Definition of Tropical Hypersurface












0












$begingroup$


Given the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$, a tropical hypersurface associated to a tropical polynomial is the set of points where it is non-differentiable.



I'm wondering how incidental the non-differentiable part is, and how this part is derived. For instance, had we given a different semiring $S$, would there be a canonical way of associating to $S$-polynomials $S$-hypersurfaces? I imagine this might have something to do with Universal Algebra, of which I am ignorant, so it would be good to get a light answer on this as much as possible, and if not possible a light reference would be greatly appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$, a tropical hypersurface associated to a tropical polynomial is the set of points where it is non-differentiable.



    I'm wondering how incidental the non-differentiable part is, and how this part is derived. For instance, had we given a different semiring $S$, would there be a canonical way of associating to $S$-polynomials $S$-hypersurfaces? I imagine this might have something to do with Universal Algebra, of which I am ignorant, so it would be good to get a light answer on this as much as possible, and if not possible a light reference would be greatly appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$, a tropical hypersurface associated to a tropical polynomial is the set of points where it is non-differentiable.



      I'm wondering how incidental the non-differentiable part is, and how this part is derived. For instance, had we given a different semiring $S$, would there be a canonical way of associating to $S$-polynomials $S$-hypersurfaces? I imagine this might have something to do with Universal Algebra, of which I am ignorant, so it would be good to get a light answer on this as much as possible, and if not possible a light reference would be greatly appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$, a tropical hypersurface associated to a tropical polynomial is the set of points where it is non-differentiable.



      I'm wondering how incidental the non-differentiable part is, and how this part is derived. For instance, had we given a different semiring $S$, would there be a canonical way of associating to $S$-polynomials $S$-hypersurfaces? I imagine this might have something to do with Universal Algebra, of which I am ignorant, so it would be good to get a light answer on this as much as possible, and if not possible a light reference would be greatly appreciated!







      algebraic-geometry universal-algebra tropical-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 2 '18 at 16:12









      Andrew WhelanAndrew Whelan

      1,363415




      1,363415






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          On not initially receiving an answer, I did some further reading on this and found a lovely light exposition: https://www.mathenjeans.fr/sites/default/files/documents/Sujets2012/tropical_geometry_-_casagrande.pdf



          The idea is to construct the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$ in analogy to the reals via closure of operations from the more primitive $(mathbb{N},oplus,otimes)$. What a root is turns out to be a pivotal concept. So the root of an $mathbb{R}$-monomial $P(x) = ax+b$ is a number $x_0$ for which $P(x_0)=0$, the additive identity. If we try transferring this over naively, we get the following:
          $$ begin{align} a otimes x oplus b &= -infty \
          iff max(a+x,b) &= - infty, end{align} $$

          which is not analogously informative. In the above paper, they provide an analogue of the fundamental theorem of algebra, and give a justification for the 'non-differentiability' aspect as a consequence of wanting our $mathbb{T}$-roots to give us the information on the factorisation implied by the fundamental theorem.



          So the associated hypersurface of a tropical polynomial is its set of tropical roots as defined above. Very happy to accept answers that might go into more detail or on anything I missed here!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022824%2fdefinition-of-tropical-hypersurface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            On not initially receiving an answer, I did some further reading on this and found a lovely light exposition: https://www.mathenjeans.fr/sites/default/files/documents/Sujets2012/tropical_geometry_-_casagrande.pdf



            The idea is to construct the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$ in analogy to the reals via closure of operations from the more primitive $(mathbb{N},oplus,otimes)$. What a root is turns out to be a pivotal concept. So the root of an $mathbb{R}$-monomial $P(x) = ax+b$ is a number $x_0$ for which $P(x_0)=0$, the additive identity. If we try transferring this over naively, we get the following:
            $$ begin{align} a otimes x oplus b &= -infty \
            iff max(a+x,b) &= - infty, end{align} $$

            which is not analogously informative. In the above paper, they provide an analogue of the fundamental theorem of algebra, and give a justification for the 'non-differentiability' aspect as a consequence of wanting our $mathbb{T}$-roots to give us the information on the factorisation implied by the fundamental theorem.



