Can anyone explain why $a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$












12












$begingroup$


I'm so puzzled about this:



$$a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}.$$



Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{(bc)}$? Why is $a^{b^c}$ instead equal to $a^{(b^c)}$? And how is it possible that $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$?



My mind is pretty much exploding from trying to understand this.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    full blown real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – bodacydo
    Nov 18 '12 at 14:15
















12












$begingroup$


I'm so puzzled about this:



$$a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}.$$



Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{(bc)}$? Why is $a^{b^c}$ instead equal to $a^{(b^c)}$? And how is it possible that $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$?



My mind is pretty much exploding from trying to understand this.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    full blown real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – bodacydo
    Nov 18 '12 at 14:15














12












12








12


1



$begingroup$


I'm so puzzled about this:



$$a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}.$$



Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{(bc)}$? Why is $a^{b^c}$ instead equal to $a^{(b^c)}$? And how is it possible that $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$?



My mind is pretty much exploding from trying to understand this.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm so puzzled about this:



$$a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}.$$



Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{(bc)}$? Why is $a^{b^c}$ instead equal to $a^{(b^c)}$? And how is it possible that $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$?



My mind is pretty much exploding from trying to understand this.







notation exponentiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '12 at 1:58









Ilmari Karonen

20.2k25286




20.2k25286










asked Nov 18 '12 at 14:06









bodacydobodacydo

1,48462240




1,48462240












  • $begingroup$
    full blown real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – bodacydo
    Nov 18 '12 at 14:15


















  • $begingroup$
    full blown real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – bodacydo
    Nov 18 '12 at 14:15
















$begingroup$
full blown real numbers
$endgroup$
– bodacydo
Nov 18 '12 at 14:15




$begingroup$
full blown real numbers
$endgroup$
– bodacydo
Nov 18 '12 at 14:15










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















25












$begingroup$

That $a^{b^c}$ stands for $a^{(b^c)}$ rather than for $(a^b)^c$ is merely a notational convention; we say that the exponentiation notation associates to the right (whereas arithmetic operations associate to the left, so that $a-b-c$ means $(a-b)-c$ rather than $a-(b-c)$).



The fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ is easy to understand: $a^b$ is obtained by multiplying together a sequence of $b$ copies of $a$, and $(a^b)^c$ is obtained by multiplying together $c$ such products; writing all this out in terms of copies of $a$ means that $btimes c$ such copies have been multiplied together. Now you can see also why this is not equal to $a^{(b^c)}$ which is obtained by multiplying together $b^c$ copies of $a$.



Finally the fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ explains why the convention is that exponentiation notation associates to the right: both $a^{(b^c)}$ and $(a^b)^c$ are useful expressions, but since the latter can be more easily written as $a^{bc}$, one might as well reserve $a^{b^c}$ to stand for the former, which has no such easy alternative. It might seem that $a^{b^c}$ is such an enormous product that is unlikely to be useful; it is however encountered surprisingly often in some contexts.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$

    Note that $(2^2)^3=4^3=64$, whereas $2^{(2^3)}=2^8=256$ (and incidentally $2^{2cdot 3}=2^6=64$).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      +1 great, clean and nicely done!
      $endgroup$
      – doniyor
      Nov 18 '12 at 15:21






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      Nov 18 '12 at 15:35










    • $begingroup$
      @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
      $endgroup$
      – Hagen von Eitzen
      Nov 18 '12 at 15:58



















    3












    $begingroup$

    First question,




    Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{bc}$




    assuming the remaining questions already answered. It is a matter of convention. Since $a^{(b^c)} ne (a^b)^c$ in general, when we write $a^{b^c}$ we need convention to say which of these two we mean. Since $(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$, there is already a short way to write that, so we use $a^{b^c}$ for the other one.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
      $endgroup$
      – mrs
      Nov 18 '12 at 14:34



















    2












    $begingroup$

    First concept: Multiplication is NOT the same as exponentiation.



    The question you are asking is, basically, why is $3^2 $ not the same as $3 (2)$ or $3 times 2$?



    Now, if we just take a look at an example problem involving your question:$$3^{2^{3}} = 3^{8} ne {left(3^{2}right)^3}ne 3^{2times 3}ne3^6$$
    Notice that $3^{2^3}=3^8$ since $2^3 = 8$.



