“Density” of Topological Properties.












0












$begingroup$


I came up with this question when I drew diagrams to represent the relations among special topological space. I am aware that the answer might be trivial, but I haven’t figure out a way to do it yet.



Given two topological properties $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $P_1<P_2$($P_1$ implies $P_2$, but does not equal to $P_2$. An example would be “$T_0<T_1$”), is there a topological property $P$ such that $P_1<P<P_2$?(“$<$” is defined as above) Can we define a topology using the class of topological properties?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I came up with this question when I drew diagrams to represent the relations among special topological space. I am aware that the answer might be trivial, but I haven’t figure out a way to do it yet.



    Given two topological properties $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $P_1<P_2$($P_1$ implies $P_2$, but does not equal to $P_2$. An example would be “$T_0<T_1$”), is there a topological property $P$ such that $P_1<P<P_2$?(“$<$” is defined as above) Can we define a topology using the class of topological properties?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I came up with this question when I drew diagrams to represent the relations among special topological space. I am aware that the answer might be trivial, but I haven’t figure out a way to do it yet.



      Given two topological properties $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $P_1<P_2$($P_1$ implies $P_2$, but does not equal to $P_2$. An example would be “$T_0<T_1$”), is there a topological property $P$ such that $P_1<P<P_2$?(“$<$” is defined as above) Can we define a topology using the class of topological properties?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I came up with this question when I drew diagrams to represent the relations among special topological space. I am aware that the answer might be trivial, but I haven’t figure out a way to do it yet.



      Given two topological properties $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $P_1<P_2$($P_1$ implies $P_2$, but does not equal to $P_2$. An example would be “$T_0<T_1$”), is there a topological property $P$ such that $P_1<P<P_2$?(“$<$” is defined as above) Can we define a topology using the class of topological properties?







      general-topology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 23:34









      Eric Wofsey

      184k13212338




      184k13212338










      asked Dec 3 '18 at 19:59









      William SunWilliam Sun

      471111




      471111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The key thing to understand is that a topological property is really just a collection of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces. Given a collection $C$ of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces, the property of being in one of those homeomorphism classes is a topological property, and every topological property has this form.



          So, how do you find two topological properties with nothing in between them? You just make them differ by exactly one homeomorphism class. For instance, let $P_2$ be the property of being Hausdorff, and let $P_1$ be the property of being Hausdorff but not homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}$. There is no topological property strictly in between these, since they differ only on a single homeomorphism class (namely that of $mathbb{R}$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024580%2fdensity-of-topological-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            The key thing to understand is that a topological property is really just a collection of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces. Given a collection $C$ of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces, the property of being in one of those homeomorphism classes is a topological property, and every topological property has this form.



            So, how do you find two topological properties with nothing in between them? You just make them differ by exactly one homeomorphism class. For instance, let $P_2$ be the property of being Hausdorff, and let $P_1$ be the property of being Hausdorff but not homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}$. There is no topological property strictly in between these, since they differ only on a single homeomorphism class (namely that of $mathbb{R}$).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              The key thing to understand is that a topological property is really just a collection of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces. Given a collection $C$ of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces, the property of being in one of those homeomorphism classes is a topological property, and every topological property has this form.



              So, how do you find two topological properties with nothing in between them? You just make them differ by exactly one homeomorphism class. For instance, let $P_2$ be the property of being Hausdorff, and let $P_1$ be the property of being Hausdorff but not homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}$. There is no topological property strictly in between these, since they differ only on a single homeomorphism class (namely that of $mathbb{R}$).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                The key thing to understand is that a topological property is really just a collection of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces. Given a collection $C$ of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces, the property of being in one of those homeomorphism classes is a topological property, and every topological property has this form.



                So, how do you find two topological properties with nothing in between them? You just make them differ by exactly one homeomorphism class. For instance, let $P_2$ be the property of being Hausdorff, and let $P_1$ be the property of being Hausdorff but not homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}$. There is no topological property strictly in between these, since they differ only on a single homeomorphism class (namely that of $mathbb{R}$).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The key thing to understand is that a topological property is really just a collection of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces. Given a collection $C$ of homeomorphism classes of topological spaces, the property of being in one of those homeomorphism classes is a topological property, and every topological property has this form.



                So, how do you find two topological properties with nothing in between them? You just make them differ by exactly one homeomorphism class. For instance, let $P_2$ be the property of being Hausdorff, and let $P_1$ be the property of being Hausdorff but not homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}$. There is no topological property strictly in between these, since they differ only on a single homeomorphism class (namely that of $mathbb{R}$).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 3 '18 at 23:37









                Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                184k13212338




                184k13212338






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024580%2fdensity-of-topological-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    Puebla de Zaragoza

                    Musa