Finding Approximate PDFs [closed]












-1












$begingroup$


Any insight that can be given regarding this problem would be helpful! I'm not sure how to start this...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg Dec 4 '18 at 2:37


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:24
















-1












$begingroup$


Any insight that can be given regarding this problem would be helpful! I'm not sure how to start this...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg Dec 4 '18 at 2:37


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:24














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Any insight that can be given regarding this problem would be helpful! I'm not sure how to start this...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Any insight that can be given regarding this problem would be helpful! I'm not sure how to start this...







statistics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 3 '18 at 19:49









Jason AJason A

6




6




closed as off-topic by T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg Dec 4 '18 at 2:37


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg Dec 4 '18 at 2:37


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – T. Bongers, Xander Henderson, Leucippus, KReiser, darij grinberg

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:24


















  • $begingroup$
    Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:24
















$begingroup$
Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
$endgroup$
– BruceET
Dec 3 '18 at 22:24




$begingroup$
Generally, you will get better help here (without downvotes and votes to close) if you state the problem in your own words, and suggest possible approaches or show what you have tried and why you can't finish on your own.
$endgroup$
– BruceET
Dec 3 '18 at 22:24










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

So, you're asked to evaluate the Central Limit Theorem with this distribution at certain points.
My guess is that you should plug in the uniform distribution $mathcal{U}([0,1])$ and sum the values up. Given the CLT it should somewhat converge against the normal distribution $mathcal{N}(0,1)$ (at least I think so).



Be aware that the CLT assumes that all $X_i$ are iid.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:21



















0












$begingroup$

Let $X_1, X_2, dots X_n$ be a random sample from
$mathsf{Unif}(0,1),$ with $mu = E(X_i) = 1/2$ and
$sigma^2 = Var(X_i) = 1/12.$



Then, according to the CLT the sample mean $bar X$ when $n = 25$ is approximately $mathsf{Norm}left(mu_n = 1/2,
sigma_n = sqrt{frac{1/12}{25}=0.5775}right).$



For $n = 25,$ the fit to normal is quite good, as shown in the figure below of a million simulated values of $bar X_{25}.$



enter image description here



For $n = 2$ the density function of $bar X_2$ has the shape
of an isosceles triangle with peak at 1/2, so the fit to normal is not so good.



The fit to normal from adding $n = 12$ standard uniform random variables is sufficiently close to normal that in early simulation programs (from
a time when
computation beyond $+$ and $-$ was very expensive) standard
normal random variables were simulated as
$Z = sum_{i=1}^{12} X_i - 6, = 12bar X_{12} - 6,$ where the $X_i$ are
standard uniform. With this formula it turns out that $E(Z) = 0$ and $Var(Z) = 1.$



The distribution of the sum of $n$ standard uniform distributions is called the Irwin-Hall distribution, illustrated in Wikipedia.



Note; R code for simulation in case it is of interest:



set.seed(1203); m = 10^6; n = 25
a.n = replicate(m, mean(runif(n)))
hist(a.n, prob=T, col="skyblue2",
main="Simulated Dist'n of Mean of 25 Std Unif RVs")
curve(dnorm(x, 1/2, .05774), add=T, lwd=2, col="red")





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    So, you're asked to evaluate the Central Limit Theorem with this distribution at certain points.
    My guess is that you should plug in the uniform distribution $mathcal{U}([0,1])$ and sum the values up. Given the CLT it should somewhat converge against the normal distribution $mathcal{N}(0,1)$ (at least I think so).



    Be aware that the CLT assumes that all $X_i$ are iid.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – BruceET
      Dec 3 '18 at 22:21
















    1












    $begingroup$

    So, you're asked to evaluate the Central Limit Theorem with this distribution at certain points.
    My guess is that you should plug in the uniform distribution $mathcal{U}([0,1])$ and sum the values up. Given the CLT it should somewhat converge against the normal distribution $mathcal{N}(0,1)$ (at least I think so).