    You are asking why multiplication is not the same as exponentiation, essentially. My answer is that multiplication is pertaining to repeated addition whereas exponentiation is pertaining to repeated multiplication.





    If we look at fundamentals, $(a^b)^c$ is multiplying $a^b$ to itself $c$ times. Now if we multiply $a^b$ to itself an arbitrary number of times, then we are adding the power (here, $b$) to itself the same number of times. If you add something to itself some number of times, then you just multiply it by the number of times you are adding something to itself. Example: $$(2^3)^2 = 2^3 times 2^3 = 2^{3 + 3} = 2^6 = 2^{3 cdot 2}$$



    And... $a^{b^c}$ means that you are multiplying $b$ to itself $c$ number of times.





    For casual readers: skip to this part.
    In $(a^b)^c$, we multiply $b$ to $c$... and in $a^{b^c}$, we raise $b$ to the power $c$. As I have clearly repeated, exponentiation is not the same as addition is not the same as exponentiation. In other words, $bc ne b^c ne b + c$ always.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Nov 18 '12 at 14:47










    • $begingroup$
      @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
      $endgroup$
      – Parth Kohli
      Nov 18 '12 at 14:49










    • $begingroup$
      I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Nov 18 '12 at 14:55



















    2












    $begingroup$

    Without parentheses: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division should be evaluated from left to right. Like: $1 + 3 + 5 = 4 + 5 = 9$.



    This rule does NOT apply for exponentiation, without parentheses, for exponentiation, we'll go from RIGHT to LEFT.



    For example, to evaluate: $2^{2^3}$, we must evaluate $2^3 = 8$ first, so: $2^{2^3} = 2^8 = 256$.



    So, without any parentheses, $a^{b^c}$ is the same as $a^{left(b^cright)}$, since we must go from RIGHT to LEFT.





    For your second problem, why ${(a^b)}^c = a^{b.c}$.



    Definition



    If we take the sum of some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have multiplication, i.e $a times n = underbrace{a + a + a + ... + a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



    If we multiply some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have exponentiation, i.e $a ^ n = underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



    Example




    • $2 times 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6$

    • $2 ^ 3 = 2 times 2 times 2 = 4 times 2 = 8$

    • $3 times 4 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$

    • $3 ^ 4 = 3 times 3 times 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81$


    Properties




    • $a ^ m times a ^ n = a^{m+n}$

      Proof




    $a ^ m times a ^ n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox { times}} times underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}}_{m + n mbox { times}} = a^{m+n}$.

    It's like 2 apples together with 3 apples becomes 2 + 3 = 5 apples. You have $n$ copies of $a$ together with another $m$ copies of $a$, you'll get $m + n$ copies of $a$.




    • $(a ^ m)^n = a^{m.n}$

      Proof




    $(a^m)^n$ basically means that you take the result of $a^m$, then raise the whole stuff to the power of $n$, or in other words, multiply $n$ copies of it together.



    $(a^m)^n = underbrace{a^m times a^m times ... times a^m}_{n mbox{ times}}$



    Now, think of 5 groups of apples, such that that each group has exactly 2 apples. So there'll be a total of 2 x 5 = 10 apples. Each $a^m$ has $m$ copies of $a$, and there are $n$ copies of $a^m$, or in other words, there are $n$ groups, in which each group has $m$ copies of $a$. So there'll be a total of $m times n$ copies of $a$. So:



    $(a^m)^n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times ... times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}}}_{n mbox { times}} = a^{m.n}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      good job by giving details!
      $endgroup$
      – doniyor
      Nov 18 '12 at 15:26












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239825%2fcan-anyone-explain-why-abc-abc-neq-abc-abc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    25












    $begingroup$

    That $a^{b^c}$ stands for $a^{(b^c)}$ rather than for $(a^b)^c$ is merely a notational convention; we say that the exponentiation notation associates to the right (whereas arithmetic operations associate to the left, so that $a-b-c$ means $(a-b)-c$ rather than $a-(b-c)$).



