and include this new array in
    | | | | the final output
    | | | |
    a => [b = , ...a.map(n => b = [...b, n])]
    | |
    +---------+--------+
    |
    spread syntax: expands all elements of
    the child array within the parent array





    share|improve this answer























    • wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
      – Brian H.
      Dec 10 at 12:54










    • @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
      – Arnauld
      Dec 10 at 13:05










    • Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
      – Brian H.
      Dec 10 at 13:08






    • 2




      Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
      – Arnauld
      Dec 10 at 13:30



















    6















    Jelly, 3 bytes



    ṭṖƤ


    Try it online!



    How it works



    ṭṖƤ  Main link. Argument: A

    Ƥ Map the link to the left over all non-empty(!) prefixes of A.
    Ṗ Pop; remove the last element.
    ṭ Tack; append A to the resulting list.





    share|improve this answer





























      6















      Japt, 4 bytes



      ²£¯Y


      Try it online!



      Explanation:



      ²       :Add an arbitrary extra item to the end of the array
      £ :For each item in the new array:
      ¯Y : Get an array of the items that are before it





      share|improve this answer































        6














        CW for all trivial entries




        Clean, 19 bytes



        Haskell version works in Clean too.



        import StdLib
        inits


        Try it online!




        Haskell, 22 bytes





        import Data.List
        inits


        Try it online!




        Prolog (SWI), 6 bytes



        prefix


        Try it online!






        share|improve this answer































          6















          Perl 6, 13 bytes



          {(),|[,] @_}


          Try it online!



          To explain:



          In Perl 6 you can wrap an operator in square brackets as an alternate way to write a list reduction. [+] @array returns the sum of the elements in @array, [*] @array returns the product, etc. You can also precede the operator with a backslash to make a "triangular" reduction, which some languages call "scan." So [+] @array returns a list consisting of the first element of @array, then the sum of the first two elements, then the sum of the first three elements, etc.



          Here [,] @_ is a triangular reduction over the input array @_ using the list construction operator ,. So it evaluates to a lists of lists: the first element of @_, the first two elements of @_, etc. That's almost what's needed, but the problem calls for a single empty list first. So the first element of the return list is a literal empty list (),, then the reduction over the input list is flattened into the rest of the return list with |.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            O_o what is even happening here
            – ASCII-only
            Dec 8 at 4:12










          • @ASCII-only triangular reduction
            – user202729
            Dec 8 at 4:33



















          5















          Python 2, 32 bytes





          f=lambda l:(l and f(l[:-1]))+[l]


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Also works in Python 3
            – ASCII-only
            Dec 8 at 4:14



















          5















          R, 40 39 bytes





          function(L)lapply(0:length(L),head,x=L)


          Try it online!



          -1 byte thanks to digEmAll



          The output of R's list type is a bit weird; it uses sequential indexing, so for instance, the output for



          list(1,2) is



          [[1]]                     # first list element
          list()

          [[2]] # second list element
          [[2]][[1]] # first element of second list element
          [1] 1


          [[3]] # third list element
          [[3]][[1]] # first element of third list element
          [1] 1

          [[3]][[2]] # etc.
          [1] 2


          Taking input as a vector instead gives a neater output format, although then the inputs are not technically lists.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            39 using lapply
            – digEmAll
            Dec 8 at 12:46










          • @digEmAll thanks!
            – Giuseppe
            Dec 10 at 14:41



















          4














          JavaScript, 36 bytes





          a=>[...a,0].map((x,y)=>a.slice(0,y))


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer































            4














            Mathematica, 22 21 bytes



            -1 byte thanks to Misha Lavrov!



            {}~FoldList@Append~#&


            Pure function. Takes a list as input and returns a list of lists as output. I believe this is the shortest possible solution.






            share|improve this answer























            • We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
              – Misha Lavrov
              Dec 7 at 21:59










            • @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
              – LegionMammal978
              Dec 7 at 22:46



















            3















            J, 5 bytes



            a:,<


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer





























              3















              PowerShell, 65 bytes





              param($a)'';$x=,0*($y=$a.count);0..--$y|%{$x[$_]=@($a[0..$_])};$x


              Try it online!



              PowerShell helpfully unrolls lists-of-lists when the default Write-Output happens at program completion, so you get one item per line. Tack on a -join',' to see the list-of-lists better, by converting the inner lists into strings.



              (Ab)uses the fact that attempting to output an empty array (e.g., @()) results in no output, so an empty array input just has '' as the output, since the $a[0..$_] will result in nothing. It will also throw out some spectacular error messages.






              share|improve this answer























              • Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                – Veskah
                Dec 8 at 2:59












              • @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                – AdmBorkBork
                Dec 10 at 13:44



















              3















              K (ngn/k), 8 bytes



              ,(,!0),


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer

















              • 1




                This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                – streetster
                Dec 7 at 20:46






              • 1




                @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                – ngn
                Dec 7 at 21:07








              • 1




                @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                – ngn
                Dec 7 at 21:13





















              3















              Common Lisp, 39 bytes





              (defun f(l)`(,@(if l(f(butlast l))),l))


              Try it online!



              Explanation



              (defun f(l)                           )  ; Define a function f
              `( ) ; With the list (essentially capable of interpolation), containing:
              ,@ ; The value of, flattened to one level
              (if l ) ; If l is not the empty list (which is the representation of nil, i.e. the only falsy value)
              (f(butlast l)) ; Recurse with all of l but the tail
              ,l ; The value of l





              share|improve this answer





























                3














                F#, 53 bytes



                I've actually got two pretty similar answers for this, both the same length. They both take a generic sequence s as a parameter.



                First solution:



                let i s=Seq.init(Seq.length s+1)(fun n->Seq.take n s)


                Try it online!



                Seq.take takes the first n elements of the sequence. Seq.init creates a new sequence with a count (in this case) of the length of sequence s plus 1, and for each element in the sequence takes the first n elements in s.



                Second solution:



                let i s=Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s}


                Similar to before, except it creates a sequence from 0 to the length of s. Then takes that number of elements from s.



                Try this online too!






                share|improve this answer























                • fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                  – Embodiment of Ignorance
                  Dec 9 at 6:41





















                3















                Husk, 2 bytes



                Θḣ


                Gets all the eads and then prepends Θ (in this case ):



                Try it online!



                (needs type annotation for empty list: Try it online!)






                share|improve this answer





























                  3














                  MATL, 15 12 bytes



                  3 bytes saved thanks to @Giuseppe



                  vin:"G@:)]Xh


                  Try it at MATL Online.



                  Due to the way that MATL displays the output, you can't explicitly see the empty array in the cell array. Here is a version that shows the output a little more explicitly.



                  Explanation



                  v       # Vertically concatenate the (empty) stack to create the array 
                  i # Explicitly grab the input
                  n # Compute the number of elements in the input (N)
                  : # Create an array from [1, ..., N]
                  " # Loop through this array
                  G # For each of these numbers, M
                  @: # Create an array from [1, ..., M]
                  ) # Use this to index into the initial array
                  ] # End of the for loop
                  Xh # Concatenate the entire stack into a cell array





                  share|improve this answer























                  • use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                    – Giuseppe
                    Dec 10 at 18:34










                  • @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                    – Suever
                    Dec 10 at 22:04



















                  3















                  SWI PROLOG 22 bytes



                  i(X,Y):-append(X,_,Y).






                  share|improve this answer





























                    2















                    Charcoal, 6 bytes



                    Eθ…θκθ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                     θ      Input array
                    E Map over elements
                    θ Input array
                    … Moulded to length
                    κ Current loop index
                    Implicitly print each array double-spaced
                    θ Input array
                    Implicitly print


                    It's possible at a cost of 1 byte to ask Charcoal to print an n+1-element array which includes the input as its last element, but the output is the same, although the cursor position would be different if you then went on to print something else.






                    share|improve this answer





























                      2















                      Groovy, 37 bytes



                      {x->(0..x.size()).collect{x[0..<it]}}


                      Try it online!






                      share|improve this answer





























                        2















                        Japt, 5 bytes



                        Êò@¯Y


                        Try it online!






                        share|improve this answer





























                          2















                          brainfuck, 43 bytes



                          Take a list of non-null characters as input and returns all prefixes separated by newline. Requires double-infinite or wrapping tape.



                          ,>-[+>,]<[-<]<<++++++++++[[<]>[.>]>[-<+>]<]


                          Try it online!






                          share|improve this answer























                          • Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                            – user202729
                            Dec 8 at 9:58










                          • 40 bytes with some rearranging
                            – Jo King
                            Dec 8 at 10:19



















                          2















                          C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 39 bytes





                          x=>x.Select((_,i)=>x.Take(i)).Append(x)


                          Try it online!






                          share|improve this answer





















                          • You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                            – LiefdeWen
                            Dec 11 at 9:51










                          • @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                            – dana
                            Dec 11 at 10:35










                          • With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                            – dana
                            Dec 11 at 10:59



















                          2















                          C (gcc), 102 bytes





                          Pretty long, as C quite obviously isn't well-suited to manipulating lists of lists.



                          Takes in a pointer to the first element of the input array, the length of the array, and a pointer to the variable in which the pointer to output will be stored. Produces a list of lists such that the first integer in the linear array stores the number of sub-lists. Sub-lists start with the number of elements, and are stored in memory in a contiguous manner.



                          p(r,e,f,i,x)int*e,**r,*x;{x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);*x++=f;for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i)*x=i,memcpy(x+1,e,4*i);}


                          Try it online!



                          Degolf



                          p(r,e,f,i,x) int*e,**r,*x; { // Declare function p. e is the input array, 
                          // r is a pointer to the variable that will store output,
                          // and x is a local iterator for r.
                          x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);// Allocate 2*(n+1)*(n+2)+4 bytes of memory,
                          // and store pointers in r and x.
                          *x++=f; // Store the number of arrays in the first variable (n+1)
                          for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i) // Iterate from 0 to f; x is incremented by i+1 every loop.
                          *x=i, // Store the length of the current sub-list.
                          memcpy(x+1,e,4*i); // Copy the data.
                          }





                          share|improve this answer





























                            2















                            F# (Mono), 45 bytes





                            fun x->List.mapi(fun i y->List.take i x)x@[x]


                            Try it online!



                            I am not totally sure if this is valid, but it seems like it follows the same "anonymous lambda" syntax that I've seem used in several other languages.






                            share|improve this answer































                              2















                              Java 8+, 86 77 bytes



                              -9 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen (getting rid of the import)!





                              x->java.util.stream.IntStream.range(0,x.size()+1).mapToObj(t->x.subList(0,t))


                              Try it online!



                              Alternative, 65 bytes



                              The following will print the results to stdout (due to Olivier Grégoire):



                              x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.print(x.subList(0,i++));}


                              Try it online






                              share|improve this answer























                              • You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                – Kevin Cruijssen
                                Dec 10 at 7:44










                              • @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                – BMO
                                Dec 10 at 14:19










                              • x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                – Olivier Grégoire
                                Dec 10 at 17:01












                              • @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                – BMO
                                Dec 10 at 17:55










                              • @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                – Olivier Grégoire
                                Dec 10 at 23:28



















                              2















                              Ruby, 31 29 bytes





                              ->a{[a*i=0]+a.map{a[0,i+=1]}}


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation:



                              ->a{             # take array input a
                              [a*i=0]+ # set i to 0 and add whatever comes next to [] (a*0 == )
                              a.map{ # for every element in a (basically do a.length times)
                              a[0,i+=1] # increment i and return the first i-1 elements of a to map
                              }
                              }





                              share|improve this answer































                                1















                                05AB1E, 3 bytes



                                η¯š


                                Explanation:



                                η    Prefixes
                                š Prepend
                                ¯ Global array (empty by default)


                                Try it online!






                                share|improve this answer





























                                  1















                                  RAD, 7 bytes



                                  (⊂⍬),,


                                  Try it online!



                                  This also works in Dyalog APL as a function.



                                  How?



                                  This works the same for both APL and RAD, given their close relation.





                                  • (⊂⍬) the empty array


                                  • , prepended to


                                  • , the prefixes (which exclude the empty array.)






                                  share|improve this answer



























                                    1 2
                                    3
                                    next



                                    Your Answer





                                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                                    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                                    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                                    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                                    });
                                    });
                                    }, "mathjax-editing");

                                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                                    StackExchange.snippets.init();
                                    });
                                    });
                                    }, "code-snippets");

                                    StackExchange.ready(function() {
                                    var channelOptions = {
                                    tags: "".split(" "),
                                    id: "200"
                                    };
                                    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                                    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                                    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                                    createEditor();
                                    });
                                    }
                                    else {
                                    createEditor();
                                    }
                                    });

                                    function createEditor() {
                                    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                                    heartbeatType: 'answer',
                                    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                                    convertImagesToLinks: false,
                                    noModals: true,
                                    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                                    reputationToPostImages: null,
                                    bindNavPrevention: true,
                                    postfix: "",
                                    imageUploader: {
                                    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                                    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                                    allowUrls: true
                                    },
                                    onDemand: true,
                                    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                                    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                                    });


                                    }
                                    });














                                    draft saved

                                    draft discarded


















                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                    function () {
                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177146%2fp-pr-pre-pref-prefi-prefix-prefixe-prefixes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                    }
                                    );

                                    Post as a guest















                                    Required, but never shown

























                                    63 Answers
                                    63






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes








                                    63 Answers
                                    63






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes









                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes








                                    1 2
                                    3
                                    next










                                    15















                                    Haskell, 20 bytes



                                    Edit: Yet a byte shorter with a completely different scan.



                                    An anonymous function slightly beating the trivial import.





                                    scanr(_->init)=<<id


                                    Try it online!




                                    • Uses =<< for the abbreviation (scanr(_->init)=<<id) l = scanr(_->init) l l.

                                    • Scans a list l from right to left, collecting intermediate results with the function _->init.

                                    • That function ignores the elements scanned through (they're only used to get the right total length for the collected results), so really iterates applying init to the initial value of the scan, which is also l.






                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      15















                                      Haskell, 20 bytes



                                      Edit: Yet a byte shorter with a completely different scan.



                                      An anonymous function slightly beating the trivial import.





                                      scanr(_->init)=<<id


                                      Try it online!




                                      • Uses =<< for the abbreviation (scanr(_->init)=<<id) l = scanr(_->init) l l.

                                      • Scans a list l from right to left, collecting intermediate results with the function _->init.

                                      • That function ignores the elements scanned through (they're only used to get the right total length for the collected results), so really iterates applying init to the initial value of the scan, which is also l.






                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        15












                                        15








                                        15







                                        Haskell, 20 bytes



                                        Edit: Yet a byte shorter with a completely different scan.



                                        An anonymous function slightly beating the trivial import.





                                        scanr(_->init)=<<id


                                        Try it online!




                                        • Uses =<< for the abbreviation (scanr(_->init)=<<id) l = scanr(_->init) l l.

                                        • Scans a list l from right to left, collecting intermediate results with the function _->init.

                                        • That function ignores the elements scanned through (they're only used to get the right total length for the collected results), so really iterates applying init to the initial value of the scan, which is also l.






                                        share|improve this answer















                                        Haskell, 20 bytes



                                        Edit: Yet a byte shorter with a completely different scan.



                                        An anonymous function slightly beating the trivial import.





                                        scanr(_->init)=<<id


                                        Try it online!




                                        • Uses =<< for the abbreviation (scanr(_->init)=<<id) l = scanr(_->init) l l.

                                        • Scans a list l from right to left, collecting intermediate results with the function _->init.

                                        • That function ignores the elements scanned through (they're only used to get the right total length for the collected results), so really iterates applying init to the initial value of the scan, which is also l.







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Dec 7 at 20:05

























                                        answered Dec 7 at 19:43









                                        Ørjan Johansen

                                        6,44411131




                                        6,44411131























                                            13















                                            brainfuck, 21 12 bytes



                                            -9 bytes thanks to Arnauld suggesting the separator ÿ instead of newlines



                                            -[[<]>[.>],]


                                            Try it online!



                                            Takes bytes through STDIN with no null bytes and prints a series of prefixes separated by the ÿ character with a leading ÿ character. For example, for the input Prefixes, the output is ÿÿPÿPrÿPreÿPrefÿPrefiÿPrefixÿPrefixeÿPrefixes.



                                            For readability, here's a version with newlines instead.



                                            Explanation:



                                            -              Create a ÿ character in cell 0
                                            [ ,] While input, starting with the ÿ
                                            [<]> Go to the start of the string
                                            [.>] Print the string
                                            , Append the input to the end of the string





                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                              – Dev
                                              Dec 10 at 3:11
















                                            13















                                            brainfuck, 21 12 bytes



                                            -9 bytes thanks to Arnauld suggesting the separator ÿ instead of newlines



                                            -[[<]>[.>],]


                                            Try it online!



                                            Takes bytes through STDIN with no null bytes and prints a series of prefixes separated by the ÿ character with a leading ÿ character. For example, for the input Prefixes, the output is ÿÿPÿPrÿPreÿPrefÿPrefiÿPrefixÿPrefixeÿPrefixes.



                                            For readability, here's a version with newlines instead.



                                            Explanation:



                                            -              Create a ÿ character in cell 0
                                            [ ,] While input, starting with the ÿ
                                            [<]> Go to the start of the string
                                            [.>] Print the string
                                            , Append the input to the end of the string





                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                              – Dev
                                              Dec 10 at 3:11














                                            13












                                            13








                                            13







                                            brainfuck, 21 12 bytes



                                            -9 bytes thanks to Arnauld suggesting the separator ÿ instead of newlines



                                            -[[<]>[.>],]


                                            Try it online!



                                            Takes bytes through STDIN with no null bytes and prints a series of prefixes separated by the ÿ character with a leading ÿ character. For example, for the input Prefixes, the output is ÿÿPÿPrÿPreÿPrefÿPrefiÿPrefixÿPrefixeÿPrefixes.



                                            For readability, here's a version with newlines instead.



                                            Explanation:



                                            -              Create a ÿ character in cell 0
                                            [ ,] While input, starting with the ÿ
                                            [<]> Go to the start of the string
                                            [.>] Print the string
                                            , Append the input to the end of the string





                                            share|improve this answer















                                            brainfuck, 21 12 bytes



                                            -9 bytes thanks to Arnauld suggesting the separator ÿ instead of newlines



                                            -[[<]>[.>],]


                                            Try it online!



                                            Takes bytes through STDIN with no null bytes and prints a series of prefixes separated by the ÿ character with a leading ÿ character. For example, for the input Prefixes, the output is ÿÿPÿPrÿPreÿPrefÿPrefiÿPrefixÿPrefixeÿPrefixes.



                                            For readability, here's a version with newlines instead.



                                            Explanation:



                                            -              Create a ÿ character in cell 0
                                            [ ,] While input, starting with the ÿ
                                            [<]> Go to the start of the string
                                            [.>] Print the string
                                            , Append the input to the end of the string






                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Dec 9 at 22:28

























                                            answered Dec 8 at 8:56









                                            Jo King

                                            20.7k247109




                                            20.7k247109








                                            • 1




                                              This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                              – Dev
                                              Dec 10 at 3:11














                                            • 1




                                              This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                              – Dev
                                              Dec 10 at 3:11








                                            1




                                            1




                                            This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                            – Dev
                                            Dec 10 at 3:11




                                            This only works on BF implementations with 8-bit, unsigned, wrapping cells.
                                            – Dev
                                            Dec 10 at 3:11











                                            10














                                            JavaScript (ES6), 33 bytes



                                            a=>[b=,...a.map(n=>b=[...b,n])]


                                            Try it online!



                                            How?



                                            +--- a = input array
                                            |
                                            | +--- initialize b to an empty array and include it as the first entry
                                            | | of the output (whatever the input is)
                                            | |
                                            | | +--- for each value n in a:
                                            | | |
                                            | | | +--- append n to b and include this new array in
                                            | | | | the final output
                                            | | | |
                                            a => [b = , ...a.map(n => b = [...b, n])]
                                            | |
                                            +---------+--------+
                                            |
                                            spread syntax: expands all elements of
                                            the child array within the parent array





                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 12:54










                                            • @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:05










                                            • Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 13:08






                                            • 2




                                              Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:30
















                                            10














                                            JavaScript (ES6), 33 bytes



                                            a=>[b=,...a.map(n=>b=[...b,n])]


                                            Try it online!



                                            How?



                                            +--- a = input array
                                            |
                                            | +--- initialize b to an empty array and include it as the first entry
                                            | | of the output (whatever the input is)
                                            | |
                                            | | +--- for each value n in a:
                                            | | |
                                            | | | +--- append n to b and include this new array in
                                            | | | | the final output
                                            | | | |
                                            a => [b = , ...a.map(n => b = [...b, n])]
                                            | |
                                            +---------+--------+
                                            |
                                            spread syntax: expands all elements of
                                            the child array within the parent array





                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 12:54










                                            • @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:05










                                            • Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 13:08






                                            • 2




                                              Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:30














                                            10












                                            10








                                            10






                                            JavaScript (ES6), 33 bytes



                                            a=>[b=,...a.map(n=>b=[...b,n])]


                                            Try it online!



                                            How?