            So the associated hypersurface of a tropical polynomial is its set of tropical roots as defined above. Very happy to accept answers that might go into more detail or on anything I missed here!






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              On not initially receiving an answer, I did some further reading on this and found a lovely light exposition: https://www.mathenjeans.fr/sites/default/files/documents/Sujets2012/tropical_geometry_-_casagrande.pdf



              The idea is to construct the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$ in analogy to the reals via closure of operations from the more primitive $(mathbb{N},oplus,otimes)$. What a root is turns out to be a pivotal concept. So the root of an $mathbb{R}$-monomial $P(x) = ax+b$ is a number $x_0$ for which $P(x_0)=0$, the additive identity. If we try transferring this over naively, we get the following:
              $$ begin{align} a otimes x oplus b &= -infty \
              iff max(a+x,b) &= - infty, end{align} $$

              which is not analogously informative. In the above paper, they provide an analogue of the fundamental theorem of algebra, and give a justification for the 'non-differentiability' aspect as a consequence of wanting our $mathbb{T}$-roots to give us the information on the factorisation implied by the fundamental theorem.



              So the associated hypersurface of a tropical polynomial is its set of tropical roots as defined above. Very happy to accept answers that might go into more detail or on anything I missed here!






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                On not initially receiving an answer, I did some further reading on this and found a lovely light exposition: https://www.mathenjeans.fr/sites/default/files/documents/Sujets2012/tropical_geometry_-_casagrande.pdf



                The idea is to construct the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$ in analogy to the reals via closure of operations from the more primitive $(mathbb{N},oplus,otimes)$. What a root is turns out to be a pivotal concept. So the root of an $mathbb{R}$-monomial $P(x) = ax+b$ is a number $x_0$ for which $P(x_0)=0$, the additive identity. If we try transferring this over naively, we get the following:
                $$ begin{align} a otimes x oplus b &= -infty \
                iff max(a+x,b) &= - infty, end{align} $$

                which is not analogously informative. In the above paper, they provide an analogue of the fundamental theorem of algebra, and give a justification for the 'non-differentiability' aspect as a consequence of wanting our $mathbb{T}$-roots to give us the information on the factorisation implied by the fundamental theorem.



                So the associated hypersurface of a tropical polynomial is its set of tropical roots as defined above. Very happy to accept answers that might go into more detail or on anything I missed here!






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                On not initially receiving an answer, I did some further reading on this and found a lovely light exposition: https://www.mathenjeans.fr/sites/default/files/documents/Sujets2012/tropical_geometry_-_casagrande.pdf



                The idea is to construct the tropical semiring $(mathbb{T},oplus,otimes)$ in analogy to the reals via closure of operations from the more primitive $(mathbb{N},oplus,otimes)$. What a root is turns out to be a pivotal concept. So the root of an $mathbb{R}$-monomial $P(x) = ax+b$ is a number $x_0$ for which $P(x_0)=0$, the additive identity. If we try transferring this over naively, we get the following:
                $$ begin{align} a otimes x oplus b &= -infty \
                iff max(a+x,b) &= - infty, end{align} $$

                which is not analogously informative. In the above paper, they provide an analogue of the fundamental theorem of algebra, and give a justification for the 'non-differentiability' aspect as a consequence of wanting our $mathbb{T}$-roots to give us the information on the factorisation implied by the fundamental theorem.



                So the associated hypersurface of a tropical polynomial is its set of tropical roots as defined above. Very happy to accept answers that might go into more detail or on anything I missed here!







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 4 '18 at 0:17

























                answered Dec 4 '18 at 0:03









                Andrew WhelanAndrew Whelan

                1,363415




                1,363415






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022824%2fdefinition-of-tropical-hypersurface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...