    The fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ is easy to understand: $a^b$ is obtained by multiplying together a sequence of $b$ copies of $a$, and $(a^b)^c$ is obtained by multiplying together $c$ such products; writing all this out in terms of copies of $a$ means that $btimes c$ such copies have been multiplied together. Now you can see also why this is not equal to $a^{(b^c)}$ which is obtained by multiplying together $b^c$ copies of $a$.



    Finally the fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ explains why the convention is that exponentiation notation associates to the right: both $a^{(b^c)}$ and $(a^b)^c$ are useful expressions, but since the latter can be more easily written as $a^{bc}$, one might as well reserve $a^{b^c}$ to stand for the former, which has no such easy alternative. It might seem that $a^{b^c}$ is such an enormous product that is unlikely to be useful; it is however encountered surprisingly often in some contexts.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      25












      $begingroup$

      That $a^{b^c}$ stands for $a^{(b^c)}$ rather than for $(a^b)^c$ is merely a notational convention; we say that the exponentiation notation associates to the right (whereas arithmetic operations associate to the left, so that $a-b-c$ means $(a-b)-c$ rather than $a-(b-c)$).



      The fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ is easy to understand: $a^b$ is obtained by multiplying together a sequence of $b$ copies of $a$, and $(a^b)^c$ is obtained by multiplying together $c$ such products; writing all this out in terms of copies of $a$ means that $btimes c$ such copies have been multiplied together. Now you can see also why this is not equal to $a^{(b^c)}$ which is obtained by multiplying together $b^c$ copies of $a$.



      Finally the fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ explains why the convention is that exponentiation notation associates to the right: both $a^{(b^c)}$ and $(a^b)^c$ are useful expressions, but since the latter can be more easily written as $a^{bc}$, one might as well reserve $a^{b^c}$ to stand for the former, which has no such easy alternative. It might seem that $a^{b^c}$ is such an enormous product that is unlikely to be useful; it is however encountered surprisingly often in some contexts.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        25












        25








        25





        $begingroup$

        That $a^{b^c}$ stands for $a^{(b^c)}$ rather than for $(a^b)^c$ is merely a notational convention; we say that the exponentiation notation associates to the right (whereas arithmetic operations associate to the left, so that $a-b-c$ means $(a-b)-c$ rather than $a-(b-c)$).



        The fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ is easy to understand: $a^b$ is obtained by multiplying together a sequence of $b$ copies of $a$, and $(a^b)^c$ is obtained by multiplying together $c$ such products; writing all this out in terms of copies of $a$ means that $btimes c$ such copies have been multiplied together. Now you can see also why this is not equal to $a^{(b^c)}$ which is obtained by multiplying together $b^c$ copies of $a$.



        Finally the fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ explains why the convention is that exponentiation notation associates to the right: both $a^{(b^c)}$ and $(a^b)^c$ are useful expressions, but since the latter can be more easily written as $a^{bc}$, one might as well reserve $a^{b^c}$ to stand for the former, which has no such easy alternative. It might seem that $a^{b^c}$ is such an enormous product that is unlikely to be useful; it is however encountered surprisingly often in some contexts.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        That $a^{b^c}$ stands for $a^{(b^c)}$ rather than for $(a^b)^c$ is merely a notational convention; we say that the exponentiation notation associates to the right (whereas arithmetic operations associate to the left, so that $a-b-c$ means $(a-b)-c$ rather than $a-(b-c)$).



        The fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ is easy to understand: $a^b$ is obtained by multiplying together a sequence of $b$ copies of $a$, and $(a^b)^c$ is obtained by multiplying together $c$ such products; writing all this out in terms of copies of $a$ means that $btimes c$ such copies have been multiplied together. Now you can see also why this is not equal to $a^{(b^c)}$ which is obtained by multiplying together $b^c$ copies of $a$.



