$mathcal{Nil}_n$ isomorphic to $h^A$ with $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$
$begingroup$
I would like to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is isomorphic to $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ as categories.
$texttt{Nil}_n: texttt{Rings} longrightarrow texttt{Sets}$ is the functor that sends a ring $R$ to ${x in R | x^n = 0}$.
$h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}: texttt{Mod}_R longrightarrow texttt{Mod}_R$ is the functor where $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ is an $R$-module and it sends an $R$-module $N$ to $Hom(mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n),N)$.
I know that two categories are isomorphic if when there exists two functors as above, they satisfy also the above conditions.
I want to see that if there exists two functors $F: texttt{Nil}_n longrightarrow h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and $G: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$, then $FG=id_{h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}}$ and $GF=id_{texttt{Nil}_n}$.
But my problem comes when I have to find / see which are these functors. Does $F$ and $G$ even exist? How can I find them? Are they known functors?
I want to see that in order to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is represented by the ring $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and the natural equivalence
$tau: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$
given (for each ring $R$) by
$tau_R: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(R) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(R): f ↦ f(bar{x})$.
I was thinking on first showing that $texttt{Nil}_n$ and $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ are isomorphic and then showing that there exists a natural iso $mu: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$ determined by $mu_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(Id_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)})$ and it is equal to $tau$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is isomorphic to $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ as categories.
$texttt{Nil}_n: texttt{Rings} longrightarrow texttt{Sets}$ is the functor that sends a ring $R$ to ${x in R | x^n = 0}$.
$h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}: texttt{Mod}_R longrightarrow texttt{Mod}_R$ is the functor where $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ is an $R$-module and it sends an $R$-module $N$ to $Hom(mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n),N)$.
I know that two categories are isomorphic if when there exists two functors as above, they satisfy also the above conditions.
I want to see that if there exists two functors $F: texttt{Nil}_n longrightarrow h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and $G: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$, then $FG=id_{h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}}$ and $GF=id_{texttt{Nil}_n}$.
But my problem comes when I have to find / see which are these functors. Does $F$ and $G$ even exist? How can I find them? Are they known functors?
I want to see that in order to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is represented by the ring $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and the natural equivalence
$tau: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$
given (for each ring $R$) by
$tau_R: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(R) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(R): f ↦ f(bar{x})$.
I was thinking on first showing that $texttt{Nil}_n$ and $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ are isomorphic and then showing that there exists a natural iso $mu: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$ determined by $mu_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(Id_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)})$ and it is equal to $tau$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is isomorphic to $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ as categories.
$texttt{Nil}_n: texttt{Rings} longrightarrow texttt{Sets}$ is the functor that sends a ring $R$ to ${x in R | x^n = 0}$.
$h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}: texttt{Mod}_R longrightarrow texttt{Mod}_R$ is the functor where $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ is an $R$-module and it sends an $R$-module $N$ to $Hom(mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n),N)$.
I know that two categories are isomorphic if when there exists two functors as above, they satisfy also the above conditions.
I want to see that if there exists two functors $F: texttt{Nil}_n longrightarrow h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and $G: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$, then $FG=id_{h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}}$ and $GF=id_{texttt{Nil}_n}$.
But my problem comes when I have to find / see which are these functors. Does $F$ and $G$ even exist? How can I find them? Are they known functors?
I want to see that in order to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is represented by the ring $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and the natural equivalence
$tau: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$
given (for each ring $R$) by
$tau_R: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(R) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(R): f ↦ f(bar{x})$.
I was thinking on first showing that $texttt{Nil}_n$ and $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ are isomorphic and then showing that there exists a natural iso $mu: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$ determined by $mu_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(Id_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)})$ and it is equal to $tau$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
I would like to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is isomorphic to $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ as categories.
$texttt{Nil}_n: texttt{Rings} longrightarrow texttt{Sets}$ is the functor that sends a ring $R$ to ${x in R | x^n = 0}$.
$h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}: texttt{Mod}_R longrightarrow texttt{Mod}_R$ is the functor where $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ is an $R$-module and it sends an $R$-module $N$ to $Hom(mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n),N)$.
I know that two categories are isomorphic if when there exists two functors as above, they satisfy also the above conditions.
I want to see that if there exists two functors $F: texttt{Nil}_n longrightarrow h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and $G: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$, then $FG=id_{h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}}$ and $GF=id_{texttt{Nil}_n}$.
But my problem comes when I have to find / see which are these functors. Does $F$ and $G$ even exist? How can I find them? Are they known functors?
I want to see that in order to see that $texttt{Nil}_n$ is represented by the ring $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ and the natural equivalence
$tau: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$
given (for each ring $R$) by
$tau_R: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(R) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(R): f ↦ f(bar{x})$.
I was thinking on first showing that $texttt{Nil}_n$ and $h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}$ are isomorphic and then showing that there exists a natural iso $mu: h^{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)} longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n$ determined by $mu_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)}(Id_{mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)})$ and it is equal to $tau$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
edited Dec 22 '18 at 15:28
idriskameni
asked Dec 22 '18 at 15:19
idriskameniidriskameni
749321
749321
2
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29
2
2
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Ok, several problems. As Kevin Carlson points out in the comments, $newcommandNil{operatorname{Nil}}Nil_n$ and (if we define $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$) $h^A$ are functors, not categories.
Thus we need to show that they are isomorphic as functors.
Isomorphisms of functors
Recall, then, the definition of natural transformation, which is the notion of a morphism between functors. Let $F,G:Cto D$ be functors from a category $C$ to a category $D$. Then a natural transformation $theta: Fto G$ is a family of maps, $theta_x: F(x)to G(x)$ for each $xin C$ satisfying the following commutative diagram for every morphism $f:xto y$ in $C$:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}F(x) @>F(f)>> F(y) \ @Vtheta_xVV @Vtheta_yVV\G(x) @>>G(f)> G(y) end{CD}$$
An isomorphism of functors (usually called a natural isomorphism) then is a natural transformation all of whose components are isomorphisms. (Check that this is equivalent to the natural transformation having an inverse natural transformation)
How to apply this to your question
First of all, you have the domains and codomains of your functors wrong. Well $Nil_n$ is correct. It is a functor from $newcommandRing{mathbf{Ring}}newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Ring$ to $Set$, but $h^A(R)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom_Ring(A,R)$ is actually also a functor from $Ring$ to $Set$, not from right $R$-modules to right $R$-modules.
Thus you want to find a family of maps for every ring $RinRing$, $tau_R:h^A(R)to Nil_n(R)$ with $tau_R$ an isomorphism of sets (i.e. a bijection) for every ring $R$.
You should also check that $tau_R$ is natural. I.e. that the following diagram commutes for every map $phi :Rto S$ of rings:
$$begin{CD}h^A(R) @>h^A(phi)>> h^A(S) \ @Vtau_RVV @Vtau_SVV\Nil_n(R) @>>Nil_n(phi)> Nil_n(S) end{CD}$$
Note: I've used $tau_R$, because you've already identified the correct family of maps $tau_R$ in your question, you just have to prove it has the right properties.
Edit: In response to your comment asking how is $tau_R$ defined exactly.
Well, as you mentioned, the elements of $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$, and the elements of $Nil_n(R)$ are elements $r$ of $R$ with $r^n=0$. Thus $tau_R$ should take ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$ and produce appropriate elements of $R$.
Well, $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$, so let $bar{x}$ be the image of $xin Bbb{Z}[x]$ in the quotient, $A$. Then if $f:Ato R$ is a ring homomorphism, $r=f(bar{x})$ is an element of $R$, and moreover, $r^n=f(bar{x})^n=f(bar{x}^n)=f(0)=0$, so $r$ is in $Nil_n(R)$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: there is a universal property of $mathbb Z[x]$ as the free ring on one generator. This means there is a functorial identifcation $$Hom_{Rings}(mathbb Z[x], R) = Hom_{Sets}({x},R) = {xin R} = R$$
Now describe this equality in terms of an isomorphism of functors and adapt the proof to your situation. (Yes the functors natural transformations exist and are well known.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049536%2fmathcalnil-n-isomorphic-to-ha-with-a-mathbbzx-xn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Ok, several problems. As Kevin Carlson points out in the comments, $newcommandNil{operatorname{Nil}}Nil_n$ and (if we define $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$) $h^A$ are functors, not categories.
Thus we need to show that they are isomorphic as functors.
Isomorphisms of functors
Recall, then, the definition of natural transformation, which is the notion of a morphism between functors. Let $F,G:Cto D$ be functors from a category $C$ to a category $D$. Then a natural transformation $theta: Fto G$ is a family of maps, $theta_x: F(x)to G(x)$ for each $xin C$ satisfying the following commutative diagram for every morphism $f:xto y$ in $C$:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}F(x) @>F(f)>> F(y) \ @Vtheta_xVV @Vtheta_yVV\G(x) @>>G(f)> G(y) end{CD}$$
An isomorphism of functors (usually called a natural isomorphism) then is a natural transformation all of whose components are isomorphisms. (Check that this is equivalent to the natural transformation having an inverse natural transformation)
How to apply this to your question
First of all, you have the domains and codomains of your functors wrong. Well $Nil_n$ is correct. It is a functor from $newcommandRing{mathbf{Ring}}newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Ring$ to $Set$, but $h^A(R)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom_Ring(A,R)$ is actually also a functor from $Ring$ to $Set$, not from right $R$-modules to right $R$-modules.
Thus you want to find a family of maps for every ring $RinRing$, $tau_R:h^A(R)to Nil_n(R)$ with $tau_R$ an isomorphism of sets (i.e. a bijection) for every ring $R$.
You should also check that $tau_R$ is natural. I.e. that the following diagram commutes for every map $phi :Rto S$ of rings:
$$begin{CD}h^A(R) @>h^A(phi)>> h^A(S) \ @Vtau_RVV @Vtau_SVV\Nil_n(R) @>>Nil_n(phi)> Nil_n(S) end{CD}$$
Note: I've used $tau_R$, because you've already identified the correct family of maps $tau_R$ in your question, you just have to prove it has the right properties.
Edit: In response to your comment asking how is $tau_R$ defined exactly.
Well, as you mentioned, the elements of $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$, and the elements of $Nil_n(R)$ are elements $r$ of $R$ with $r^n=0$. Thus $tau_R$ should take ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$ and produce appropriate elements of $R$.
Well, $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$, so let $bar{x}$ be the image of $xin Bbb{Z}[x]$ in the quotient, $A$. Then if $f:Ato R$ is a ring homomorphism, $r=f(bar{x})$ is an element of $R$, and moreover, $r^n=f(bar{x})^n=f(bar{x}^n)=f(0)=0$, so $r$ is in $Nil_n(R)$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Ok, several problems. As Kevin Carlson points out in the comments, $newcommandNil{operatorname{Nil}}Nil_n$ and (if we define $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$) $h^A$ are functors, not categories.
Thus we need to show that they are isomorphic as functors.
Isomorphisms of functors
Recall, then, the definition of natural transformation, which is the notion of a morphism between functors. Let $F,G:Cto D$ be functors from a category $C$ to a category $D$. Then a natural transformation $theta: Fto G$ is a family of maps, $theta_x: F(x)to G(x)$ for each $xin C$ satisfying the following commutative diagram for every morphism $f:xto y$ in $C$:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}F(x) @>F(f)>> F(y) \ @Vtheta_xVV @Vtheta_yVV\G(x) @>>G(f)> G(y) end{CD}$$
An isomorphism of functors (usually called a natural isomorphism) then is a natural transformation all of whose components are isomorphisms. (Check that this is equivalent to the natural transformation having an inverse natural transformation)
How to apply this to your question
First of all, you have the domains and codomains of your functors wrong. Well $Nil_n$ is correct. It is a functor from $newcommandRing{mathbf{Ring}}newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Ring$ to $Set$, but $h^A(R)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom_Ring(A,R)$ is actually also a functor from $Ring$ to $Set$, not from right $R$-modules to right $R$-modules.
Thus you want to find a family of maps for every ring $RinRing$, $tau_R:h^A(R)to Nil_n(R)$ with $tau_R$ an isomorphism of sets (i.e. a bijection) for every ring $R$.
You should also check that $tau_R$ is natural. I.e. that the following diagram commutes for every map $phi :Rto S$ of rings:
$$begin{CD}h^A(R) @>h^A(phi)>> h^A(S) \ @Vtau_RVV @Vtau_SVV\Nil_n(R) @>>Nil_n(phi)> Nil_n(S) end{CD}$$
Note: I've used $tau_R$, because you've already identified the correct family of maps $tau_R$ in your question, you just have to prove it has the right properties.
Edit: In response to your comment asking how is $tau_R$ defined exactly.
Well, as you mentioned, the elements of $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$, and the elements of $Nil_n(R)$ are elements $r$ of $R$ with $r^n=0$. Thus $tau_R$ should take ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$ and produce appropriate elements of $R$.
Well, $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$, so let $bar{x}$ be the image of $xin Bbb{Z}[x]$ in the quotient, $A$. Then if $f:Ato R$ is a ring homomorphism, $r=f(bar{x})$ is an element of $R$, and moreover, $r^n=f(bar{x})^n=f(bar{x}^n)=f(0)=0$, so $r$ is in $Nil_n(R)$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Ok, several problems. As Kevin Carlson points out in the comments, $newcommandNil{operatorname{Nil}}Nil_n$ and (if we define $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$) $h^A$ are functors, not categories.
