The first eigenvalue of Laplacian











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












It's well known that for any bounded domain $Sigma$, there exist unique $lambda_Sigma >0$
and nonnegative $varphiin H_0^1(Sigma)$ such that
begin{equation}label{Eq-La-Bel-op}
left{
begin{aligned}
&-Deltavarphi=lambda_Sigmavarphi
quadmbox{in }Sigma, \
&varphi=0 quadquadquadquad~mbox{on } partialSigma,\
end{aligned}
right.
end{equation}

where $Delta$ is the Laplace operator and $lambda_Sigma$ is the first eigenvalue of it.



Question: For any $varepsilon>0$ small, does there eixist some smooth domain $Omega$ such that $SigmasubsetneqOmega$ and
$lambda_{Sigma}leqlambda_{Omega}+varepsilon$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:11










  • A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:15










  • How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
    – xiaobiaoJia
    Nov 14 at 14:17












  • OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:49












  • Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:49















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












It's well known that for any bounded domain $Sigma$, there exist unique $lambda_Sigma >0$
and nonnegative $varphiin H_0^1(Sigma)$ such that
begin{equation}label{Eq-La-Bel-op}
left{
begin{aligned}
&-Deltavarphi=lambda_Sigmavarphi
quadmbox{in }Sigma, \
&varphi=0 quadquadquadquad~mbox{on } partialSigma,\
end{aligned}
right.
end{equation}

where $Delta$ is the Laplace operator and $lambda_Sigma$ is the first eigenvalue of it.



Question: For any $varepsilon>0$ small, does there eixist some smooth domain $Omega$ such that $SigmasubsetneqOmega$ and
$lambda_{Sigma}leqlambda_{Omega}+varepsilon$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:11










  • A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:15










  • How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
    – xiaobiaoJia
    Nov 14 at 14:17












  • OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:49












  • Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:49













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











It's well known that for any bounded domain $Sigma$, there exist unique $lambda_Sigma >0$
and nonnegative $varphiin H_0^1(Sigma)$ such that
begin{equation}label{Eq-La-Bel-op}
left{
begin{aligned}
&-Deltavarphi=lambda_Sigmavarphi
quadmbox{in }Sigma, \
&varphi=0 quadquadquadquad~mbox{on } partialSigma,\
end{aligned}
right.
end{equation}

where $Delta$ is the Laplace operator and $lambda_Sigma$ is the first eigenvalue of it.



Question: For any $varepsilon>0$ small, does there eixist some smooth domain $Omega$ such that $SigmasubsetneqOmega$ and
$lambda_{Sigma}leqlambda_{Omega}+varepsilon$?










share|cite|improve this question













It's well known that for any bounded domain $Sigma$, there exist unique $lambda_Sigma >0$
and nonnegative $varphiin H_0^1(Sigma)$ such that
begin{equation}label{Eq-La-Bel-op}
left{
begin{aligned}
&-Deltavarphi=lambda_Sigmavarphi
quadmbox{in }Sigma, \
&varphi=0 quadquadquadquad~mbox{on } partialSigma,\
end{aligned}
right.
end{equation}

where $Delta$ is the Laplace operator and $lambda_Sigma$ is the first eigenvalue of it.



Question: For any $varepsilon>0$ small, does there eixist some smooth domain $Omega$ such that $SigmasubsetneqOmega$ and
$lambda_{Sigma}leqlambda_{Omega}+varepsilon$?







pde






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 14 at 14:01









xiaobiaoJia

183




183












  • Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:11










  • A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:15










  • How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
    – xiaobiaoJia
    Nov 14 at 14:17












  • OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:49












  • Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:49


















  • Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:11










  • A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:15










  • How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
    – xiaobiaoJia
    Nov 14 at 14:17












  • OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 14 at 14:49












  • Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
    – Kusma
    Nov 14 at 14:49
















Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 14 at 14:11




Are you sure this is what you need? Because there is a trivial answer; just take $Omega$ equal to a translate of $Sigma$.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 14 at 14:11












A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
– Kusma
Nov 14 at 14:15




A translate of $Sigma$ is not a superset of $Sigma$.
– Kusma
Nov 14 at 14:15












How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
– xiaobiaoJia
Nov 14 at 14:17






How about $Omega$ is not a planar domain? e.g., $Omega$ is a subdomain of unit sphere. (There is a result: If $Omega$ is a planar domain, then $lambda_{(alphaOmega)}=frac{lambda_{Omega}}{alpha^2}$)
– xiaobiaoJia
Nov 14 at 14:17














OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 14 at 14:49






OH sorry, that symbol made me think that $Sigma notsubset Omega$.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 14 at 14:49














Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
– Kusma
Nov 14 at 14:49




Just scaling your domain only satisfied your condition of $Sigmasubsetneq Omega$ if it is star shaped.
– Kusma
Nov 14 at 14:49










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










One answer to this question is that you could try to use continuity of eigenvalues with respect to changes of the domain. I haven't looked at the proofs (they aren't in the reference I use anyway), but in Antoine Henrot's book Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators, Section 2.3.3 deals with this (and Section 2.3.5 tells you about differentiability). The results are approximately (all sets lying in a fixed compact set)




  1. if $Sigma$ is convex and $Omega_n$ are convex sets tending to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.

  2. If $Omega_n$ are uniformly Lipschitz and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$

  3. If $Omega_nsubset mathbb{R}^2$ such that the number of connected components of the complement is uniformly bounded, and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.


Depending on the regularity and connectedness properties of your set $Sigma$ (and the dimension), this could answer your problems. I am not aware of any necessary conditions for continuity, but of course there might be some.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998307%2fthe-first-eigenvalue-of-laplacian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    One answer to this question is that you could try to use continuity of eigenvalues with respect to changes of the domain. I haven't looked at the proofs (they aren't in the reference I use anyway), but in Antoine Henrot's book Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators, Section 2.3.3 deals with this (and Section 2.3.5 tells you about differentiability). The results are approximately (all sets lying in a fixed compact set)




    1. if $Sigma$ is convex and $Omega_n$ are convex sets tending to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.

    2. If $Omega_n$ are uniformly Lipschitz and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$

    3. If $Omega_nsubset mathbb{R}^2$ such that the number of connected components of the complement is uniformly bounded, and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.


    Depending on the regularity and connectedness properties of your set $Sigma$ (and the dimension), this could answer your problems. I am not aware of any necessary conditions for continuity, but of course there might be some.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      One answer to this question is that you could try to use continuity of eigenvalues with respect to changes of the domain. I haven't looked at the proofs (they aren't in the reference I use anyway), but in Antoine Henrot's book Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators, Section 2.3.3 deals with this (and Section 2.3.5 tells you about differentiability). The results are approximately (all sets lying in a fixed compact set)




      1. if $Sigma$ is convex and $Omega_n$ are convex sets tending to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.

      2. If $Omega_n$ are uniformly Lipschitz and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$

      3. If $Omega_nsubset mathbb{R}^2$ such that the number of connected components of the complement is uniformly bounded, and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.


      Depending on the regularity and connectedness properties of your set $Sigma$ (and the dimension), this could answer your problems. I am not aware of any necessary conditions for continuity, but of course there might be some.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        One answer to this question is that you could try to use continuity of eigenvalues with respect to changes of the domain. I haven't looked at the proofs (they aren't in the reference I use anyway), but in Antoine Henrot's book Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators, Section 2.3.3 deals with this (and Section 2.3.5 tells you about differentiability). The results are approximately (all sets lying in a fixed compact set)




        1. if $Sigma$ is convex and $Omega_n$ are convex sets tending to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.

        2. If $Omega_n$ are uniformly Lipschitz and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$

        3. If $Omega_nsubset mathbb{R}^2$ such that the number of connected components of the complement is uniformly bounded, and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.


        Depending on the regularity and connectedness properties of your set $Sigma$ (and the dimension), this could answer your problems. I am not aware of any necessary conditions for continuity, but of course there might be some.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        One answer to this question is that you could try to use continuity of eigenvalues with respect to changes of the domain. I haven't looked at the proofs (they aren't in the reference I use anyway), but in Antoine Henrot's book Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators, Section 2.3.3 deals with this (and Section 2.3.5 tells you about differentiability). The results are approximately (all sets lying in a fixed compact set)




        1. if $Sigma$ is convex and $Omega_n$ are convex sets tending to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.

        2. If $Omega_n$ are uniformly Lipschitz and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$

        3. If $Omega_nsubset mathbb{R}^2$ such that the number of connected components of the complement is uniformly bounded, and converging to $Sigma$ in Hausdorff distance, then $lambda_k(Omega_n)to lambda_k(Sigma)$.


        Depending on the regularity and connectedness properties of your set $Sigma$ (and the dimension), this could answer your problems. I am not aware of any necessary conditions for continuity, but of course there might be some.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 at 14:43









        Kusma

        3,6881219




        3,6881219






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998307%2fthe-first-eigenvalue-of-laplacian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa