Deriving parallel transport equations












0












$begingroup$


From Wald's General Relativity page 37,



enter image description here




It is easiest to compute the change in $v^a$ when we return to $p$ by letting $omega_a$ be an arbitray dual vector field and finding the change in the scalar $v^aomega_a$ as we traverse the loop.




1) Where is the vector $v^a$ in the picture above?



2) Why do they consider $omega_a$?




For small $Delta t$ the change, $delta_1$, in $v^aomega_a$ on the first leg of the path,
$$delta_1 = Delta t frac{partial}{partial t}(v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$



where, by evaluating the derivative at the midpoint, we have ensured that this expression is accurate to second order in $Delta t$. We may rewrite $delta_1$ as
$$ delta_1 = Delta t T^b triangledown_b (v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$




3) How can we introduce the $T^b triangledown_b$?? I do not see where this came from?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    From Wald's General Relativity page 37,



    enter image description here




    It is easiest to compute the change in $v^a$ when we return to $p$ by letting $omega_a$ be an arbitray dual vector field and finding the change in the scalar $v^aomega_a$ as we traverse the loop.




    1) Where is the vector $v^a$ in the picture above?



    2) Why do they consider $omega_a$?




    For small $Delta t$ the change, $delta_1$, in $v^aomega_a$ on the first leg of the path,
    $$delta_1 = Delta t frac{partial}{partial t}(v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$



    where, by evaluating the derivative at the midpoint, we have ensured that this expression is accurate to second order in $Delta t$. We may rewrite $delta_1$ as
    $$ delta_1 = Delta t T^b triangledown_b (v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$




    3) How can we introduce the $T^b triangledown_b$?? I do not see where this came from?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      From Wald's General Relativity page 37,



      enter image description here




      It is easiest to compute the change in $v^a$ when we return to $p$ by letting $omega_a$ be an arbitray dual vector field and finding the change in the scalar $v^aomega_a$ as we traverse the loop.




      1) Where is the vector $v^a$ in the picture above?



      2) Why do they consider $omega_a$?




      For small $Delta t$ the change, $delta_1$, in $v^aomega_a$ on the first leg of the path,
      $$delta_1 = Delta t frac{partial}{partial t}(v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$



      where, by evaluating the derivative at the midpoint, we have ensured that this expression is accurate to second order in $Delta t$. We may rewrite $delta_1$ as
      $$ delta_1 = Delta t T^b triangledown_b (v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$




      3) How can we introduce the $T^b triangledown_b$?? I do not see where this came from?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      From Wald's General Relativity page 37,



      enter image description here




      It is easiest to compute the change in $v^a$ when we return to $p$ by letting $omega_a$ be an arbitray dual vector field and finding the change in the scalar $v^aomega_a$ as we traverse the loop.




      1) Where is the vector $v^a$ in the picture above?



      2) Why do they consider $omega_a$?




      For small $Delta t$ the change, $delta_1$, in $v^aomega_a$ on the first leg of the path,
      $$delta_1 = Delta t frac{partial}{partial t}(v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$



      where, by evaluating the derivative at the midpoint, we have ensured that this expression is accurate to second order in $Delta t$. We may rewrite $delta_1$ as
      $$ delta_1 = Delta t T^b triangledown_b (v^aomega_a)|_{(Delta t/2,0)}$$




      3) How can we introduce the $T^b triangledown_b$?? I do not see where this came from?







      geometry differential-geometry vector-spaces tensors general-relativity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 21:15







      Permian

















      asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:12









      PermianPermian

      2,2061135




      2,2061135






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          1. The vector $v^a$ is just an arbitrary vector at $p$


          enter image description here




          1. It is just a convenient step, you will see how it pays off later in the development. At this point, just note that by introducing $omega_a$, we can build the quantity $v^aomega_a$, which is a scalar, and easier to work with: one less index to worry about


          2. The chain rule



          $$
          frac{partial }{partial t} = left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_sfrac{partial}{partial x^b} = T^b partial_b
          $$



          where



          $$
          T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s
          $$



          is the tangent to the curves of constant $s$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:13










          • $begingroup$
            @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:14










          • $begingroup$
            I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 20:54












          • $begingroup$
            @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 7 '18 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            Ill give it to you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:01