    Be aware that the CLT assumes that all $X_i$ are iid.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – BruceET
      Dec 3 '18 at 22:21














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    So, you're asked to evaluate the Central Limit Theorem with this distribution at certain points.
    My guess is that you should plug in the uniform distribution $mathcal{U}([0,1])$ and sum the values up. Given the CLT it should somewhat converge against the normal distribution $mathcal{N}(0,1)$ (at least I think so).



    Be aware that the CLT assumes that all $X_i$ are iid.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    So, you're asked to evaluate the Central Limit Theorem with this distribution at certain points.
    My guess is that you should plug in the uniform distribution $mathcal{U}([0,1])$ and sum the values up. Given the CLT it should somewhat converge against the normal distribution $mathcal{N}(0,1)$ (at least I think so).



    Be aware that the CLT assumes that all $X_i$ are iid.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 3 '18 at 19:59









    Thomas LangThomas Lang

    1624




    1624












    • $begingroup$
      Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – BruceET
      Dec 3 '18 at 22:21


















    • $begingroup$
      Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – BruceET
      Dec 3 '18 at 22:21
















    $begingroup$
    Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:21




    $begingroup$
    Not exactly an answer, but on the right track. (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:21











    0












    $begingroup$

    Let $X_1, X_2, dots X_n$ be a random sample from
    $mathsf{Unif}(0,1),$ with $mu = E(X_i) = 1/2$ and
    $sigma^2 = Var(X_i) = 1/12.$



    Then, according to the CLT the sample mean $bar X$ when $n = 25$ is approximately $mathsf{Norm}left(mu_n = 1/2,
    sigma_n = sqrt{frac{1/12}{25}=0.5775}right).$



    For $n = 25,$ the fit to normal is quite good, as shown in the figure below of a million simulated values of $bar X_{25}.$



    enter image description here



    For $n = 2$ the density function of $bar X_2$ has the shape
    of an isosceles triangle with peak at 1/2, so the fit to normal is not so good.



    The fit to normal from adding $n = 12$ standard uniform random variables is sufficiently close to normal that in early simulation programs (from
    a time when
    computation beyond $+$ and $-$ was very expensive) standard
    normal random variables were simulated as
    $Z = sum_{i=1}^{12} X_i - 6, = 12bar X_{12} - 6,$ where the $X_i$ are
    standard uniform. With this formula it turns out that $E(Z) = 0$ and $Var(Z) = 1.$



    The distribution of the sum of $n$ standard uniform distributions is called the Irwin-Hall distribution, illustrated in Wikipedia.



    Note; R code for simulation in case it is of interest:



    set.seed(1203); m = 10^6; n = 25
    a.n = replicate(m, mean(runif(n)))
    hist(a.n, prob=T, col="skyblue2",
    main="Simulated Dist'n of Mean of 25 Std Unif RVs")
    curve(dnorm(x, 1/2, .05774), add=T, lwd=2, col="red")





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Let $X_1, X_2, dots X_n$ be a random sample from
      $mathsf{Unif}(0,1),$ with $mu = E(X_i) = 1/2$ and
      $sigma^2 = Var(X_i) = 1/12.$



      Then, according to the CLT the sample mean $bar X$ when $n = 25$ is approximately $mathsf{Norm}left(mu_n = 1/2,
      sigma_n = sqrt{frac{1/12}{25}=0.5775}right).$



      For $n = 25,$ the fit to normal is quite good, as shown in the figure below of a million simulated values of $bar X_{25}.$



      enter image description here



      For $n = 2$ the density function of $bar X_2$ has the shape
      of an isosceles triangle with peak at 1/2, so the fit to normal is not so good.



      The fit to normal from adding $n = 12$ standard uniform random variables is sufficiently close to normal that in early simulation programs (from
      a time when
      computation beyond $+$ and $-$ was very expensive) standard
      normal random variables were simulated as
      $Z = sum_{i=1}^{12} X_i - 6, = 12bar X_{12} - 6,$ where the $X_i$ are
      standard uniform. With this formula it turns out that $E(Z) = 0$ and $Var(Z) = 1.$



      The distribution of the sum of $n$ standard uniform distributions is called the Irwin-Hall distribution, illustrated in Wikipedia.



      Note; R code for simulation in case it is of interest:



      set.seed(1203); m = 10^6; n = 25
      a.n = replicate(m, mean(runif(n)))
      hist(a.n, prob=T, col="skyblue2",
      main="Simulated Dist'n of Mean of 25 Std Unif RVs")
      curve(dnorm(x, 1/2, .05774), add=T, lwd=2, col="red")





      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Let $X_1, X_2, dots X_n$ be a random sample from
        $mathsf{Unif}(0,1),$ with $mu = E(X_i) = 1/2$ and
        $sigma^2 = Var(X_i) = 1/12.$



        Then, according to the CLT the sample mean $bar X$ when $n = 25$ is approximately $mathsf{Norm}left(mu_n = 1/2,
        sigma_n = sqrt{frac{1/12}{25}=0.5775}right).$



        For $n = 25,$ the fit to normal is quite good, as shown in the figure below of a million simulated values of $bar X_{25}.$



        enter image description here



        For $n = 2$ the density function of $bar X_2$ has the shape
        of an isosceles triangle with peak at 1/2, so the fit to normal is not so good.



        The fit to normal from adding $n = 12$ standard uniform random variables is sufficiently close to normal that in early simulation programs (from
        a time when
        computation beyond $+$ and $-$ was very expensive) standard
        normal random variables were simulated as
        $Z = sum_{i=1}^{12} X_i - 6, = 12bar X_{12} - 6,$ where the $X_i$ are
        standard uniform. With this formula it turns out that $E(Z) = 0$ and $Var(Z) = 1.$



        The distribution of the sum of $n$ standard uniform distributions is called the Irwin-Hall distribution, illustrated in Wikipedia.



        Note; R code for simulation in case it is of interest:



        set.seed(1203); m = 10^6; n = 25
        a.n = replicate(m, mean(runif(n)))
        hist(a.n, prob=T, col="skyblue2",
        main="Simulated Dist'n of Mean of 25 Std Unif RVs")
        curve(dnorm(x, 1/2, .05774), add=T, lwd=2, col="red")





        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $X_1, X_2, dots X_n$ be a random sample from
        $mathsf{Unif}(0,1),$ with $mu = E(X_i) = 1/2$ and
        $sigma^2 = Var(X_i) = 1/12.$



        Then, according to the CLT the sample mean $bar X$ when $n = 25$ is approximately $mathsf{Norm}left(mu_n = 1/2,
        sigma_n = sqrt{frac{1/12}{25}=0.5775}right).$



        For $n = 25,$ the fit to normal is quite good, as shown in the figure below of a million simulated values of $bar X_{25}.$



        enter image description here



        For $n = 2$ the density function of $bar X_2$ has the shape
        of an isosceles triangle with peak at 1/2, so the fit to normal is not so good.



        The fit to normal from adding $n = 12$ standard uniform random variables is sufficiently close to normal that in early simulation programs (from
        a time when
        computation beyond $+$ and $-$ was very expensive) standard
        normal random variables were simulated as
        $Z = sum_{i=1}^{12} X_i - 6, = 12bar X_{12} - 6,$ where the $X_i$ are
        standard uniform. With this formula it turns out that $E(Z) = 0$ and $Var(Z) = 1.$



        The distribution of the sum of $n$ standard uniform distributions is called the Irwin-Hall distribution, illustrated in Wikipedia.



        Note; R code for simulation in case it is of interest:



        set.seed(1203); m = 10^6; n = 25
        a.n = replicate(m, mean(runif(n)))
        hist(a.n, prob=T, col="skyblue2",
        main="Simulated Dist'n of Mean of 25 Std Unif RVs")
        curve(dnorm(x, 1/2, .05774), add=T, lwd=2, col="red")






        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 '18 at 22:29

























        answered Dec 3 '18 at 21:44









        BruceETBruceET

        35.5k71440




        35.5k71440















            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa