Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p$












2












$begingroup$



Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$




As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.



Thanks in advance.



EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):



EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.



Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.



Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Wagter
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
















2












$begingroup$



Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$




As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.



Thanks in advance.



EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):



EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.



Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.



Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Wagter
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$



Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$




As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.



Thanks in advance.



EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):



EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.



Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.



Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$




As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.



Thanks in advance.



EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):



EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.



Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.



Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:22







Steven Wagter

















asked Dec 24 '18 at 20:20









Steven WagterSteven Wagter

1789




1789








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Wagter
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:51














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Wagter
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:51








2




2




$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25




$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25












$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28




$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28




1




1




$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34




$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34












$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39




$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51




$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.



Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.



Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.



Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
    $endgroup$
    – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:40












  • $begingroup$
    The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:42



















1












$begingroup$

We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.



So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.



So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.



So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Wagter
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:29










  • $begingroup$
    I will add more to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – John Wayland Bales
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












  • $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:45



















1












$begingroup$

You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;



For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.



The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.



But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.



And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:



If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.



So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.



And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.



Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".



====in recap ==



For natural numbers it's clear by induction.



If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.



For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.



If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.



So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.



ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
      $endgroup$
      – Steven Wagter
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:28










    • $begingroup$
      If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
      $endgroup$
      – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:41










    • $begingroup$
      natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
      $endgroup$
      – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:48



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Here is another potential route through this.



    Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.



    For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051598%2fprove-that-if-a-b-0-p-0-then-ap-bp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.



      Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
      can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
      for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
      then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
      mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.



      Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
      (Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
      $y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
      is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
      the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
      which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
      by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
      That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.



      Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
      such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
      By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
        $endgroup$
        – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:40












      • $begingroup$
        The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
















      2












      $begingroup$

      Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.



      Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
      can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
      for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
      then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
      mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.



      Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
      (Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
      $y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
      is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
      the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
      which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
      by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
      That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.



      Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
      such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
      By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
        $endgroup$
        – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:40












      • $begingroup$
        The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:42














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.



      Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
      can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
      for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
      then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
      mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.



      Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
      (Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
      $y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
      is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
      the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
      which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
      by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
      That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.



      Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
      such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
      By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.



      Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
      can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
      for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
      then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
      mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.



      Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
      (Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
      $y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
      is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
      the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
      which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
      by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
      That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.



      Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
      such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
      By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
      Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:38









      Danny Pak-Keung ChanDanny Pak-Keung Chan

      2,58438




      2,58438












      • $begingroup$
        For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
        $endgroup$
        – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:40












      • $begingroup$
        The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:42


















      • $begingroup$
        For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
        $endgroup$
        – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:40












      • $begingroup$
        The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
















      $begingroup$
      For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
      $endgroup$
      – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:40






      $begingroup$
      For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
      $endgroup$
      – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:40














      $begingroup$
      The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:42




      $begingroup$
      The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:42











      1












      $begingroup$

      We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.



      So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.



      So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.



      So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
        $endgroup$
        – Steven Wagter
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:29










      • $begingroup$
        I will add more to my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – John Wayland Bales
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:36










      • $begingroup$
        Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:37










      • $begingroup$
        However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












      • $begingroup$
        I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
















      1












      $begingroup$

      We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.



      So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.



      So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.



      So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
        $endgroup$
        – Steven Wagter
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:29










      • $begingroup$
        I will add more to my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – John Wayland Bales
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:36










      • $begingroup$
        Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:37










      • $begingroup$
        However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












      • $begingroup$
        I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:45














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.



      So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.



      So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.



      So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.



      So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.



      So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.



      So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Dec 24 '18 at 20:41

























      answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:27









      John Wayland BalesJohn Wayland Bales

      15.4k21238




      15.4k21238












      • $begingroup$
        I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
        $endgroup$
        – Steven Wagter
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:29










      • $begingroup$
        I will add more to my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – John Wayland Bales
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:36










      • $begingroup$
        Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:37










      • $begingroup$
        However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












      • $begingroup$
        I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:45


















      • $begingroup$
        I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
        $endgroup$
        – Steven Wagter
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:29










      • $begingroup$
        I will add more to my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – John Wayland Bales
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:36










      • $begingroup$
        Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:37










      • $begingroup$
        However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:39












      • $begingroup$
        I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
















      $begingroup$
      I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – Steven Wagter
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:29




      $begingroup$
      I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – Steven Wagter
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:29












      $begingroup$
      I will add more to my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – John Wayland Bales
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:36




      $begingroup$
      I will add more to my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – John Wayland Bales
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:36












      $begingroup$
      Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:37




      $begingroup$
      Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:37












      $begingroup$
      However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:39






      $begingroup$
      However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:39














      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:45




      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Namaste
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:45











      1












      $begingroup$

      You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;



      For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.



      The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.



      But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.



      And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:



      If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.



      So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.



      And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.



      Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".



      ====in recap ==



      For natural numbers it's clear by induction.



      If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.



      For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.



      If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.



      So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.



      ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;



        For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.



        The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.



        But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.



        And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:



        If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.



        So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.



        And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.



        Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".



        ====in recap ==



        For natural numbers it's clear by induction.



        If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.



        For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.



        If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.



        So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.



        ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;



          For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.



          The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.



          But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.



          And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:



          If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.



          So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.



          And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.



          Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".



          ====in recap ==



          For natural numbers it's clear by induction.



          If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.



          For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.



          If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.



          So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.



          ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;



          For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.



          The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.



          But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.



          And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:



          If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.



          So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.



          And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.



          Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".



          ====in recap ==



          For natural numbers it's clear by induction.



          If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.



          For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.



          If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.



          So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.



          ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:36

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:59









          fleabloodfleablood

          1




          1























              0












              $begingroup$

              If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
                $endgroup$
                – Steven Wagter
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:28










              • $begingroup$
                If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:41










              • $begingroup$
                natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
















              0












              $begingroup$

              If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
                $endgroup$
                – Steven Wagter
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:28










              • $begingroup$
                If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:41










              • $begingroup$
                natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:48














              0












              0








              0





              $begingroup$

              If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Dec 24 '18 at 20:29

























              answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:28









              Julio Trujillo GonzalezJulio Trujillo Gonzalez

              856




              856








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
                $endgroup$
                – Steven Wagter
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:28










              • $begingroup$
                If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:41










              • $begingroup$
                natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:48














              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
                $endgroup$
                – Steven Wagter
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:28










              • $begingroup$
                If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:41










              • $begingroup$
                natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
                $endgroup$
                – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
                Dec 24 '18 at 20:48








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven Wagter
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:28




              $begingroup$
              I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven Wagter
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:28












              $begingroup$
              If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
              $endgroup$
              – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:41




              $begingroup$
              If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
              $endgroup$
              – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:41












              $begingroup$
              natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
              $endgroup$
              – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:48




              $begingroup$
              natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
              $endgroup$
              – Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
              Dec 24 '18 at 20:48











              0












              $begingroup$

              Here is another potential route through this.



              Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.



              For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Here is another potential route through this.



                Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.



                For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Here is another potential route through this.



                  Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.



                  For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Here is another potential route through this.



                  Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.



                  For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:47









                  Mark BennetMark Bennet

                  82.1k984182




                  82.1k984182






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051598%2fprove-that-if-a-b-0-p-0-then-ap-bp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How? [on hold]