Thus we need to show that they are isomorphic as functors.
Isomorphisms of functors
Recall, then, the definition of natural transformation, which is the notion of a morphism between functors. Let $F,G:Cto D$ be functors from a category $C$ to a category $D$. Then a natural transformation $theta: Fto G$ is a family of maps, $theta_x: F(x)to G(x)$ for each $xin C$ satisfying the following commutative diagram for every morphism $f:xto y$ in $C$:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}F(x) @>F(f)>> F(y) \ @Vtheta_xVV @Vtheta_yVV\G(x) @>>G(f)> G(y) end{CD}$$
An isomorphism of functors (usually called a natural isomorphism) then is a natural transformation all of whose components are isomorphisms. (Check that this is equivalent to the natural transformation having an inverse natural transformation)
How to apply this to your question
First of all, you have the domains and codomains of your functors wrong. Well $Nil_n$ is correct. It is a functor from $newcommandRing{mathbf{Ring}}newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Ring$ to $Set$, but $h^A(R)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom_Ring(A,R)$ is actually also a functor from $Ring$ to $Set$, not from right $R$-modules to right $R$-modules.
Thus you want to find a family of maps for every ring $RinRing$, $tau_R:h^A(R)to Nil_n(R)$ with $tau_R$ an isomorphism of sets (i.e. a bijection) for every ring $R$.
You should also check that $tau_R$ is natural. I.e. that the following diagram commutes for every map $phi :Rto S$ of rings:
$$begin{CD}h^A(R) @>h^A(phi)>> h^A(S) \ @Vtau_RVV @Vtau_SVV\Nil_n(R) @>>Nil_n(phi)> Nil_n(S) end{CD}$$
Note: I've used $tau_R$, because you've already identified the correct family of maps $tau_R$ in your question, you just have to prove it has the right properties.
Edit: In response to your comment asking how is $tau_R$ defined exactly.
Well, as you mentioned, the elements of $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$, and the elements of $Nil_n(R)$ are elements $r$ of $R$ with $r^n=0$. Thus $tau_R$ should take ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$ and produce appropriate elements of $R$.
Well, $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$, so let $bar{x}$ be the image of $xin Bbb{Z}[x]$ in the quotient, $A$. Then if $f:Ato R$ is a ring homomorphism, $r=f(bar{x})$ is an element of $R$, and moreover, $r^n=f(bar{x})^n=f(bar{x}^n)=f(0)=0$, so $r$ is in $Nil_n(R)$.
$endgroup$
Ok, several problems. As Kevin Carlson points out in the comments, $newcommandNil{operatorname{Nil}}Nil_n$ and (if we define $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$) $h^A$ are functors, not categories.
Thus we need to show that they are isomorphic as functors.
Isomorphisms of functors
Recall, then, the definition of natural transformation, which is the notion of a morphism between functors. Let $F,G:Cto D$ be functors from a category $C$ to a category $D$. Then a natural transformation $theta: Fto G$ is a family of maps, $theta_x: F(x)to G(x)$ for each $xin C$ satisfying the following commutative diagram for every morphism $f:xto y$ in $C$:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}F(x) @>F(f)>> F(y) \ @Vtheta_xVV @Vtheta_yVV\G(x) @>>G(f)> G(y) end{CD}$$
An isomorphism of functors (usually called a natural isomorphism) then is a natural transformation all of whose components are isomorphisms. (Check that this is equivalent to the natural transformation having an inverse natural transformation)
How to apply this to your question
First of all, you have the domains and codomains of your functors wrong. Well $Nil_n$ is correct. It is a functor from $newcommandRing{mathbf{Ring}}newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Ring$ to $Set$, but $h^A(R)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom_Ring(A,R)$ is actually also a functor from $Ring$ to $Set$, not from right $R$-modules to right $R$-modules.
Thus you want to find a family of maps for every ring $RinRing$, $tau_R:h^A(R)to Nil_n(R)$ with $tau_R$ an isomorphism of sets (i.e. a bijection) for every ring $R$.
You should also check that $tau_R$ is natural. I.e. that the following diagram commutes for every map $phi :Rto S$ of rings:
$$begin{CD}h^A(R) @>h^A(phi)>> h^A(S) \ @Vtau_RVV @Vtau_SVV\Nil_n(R) @>>Nil_n(phi)> Nil_n(S) end{CD}$$
Note: I've used $tau_R$, because you've already identified the correct family of maps $tau_R$ in your question, you just have to prove it has the right properties.
