Sharing internet access - solid way to guarantee good bandwidth for VoIP and gaming?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
we have a linksys E2500 here
The internet connection is a low 2 mbit with 1 mbit upload. The connection is shared by around 16 people (yayyy).
I want teamviewer, skype, VoIP work well, as well as a casual game of Dota 2 or HOS.
I have the ability to flash the router I guess, since I am in contact with the owner.
What is my best bet and how to do it?
What I read is, QoS of linksys standard firmware is for outgoing traffic only. I read there are working custom firmwares that control the incoming traffic as well (by delaying tcp ack responses etc i guess)
But I don't know which settings would be good to make the bandwidth leave me in without making other users very unhappy.
Point is, even if i could talk the owner into increasing bandwidth in general, it will probably still cause lag since 16 people can cause lag very easily even with 10 mbit.
bandwidth tomato qos
add a comment |
we have a linksys E2500 here
The internet connection is a low 2 mbit with 1 mbit upload. The connection is shared by around 16 people (yayyy).
I want teamviewer, skype, VoIP work well, as well as a casual game of Dota 2 or HOS.
I have the ability to flash the router I guess, since I am in contact with the owner.
What is my best bet and how to do it?
What I read is, QoS of linksys standard firmware is for outgoing traffic only. I read there are working custom firmwares that control the incoming traffic as well (by delaying tcp ack responses etc i guess)
But I don't know which settings would be good to make the bandwidth leave me in without making other users very unhappy.
Point is, even if i could talk the owner into increasing bandwidth in general, it will probably still cause lag since 16 people can cause lag very easily even with 10 mbit.
bandwidth tomato qos
1
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
we have a linksys E2500 here
The internet connection is a low 2 mbit with 1 mbit upload. The connection is shared by around 16 people (yayyy).
I want teamviewer, skype, VoIP work well, as well as a casual game of Dota 2 or HOS.
I have the ability to flash the router I guess, since I am in contact with the owner.
What is my best bet and how to do it?
What I read is, QoS of linksys standard firmware is for outgoing traffic only. I read there are working custom firmwares that control the incoming traffic as well (by delaying tcp ack responses etc i guess)
But I don't know which settings would be good to make the bandwidth leave me in without making other users very unhappy.
Point is, even if i could talk the owner into increasing bandwidth in general, it will probably still cause lag since 16 people can cause lag very easily even with 10 mbit.
bandwidth tomato qos
we have a linksys E2500 here
The internet connection is a low 2 mbit with 1 mbit upload. The connection is shared by around 16 people (yayyy).
I want teamviewer, skype, VoIP work well, as well as a casual game of Dota 2 or HOS.
I have the ability to flash the router I guess, since I am in contact with the owner.
What is my best bet and how to do it?
What I read is, QoS of linksys standard firmware is for outgoing traffic only. I read there are working custom firmwares that control the incoming traffic as well (by delaying tcp ack responses etc i guess)
But I don't know which settings would be good to make the bandwidth leave me in without making other users very unhappy.
Point is, even if i could talk the owner into increasing bandwidth in general, it will probably still cause lag since 16 people can cause lag very easily even with 10 mbit.
bandwidth tomato qos
bandwidth tomato qos
edited Feb 8 at 10:38
Hennes
59.5k793145
59.5k793145
asked May 15 '15 at 6:47
ToskanToskan
2071412
2071412
1
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
1
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
1
1
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you want you can flash DD-WRT (paste E2500
and install the webflash).
This is The DDwrt QoS wiki. But with that low internet connection between 16 people I doubt that you will achieve something.
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f915084%2fsharing-internet-access-solid-way-to-guarantee-good-bandwidth-for-voip-and-gam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you want you can flash DD-WRT (paste E2500
and install the webflash).
This is The DDwrt QoS wiki. But with that low internet connection between 16 people I doubt that you will achieve something.
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
If you want you can flash DD-WRT (paste E2500
and install the webflash).
This is The DDwrt QoS wiki. But with that low internet connection between 16 people I doubt that you will achieve something.
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
If you want you can flash DD-WRT (paste E2500
and install the webflash).
This is The DDwrt QoS wiki. But with that low internet connection between 16 people I doubt that you will achieve something.
If you want you can flash DD-WRT (paste E2500
and install the webflash).
This is The DDwrt QoS wiki. But with that low internet connection between 16 people I doubt that you will achieve something.
edited May 25 '15 at 15:06
kenorb
11.7k1580120
11.7k1580120
answered May 15 '15 at 7:09
NIZNIZ
19716
19716
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
i read about toastman tomato, seems to be what everyone is looking for
– Toskan
May 15 '15 at 7:25
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
@Toskan you can use whatever you want. There is Tomato, DD-wrt, Openwrt and they are all custom firmwares. I personally use DDwrt but you can try them all and see what suits you best. Just know that some thirdparty firmwares have some bugs in QoS and doesnt control very well the trafic. You should test and then relay on them. It is not always out of the box solution.
– NIZ
May 15 '15 at 7:33
1
1
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
that's what i am saying, toastman is known for his QoS solutions, that's what he's well known for. Shibby tomatousb implements his QoS config as well. It works kinda well, needs some fine tuning but as far as now, I am quite happy.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f915084%2fsharing-internet-access-solid-way-to-guarantee-good-bandwidth-for-voip-and-gam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Most of the stuff you want to use are require a good amount of bandwidth. You need a better internet connection before all 16 people will be able to use all those services. You have a bottom of the barrel router, it doesn't support 802.11ac which is one of the only ways you will be able to support high bandwidth services to 16+ clients.
– Ramhound
May 15 '15 at 11:02
it's plain wrong. I mean sure, 16 clients is a lot but even 10 mbit can be too little for them.
– Toskan
May 18 '15 at 13:24