        Finally the fact that $(a^b)^c=a^{btimes c}$ explains why the convention is that exponentiation notation associates to the right: both $a^{(b^c)}$ and $(a^b)^c$ are useful expressions, but since the latter can be more easily written as $a^{bc}$, one might as well reserve $a^{b^c}$ to stand for the former, which has no such easy alternative. It might seem that $a^{b^c}$ is such an enormous product that is unlikely to be useful; it is however encountered surprisingly often in some contexts.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 18 '12 at 14:33









        Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

        89k6112231




        89k6112231























            6












            $begingroup$

            Note that $(2^2)^3=4^3=64$, whereas $2^{(2^3)}=2^8=256$ (and incidentally $2^{2cdot 3}=2^6=64$).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              +1 great, clean and nicely done!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:21






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:35










            • $begingroup$
              @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
              $endgroup$
              – Hagen von Eitzen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:58
















            6












            $begingroup$

            Note that $(2^2)^3=4^3=64$, whereas $2^{(2^3)}=2^8=256$ (and incidentally $2^{2cdot 3}=2^6=64$).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              +1 great, clean and nicely done!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:21






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:35










            • $begingroup$
              @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
              $endgroup$
              – Hagen von Eitzen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:58














            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            Note that $(2^2)^3=4^3=64$, whereas $2^{(2^3)}=2^8=256$ (and incidentally $2^{2cdot 3}=2^6=64$).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Note that $(2^2)^3=4^3=64$, whereas $2^{(2^3)}=2^8=256$ (and incidentally $2^{2cdot 3}=2^6=64$).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 18 '12 at 15:45









            MJD

            47.9k29217398




            47.9k29217398










            answered Nov 18 '12 at 14:34









            Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

            284k23274508




            284k23274508












            • $begingroup$
              +1 great, clean and nicely done!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:21






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:35










            • $begingroup$
              @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
              $endgroup$
              – Hagen von Eitzen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:58


















            • $begingroup$
              +1 great, clean and nicely done!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:21






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:35










            • $begingroup$
              @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
              $endgroup$
              – Hagen von Eitzen
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:58
















            $begingroup$
            +1 great, clean and nicely done!
            $endgroup$
            – doniyor
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:21




            $begingroup$
            +1 great, clean and nicely done!
            $endgroup$
            – doniyor
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:21




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
            $endgroup$
            – Marc van Leeuwen
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:35




            $begingroup$
            However I would need to subtract some points for $2^8=128$ if I found this on a test.
            $endgroup$
            – Marc van Leeuwen
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:35












            $begingroup$
            @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:58




            $begingroup$
            @MarcvanLeeuwen Argh, numbers
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:58











            3












            $begingroup$

            First question,




            Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{bc}$




            assuming the remaining questions already answered. It is a matter of convention. Since $a^{(b^c)} ne (a^b)^c$ in general, when we write $a^{b^c}$ we need convention to say which of these two we mean. Since $(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$, there is already a short way to write that, so we use $a^{b^c}$ for the other one.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
              $endgroup$
              – mrs
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:34
















            3












            $begingroup$

            First question,




            Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{bc}$




            assuming the remaining questions already answered. It is a matter of convention. Since $a^{(b^c)} ne (a^b)^c$ in general, when we write $a^{b^c}$ we need convention to say which of these two we mean. Since $(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$, there is already a short way to write that, so we use $a^{b^c}$ for the other one.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
              $endgroup$
              – mrs
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:34














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            First question,




            Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{bc}$




            assuming the remaining questions already answered. It is a matter of convention. Since $a^{(b^c)} ne (a^b)^c$ in general, when we write $a^{b^c}$ we need convention to say which of these two we mean. Since $(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$, there is already a short way to write that, so we use $a^{b^c}$ for the other one.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            First question,




            Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{bc}$




            assuming the remaining questions already answered. It is a matter of convention. Since $a^{(b^c)} ne (a^b)^c$ in general, when we write $a^{b^c}$ we need convention to say which of these two we mean. Since $(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$, there is already a short way to write that, so we use $a^{b^c}$ for the other one.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 18 '12 at 14:22









            GEdgarGEdgar

            63.7k269176




            63.7k269176












            • $begingroup$
              Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
              $endgroup$
              – mrs
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:34


















            • $begingroup$
              Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
              $endgroup$
              – mrs
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:34
















            $begingroup$
            Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
            $endgroup$
            – mrs
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:34




            $begingroup$
            Can we take a numeric example for showing him what is the story. Particularly, when the conventions looks a bit hard to understand?
            $endgroup$
            – mrs
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:34











            2












            $begingroup$

            First concept: Multiplication is NOT the same as exponentiation.



            The question you are asking is, basically, why is $3^2 $ not the same as $3 (2)$ or $3 times 2$?



            Now, if we just take a look at an example problem involving your question:$$3^{2^{3}} = 3^{8} ne {left(3^{2}right)^3}ne 3^{2times 3}ne3^6$$
            Notice that $3^{2^3}=3^8$ since $2^3 = 8$.



            You are asking why multiplication is not the same as exponentiation, essentially. My answer is that multiplication is pertaining to repeated addition whereas exponentiation is pertaining to repeated multiplication.





            If we look at fundamentals, $(a^b)^c$ is multiplying $a^b$ to itself $c$ times. Now if we multiply $a^b$ to itself an arbitrary number of times, then we are adding the power (here, $b$) to itself the same number of times. If you add something to itself some number of times, then you just multiply it by the number of times you are adding something to itself. Example: $$(2^3)^2 = 2^3 times 2^3 = 2^{3 + 3} = 2^6 = 2^{3 cdot 2}$$



            And... $a^{b^c}$ means that you are multiplying $b$ to itself $c$ number of times.





            For casual readers: skip to this part.
            In $(a^b)^c$, we multiply $b$ to $c$... and in $a^{b^c}$, we raise $b$ to the power $c$. As I have clearly repeated, exponentiation is not the same as addition is not the same as exponentiation. In other words, $bc ne b^c ne b + c$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:47










            • $begingroup$
              @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
              $endgroup$
              – Parth Kohli
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:49










            • $begingroup$
              I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:55
















            2












            $begingroup$

            First concept: Multiplication is NOT the same as exponentiation.



            The question you are asking is, basically, why is $3^2 $ not the same as $3 (2)$ or $3 times 2$?



            Now, if we just take a look at an example problem involving your question:$$3^{2^{3}} = 3^{8} ne {left(3^{2}right)^3}ne 3^{2times 3}ne3^6$$
            Notice that $3^{2^3}=3^8$ since $2^3 = 8$.



            You are asking why multiplication is not the same as exponentiation, essentially. My answer is that multiplication is pertaining to repeated addition whereas exponentiation is pertaining to repeated multiplication.





            If we look at fundamentals, $(a^b)^c$ is multiplying $a^b$ to itself $c$ times. Now if we multiply $a^b$ to itself an arbitrary number of times, then we are adding the power (here, $b$) to itself the same number of times. If you add something to itself some number of times, then you just multiply it by the number of times you are adding something to itself. Example: $$(2^3)^2 = 2^3 times 2^3 = 2^{3 + 3} = 2^6 = 2^{3 cdot 2}$$



            And... $a^{b^c}$ means that you are multiplying $b$ to itself $c$ number of times.





            For casual readers: skip to this part.
            In $(a^b)^c$, we multiply $b$ to $c$... and in $a^{b^c}$, we raise $b$ to the power $c$. As I have clearly repeated, exponentiation is not the same as addition is not the same as exponentiation. In other words, $bc ne b^c ne b + c$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:47










            • $begingroup$
              @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
              $endgroup$
              – Parth Kohli
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:49










            • $begingroup$
              I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:55














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            First concept: Multiplication is NOT the same as exponentiation.



            The question you are asking is, basically, why is $3^2 $ not the same as $3 (2)$ or $3 times 2$?



            Now, if we just take a look at an example problem involving your question:$$3^{2^{3}} = 3^{8} ne {left(3^{2}right)^3}ne 3^{2times 3}ne3^6$$
            Notice that $3^{2^3}=3^8$ since $2^3 = 8$.



            You are asking why multiplication is not the same as exponentiation, essentially. My answer is that multiplication is pertaining to repeated addition whereas exponentiation is pertaining to repeated multiplication.





            If we look at fundamentals, $(a^b)^c$ is multiplying $a^b$ to itself $c$ times. Now if we multiply $a^b$ to itself an arbitrary number of times, then we are adding the power (here, $b$) to itself the same number of times. If you add something to itself some number of times, then you just multiply it by the number of times you are adding something to itself. Example: $$(2^3)^2 = 2^3 times 2^3 = 2^{3 + 3} = 2^6 = 2^{3 cdot 2}$$



            And... $a^{b^c}$ means that you are multiplying $b$ to itself $c$ number of times.