Edit: In response to your comment asking how is $tau_R$ defined exactly.
Well, as you mentioned, the elements of $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$, and the elements of $Nil_n(R)$ are elements $r$ of $R$ with $r^n=0$. Thus $tau_R$ should take ring homomorphisms $f:Ato R$ and produce appropriate elements of $R$.
Well, $A=Bbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$, so let $bar{x}$ be the image of $xin Bbb{Z}[x]$ in the quotient, $A$. Then if $f:Ato R$ is a ring homomorphism, $r=f(bar{x})$ is an element of $R$, and moreover, $r^n=f(bar{x})^n=f(bar{x}^n)=f(0)=0$, so $r$ is in $Nil_n(R)$.
edited Dec 28 '18 at 19:32
answered Dec 22 '18 at 19:32
jgonjgon
16.7k32244
16.7k32244
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
|
show 3 more comments
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
3
3
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
To the downvoter: I don't particularly care about the rep, but if you think there's something wrong with my answer, please leave a comment, and I'll try to address it.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 23 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I do understand what you say. But I have a hard problem trying to understand what $tau_R$ does. Because I know that elements in $h^A(R)$ are ring homomorphisms from $A=mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ to $R$. And elements in $Nil_n(R)$ are elements in $R$ that are zero when we take the $n$-th power. But how can you map $f mapsto f(overline{x})$?I do not understand what that means. Any help?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 28 '18 at 18:11
1
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
@idriskameni edited.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 28 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
$begingroup$
Could you tell me if this would be correct to check commutativity? Let $hin h^A(R)$. Then $(tau_S circ h^A(f))(h)=tau_S(h^A(f)(h))=tau_S(fcirc h)=( fcirc h)(overline{x})$. On the other hand, $(Nil_n(f) circ tau_R)(h)=Nil_n(f)(tau_R(h))= Nil_n(f)(h(overline{x}))= f(h(overline{x}))=(fcirc h)(overline{x})$. Hence, $tau_S circ h^A(f)=Nil_n(f) circ tau_R$.
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 30 '18 at 16:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
$begingroup$
@idriskameni Sorry, didn't see these till now, commutativity looks good, I'll edit to address bijectivity later, since I've got to head out now.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 17:13
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: there is a universal property of $mathbb Z[x]$ as the free ring on one generator. This means there is a functorial identifcation $$Hom_{Rings}(mathbb Z[x], R) = Hom_{Sets}({x},R) = {xin R} = R$$
Now describe this equality in terms of an isomorphism of functors and adapt the proof to your situation. (Yes the functors natural transformations exist and are well known.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: there is a universal property of $mathbb Z[x]$ as the free ring on one generator. This means there is a functorial identifcation $$Hom_{Rings}(mathbb Z[x], R) = Hom_{Sets}({x},R) = {xin R} = R$$
Now describe this equality in terms of an isomorphism of functors and adapt the proof to your situation. (Yes the functors natural transformations exist and are well known.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: there is a universal property of $mathbb Z[x]$ as the free ring on one generator. This means there is a functorial identifcation $$Hom_{Rings}(mathbb Z[x], R) = Hom_{Sets}({x},R) = {xin R} = R$$
Now describe this equality in terms of an isomorphism of functors and adapt the proof to your situation. (Yes the functors natural transformations exist and are well known.)
$endgroup$
Hint: there is a universal property of $mathbb Z[x]$ as the free ring on one generator. This means there is a functorial identifcation $$Hom_{Rings}(mathbb Z[x], R) = Hom_{Sets}({x},R) = {xin R} = R$$
Now describe this equality in terms of an isomorphism of functors and adapt the proof to your situation. (Yes the functors natural transformations exist and are well known.)
edited Dec 22 '18 at 16:09
answered Dec 22 '18 at 15:32
BenBen
4,383617
4,383617
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049536%2fmathcalnil-n-isomorphic-to-ha-with-a-mathbbzx-xn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
You are asking for two functors to be isomorphic as categories, which doesn't make sense. They're not categories! Furthermore, you definitely don't want to consider $R$-module maps out of $Z[x]/x^n$ here-those have nothing to do with nilpotents. You should probably be showing that the representables associates to $Z[x]/x^n$ and $Nil_n$ are naturally isomorphic functors from rings to sets.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
And how can I check if two functors are isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 22 '18 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You've already given the natural map $tau$. Now you just need to show $tau_R$ is an isomorphism for every $R$.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 22 '18 at 19:29