                                            +--- a = input array
                                            |
                                            | +--- initialize b to an empty array and include it as the first entry
                                            | | of the output (whatever the input is)
                                            | |
                                            | | +--- for each value n in a:
                                            | | |
                                            | | | +--- append n to b and include this new array in
                                            | | | | the final output
                                            | | | |
                                            a => [b = , ...a.map(n => b = [...b, n])]
                                            | |
                                            +---------+--------+
                                            |
                                            spread syntax: expands all elements of
                                            the child array within the parent array





                                            share|improve this answer














                                            JavaScript (ES6), 33 bytes



                                            a=>[b=,...a.map(n=>b=[...b,n])]


                                            Try it online!



                                            How?



                                            +--- a = input array
                                            |
                                            | +--- initialize b to an empty array and include it as the first entry
                                            | | of the output (whatever the input is)
                                            | |
                                            | | +--- for each value n in a:
                                            | | |
                                            | | | +--- append n to b and include this new array in
                                            | | | | the final output
                                            | | | |
                                            a => [b = , ...a.map(n => b = [...b, n])]
                                            | |
                                            +---------+--------+
                                            |
                                            spread syntax: expands all elements of
                                            the child array within the parent array






                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Dec 8 at 8:15

























                                            answered Dec 7 at 19:22









                                            Arnauld

                                            72.4k689304




                                            72.4k689304












                                            • wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 12:54










                                            • @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:05










                                            • Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 13:08






                                            • 2




                                              Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:30


















                                            • wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 12:54










                                            • @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:05










                                            • Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                              – Brian H.
                                              Dec 10 at 13:08






                                            • 2




                                              Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 10 at 13:30
















                                            wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                            – Brian H.
                                            Dec 10 at 12:54




                                            wow, that's a whole new level of code explanation, awesome job :O
                                            – Brian H.
                                            Dec 10 at 12:54












                                            @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 10 at 13:05




                                            @BrianH. Thank you! Simple tasks are good opportunities to write detailed explanations that can't be brought up in denser code.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 10 at 13:05












                                            Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                            – Brian H.
                                            Dec 10 at 13:08




                                            Did you make it by hand? or did you get help from any weird software i've never heard about?
                                            – Brian H.
                                            Dec 10 at 13:08




                                            2




                                            2




                                            Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 10 at 13:30




                                            Just Notepad++ with some column mode editing.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 10 at 13:30











                                            6















                                            Jelly, 3 bytes



                                            ṭṖƤ


                                            Try it online!



                                            How it works



                                            ṭṖƤ  Main link. Argument: A

                                            Ƥ Map the link to the left over all non-empty(!) prefixes of A.
                                            Ṗ Pop; remove the last element.
                                            ṭ Tack; append A to the resulting list.





                                            share|improve this answer


























                                              6















                                              Jelly, 3 bytes



                                              ṭṖƤ


                                              Try it online!



                                              How it works



                                              ṭṖƤ  Main link. Argument: A

                                              Ƥ Map the link to the left over all non-empty(!) prefixes of A.
                                              Ṗ Pop; remove the last element.
                                              ṭ Tack; append A to the resulting list.





                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                6












                                                6








                                                6







                                                Jelly, 3 bytes



                                                ṭṖƤ


                                                Try it online!



                                                How it works



                                                ṭṖƤ  Main link. Argument: A

                                                Ƥ Map the link to the left over all non-empty(!) prefixes of A.
                                                Ṗ Pop; remove the last element.
                                                ṭ Tack; append A to the resulting list.





                                                share|improve this answer













                                                Jelly, 3 bytes



                                                ṭṖƤ


                                                Try it online!



                                                How it works



                                                ṭṖƤ  Main link. Argument: A

                                                Ƥ Map the link to the left over all non-empty(!) prefixes of A.
                                                Ṗ Pop; remove the last element.
                                                ṭ Tack; append A to the resulting list.






                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Dec 7 at 20:03









                                                Dennis

                                                186k32296735




                                                186k32296735























                                                    6















                                                    Japt, 4 bytes



                                                    ²£¯Y


                                                    Try it online!



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    ²       :Add an arbitrary extra item to the end of the array
                                                    £ :For each item in the new array:
                                                    ¯Y : Get an array of the items that are before it





                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                      6















                                                      Japt, 4 bytes



                                                      ²£¯Y


                                                      Try it online!



                                                      Explanation:



                                                      ²       :Add an arbitrary extra item to the end of the array
                                                      £ :For each item in the new array:
                                                      ¯Y : Get an array of the items that are before it





                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                        6












                                                        6








                                                        6







                                                        Japt, 4 bytes



                                                        ²£¯Y


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Explanation:



                                                        ²       :Add an arbitrary extra item to the end of the array
                                                        £ :For each item in the new array:
                                                        ¯Y : Get an array of the items that are before it





                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                        Japt, 4 bytes



                                                        ²£¯Y


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Explanation:



                                                        ²       :Add an arbitrary extra item to the end of the array
                                                        £ :For each item in the new array:
                                                        ¯Y : Get an array of the items that are before it






                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        edited Dec 8 at 9:31

























                                                        answered Dec 7 at 20:05









                                                        Kamil Drakari

                                                        2,971416




                                                        2,971416























                                                            6














                                                            CW for all trivial entries




                                                            Clean, 19 bytes



                                                            Haskell version works in Clean too.



                                                            import StdLib
                                                            inits


                                                            Try it online!




                                                            Haskell, 22 bytes





                                                            import Data.List
                                                            inits


                                                            Try it online!




                                                            Prolog (SWI), 6 bytes



                                                            prefix


                                                            Try it online!






                                                            share|improve this answer




























                                                              6














                                                              CW for all trivial entries




                                                              Clean, 19 bytes



                                                              Haskell version works in Clean too.



                                                              import StdLib
                                                              inits


                                                              Try it online!




                                                              Haskell, 22 bytes





                                                              import Data.List
                                                              inits


                                                              Try it online!




                                                              Prolog (SWI), 6 bytes



                                                              prefix


                                                              Try it online!






                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                6












                                                                6








                                                                6






                                                                CW for all trivial entries




                                                                Clean, 19 bytes



                                                                Haskell version works in Clean too.



                                                                import StdLib
                                                                inits


                                                                Try it online!




                                                                Haskell, 22 bytes





                                                                import Data.List
                                                                inits


                                                                Try it online!




                                                                Prolog (SWI), 6 bytes



                                                                prefix


                                                                Try it online!






                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                CW for all trivial entries




                                                                Clean, 19 bytes



                                                                Haskell version works in Clean too.



                                                                import StdLib
                                                                inits


                                                                Try it online!




                                                                Haskell, 22 bytes





                                                                import Data.List
                                                                inits


                                                                Try it online!




                                                                Prolog (SWI), 6 bytes



                                                                prefix


                                                                Try it online!







                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                edited Dec 10 at 1:04


























                                                                community wiki





                                                                6 revs, 5 users 35%
                                                                flawr
























                                                                    6















                                                                    Perl 6, 13 bytes



                                                                    {(),|[,] @_}


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    To explain:



                                                                    In Perl 6 you can wrap an operator in square brackets as an alternate way to write a list reduction. [+] @array returns the sum of the elements in @array, [*] @array returns the product, etc. You can also precede the operator with a backslash to make a "triangular" reduction, which some languages call "scan." So [+] @array returns a list consisting of the first element of @array, then the sum of the first two elements, then the sum of the first three elements, etc.



                                                                    Here [,] @_ is a triangular reduction over the input array @_ using the list construction operator ,. So it evaluates to a lists of lists: the first element of @_, the first two elements of @_, etc. That's almost what's needed, but the problem calls for a single empty list first. So the first element of the return list is a literal empty list (),, then the reduction over the input list is flattened into the rest of the return list with |.






                                                                    share|improve this answer



















                                                                    • 2




                                                                      O_o what is even happening here
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:12










                                                                    • @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                      – user202729
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:33
















                                                                    6















                                                                    Perl 6, 13 bytes



                                                                    {(),|[,] @_}


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    To explain:



                                                                    In Perl 6 you can wrap an operator in square brackets as an alternate way to write a list reduction. [+] @array returns the sum of the elements in @array, [*] @array returns the product, etc. You can also precede the operator with a backslash to make a "triangular" reduction, which some languages call "scan." So [+] @array returns a list consisting of the first element of @array, then the sum of the first two elements, then the sum of the first three elements, etc.



                                                                    Here [,] @_ is a triangular reduction over the input array @_ using the list construction operator ,. So it evaluates to a lists of lists: the first element of @_, the first two elements of @_, etc. That's almost what's needed, but the problem calls for a single empty list first. So the first element of the return list is a literal empty list (),, then the reduction over the input list is flattened into the rest of the return list with |.






                                                                    share|improve this answer



















                                                                    • 2




                                                                      O_o what is even happening here
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:12










                                                                    • @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                      – user202729
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:33














                                                                    6












                                                                    6








                                                                    6







                                                                    Perl 6, 13 bytes



                                                                    {(),|[,] @_}


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    To explain:



                                                                    In Perl 6 you can wrap an operator in square brackets as an alternate way to write a list reduction. [+] @array returns the sum of the elements in @array, [*] @array returns the product, etc. You can also precede the operator with a backslash to make a "triangular" reduction, which some languages call "scan." So [+] @array returns a list consisting of the first element of @array, then the sum of the first two elements, then the sum of the first three elements, etc.



                                                                    Here [,] @_ is a triangular reduction over the input array @_ using the list construction operator ,. So it evaluates to a lists of lists: the first element of @_, the first two elements of @_, etc. That's almost what's needed, but the problem calls for a single empty list first. So the first element of the return list is a literal empty list (),, then the reduction over the input list is flattened into the rest of the return list with |.






                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                    Perl 6, 13 bytes



                                                                    {(),|[,] @_}


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    To explain:



                                                                    In Perl 6 you can wrap an operator in square brackets as an alternate way to write a list reduction. [+] @array returns the sum of the elements in @array, [*] @array returns the product, etc. You can also precede the operator with a backslash to make a "triangular" reduction, which some languages call "scan." So [+] @array returns a list consisting of the first element of @array, then the sum of the first two elements, then the sum of the first three elements, etc.



                                                                    Here [,] @_ is a triangular reduction over the input array @_ using the list construction operator ,. So it evaluates to a lists of lists: the first element of @_, the first two elements of @_, etc. That's almost what's needed, but the problem calls for a single empty list first. So the first element of the return list is a literal empty list (),, then the reduction over the input list is flattened into the rest of the return list with |.







