Nice result that I can't prove: $int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x²text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$
$begingroup$
I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.
The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?
integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.
The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?
integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.
The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?
integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function
$endgroup$
I'm always trying to find the integral representation of $pi$ using some interesting special function, at this time I have got the below representation
$$I=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx=pi$$ and according to Wolfram alpha its numerical value is very close to $pi$.
The problem that I have accrossed is the closed form of : $exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$ in the range $[-2,2]$ , I have used $$mathrm{erf}!left(xright)^2approx1-expBig(-frac 4 {pi},frac{1+alpha x^2}{1+beta x^2},x^2 Big)$$ $$alpha=frac{10-pi ^2}{5 (pi -3) pi }$$ $$beta=frac{120-60 pi +7 pi ^2}{15 (pi -3) pi }.$$ The value of the corresponding error function is $1.1568times 10^{-7}$ that is to say almost $250$ times smaller than with the initial formulation. The maximum error is $0.00035$. But when we try to replace that approximation in $tan^{-1}$ for evaluation the formula would be complicat to integrate it. My question here is if this result is known. Is it $pi$? If no any simple way for integration ?
integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function
integration probability-distributions approximation pi error-function
edited Dec 9 '18 at 15:54
Robert Z
95.9k1065136
95.9k1065136
asked Dec 3 '18 at 19:34
zeraoulia rafikzeraoulia rafik
2,40311029
2,40311029
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.
The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024551%2fnice-result-that-i-cant-prove-int-22-tan-1-bigg-exp-x%25c2%25b2-texter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.
The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.
The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.
The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).
$endgroup$
Yes, the integral $I$ is equal to $pi$. Note that for $t>0$
$$arctan(t)+arctan(1/t)=pi/2.$$
and after letting $y=-x$ we get
$$I:=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(-x^2text{erf}(x)) bigg) ;dx
=int_{-2}^{2} tan^{-1} bigg( exp(y^2text{erf}(y)) bigg) ;dy.$$
Hence
$$I=frac{1}{2}int_{-2}^{2}arctan(t(x))+arctan(1/t(x))dx=frac{pi/2cdot 4}{2}=pi$$
where $t(x)=exp(-x^2text{erf}(x))$.
The same argument holds if we replace $-x^2text{erf}(x)$ with any odd function (see Michael Seifert's comment below).
edited Dec 4 '18 at 5:20
answered Dec 3 '18 at 19:55
Robert ZRobert Z
95.9k1065136
95.9k1065136
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
1
1
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Note that this argument would still work, and the integral would still be $pi$, if you replaced $x^2 mathrm{erf}(x)$ by any odd function $f(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 3 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
$begingroup$
Attractive answer
$endgroup$
– zeraoulia rafik
Dec 3 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024551%2fnice-result-that-i-cant-prove-int-22-tan-1-bigg-exp-x%25c2%25b2-texter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
That approximation of the erf is out by a factor of 250!? That's not a very good approximation then ... or have I misunderstood you?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 3 '18 at 22:03