            For casual readers: skip to this part.
            In $(a^b)^c$, we multiply $b$ to $c$... and in $a^{b^c}$, we raise $b$ to the power $c$. As I have clearly repeated, exponentiation is not the same as addition is not the same as exponentiation. In other words, $bc ne b^c ne b + c$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            First concept: Multiplication is NOT the same as exponentiation.



            The question you are asking is, basically, why is $3^2 $ not the same as $3 (2)$ or $3 times 2$?



            Now, if we just take a look at an example problem involving your question:$$3^{2^{3}} = 3^{8} ne {left(3^{2}right)^3}ne 3^{2times 3}ne3^6$$
            Notice that $3^{2^3}=3^8$ since $2^3 = 8$.



            You are asking why multiplication is not the same as exponentiation, essentially. My answer is that multiplication is pertaining to repeated addition whereas exponentiation is pertaining to repeated multiplication.





            If we look at fundamentals, $(a^b)^c$ is multiplying $a^b$ to itself $c$ times. Now if we multiply $a^b$ to itself an arbitrary number of times, then we are adding the power (here, $b$) to itself the same number of times. If you add something to itself some number of times, then you just multiply it by the number of times you are adding something to itself. Example: $$(2^3)^2 = 2^3 times 2^3 = 2^{3 + 3} = 2^6 = 2^{3 cdot 2}$$



            And... $a^{b^c}$ means that you are multiplying $b$ to itself $c$ number of times.





            For casual readers: skip to this part.
            In $(a^b)^c$, we multiply $b$ to $c$... and in $a^{b^c}$, we raise $b$ to the power $c$. As I have clearly repeated, exponentiation is not the same as addition is not the same as exponentiation. In other words, $bc ne b^c ne b + c$ always.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 18 '12 at 14:57

























            answered Nov 18 '12 at 14:38









            Parth KohliParth Kohli

            6,05512961




            6,05512961












            • $begingroup$
              +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:47










            • $begingroup$
              @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
              $endgroup$
              – Parth Kohli
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:49










            • $begingroup$
              I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:55


















            • $begingroup$
              +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:47










            • $begingroup$
              @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
              $endgroup$
              – Parth Kohli
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:49










            • $begingroup$
              I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
              $endgroup$
              – Namaste
              Nov 18 '12 at 14:55
















            $begingroup$
            +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
            $endgroup$
            – Namaste
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:47




            $begingroup$
            +1 here too: much cleaner example than I chose (now deleted)! Good for having pointed out explicitly that we are dealing with exponentiation of exponent, vs. multiplication in an exponent.
            $endgroup$
            – Namaste
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:47












            $begingroup$
            @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
            $endgroup$
            – Parth Kohli
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:49




            $begingroup$
            @amWhy: Heh... more improvement now.
            $endgroup$
            – Parth Kohli
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:49












            $begingroup$
            I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
            $endgroup$
            – Namaste
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:55




            $begingroup$
            I think you mean, in your second to last sentence, that exponentiation is not the same as multiplication. (No worries, I understood what you were saying...)!
            $endgroup$
            – Namaste
            Nov 18 '12 at 14:55











            2












            $begingroup$

            Without parentheses: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division should be evaluated from left to right. Like: $1 + 3 + 5 = 4 + 5 = 9$.



            This rule does NOT apply for exponentiation, without parentheses, for exponentiation, we'll go from RIGHT to LEFT.



            For example, to evaluate: $2^{2^3}$, we must evaluate $2^3 = 8$ first, so: $2^{2^3} = 2^8 = 256$.



            So, without any parentheses, $a^{b^c}$ is the same as $a^{left(b^cright)}$, since we must go from RIGHT to LEFT.





            For your second problem, why ${(a^b)}^c = a^{b.c}$.



            Definition



            If we take the sum of some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have multiplication, i.e $a times n = underbrace{a + a + a + ... + a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            If we multiply some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have exponentiation, i.e $a ^ n = underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            Example




            • $2 times 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6$

            • $2 ^ 3 = 2 times 2 times 2 = 4 times 2 = 8$

            • $3 times 4 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$

            • $3 ^ 4 = 3 times 3 times 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81$


            Properties




            • $a ^ m times a ^ n = a^{m+n}$

              Proof




            $a ^ m times a ^ n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox { times}} times underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}}_{m + n mbox { times}} = a^{m+n}$.

            It's like 2 apples together with 3 apples becomes 2 + 3 = 5 apples. You have $n$ copies of $a$ together with another $m$ copies of $a$, you'll get $m + n$ copies of $a$.




            • $(a ^ m)^n = a^{m.n}$

              Proof




            $(a^m)^n$ basically means that you take the result of $a^m$, then raise the whole stuff to the power of $n$, or in other words, multiply $n$ copies of it together.



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{a^m times a^m times ... times a^m}_{n mbox{ times}}$



            Now, think of 5 groups of apples, such that that each group has exactly 2 apples. So there'll be a total of 2 x 5 = 10 apples. Each $a^m$ has $m$ copies of $a$, and there are $n$ copies of $a^m$, or in other words, there are $n$ groups, in which each group has $m$ copies of $a$. So there'll be a total of $m times n$ copies of $a$. So:



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times ... times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}}}_{n mbox { times}} = a^{m.n}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              good job by giving details!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:26
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Without parentheses: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division should be evaluated from left to right. Like: $1 + 3 + 5 = 4 + 5 = 9$.



            This rule does NOT apply for exponentiation, without parentheses, for exponentiation, we'll go from RIGHT to LEFT.



            For example, to evaluate: $2^{2^3}$, we must evaluate $2^3 = 8$ first, so: $2^{2^3} = 2^8 = 256$.



            So, without any parentheses, $a^{b^c}$ is the same as $a^{left(b^cright)}$, since we must go from RIGHT to LEFT.





            For your second problem, why ${(a^b)}^c = a^{b.c}$.



            Definition



            If we take the sum of some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have multiplication, i.e $a times n = underbrace{a + a + a + ... + a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            If we multiply some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have exponentiation, i.e $a ^ n = underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            Example




            • $2 times 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6$

            • $2 ^ 3 = 2 times 2 times 2 = 4 times 2 = 8$

            • $3 times 4 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$

            • $3 ^ 4 = 3 times 3 times 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81$


            Properties




            • $a ^ m times a ^ n = a^{m+n}$

              Proof




            $a ^ m times a ^ n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox { times}} times underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}}_{m + n mbox { times}} = a^{m+n}$.

            It's like 2 apples together with 3 apples becomes 2 + 3 = 5 apples. You have $n$ copies of $a$ together with another $m$ copies of $a$, you'll get $m + n$ copies of $a$.




            • $(a ^ m)^n = a^{m.n}$

              Proof




            $(a^m)^n$ basically means that you take the result of $a^m$, then raise the whole stuff to the power of $n$, or in other words, multiply $n$ copies of it together.



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{a^m times a^m times ... times a^m}_{n mbox{ times}}$



            Now, think of 5 groups of apples, such that that each group has exactly 2 apples. So there'll be a total of 2 x 5 = 10 apples. Each $a^m$ has $m$ copies of $a$, and there are $n$ copies of $a^m$, or in other words, there are $n$ groups, in which each group has $m$ copies of $a$. So there'll be a total of $m times n$ copies of $a$. So:



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times ... times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}}}_{n mbox { times}} = a^{m.n}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              good job by giving details!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:26














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Without parentheses: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division should be evaluated from left to right. Like: $1 + 3 + 5 = 4 + 5 = 9$.



            This rule does NOT apply for exponentiation, without parentheses, for exponentiation, we'll go from RIGHT to LEFT.



            For example, to evaluate: $2^{2^3}$, we must evaluate $2^3 = 8$ first, so: $2^{2^3} = 2^8 = 256$.



            So, without any parentheses, $a^{b^c}$ is the same as $a^{left(b^cright)}$, since we must go from RIGHT to LEFT.





            For your second problem, why ${(a^b)}^c = a^{b.c}$.