                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                    edited Dec 11 at 18:21

























                                                                    answered Dec 7 at 22:53









                                                                    Sean

                                                                    3,36636




                                                                    3,36636








                                                                    • 2




                                                                      O_o what is even happening here
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:12










                                                                    • @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                      – user202729
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:33














                                                                    • 2




                                                                      O_o what is even happening here
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:12










                                                                    • @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                      – user202729
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:33








                                                                    2




                                                                    2




                                                                    O_o what is even happening here
                                                                    – ASCII-only
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:12




                                                                    O_o what is even happening here
                                                                    – ASCII-only
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:12












                                                                    @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                    – user202729
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:33




                                                                    @ASCII-only triangular reduction
                                                                    – user202729
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:33











                                                                    5















                                                                    Python 2, 32 bytes





                                                                    f=lambda l:(l and f(l[:-1]))+[l]


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer

















                                                                    • 1




                                                                      Also works in Python 3
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:14
















                                                                    5















                                                                    Python 2, 32 bytes





                                                                    f=lambda l:(l and f(l[:-1]))+[l]


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer

















                                                                    • 1




                                                                      Also works in Python 3
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:14














                                                                    5












                                                                    5








                                                                    5







                                                                    Python 2, 32 bytes





                                                                    f=lambda l:(l and f(l[:-1]))+[l]


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer













                                                                    Python 2, 32 bytes





                                                                    f=lambda l:(l and f(l[:-1]))+[l]


                                                                    Try it online!







                                                                    share|improve this answer












                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                    share|improve this answer










                                                                    answered Dec 7 at 20:15









                                                                    ovs

                                                                    18.7k21059




                                                                    18.7k21059








                                                                    • 1




                                                                      Also works in Python 3
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:14














                                                                    • 1




                                                                      Also works in Python 3
                                                                      – ASCII-only
                                                                      Dec 8 at 4:14








                                                                    1




                                                                    1




                                                                    Also works in Python 3
                                                                    – ASCII-only
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:14




                                                                    Also works in Python 3
                                                                    – ASCII-only
                                                                    Dec 8 at 4:14











                                                                    5















                                                                    R, 40 39 bytes





                                                                    function(L)lapply(0:length(L),head,x=L)


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    -1 byte thanks to digEmAll



                                                                    The output of R's list type is a bit weird; it uses sequential indexing, so for instance, the output for



                                                                    list(1,2) is



                                                                    [[1]]                     # first list element
                                                                    list()

                                                                    [[2]] # second list element
                                                                    [[2]][[1]] # first element of second list element
                                                                    [1] 1


                                                                    [[3]] # third list element
                                                                    [[3]][[1]] # first element of third list element
                                                                    [1] 1

                                                                    [[3]][[2]] # etc.
                                                                    [1] 2


                                                                    Taking input as a vector instead gives a neater output format, although then the inputs are not technically lists.






                                                                    share|improve this answer



















                                                                    • 1




                                                                      39 using lapply
                                                                      – digEmAll
                                                                      Dec 8 at 12:46










                                                                    • @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:41
















                                                                    5















                                                                    R, 40 39 bytes





                                                                    function(L)lapply(0:length(L),head,x=L)


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    -1 byte thanks to digEmAll



                                                                    The output of R's list type is a bit weird; it uses sequential indexing, so for instance, the output for



                                                                    list(1,2) is



                                                                    [[1]]                     # first list element
                                                                    list()

                                                                    [[2]] # second list element
                                                                    [[2]][[1]] # first element of second list element
                                                                    [1] 1


                                                                    [[3]] # third list element
                                                                    [[3]][[1]] # first element of third list element
                                                                    [1] 1

                                                                    [[3]][[2]] # etc.
                                                                    [1] 2


                                                                    Taking input as a vector instead gives a neater output format, although then the inputs are not technically lists.






                                                                    share|improve this answer



















                                                                    • 1




                                                                      39 using lapply
                                                                      – digEmAll
                                                                      Dec 8 at 12:46










                                                                    • @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:41














                                                                    5












                                                                    5








                                                                    5







                                                                    R, 40 39 bytes





                                                                    function(L)lapply(0:length(L),head,x=L)


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    -1 byte thanks to digEmAll



                                                                    The output of R's list type is a bit weird; it uses sequential indexing, so for instance, the output for



                                                                    list(1,2) is



                                                                    [[1]]                     # first list element
                                                                    list()

                                                                    [[2]] # second list element
                                                                    [[2]][[1]] # first element of second list element
                                                                    [1] 1


                                                                    [[3]] # third list element
                                                                    [[3]][[1]] # first element of third list element
                                                                    [1] 1

                                                                    [[3]][[2]] # etc.
                                                                    [1] 2


                                                                    Taking input as a vector instead gives a neater output format, although then the inputs are not technically lists.






                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                    R, 40 39 bytes





                                                                    function(L)lapply(0:length(L),head,x=L)


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    -1 byte thanks to digEmAll



                                                                    The output of R's list type is a bit weird; it uses sequential indexing, so for instance, the output for



                                                                    list(1,2) is



                                                                    [[1]]                     # first list element
                                                                    list()

                                                                    [[2]] # second list element
                                                                    [[2]][[1]] # first element of second list element
                                                                    [1] 1


                                                                    [[3]] # third list element
                                                                    [[3]][[1]] # first element of third list element
                                                                    [1] 1

                                                                    [[3]][[2]] # etc.
                                                                    [1] 2


                                                                    Taking input as a vector instead gives a neater output format, although then the inputs are not technically lists.







                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                    edited Dec 10 at 14:40

























                                                                    answered Dec 7 at 20:12









                                                                    Giuseppe

                                                                    16.6k31052




                                                                    16.6k31052








                                                                    • 1




                                                                      39 using lapply
                                                                      – digEmAll
                                                                      Dec 8 at 12:46










                                                                    • @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:41














                                                                    • 1




                                                                      39 using lapply
                                                                      – digEmAll
                                                                      Dec 8 at 12:46










                                                                    • @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:41








                                                                    1




                                                                    1




                                                                    39 using lapply
                                                                    – digEmAll
                                                                    Dec 8 at 12:46




                                                                    39 using lapply
                                                                    – digEmAll
                                                                    Dec 8 at 12:46












                                                                    @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                    – Giuseppe
                                                                    Dec 10 at 14:41




                                                                    @digEmAll thanks!
                                                                    – Giuseppe
                                                                    Dec 10 at 14:41











                                                                    4














                                                                    JavaScript, 36 bytes





                                                                    a=>[...a,0].map((x,y)=>a.slice(0,y))


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                                      4














                                                                      JavaScript, 36 bytes





                                                                      a=>[...a,0].map((x,y)=>a.slice(0,y))


                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                        4












                                                                        4








                                                                        4






                                                                        JavaScript, 36 bytes





                                                                        a=>[...a,0].map((x,y)=>a.slice(0,y))


                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                        JavaScript, 36 bytes





                                                                        a=>[...a,0].map((x,y)=>a.slice(0,y))


                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                        edited Dec 7 at 21:27

























                                                                        answered Dec 7 at 21:16









                                                                        Oliver

                                                                        4,7351831




                                                                        4,7351831























                                                                            4














                                                                            Mathematica, 22 21 bytes



                                                                            -1 byte thanks to Misha Lavrov!



                                                                            {}~FoldList@Append~#&


                                                                            Pure function. Takes a list as input and returns a list of lists as output. I believe this is the shortest possible solution.






                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                            • We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                              – Misha Lavrov
                                                                              Dec 7 at 21:59










                                                                            • @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                              – LegionMammal978
                                                                              Dec 7 at 22:46
















                                                                            4














                                                                            Mathematica, 22 21 bytes



                                                                            -1 byte thanks to Misha Lavrov!



                                                                            {}~FoldList@Append~#&


                                                                            Pure function. Takes a list as input and returns a list of lists as output. I believe this is the shortest possible solution.






                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                            • We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                              – Misha Lavrov
                                                                              Dec 7 at 21:59










                                                                            • @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                              – LegionMammal978
                                                                              Dec 7 at 22:46














                                                                            4












                                                                            4








                                                                            4






                                                                            Mathematica, 22 21 bytes



                                                                            -1 byte thanks to Misha Lavrov!



                                                                            {}~FoldList@Append~#&


                                                                            Pure function. Takes a list as input and returns a list of lists as output. I believe this is the shortest possible solution.






                                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                                            Mathematica, 22 21 bytes



                                                                            -1 byte thanks to Misha Lavrov!



                                                                            {}~FoldList@Append~#&


                                                                            Pure function. Takes a list as input and returns a list of lists as output. I believe this is the shortest possible solution.







                                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                                            edited Dec 7 at 22:47

























                                                                            answered Dec 7 at 21:33









                                                                            LegionMammal978

                                                                            15.1k41852




                                                                            15.1k41852












                                                                            • We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                              – Misha Lavrov
                                                                              Dec 7 at 21:59










                                                                            • @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                              – LegionMammal978
                                                                              Dec 7 at 22:46


















                                                                            • We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                              – Misha Lavrov
                                                                              Dec 7 at 21:59










                                                                            • @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                              – LegionMammal978
                                                                              Dec 7 at 22:46
















                                                                            We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                            – Misha Lavrov
                                                                            Dec 7 at 21:59




                                                                            We can write the same solution more compactly as {}~FoldList@Append~#&.
                                                                            – Misha Lavrov
                                                                            Dec 7 at 21:59












                                                                            @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                            – LegionMammal978
                                                                            Dec 7 at 22:46




                                                                            @MishaLavrov Thanks! I didn't think to use the curried 1+2-argument form like that.
                                                                            – LegionMammal978
                                                                            Dec 7 at 22:46











                                                                            3















                                                                            J, 5 bytes



                                                                            a:,<


                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                              3















                                                                              J, 5 bytes



                                                                              a:,<


                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                                3












                                                                                3








                                                                                3







                                                                                J, 5 bytes



                                                                                a:,<


                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                J, 5 bytes



                                                                                a:,<


                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                answered Dec 7 at 19:26









                                                                                FrownyFrog

                                                                                2,4471518




                                                                                2,4471518























                                                                                    3















                                                                                    PowerShell, 65 bytes





                                                                                    param($a)'';$x=,0*($y=$a.count);0..--$y|%{$x[$_]=@($a[0..$_])};$x


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    PowerShell helpfully unrolls lists-of-lists when the default Write-Output happens at program completion, so you get one item per line. Tack on a -join',' to see the list-of-lists better, by converting the inner lists into strings.



                                                                                    (Ab)uses the fact that attempting to output an empty array (e.g., @()) results in no output, so an empty array input just has '' as the output, since the $a[0..$_] will result in nothing. It will also throw out some spectacular error messages.






                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                    • Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                      – Veskah
                                                                                      Dec 8 at 2:59












                                                                                    • @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                      Dec 10 at 13:44
















                                                                                    3















                                                                                    PowerShell, 65 bytes





                                                                                    param($a)'';$x=,0*($y=$a.count);0..--$y|%{$x[$_]=@($a[0..$_])};$x


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    PowerShell helpfully unrolls lists-of-lists when the default Write-Output happens at program completion, so you get one item per line. Tack on a -join',' to see the list-of-lists better, by converting the inner lists into strings.



                                                                                    (Ab)uses the fact that attempting to output an empty array (e.g., @()) results in no output, so an empty array input just has '' as the output, since the $a[0..$_] will result in nothing. It will also throw out some spectacular error messages.






                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                    • Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                      – Veskah
                                                                                      Dec 8 at 2:59












                                                                                    • @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                      Dec 10 at 13:44














                                                                                    3












                                                                                    3








                                                                                    3







                                                                                    PowerShell, 65 bytes





                                                                                    param($a)'';$x=,0*($y=$a.count);0..--$y|%{$x[$_]=@($a[0..$_])};$x


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    PowerShell helpfully unrolls lists-of-lists when the default Write-Output happens at program completion, so you get one item per line. Tack on a -join',' to see the list-of-lists better, by converting the inner lists into strings.



                                                                                    (Ab)uses the fact that attempting to output an empty array (e.g., @()) results in no output, so an empty array input just has '' as the output, since the $a[0..$_] will result in nothing. It will also throw out some spectacular error messages.






                                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                                    PowerShell, 65 bytes





                                                                                    param($a)'';$x=,0*($y=$a.count);0..--$y|%{$x[$_]=@($a[0..$_])};$x


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    PowerShell helpfully unrolls lists-of-lists when the default Write-Output happens at program completion, so you get one item per line. Tack on a -join',' to see the list-of-lists better, by converting the inner lists into strings.



                                                                                    (Ab)uses the fact that attempting to output an empty array (e.g., @()) results in no output, so an empty array input just has '' as the output, since the $a[0..$_] will result in nothing. It will also throw out some spectacular error messages.







                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                    edited Dec 7 at 20:08

























                                                                                    answered Dec 7 at 19:38









                                                                                    AdmBorkBork

                                                                                    26.2k364228




                                                                                    26.2k364228












                                                                                    • Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                      – Veskah
                                                                                      Dec 8 at 2:59












                                                                                    • @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                      Dec 10 at 13:44


















                                                                                    • Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                      – Veskah
                                                                                      Dec 8 at 2:59












                                                                                    • @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                      Dec 10 at 13:44
















                                                                                    Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                    – Veskah
                                                                                    Dec 8 at 2:59






                                                                                    Wrapping it in parens instead of assigning it saves 20 bytes. Unless you don't think that counts as returning a list of lists. I've always been fuzzy on that distinction.
                                                                                    – Veskah
                                                                                    Dec 8 at 2:59














                                                                                    @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                    – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                    Dec 10 at 13:44




                                                                                    @veskah Yeah, that's almost what I had before my edit to this version. The problem with your solution or my earlier solution -- it doesn't return a list-of-lists. TIO1 vs TIO2
                                                                                    – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                    Dec 10 at 13:44











                                                                                    3















                                                                                    K (ngn/k), 8 bytes



                                                                                    ,(,!0),


                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                    share|improve this answer

















                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                      – streetster
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 20:46






                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:07








                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:13


















                                                                                    3















                                                                                    K (ngn/k), 8 bytes



                                                                                    ,(,!0),


                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                    share|improve this answer

















                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                      – streetster
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 20:46






                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:07








                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:13
















                                                                                    3












                                                                                    3








                                                                                    3







                                                                                    K (ngn/k), 8 bytes



                                                                                    ,(,!0),


                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                    share|improve this answer













                                                                                    K (ngn/k), 8 bytes



                                                                                    ,(,!0),


                                                                                    Try it online!







                                                                                    share|improve this answer












                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                    share|improve this answer










                                                                                    answered Dec 7 at 20:25









                                                                                    ngn

                                                                                    6,94112559




                                                                                    6,94112559








                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                      – streetster
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 20:46






                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:07








                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:13
















                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                      – streetster
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 20:46






                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:07








                                                                                    • 1




                                                                                      @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                      – ngn
                                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:13










                                                                                    1




                                                                                    1




                                                                                    This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                    – streetster
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 20:46




                                                                                    This is some kind of voodoo. ,(,()), in K4. Joining enlisted null along enlisted input? howsitwork?
                                                                                    – streetster
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 20:46




                                                                                    1




                                                                                    1




                                                                                    @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                    – ngn
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 21:07






                                                                                    @streetster () is an empty list. (,()),x prepends it to x. finally , does a concat-scan. the x is omitted to form a composition. note that the trailing , is dyadic, so it's "concat", not "enlist".
                                                                                    – ngn
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 21:07






                                                                                    1




                                                                                    1




                                                                                    @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                    – ngn
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 21:13






                                                                                    @streetster in k4 it can be a byte shorter: 1_',, but my parser isn't smart enough to handle this...
                                                                                    – ngn
                                                                                    Dec 7 at 21:13













                                                                                    3















                                                                                    Common Lisp, 39 bytes





                                                                                    (defun f(l)`(,@(if l(f(butlast l))),l))


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                    (defun f(l)                           )  ; Define a function f
                                                                                    `( ) ; With the list (essentially capable of interpolation), containing:
                                                                                    ,@ ; The value of, flattened to one level
                                                                                    (if l ) ; If l is not the empty list (which is the representation of nil, i.e. the only falsy value)
                                                                                    (f(butlast l)) ; Recurse with all of l but the tail
                                                                                    ,l ; The value of l





                                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                                      3















                                                                                      Common Lisp, 39 bytes





                                                                                      (defun f(l)`(,@(if l(f(butlast l))),l))


                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Explanation



                                                                                      (defun f(l)                           )  ; Define a function f
                                                                                      `( ) ; With the list (essentially capable of interpolation), containing:
                                                                                      ,@ ; The value of, flattened to one level
                                                                                      (if l ) ; If l is not the empty list (which is the representation of nil, i.e. the only falsy value)
                                                                                      (f(butlast l)) ; Recurse with all of l but the tail
                                                                                      ,l ; The value of l





                                                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                                                        3












                                                                                        3








                                                                                        3







                                                                                        Common Lisp, 39 bytes





                                                                                        (defun f(l)`(,@(if l(f(butlast l))),l))


                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                        Explanation



                                                                                        (defun f(l)                           )  ; Define a function f
                                                                                        `( ) ; With the list (essentially capable of interpolation), containing:
                                                                                        ,@ ; The value of, flattened to one level
                                                                                        (if l ) ; If l is not the empty list (which is the representation of nil, i.e. the only falsy value)
                                                                                        (f(butlast l)) ; Recurse with all of l but the tail
                                                                                        ,l ; The value of l





                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                        Common Lisp, 39 bytes





                                                                                        (defun f(l)`(,@(if l(f(butlast l))),l))


                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                        Explanation



                                                                                        (defun f(l)                           )  ; Define a function f
                                                                                        `( ) ; With the list (essentially capable of interpolation), containing:
                                                                                        ,@ ; The value of, flattened to one level
                                                                                        (if l ) ; If l is not the empty list (which is the representation of nil, i.e. the only falsy value)
                                                                                        (f(butlast l)) ; Recurse with all of l but the tail
                                                                                        ,l ; The value of l






                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                        answered Dec 7 at 23:18









                                                                                        ASCII-only

                                                                                        3,1741136




                                                                                        3,1741136























                                                                                            3














                                                                                            F#, 53 bytes



                                                                                            I've actually got two pretty similar answers for this, both the same length. They both take a generic sequence s as a parameter.



                                                                                            First solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.init(Seq.length s+1)(fun n->Seq.take n s)


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Seq.take takes the first n elements of the sequence. Seq.init creates a new sequence with a count (in this case) of the length of sequence s plus 1, and for each element in the sequence takes the first n elements in s.



                                                                                            Second solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s}


                                                                                            Similar to before, except it creates a sequence from 0 to the length of s. Then takes that number of elements from s.



                                                                                            Try this online too!






                                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                                            • fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                              – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                              Dec 9 at 6:41


















                                                                                            3














                                                                                            F#, 53 bytes



                                                                                            I've actually got two pretty similar answers for this, both the same length. They both take a generic sequence s as a parameter.



                                                                                            First solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.init(Seq.length s+1)(fun n->Seq.take n s)


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Seq.take takes the first n elements of the sequence. Seq.init creates a new sequence with a count (in this case) of the length of sequence s plus 1, and for each element in the sequence takes the first n elements in s.



                                                                                            Second solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s}


                                                                                            Similar to before, except it creates a sequence from 0 to the length of s. Then takes that number of elements from s.



                                                                                            Try this online too!






                                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                                            • fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                              – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                              Dec 9 at 6:41
















                                                                                            3












                                                                                            3








                                                                                            3






                                                                                            F#, 53 bytes



                                                                                            I've actually got two pretty similar answers for this, both the same length. They both take a generic sequence s as a parameter.



                                                                                            First solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.init(Seq.length s+1)(fun n->Seq.take n s)


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Seq.take takes the first n elements of the sequence. Seq.init creates a new sequence with a count (in this case) of the length of sequence s plus 1, and for each element in the sequence takes the first n elements in s.



                                                                                            Second solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s}


                                                                                            Similar to before, except it creates a sequence from 0 to the length of s. Then takes that number of elements from s.



                                                                                            Try this online too!






                                                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                                                            F#, 53 bytes



                                                                                            I've actually got two pretty similar answers for this, both the same length. They both take a generic sequence s as a parameter.



                                                                                            First solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.init(Seq.length s+1)(fun n->Seq.take n s)


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Seq.take takes the first n elements of the sequence. Seq.init creates a new sequence with a count (in this case) of the length of sequence s plus 1, and for each element in the sequence takes the first n elements in s.



                                                                                            Second solution:



                                                                                            let i s=Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s}


                                                                                            Similar to before, except it creates a sequence from 0 to the length of s. Then takes that number of elements from s.



                                                                                            Try this online too!







                                                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                                                            edited Dec 7 at 23:57

























                                                                                            answered Dec 7 at 23:47









                                                                                            Ciaran_McCarthy

                                                                                            521118




                                                                                            521118












                                                                                            • fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                              – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                              Dec 9 at 6:41




















                                                                                            • fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                              – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                              Dec 9 at 6:41


















                                                                                            fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                            – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                            Dec 9 at 6:41






                                                                                            fun s->Seq.map(fun n->Seq.take n s){0..Seq.length s} saves 1 byte
                                                                                            – Embodiment of Ignorance
                                                                                            Dec 9 at 6:41













                                                                                            3















                                                                                            Husk, 2 bytes



                                                                                            Θḣ


                                                                                            Gets all the eads and then prepends Θ (in this case ):



                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            (needs type annotation for empty list: Try it online!)






                                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                                              3















                                                                                              Husk, 2 bytes



                                                                                              Θḣ


                                                                                              Gets all the eads and then prepends Θ (in this case ):



                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                              (needs type annotation for empty list: Try it online!)






                                                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                3












                                                                                                3








                                                                                                3







                                                                                                Husk, 2 bytes



                                                                                                Θḣ


                                                                                                Gets all the eads and then prepends Θ (in this case ):



                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                (needs type annotation for empty list: Try it online!)






                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                Husk, 2 bytes



                                                                                                Θḣ


                                                                                                Gets all the eads and then prepends Θ (in this case ):



                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                (needs type annotation for empty list: Try it online!)







                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                answered Dec 8 at 0:35









                                                                                                BMO

                                                                                                11.3k22185




                                                                                                11.3k22185























                                                                                                    3














                                                                                                    MATL, 15 12 bytes



                                                                                                    3 bytes saved thanks to @Giuseppe



                                                                                                    vin:"G@:)]Xh


                                                                                                    Try it at MATL Online.



                                                                                                    Due to the way that MATL displays the output, you can't explicitly see the empty array in the cell array. Here is a version that shows the output a little more explicitly.



                                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                                    v       # Vertically concatenate the (empty) stack to create the array 
                                                                                                    i # Explicitly grab the input
                                                                                                    n # Compute the number of elements in the input (N)
                                                                                                    : # Create an array from [1, ..., N]
                                                                                                    " # Loop through this array
                                                                                                    G # For each of these numbers, M
                                                                                                    @: # Create an array from [1, ..., M]
                                                                                                    ) # Use this to index into the initial array
                                                                                                    ] # End of the for loop
                                                                                                    Xh # Concatenate the entire stack into a cell array





                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                    • use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 18:34










                                                                                                    • @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                      – Suever
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 22:04
















                                                                                                    3














                                                                                                    MATL, 15 12 bytes



                                                                                                    3 bytes saved thanks to @Giuseppe



                                                                                                    vin:"G@:)]Xh


                                                                                                    Try it at MATL Online.



                                                                                                    Due to the way that MATL displays the output, you can't explicitly see the empty array in the cell array. Here is a version that shows the output a little more explicitly.



                                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                                    v       # Vertically concatenate the (empty) stack to create the array 
                                                                                                    i # Explicitly grab the input
                                                                                                    n # Compute the number of elements in the input (N)
                                                                                                    : # Create an array from [1, ..., N]
                                                                                                    " # Loop through this array
                                                                                                    G # For each of these numbers, M
                                                                                                    @: # Create an array from [1, ..., M]
                                                                                                    ) # Use this to index into the initial array
                                                                                                    ] # End of the for loop
                                                                                                    Xh # Concatenate the entire stack into a cell array





                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                    • use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 18:34










                                                                                                    • @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                      – Suever
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 22:04














                                                                                                    3












                                                                                                    3








                                                                                                    3






                                                                                                    MATL, 15 12 bytes



                                                                                                    3 bytes saved thanks to @Giuseppe



                                                                                                    vin:"G@:)]Xh


                                                                                                    Try it at MATL Online.



                                                                                                    Due to the way that MATL displays the output, you can't explicitly see the empty array in the cell array. Here is a version that shows the output a little more explicitly.



                                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                                    v       # Vertically concatenate the (empty) stack to create the array 
                                                                                                    i # Explicitly grab the input
                                                                                                    n # Compute the number of elements in the input (N)
                                                                                                    : # Create an array from [1, ..., N]
                                                                                                    " # Loop through this array
                                                                                                    G # For each of these numbers, M
                                                                                                    @: # Create an array from [1, ..., M]
                                                                                                    ) # Use this to index into the initial array
                                                                                                    ] # End of the for loop
                                                                                                    Xh # Concatenate the entire stack into a cell array





                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                    MATL, 15 12 bytes



                                                                                                    3 bytes saved thanks to @Giuseppe



                                                                                                    vin:"G@:)]Xh


                                                                                                    Try it at MATL Online.



                                                                                                    Due to the way that MATL displays the output, you can't explicitly see the empty array in the cell array. Here is a version that shows the output a little more explicitly.



                                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                                    v       # Vertically concatenate the (empty) stack to create the array 
                                                                                                    i # Explicitly grab the input
                                                                                                    n # Compute the number of elements in the input (N)
                                                                                                    : # Create an array from [1, ..., N]
                                                                                                    " # Loop through this array
                                                                                                    G # For each of these numbers, M
                                                                                                    @: # Create an array from [1, ..., M]
                                                                                                    ) # Use this to index into the initial array
                                                                                                    ] # End of the for loop
                                                                                                    Xh # Concatenate the entire stack into a cell array






                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                                    edited Dec 10 at 22:04

























                                                                                                    answered Dec 9 at 22:22









                                                                                                    Suever

                                                                                                    9,5421345




                                                                                                    9,5421345












                                                                                                    • use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 18:34










                                                                                                    • @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                      – Suever
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 22:04


















                                                                                                    • use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                      – Giuseppe
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 18:34










                                                                                                    • @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                      – Suever
                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 22:04
















                                                                                                    use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                    – Giuseppe
                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 18:34




                                                                                                    use v instead of . And doesn't : use 1 as the default first argument? So this could be vin:"G@:)]Xh for 12 bytes.
                                                                                                    – Giuseppe
                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 18:34












                                                                                                    @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                    – Suever
                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 22:04




                                                                                                    @Giuseppe Thanks! My MATL is a little rusty it seems :(
                                                                                                    – Suever
                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 22:04











                                                                                                    3















                                                                                                    SWI PROLOG 22 bytes



                                                                                                    i(X,Y):-append(X,_,Y).






                                                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                      3















                                                                                                      SWI PROLOG 22 bytes



                                                                                                      i(X,Y):-append(X,_,Y).






                                                                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                        3












                                                                                                        3








                                                                                                        3







                                                                                                        SWI PROLOG 22 bytes



                                                                                                        i(X,Y):-append(X,_,Y).






                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                        SWI PROLOG 22 bytes



                                                                                                        i(X,Y):-append(X,_,Y).







                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                        answered Dec 10 at 22:45









                                                                                                        styrofoam fly

                                                                                                        1516




                                                                                                        1516























                                                                                                            2















                                                                                                            Charcoal, 6 bytes



                                                                                                            Eθ…θκθ


                                                                                                            Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                             θ      Input array
                                                                                                            E Map over elements
                                                                                                            θ Input array
                                                                                                            … Moulded to length
                                                                                                            κ Current loop index
                                                                                                            Implicitly print each array double-spaced
                                                                                                            θ Input array
                                                                                                            Implicitly print


                                                                                                            It's possible at a cost of 1 byte to ask Charcoal to print an n+1-element array which includes the input as its last element, but the output is the same, although the cursor position would be different if you then went on to print something else.






                                                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                              2















                                                                                                              Charcoal, 6 bytes



                                                                                                              Eθ…θκθ


                                                                                                              Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                               θ      Input array
                                                                                                              E Map over elements
                                                                                                              θ Input array
                                                                                                              … Moulded to length
                                                                                                              κ Current loop index
                                                                                                              Implicitly print each array double-spaced
                                                                                                              θ Input array
                                                                                                              Implicitly print


                                                                                                              It's possible at a cost of 1 byte to ask Charcoal to print an n+1-element array which includes the input as its last element, but the output is the same, although the cursor position would be different if you then went on to print something else.






                                                                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                                2












                                                                                                                2








                                                                                                                2







                                                                                                                Charcoal, 6 bytes



                                                                                                                Eθ…θκθ


                                                                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                                 θ      Input array
                                                                                                                E Map over elements
                                                                                                                θ Input array
                                                                                                                … Moulded to length
                                                                                                                κ Current loop index
                                                                                                                Implicitly print each array double-spaced
                                                                                                                θ Input array
                                                                                                                Implicitly print


                                                                                                                It's possible at a cost of 1 byte to ask Charcoal to print an n+1-element array which includes the input as its last element, but the output is the same, although the cursor position would be different if you then went on to print something else.






                                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                Charcoal, 6 bytes



                                                                                                                Eθ…θκθ


                                                                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                                 θ      Input array
                                                                                                                E Map over elements
                                                                                                                θ Input array
                                                                                                                … Moulded to length
                                                                                                                κ Current loop index
                                                                                                                Implicitly print each array double-spaced
                                                                                                                θ Input array
                                                                                                                Implicitly print


                                                                                                                It's possible at a cost of 1 byte to ask Charcoal to print an n+1-element array which includes the input as its last element, but the output is the same, although the cursor position would be different if you then went on to print something else.







                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                answered Dec 7 at 20:02









                                                                                                                Neil

                                                                                                                79.3k744177




                                                                                                                79.3k744177























                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                    Groovy, 37 bytes



                                                                                                                    {x->(0..x.size()).collect{x[0..<it]}}


                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                      2















                                                                                                                      Groovy, 37 bytes



                                                                                                                      {x->(0..x.size()).collect{x[0..<it]}}


                                                                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                                        2












                                                                                                                        2








                                                                                                                        2







                                                                                                                        Groovy, 37 bytes



                                                                                                                        {x->(0..x.size()).collect{x[0..<it]}}


                                                                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                        Groovy, 37 bytes



                                                                                                                        {x->(0..x.size()).collect{x[0..<it]}}


                                                                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                        answered Dec 7 at 23:25









                                                                                                                        GolfIsAGoodWalkSpoilt

                                                                                                                        1012




                                                                                                                        1012























                                                                                                                            2















                                                                                                                            Japt, 5 bytes



                                                                                                                            Êò@¯Y


                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                              2















                                                                                                                              Japt, 5 bytes



                                                                                                                              Êò@¯Y


                                                                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                                                2












                                                                                                                                2








                                                                                                                                2







                                                                                                                                Japt, 5 bytes



                                                                                                                                Êò@¯Y


                                                                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                Japt, 5 bytes



                                                                                                                                Êò@¯Y


                                                                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                answered Dec 8 at 2:11









                                                                                                                                Oliver

                                                                                                                                4,7351831




                                                                                                                                4,7351831























                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                    brainfuck, 43 bytes



                                                                                                                                    Take a list of non-null characters as input and returns all prefixes separated by newline. Requires double-infinite or wrapping tape.



                                                                                                                                    ,>-[+>,]<[-<]<<++++++++++[[<]>[.>]>[-<+>]<]


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                    • Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                      – user202729
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 9:58










                                                                                                                                    • 40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                      – Jo King
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 10:19
















                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                    brainfuck, 43 bytes



                                                                                                                                    Take a list of non-null characters as input and returns all prefixes separated by newline. Requires double-infinite or wrapping tape.



                                                                                                                                    ,>-[+>,]<[-<]<<++++++++++[[<]>[.>]>[-<+>]<]


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                    • Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                      – user202729
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 9:58










                                                                                                                                    • 40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                      – Jo King
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 10:19














                                                                                                                                    2












                                                                                                                                    2








                                                                                                                                    2







                                                                                                                                    brainfuck, 43 bytes



                                                                                                                                    Take a list of non-null characters as input and returns all prefixes separated by newline. Requires double-infinite or wrapping tape.



                                                                                                                                    ,>-[+>,]<[-<]<<++++++++++[[<]>[.>]>[-<+>]<]


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                    brainfuck, 43 bytes



                                                                                                                                    Take a list of non-null characters as input and returns all prefixes separated by newline. Requires double-infinite or wrapping tape.



                                                                                                                                    ,>-[+>,]<[-<]<<++++++++++[[<]>[.>]>[-<+>]<]


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!







                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                    edited Dec 8 at 7:13

























                                                                                                                                    answered Dec 8 at 7:08









                                                                                                                                    user202729

                                                                                                                                    13.9k12551




                                                                                                                                    13.9k12551












                                                                                                                                    • Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                      – user202729
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 9:58










                                                                                                                                    • 40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                      – Jo King
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 10:19


















                                                                                                                                    • Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                      – user202729
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 9:58










                                                                                                                                    • 40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                      – Jo King
                                                                                                                                      Dec 8 at 10:19
















                                                                                                                                    Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                    – user202729
                                                                                                                                    Dec 8 at 9:58




                                                                                                                                    Another answer outgolfed me by more than a half, because I didn't think about printing output while reading. Of course that method won't work with printing increasing suffixes.
                                                                                                                                    – user202729
                                                                                                                                    Dec 8 at 9:58












                                                                                                                                    40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                    – Jo King
                                                                                                                                    Dec 8 at 10:19




                                                                                                                                    40 bytes with some rearranging
                                                                                                                                    – Jo King
                                                                                                                                    Dec 8 at 10:19











                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                    C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 39 bytes





                                                                                                                                    x=>x.Select((_,i)=>x.Take(i)).Append(x)


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer





















                                                                                                                                    • You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                      – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 9:51










                                                                                                                                    • @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:35










                                                                                                                                    • With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:59
















                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                    C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 39 bytes





                                                                                                                                    x=>x.Select((_,i)=>x.Take(i)).Append(x)


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer





















                                                                                                                                    • You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                      – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 9:51










                                                                                                                                    • @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:35










                                                                                                                                    • With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:59














                                                                                                                                    2












                                                                                                                                    2








                                                                                                                                    2







                                                                                                                                    C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 39 bytes





                                                                                                                                    x=>x.Select((_,i)=>x.Take(i)).Append(x)


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                    C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 39 bytes





                                                                                                                                    x=>x.Select((_,i)=>x.Take(i)).Append(x)


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!







                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                    answered Dec 9 at 4:32









                                                                                                                                    dana

                                                                                                                                    42135




                                                                                                                                    42135












                                                                                                                                    • You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                      – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 9:51










                                                                                                                                    • @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:35










                                                                                                                                    • With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:59


















                                                                                                                                    • You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                      – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 9:51










                                                                                                                                    • @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:35










                                                                                                                                    • With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                      – dana
                                                                                                                                      Dec 11 at 10:59
















                                                                                                                                    You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                    – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 9:51




                                                                                                                                    You need to include the using System.Linq; in your bytecount. And it seems some of your output logic is in your outputting of the arrays. Because empty array just returns empty array.
                                                                                                                                    – LiefdeWen
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 9:51












                                                                                                                                    @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                    – dana
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 10:35




                                                                                                                                    @LiefdeWen - my understanding is that since this interpreter includes a reference to System.Linq, I don't have to include this in the byte count. My submission would be considered a different language than say .NET Core. github.com/dotnet/roslyn/wiki/C%23-Interactive-Walkthrough - You mention printing which is a separate issue, I'd like to get clarity on this first.
                                                                                                                                    – dana
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 10:35












                                                                                                                                    With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                    – dana
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 10:59




                                                                                                                                    With regards to printing, here is a version that basically dumps the result to the console - tio.run/##XY29CsIwGEX3PEXGBGKhtVt/… - not as pretty for sure! The question I have is when is it acceptable to use Array vs IList vs IEnumerable.
                                                                                                                                    – dana
                                                                                                                                    Dec 11 at 10:59











                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                    C (gcc), 102 bytes





                                                                                                                                    Pretty long, as C quite obviously isn't well-suited to manipulating lists of lists.



                                                                                                                                    Takes in a pointer to the first element of the input array, the length of the array, and a pointer to the variable in which the pointer to output will be stored. Produces a list of lists such that the first integer in the linear array stores the number of sub-lists. Sub-lists start with the number of elements, and are stored in memory in a contiguous manner.



                                                                                                                                    p(r,e,f,i,x)int*e,**r,*x;{x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);*x++=f;for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i)*x=i,memcpy(x+1,e,4*i);}


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    Degolf



                                                                                                                                    p(r,e,f,i,x) int*e,**r,*x; { // Declare function p. e is the input array, 
                                                                                                                                    // r is a pointer to the variable that will store output,
                                                                                                                                    // and x is a local iterator for r.
                                                                                                                                    x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);// Allocate 2*(n+1)*(n+2)+4 bytes of memory,
                                                                                                                                    // and store pointers in r and x.
                                                                                                                                    *x++=f; // Store the number of arrays in the first variable (n+1)
                                                                                                                                    for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i) // Iterate from 0 to f; x is incremented by i+1 every loop.
                                                                                                                                    *x=i, // Store the length of the current sub-list.
                                                                                                                                    memcpy(x+1,e,4*i); // Copy the data.
                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                                      2















                                                                                                                                      C (gcc), 102 bytes





                                                                                                                                      Pretty long, as C quite obviously isn't well-suited to manipulating lists of lists.



                                                                                                                                      Takes in a pointer to the first element of the input array, the length of the array, and a pointer to the variable in which the pointer to output will be stored. Produces a list of lists such that the first integer in the linear array stores the number of sub-lists. Sub-lists start with the number of elements, and are stored in memory in a contiguous manner.



                                                                                                                                      p(r,e,f,i,x)int*e,**r,*x;{x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);*x++=f;for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i)*x=i,memcpy(x+1,e,4*i);}


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                                      Degolf



                                                                                                                                      p(r,e,f,i,x) int*e,**r,*x; { // Declare function p. e is the input array, 
                                                                                                                                      // r is a pointer to the variable that will store output,
                                                                                                                                      // and x is a local iterator for r.
                                                                                                                                      x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);// Allocate 2*(n+1)*(n+2)+4 bytes of memory,
                                                                                                                                      // and store pointers in r and x.
                                                                                                                                      *x++=f; // Store the number of arrays in the first variable (n+1)
                                                                                                                                      for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i) // Iterate from 0 to f; x is incremented by i+1 every loop.
                                                                                                                                      *x=i, // Store the length of the current sub-list.
                                                                                                                                      memcpy(x+1,e,4*i); // Copy the data.
                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                                                        2












                                                                                                                                        2








                                                                                                                                        2







                                                                                                                                        C (gcc), 102 bytes





                                                                                                                                        Pretty long, as C quite obviously isn't well-suited to manipulating lists of lists.



                                                                                                                                        Takes in a pointer to the first element of the input array, the length of the array, and a pointer to the variable in which the pointer to output will be stored. Produces a list of lists such that the first integer in the linear array stores the number of sub-lists. Sub-lists start with the number of elements, and are stored in memory in a contiguous manner.



                                                                                                                                        p(r,e,f,i,x)int*e,**r,*x;{x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);*x++=f;for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i)*x=i,memcpy(x+1,e,4*i);}


                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                        Degolf



                                                                                                                                        p(r,e,f,i,x) int*e,**r,*x; { // Declare function p. e is the input array, 
                                                                                                                                        // r is a pointer to the variable that will store output,
                                                                                                                                        // and x is a local iterator for r.
                                                                                                                                        x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);// Allocate 2*(n+1)*(n+2)+4 bytes of memory,
                                                                                                                                        // and store pointers in r and x.
                                                                                                                                        *x++=f; // Store the number of arrays in the first variable (n+1)
                                                                                                                                        for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i) // Iterate from 0 to f; x is incremented by i+1 every loop.
                                                                                                                                        *x=i, // Store the length of the current sub-list.
                                                                                                                                        memcpy(x+1,e,4*i); // Copy the data.
                                                                                                                                        }





                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                        C (gcc), 102 bytes





                                                                                                                                        Pretty long, as C quite obviously isn't well-suited to manipulating lists of lists.



                                                                                                                                        Takes in a pointer to the first element of the input array, the length of the array, and a pointer to the variable in which the pointer to output will be stored. Produces a list of lists such that the first integer in the linear array stores the number of sub-lists. Sub-lists start with the number of elements, and are stored in memory in a contiguous manner.



                                                                                                                                        p(r,e,f,i,x)int*e,**r,*x;{x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);*x++=f;for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i)*x=i,memcpy(x+1,e,4*i);}


                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                        Degolf



                                                                                                                                        p(r,e,f,i,x) int*e,**r,*x; { // Declare function p. e is the input array, 
                                                                                                                                        // r is a pointer to the variable that will store output,
                                                                                                                                        // and x is a local iterator for r.
                                                                                                                                        x=*r=malloc(++f*-~f+2<<1);// Allocate 2*(n+1)*(n+2)+4 bytes of memory,
                                                                                                                                        // and store pointers in r and x.
                                                                                                                                        *x++=f; // Store the number of arrays in the first variable (n+1)
                                                                                                                                        for(i=0;i<f;x+=++i) // Iterate from 0 to f; x is incremented by i+1 every loop.
                                                                                                                                        *x=i, // Store the length of the current sub-list.
                                                                                                                                        memcpy(x+1,e,4*i); // Copy the data.
                                                                                                                                        }






                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                        answered Dec 9 at 12:02









                                                                                                                                        Rogem

                                                                                                                                        68112




                                                                                                                                        68112























                                                                                                                                            2















                                                                                                                                            F# (Mono), 45 bytes





                                                                                                                                            fun x->List.mapi(fun i y->List.take i x)x@[x]


                                                                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                                                                            I am not totally sure if this is valid, but it seems like it follows the same "anonymous lambda" syntax that I've seem used in several other languages.






                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                                              2















                                                                                                                                              F# (Mono), 45 bytes





                                                                                                                                              fun x->List.mapi(fun i y->List.take i x)x@[x]


                                                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                                                              I am not totally sure if this is valid, but it seems like it follows the same "anonymous lambda" syntax that I've seem used in several other languages.






                                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                                                2












                                                                                                                                                2








                                                                                                                                                2







                                                                                                                                                F# (Mono), 45 bytes





                                                                                                                                                fun x->List.mapi(fun i y->List.take i x)x@[x]


                                                                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                I am not totally sure if this is valid, but it seems like it follows the same "anonymous lambda" syntax that I've seem used in several other languages.






