Nice result that I can't prove: $int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x²text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$












3












$begingroup$


I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.



The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?






integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
















3












$begingroup$


I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.



The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?






integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:03














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.



The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?






integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.



The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?






integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function




integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 '18 at 15:54









Robert Z

95.9k1065136




95.9k1065136










asked Dec 3 '18 at 19:34









zeraoulia rafikzeraoulia rafik

2,40311029




2,40311029












  • $begingroup$
    That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:03


















  • $begingroup$
    That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
















$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03




$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.



The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:01












  • $begingroup$
    Attractive answer
    $endgroup$
    – zeraoulia rafik
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:07











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024551%2fnice-result-that-i-cant-prove-int-22-tan-1-bigg-exp-x%25c2%25b2-texter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9












$begingroup$

Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.



The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:01












  • $begingroup$
    Attractive answer
    $endgroup$
    – zeraoulia rafik
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
















9












$begingroup$

Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.



The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:01












  • $begingroup$
    Attractive answer
    $endgroup$
    – zeraoulia rafik
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:07














9












9








9





$begingroup$

Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.



The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.



The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 4 '18 at 5:20

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 19:55









Robert ZRobert Z

95.9k1065136




95.9k1065136








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:01












  • $begingroup$
    Attractive answer
    $endgroup$
    – zeraoulia rafik
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:07














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:01












  • $begingroup$
    Attractive answer
    $endgroup$
    – zeraoulia rafik
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:07








1




1




$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01






$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01














$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07




$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024551%2fnice-result-that-i-cant-prove-int-22-tan-1-bigg-exp-x%25c2%25b2-texter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
Read more

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
Read more

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

Image
1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
Read more