            Definition



            If we take the sum of some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have multiplication, i.e $a times n = underbrace{a + a + a + ... + a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            If we multiply some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have exponentiation, i.e $a ^ n = underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            Example




            • $2 times 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6$

            • $2 ^ 3 = 2 times 2 times 2 = 4 times 2 = 8$

            • $3 times 4 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$

            • $3 ^ 4 = 3 times 3 times 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81$


            Properties




            • $a ^ m times a ^ n = a^{m+n}$

              Proof




            $a ^ m times a ^ n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox { times}} times underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}}_{m + n mbox { times}} = a^{m+n}$.

            It's like 2 apples together with 3 apples becomes 2 + 3 = 5 apples. You have $n$ copies of $a$ together with another $m$ copies of $a$, you'll get $m + n$ copies of $a$.




            • $(a ^ m)^n = a^{m.n}$

              Proof




            $(a^m)^n$ basically means that you take the result of $a^m$, then raise the whole stuff to the power of $n$, or in other words, multiply $n$ copies of it together.



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{a^m times a^m times ... times a^m}_{n mbox{ times}}$



            Now, think of 5 groups of apples, such that that each group has exactly 2 apples. So there'll be a total of 2 x 5 = 10 apples. Each $a^m$ has $m$ copies of $a$, and there are $n$ copies of $a^m$, or in other words, there are $n$ groups, in which each group has $m$ copies of $a$. So there'll be a total of $m times n$ copies of $a$. So:



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times ... times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}}}_{n mbox { times}} = a^{m.n}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Without parentheses: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division should be evaluated from left to right. Like: $1 + 3 + 5 = 4 + 5 = 9$.



            This rule does NOT apply for exponentiation, without parentheses, for exponentiation, we'll go from RIGHT to LEFT.



            For example, to evaluate: $2^{2^3}$, we must evaluate $2^3 = 8$ first, so: $2^{2^3} = 2^8 = 256$.



            So, without any parentheses, $a^{b^c}$ is the same as $a^{left(b^cright)}$, since we must go from RIGHT to LEFT.





            For your second problem, why ${(a^b)}^c = a^{b.c}$.



            Definition



            If we take the sum of some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have multiplication, i.e $a times n = underbrace{a + a + a + ... + a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            If we multiply some number $a$ for $n$ times, we'll have exponentiation, i.e $a ^ n = underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}$.



            Example




            • $2 times 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6$

            • $2 ^ 3 = 2 times 2 times 2 = 4 times 2 = 8$

            • $3 times 4 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$

            • $3 ^ 4 = 3 times 3 times 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81$


            Properties




            • $a ^ m times a ^ n = a^{m+n}$

              Proof




            $a ^ m times a ^ n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox { times}} times underbrace{a times a times a times ... times a}_{n mbox { times}}}_{m + n mbox { times}} = a^{m+n}$.

            It's like 2 apples together with 3 apples becomes 2 + 3 = 5 apples. You have $n$ copies of $a$ together with another $m$ copies of $a$, you'll get $m + n$ copies of $a$.




            • $(a ^ m)^n = a^{m.n}$

              Proof




            $(a^m)^n$ basically means that you take the result of $a^m$, then raise the whole stuff to the power of $n$, or in other words, multiply $n$ copies of it together.



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{a^m times a^m times ... times a^m}_{n mbox{ times}}$



            Now, think of 5 groups of apples, such that that each group has exactly 2 apples. So there'll be a total of 2 x 5 = 10 apples. Each $a^m$ has $m$ copies of $a$, and there are $n$ copies of $a^m$, or in other words, there are $n$ groups, in which each group has $m$ copies of $a$. So there'll be a total of $m times n$ copies of $a$. So:



            $(a^m)^n = underbrace{underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}} times ... times underbrace{a times a times ... times a}_{m mbox{ times}}}_{n mbox { times}} = a^{m.n}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 18 '12 at 15:25

























            answered Nov 18 '12 at 14:59









            user49685user49685

            2,69911521




            2,69911521












            • $begingroup$
              good job by giving details!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:26


















            • $begingroup$
              good job by giving details!
              $endgroup$
              – doniyor
              Nov 18 '12 at 15:26
















            $begingroup$
            good job by giving details!
            $endgroup$
            – doniyor
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:26




            $begingroup$
            good job by giving details!
            $endgroup$
            – doniyor
            Nov 18 '12 at 15:26


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239825%2fcan-anyone-explain-why-abc-abc-neq-abc-abc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How? [on hold]