                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                                F# (Mono), 45 bytes





                                                                                                                                                fun x->List.mapi(fun i y->List.take i x)x@[x]


                                                                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                I am not totally sure if this is valid, but it seems like it follows the same "anonymous lambda" syntax that I've seem used in several other languages.







                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                                edited Dec 9 at 20:27

























                                                                                                                                                answered Dec 9 at 11:02









                                                                                                                                                dana

                                                                                                                                                42135




                                                                                                                                                42135























                                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                                    Java 8+, 86 77 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    -9 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen (getting rid of the import)!





                                                                                                                                                    x->java.util.stream.IntStream.range(0,x.size()+1).mapToObj(t->x.subList(0,t))


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                    Alternative, 65 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    The following will print the results to stdout (due to Olivier Grégoire):



                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.print(x.subList(0,i++));}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online






                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                    • You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 7:44










                                                                                                                                                    • @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:19










                                                                                                                                                    • x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:01












                                                                                                                                                    • @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:55










                                                                                                                                                    • @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 23:28
















                                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                                    Java 8+, 86 77 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    -9 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen (getting rid of the import)!





                                                                                                                                                    x->java.util.stream.IntStream.range(0,x.size()+1).mapToObj(t->x.subList(0,t))


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                    Alternative, 65 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    The following will print the results to stdout (due to Olivier Grégoire):



                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.print(x.subList(0,i++));}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online






                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                    • You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 7:44










                                                                                                                                                    • @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:19










                                                                                                                                                    • x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:01












                                                                                                                                                    • @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:55










                                                                                                                                                    • @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 23:28














                                                                                                                                                    2












                                                                                                                                                    2








                                                                                                                                                    2







                                                                                                                                                    Java 8+, 86 77 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    -9 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen (getting rid of the import)!





                                                                                                                                                    x->java.util.stream.IntStream.range(0,x.size()+1).mapToObj(t->x.subList(0,t))


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                    Alternative, 65 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    The following will print the results to stdout (due to Olivier Grégoire):



                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.print(x.subList(0,i++));}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online






                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                                    Java 8+, 86 77 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    -9 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen (getting rid of the import)!





                                                                                                                                                    x->java.util.stream.IntStream.range(0,x.size()+1).mapToObj(t->x.subList(0,t))


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                    Alternative, 65 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    The following will print the results to stdout (due to Olivier Grégoire):



                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.print(x.subList(0,i++));}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online







                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                                    edited Dec 10 at 17:54

























                                                                                                                                                    answered Dec 8 at 0:22









                                                                                                                                                    BMO

                                                                                                                                                    11.3k22185




                                                                                                                                                    11.3k22185












                                                                                                                                                    • You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 7:44










                                                                                                                                                    • @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:19










                                                                                                                                                    • x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:01












                                                                                                                                                    • @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:55










                                                                                                                                                    • @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 23:28


















                                                                                                                                                    • You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 7:44










                                                                                                                                                    • @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 14:19










                                                                                                                                                    • x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:01












                                                                                                                                                    • @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 17:55










                                                                                                                                                    • @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                      Dec 10 at 23:28
















                                                                                                                                                    You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 7:44




                                                                                                                                                    You can golf it to 77 bytes by just using java.util.stream.IntStream directly and drop the import.
                                                                                                                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 7:44












                                                                                                                                                    @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 14:19




                                                                                                                                                    @KevinCruijssen: Oh thanks! I didn't even know that this was possible, that's certainly helpful (at least for golfing purposes).
                                                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 14:19












                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                    – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 17:01






                                                                                                                                                    x->{for(int i=0;i<=x.size();)System.out.println(x.subList(0,i++));} (67 bytes). This prints instead of using streams. Printing is usually the shortest way to output complex structures.
                                                                                                                                                    – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 17:01














                                                                                                                                                    @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 17:55




                                                                                                                                                    @OlivierGrégoire: In that case you can probably get away with System.out.print since the output is still unambiguous.
                                                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 17:55












                                                                                                                                                    @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                    – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 23:28




                                                                                                                                                    @BMO Indeed, that would be possible!
                                                                                                                                                    – Olivier Grégoire
                                                                                                                                                    Dec 10 at 23:28











                                                                                                                                                    2















                                                                                                                                                    Ruby, 31 29 bytes





                                                                                                                                                    ->a{[a*i=0]+a.map{a[0,i+=1]}}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                    Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                    ->a{             # take array input a
                                                                                                                                                    [a*i=0]+ # set i to 0 and add whatever comes next to [] (a*0 == )
                                                                                                                                                    a.map{ # for every element in a (basically do a.length times)
                                                                                                                                                    a[0,i+=1] # increment i and return the first i-1 elements of a to map
                                                                                                                                                    }
                                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                                                      2















                                                                                                                                                      Ruby, 31 29 bytes





                                                                                                                                                      ->a{[a*i=0]+a.map{a[0,i+=1]}}


                                                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                      Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                      ->a{             # take array input a
                                                                                                                                                      [a*i=0]+ # set i to 0 and add whatever comes next to [] (a*0 == )
                                                                                                                                                      a.map{ # for every element in a (basically do a.length times)
                                                                                                                                                      a[0,i+=1] # increment i and return the first i-1 elements of a to map
                                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                                                        2












                                                                                                                                                        2








                                                                                                                                                        2







                                                                                                                                                        Ruby, 31 29 bytes





                                                                                                                                                        ->a{[a*i=0]+a.map{a[0,i+=1]}}


                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                        Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                        ->a{             # take array input a
                                                                                                                                                        [a*i=0]+ # set i to 0 and add whatever comes next to [] (a*0 == )
                                                                                                                                                        a.map{ # for every element in a (basically do a.length times)
                                                                                                                                                        a[0,i+=1] # increment i and return the first i-1 elements of a to map
                                                                                                                                                        }
                                                                                                                                                        }





                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                                        Ruby, 31 29 bytes





                                                                                                                                                        ->a{[a*i=0]+a.map{a[0,i+=1]}}


                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                        Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                        ->a{             # take array input a
                                                                                                                                                        [a*i=0]+ # set i to 0 and add whatever comes next to [] (a*0 == )
                                                                                                                                                        a.map{ # for every element in a (basically do a.length times)
                                                                                                                                                        a[0,i+=1] # increment i and return the first i-1 elements of a to map
                                                                                                                                                        }
                                                                                                                                                        }






                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                                        edited Dec 11 at 11:52

























                                                                                                                                                        answered Dec 9 at 11:47









                                                                                                                                                        Asone Tuhid

                                                                                                                                                        1,56421




                                                                                                                                                        1,56421























                                                                                                                                                            1















                                                                                                                                                            05AB1E, 3 bytes



                                                                                                                                                            η¯š


                                                                                                                                                            Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                            η    Prefixes
                                                                                                                                                            š Prepend
                                                                                                                                                            ¯ Global array (empty by default)


                                                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                                                              1















                                                                                                                                                              05AB1E, 3 bytes



                                                                                                                                                              η¯š


                                                                                                                                                              Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                              η    Prefixes
                                                                                                                                                              š Prepend
                                                                                                                                                              ¯ Global array (empty by default)


                                                                                                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                                                                                                                1












                                                                                                                                                                1








                                                                                                                                                                1







                                                                                                                                                                05AB1E, 3 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                η¯š


                                                                                                                                                                Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                                η    Prefixes
                                                                                                                                                                š Prepend
                                                                                                                                                                ¯ Global array (empty by default)


                                                                                                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                                                05AB1E, 3 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                η¯š


                                                                                                                                                                Explanation:



                                                                                                                                                                η    Prefixes
                                                                                                                                                                š Prepend
                                                                                                                                                                ¯ Global array (empty by default)


                                                                                                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                                                answered Dec 7 at 20:43









                                                                                                                                                                Okx

                                                                                                                                                                12.5k127102




                                                                                                                                                                12.5k127102























                                                                                                                                                                    1















                                                                                                                                                                    RAD, 7 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                    (⊂⍬),,


                                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                    This also works in Dyalog APL as a function.



                                                                                                                                                                    How?



                                                                                                                                                                    This works the same for both APL and RAD, given their close relation.





                                                                                                                                                                    • (⊂⍬) the empty array


                                                                                                                                                                    • , prepended to


                                                                                                                                                                    • , the prefixes (which exclude the empty array.)






                                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                                                                      1















                                                                                                                                                                      RAD, 7 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                      (⊂⍬),,


                                                                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                      This also works in Dyalog APL as a function.



                                                                                                                                                                      How?



                                                                                                                                                                      This works the same for both APL and RAD, given their close relation.





                                                                                                                                                                      • (⊂⍬) the empty array


                                                                                                                                                                      • , prepended to


                                                                                                                                                                      • , the prefixes (which exclude the empty array.)






                                                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                                                                                                                        1












                                                                                                                                                                        1








                                                                                                                                                                        1







                                                                                                                                                                        RAD, 7 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                        (⊂⍬),,


                                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                        This also works in Dyalog APL as a function.



                                                                                                                                                                        How?



                                                                                                                                                                        This works the same for both APL and RAD, given their close relation.





                                                                                                                                                                        • (⊂⍬) the empty array


                                                                                                                                                                        • , prepended to


                                                                                                                                                                        • , the prefixes (which exclude the empty array.)






                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                                                        RAD, 7 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                        (⊂⍬),,


                                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                        This also works in Dyalog APL as a function.



                                                                                                                                                                        How?



                                                                                                                                                                        This works the same for both APL and RAD, given their close relation.





                                                                                                                                                                        • (⊂⍬) the empty array


                                                                                                                                                                        • , prepended to


                                                                                                                                                                        • , the prefixes (which exclude the empty array.)







                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                                                        edited Dec 7 at 21:01

























                                                                                                                                                                        answered Dec 7 at 20:55









                                                                                                                                                                        Zacharý

                                                                                                                                                                        5,19511035




                                                                                                                                                                        5,19511035






















                                                                                                                                                                            1 2
                                                                                                                                                                            3
                                                                                                                                                                            next

















                                                                                                                                                                            draft saved

                                                                                                                                                                            draft discarded




















































                                                                                                                                                                            If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                                                                                                            • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                                                                                                              Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                                                                                                            More generally…




                                                                                                                                                                            • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                                                                                                                                                            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                                                                                                                                            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                                                                                                                                            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                                                                                                                            But avoid



                                                                                                                                                                            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                                                                                                                            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                                                                                                                            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                                                                                                                            draft saved


                                                                                                                                                                            draft discarded














                                                                                                                                                                            StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                                                                                                            function () {
                                                                                                                                                                            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177146%2fp-pr-pre-pref-prefi-prefix-prefixe-prefixes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                                                                                                            }
                                                                                                                                                                            );

                                                                                                                                                                            Post as a guest















                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown

































                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                                                                                            Plaza Victoria

                                                                                                                                                                            Puebla de Zaragoza

                                                                                                                                                                            Musa