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024597%2fderiving-parallel-transport-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          1. The vector $v^a$ is just an arbitrary vector at $p$


          enter image description here




          1. It is just a convenient step, you will see how it pays off later in the development. At this point, just note that by introducing $omega_a$, we can build the quantity $v^aomega_a$, which is a scalar, and easier to work with: one less index to worry about


          2. The chain rule



          $$
          frac{partial }{partial t} = left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_sfrac{partial}{partial x^b} = T^b partial_b
          $$



          where



          $$
          T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s
          $$



          is the tangent to the curves of constant $s$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:13










          • $begingroup$
            @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:14










          • $begingroup$
            I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 20:54












          • $begingroup$
            @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 7 '18 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            Ill give it to you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:01
















          1












          $begingroup$


          1. The vector $v^a$ is just an arbitrary vector at $p$


          enter image description here




          1. It is just a convenient step, you will see how it pays off later in the development. At this point, just note that by introducing $omega_a$, we can build the quantity $v^aomega_a$, which is a scalar, and easier to work with: one less index to worry about


          2. The chain rule



          $$
          frac{partial }{partial t} = left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_sfrac{partial}{partial x^b} = T^b partial_b
          $$



          where



          $$
          T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s
          $$



          is the tangent to the curves of constant $s$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:13










          • $begingroup$
            @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:14










          • $begingroup$
            I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 20:54












          • $begingroup$
            @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 7 '18 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            Ill give it to you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:01














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$


          1. The vector $v^a$ is just an arbitrary vector at $p$


          enter image description here




          1. It is just a convenient step, you will see how it pays off later in the development. At this point, just note that by introducing $omega_a$, we can build the quantity $v^aomega_a$, which is a scalar, and easier to work with: one less index to worry about


          2. The chain rule



          $$
          frac{partial }{partial t} = left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_sfrac{partial}{partial x^b} = T^b partial_b
          $$



          where



          $$
          T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s
          $$



          is the tangent to the curves of constant $s$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          1. The vector $v^a$ is just an arbitrary vector at $p$


          enter image description here




          1. It is just a convenient step, you will see how it pays off later in the development. At this point, just note that by introducing $omega_a$, we can build the quantity $v^aomega_a$, which is a scalar, and easier to work with: one less index to worry about


          2. The chain rule



          $$
          frac{partial }{partial t} = left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_sfrac{partial}{partial x^b} = T^b partial_b
          $$



          where



          $$
          T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s
          $$



          is the tangent to the curves of constant $s$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 5 '18 at 14:06









          caveraccaverac

          14.5k31130




          14.5k31130












          • $begingroup$
            3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:13










          • $begingroup$
            @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:14










          • $begingroup$
            I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 20:54












          • $begingroup$
            @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 7 '18 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            Ill give it to you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:01


















          • $begingroup$
            3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:13










          • $begingroup$
            @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 5 '18 at 14:14










          • $begingroup$
            I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 20:54












          • $begingroup$
            @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
            $endgroup$
            – caverac
            Dec 7 '18 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            Ill give it to you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – Permian
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:01
















          $begingroup$
          3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 5 '18 at 14:13




          $begingroup$
          3) I still cant see how to apply the chain rule
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 5 '18 at 14:13












          $begingroup$
          @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Dec 5 '18 at 14:14




          $begingroup$
          @Permian Forget the arguments $$ frac{partial f}{partial t} = frac{partial x}{partial t}frac{partial f}{partial x} $$
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Dec 5 '18 at 14:14












          $begingroup$
          I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 7 '18 at 20:54






          $begingroup$
          I dont uderstand how you can just say $T^b stackrel{.}{=} left(frac{partial x^b(t, s)}{partial t}right)_s$?. I understand the reasoning for the RHS but I cannot see how we can call this $T$ and say its just a tensor
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 7 '18 at 20:54














          $begingroup$
          @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Dec 7 '18 at 21:02




          $begingroup$
          @Permian I never said it was a tensor, you can call it whatever convenient way you prefer
          $endgroup$
          – caverac
          Dec 7 '18 at 21:02












          $begingroup$
          Ill give it to you anyway
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:01




          $begingroup$
          Ill give it to you anyway
          $endgroup$
          – Permian
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:01


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024597%2fderiving-parallel-transport-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa