How to calculate the inverse agm(1,x)?












0












$begingroup$


If we define the following function $$agm(1,x) =y$$ and its inverse, $$agm^{-1}(y)=(1,x)$$ is it possible to calculate $agm^-1(y)$. Where $agm(x)$ is the sequence $$a_{n+1}=frac{a_n+b_n}{2}$$ and $$b_{n+1}=sqrt(a_nb_n)$$I know how to reverse the iterations of $agm(x)$ using $$a_{n-1}=a_n-sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ and that $$b_{n-1}=a_n+sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ However for those to work I would need two values, how can I calculate $x$ or $(1,x)$ using $y$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:04












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:16
















0












$begingroup$


If we define the following function $$agm(1,x) =y$$ and its inverse, $$agm^{-1}(y)=(1,x)$$ is it possible to calculate $agm^-1(y)$. Where $agm(x)$ is the sequence $$a_{n+1}=frac{a_n+b_n}{2}$$ and $$b_{n+1}=sqrt(a_nb_n)$$I know how to reverse the iterations of $agm(x)$ using $$a_{n-1}=a_n-sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ and that $$b_{n-1}=a_n+sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ However for those to work I would need two values, how can I calculate $x$ or $(1,x)$ using $y$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:04












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:16














0












0








0


0



$begingroup$


If we define the following function $$agm(1,x) =y$$ and its inverse, $$agm^{-1}(y)=(1,x)$$ is it possible to calculate $agm^-1(y)$. Where $agm(x)$ is the sequence $$a_{n+1}=frac{a_n+b_n}{2}$$ and $$b_{n+1}=sqrt(a_nb_n)$$I know how to reverse the iterations of $agm(x)$ using $$a_{n-1}=a_n-sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ and that $$b_{n-1}=a_n+sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ However for those to work I would need two values, how can I calculate $x$ or $(1,x)$ using $y$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If we define the following function $$agm(1,x) =y$$ and its inverse, $$agm^{-1}(y)=(1,x)$$ is it possible to calculate $agm^-1(y)$. Where $agm(x)$ is the sequence $$a_{n+1}=frac{a_n+b_n}{2}$$ and $$b_{n+1}=sqrt(a_nb_n)$$I know how to reverse the iterations of $agm(x)$ using $$a_{n-1}=a_n-sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ and that $$b_{n-1}=a_n+sqrt(a_n^2-b_n^2)$$ However for those to work I would need two values, how can I calculate $x$ or $(1,x)$ using $y$.







calculus inverse-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 24 '18 at 3:59









user10560552user10560552

536




536












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:04












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:16


















  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:04












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 4:16
















$begingroup$
It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Dec 24 '18 at 4:04






$begingroup$
It is not clear to me what you want to do. Do you want to find $agm^{-1}$ or to reverse the agm iteration? Can you give a simple example?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Dec 24 '18 at 4:04














$begingroup$
Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
$endgroup$
– user10560552
Dec 24 '18 at 4:16




$begingroup$
Of course, the $agm(1,2) = 1.4567910310469068692...$, what i want to know is how to calculate $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=(1,2)$ or $agm^{-1}(1.4567910310469068692)=2$ only for the special case of $agm(1,x)$
$endgroup$
– user10560552
Dec 24 '18 at 4:16










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

We have
$$text{agm}(1,x)=frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}$$ Suing series expansions for large values of $x$, we have
$$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{pi x}{4log (2)+2 log left({x}right)}+frac{1-pi log
left({4 x}right)}{8 x log ^2left({4
x}right)}+Oleft(frac{1}{x^3}right)$$
So, if we consider the first term only and solve for $x$ we have, as an approximation,
$$x=-frac{2,k }{pi },W_{-1}left(-frac{pi }{8,k}right)qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 1$$ where appears the second branch of Lambert function.



To check how good or bad is this approximation, give $x$ a value, compute $text{agm}(1,x)$ and apply $(1)$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
5 & 2.60401 & 4.94933 \
10 & 4.25041 & 9.97492 \
15 & 5.74991 & 14.9833 \
20 & 7.16581 & 19.9875 \
25 & 8.52468 & 24.9900 \
30 & 9.84096 & 29.9917 \
35 & 11.1236 & 34.9929 \
40 & 12.3787 & 39.9937 \
45 & 13.6105 & 44.9944 \
50 & 14.8223 & 49.9950 \
55 & 16.0167 & 54.9955 \
60 & 17.1955 & 59.9958 \
65 & 18.3605 & 64.9962 \
70 & 19.5129 & 69.9964 \
75 & 20.6539 & 74.9967 \
80 & 21.7844 & 79.9969 \
85 & 22.9053 & 84.9971 \
90 & 24.0173 & 89.9972 \
95 & 25.1209 & 94.9974 \
100 & 26.2167 & 99.9975
end{array}
right)$$



If $x$ is mall, using simple Padé approximants, we have
$$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{1+frac{29 }{24}(x-1)+frac{61}{192} (x-1)^2}{1+frac{17
}{24} (x-1)+frac{5}{192} (x-1)^2}$$
leading to
$$x=frac{55-63k-4 sqrt{229 k^2-194 k+109}}{5 k-61}qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 2$$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
1.0 & 1.00000 & 1.00000 \
1.5 & 1.23734 & 1.50004 \
2.0 & 1.45679 & 2.00079 \
2.5 & 1.66450 & 2.50377 \
3.0 & 1.86362 & 3.01071 \
3.5 & 2.05604 & 3.52325 \
4.0 & 2.24303 & 4.04282 \
4.5 & 2.42546 & 4.57073 \
5.0 & 2.60401 & 5.10818
end{array}
right)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:22












  • $begingroup$
    I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:41












  • $begingroup$
    Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 25 '18 at 2:42



















2












$begingroup$

From standard facts, such as in the Wikipedia article Arithmetic-geometric mean, $, textrm{agm}(1,k) = frac{pi/2}{K(k')},$ where $,k,$ is the modulus, $,k'=sqrt{1-k^2},$ is the complementary modulus, and $,K(k),$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. In order to find $,textrm{agm}^{-1},$ you need to find the inverse of $,K().,$ This involves the Jacobi amplitude function described in the Jacobi elliptic functions article.



As a practical matter, I suggest restricting to $,0<k<1,$ although there is analytic continuation, but you may run into branch cuts or worse.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:06












  • $begingroup$
    Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:21



















1












$begingroup$

$$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{2x_n(1+x_n)(agm(1,x_n)-y)}{agm(1,x_n)(1+x_n)(1-frac{4}{(1+x_n)^2}sum_{k=0}^{infty}2^{k-1}c_k^2)-x_n}$$ and $c_k^2=a_{k+1}^2-b_{k+1}^2$ using the AGM iteration, $lim_{nto infty}$ $x_n=agm^{-1}(y)$. For $x_0$ use $frac{pi}{2ln(frac{4}{x})}$ for $0<y<1$ and for larger values use $2x$ as $x_0$. Its also convergent for complex numbers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050921%2fhow-to-calculate-the-inverse-agm1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    We have
    $$text{agm}(1,x)=frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}$$ Suing series expansions for large values of $x$, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{pi x}{4log (2)+2 log left({x}right)}+frac{1-pi log
    left({4 x}right)}{8 x log ^2left({4
    x}right)}+Oleft(frac{1}{x^3}right)$$
    So, if we consider the first term only and solve for $x$ we have, as an approximation,
    $$x=-frac{2,k }{pi },W_{-1}left(-frac{pi }{8,k}right)qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 1$$ where appears the second branch of Lambert function.



    To check how good or bad is this approximation, give $x$ a value, compute $text{agm}(1,x)$ and apply $(1)$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    5 & 2.60401 & 4.94933 \
    10 & 4.25041 & 9.97492 \
    15 & 5.74991 & 14.9833 \
    20 & 7.16581 & 19.9875 \
    25 & 8.52468 & 24.9900 \
    30 & 9.84096 & 29.9917 \
    35 & 11.1236 & 34.9929 \
    40 & 12.3787 & 39.9937 \
    45 & 13.6105 & 44.9944 \
    50 & 14.8223 & 49.9950 \
    55 & 16.0167 & 54.9955 \
    60 & 17.1955 & 59.9958 \
    65 & 18.3605 & 64.9962 \
    70 & 19.5129 & 69.9964 \
    75 & 20.6539 & 74.9967 \
    80 & 21.7844 & 79.9969 \
    85 & 22.9053 & 84.9971 \
    90 & 24.0173 & 89.9972 \
    95 & 25.1209 & 94.9974 \
    100 & 26.2167 & 99.9975
    end{array}
    right)$$



    If $x$ is mall, using simple Padé approximants, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{1+frac{29 }{24}(x-1)+frac{61}{192} (x-1)^2}{1+frac{17
    }{24} (x-1)+frac{5}{192} (x-1)^2}$$
    leading to
    $$x=frac{55-63k-4 sqrt{229 k^2-194 k+109}}{5 k-61}qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 2$$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    1.0 & 1.00000 & 1.00000 \
    1.5 & 1.23734 & 1.50004 \
    2.0 & 1.45679 & 2.00079 \
    2.5 & 1.66450 & 2.50377 \
    3.0 & 1.86362 & 3.01071 \
    3.5 & 2.05604 & 3.52325 \
    4.0 & 2.24303 & 4.04282 \
    4.5 & 2.42546 & 4.57073 \
    5.0 & 2.60401 & 5.10818
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:22












    • $begingroup$
      I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:41










    • $begingroup$
      @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:21










    • $begingroup$
      You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:41












    • $begingroup$
      Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 25 '18 at 2:42
















    3












    $begingroup$

    We have
    $$text{agm}(1,x)=frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}$$ Suing series expansions for large values of $x$, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{pi x}{4log (2)+2 log left({x}right)}+frac{1-pi log
    left({4 x}right)}{8 x log ^2left({4
    x}right)}+Oleft(frac{1}{x^3}right)$$
    So, if we consider the first term only and solve for $x$ we have, as an approximation,
    $$x=-frac{2,k }{pi },W_{-1}left(-frac{pi }{8,k}right)qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 1$$ where appears the second branch of Lambert function.



    To check how good or bad is this approximation, give $x$ a value, compute $text{agm}(1,x)$ and apply $(1)$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    5 & 2.60401 & 4.94933 \
    10 & 4.25041 & 9.97492 \
    15 & 5.74991 & 14.9833 \
    20 & 7.16581 & 19.9875 \
    25 & 8.52468 & 24.9900 \
    30 & 9.84096 & 29.9917 \
    35 & 11.1236 & 34.9929 \
    40 & 12.3787 & 39.9937 \
    45 & 13.6105 & 44.9944 \
    50 & 14.8223 & 49.9950 \
    55 & 16.0167 & 54.9955 \
    60 & 17.1955 & 59.9958 \
    65 & 18.3605 & 64.9962 \
    70 & 19.5129 & 69.9964 \
    75 & 20.6539 & 74.9967 \
    80 & 21.7844 & 79.9969 \
    85 & 22.9053 & 84.9971 \
    90 & 24.0173 & 89.9972 \
    95 & 25.1209 & 94.9974 \
    100 & 26.2167 & 99.9975
    end{array}
    right)$$



    If $x$ is mall, using simple Padé approximants, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{1+frac{29 }{24}(x-1)+frac{61}{192} (x-1)^2}{1+frac{17
    }{24} (x-1)+frac{5}{192} (x-1)^2}$$
    leading to
    $$x=frac{55-63k-4 sqrt{229 k^2-194 k+109}}{5 k-61}qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 2$$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    1.0 & 1.00000 & 1.00000 \
    1.5 & 1.23734 & 1.50004 \
    2.0 & 1.45679 & 2.00079 \
    2.5 & 1.66450 & 2.50377 \
    3.0 & 1.86362 & 3.01071 \
    3.5 & 2.05604 & 3.52325 \
    4.0 & 2.24303 & 4.04282 \
    4.5 & 2.42546 & 4.57073 \
    5.0 & 2.60401 & 5.10818
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:22












    • $begingroup$
      I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:41










    • $begingroup$
      @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:21










    • $begingroup$
      You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:41












    • $begingroup$
      Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 25 '18 at 2:42














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    We have
    $$text{agm}(1,x)=frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}$$ Suing series expansions for large values of $x$, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{pi x}{4log (2)+2 log left({x}right)}+frac{1-pi log
    left({4 x}right)}{8 x log ^2left({4
    x}right)}+Oleft(frac{1}{x^3}right)$$
    So, if we consider the first term only and solve for $x$ we have, as an approximation,
    $$x=-frac{2,k }{pi },W_{-1}left(-frac{pi }{8,k}right)qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 1$$ where appears the second branch of Lambert function.



    To check how good or bad is this approximation, give $x$ a value, compute $text{agm}(1,x)$ and apply $(1)$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    5 & 2.60401 & 4.94933 \
    10 & 4.25041 & 9.97492 \
    15 & 5.74991 & 14.9833 \
    20 & 7.16581 & 19.9875 \
    25 & 8.52468 & 24.9900 \
    30 & 9.84096 & 29.9917 \
    35 & 11.1236 & 34.9929 \
    40 & 12.3787 & 39.9937 \
    45 & 13.6105 & 44.9944 \
    50 & 14.8223 & 49.9950 \
    55 & 16.0167 & 54.9955 \
    60 & 17.1955 & 59.9958 \
    65 & 18.3605 & 64.9962 \
    70 & 19.5129 & 69.9964 \
    75 & 20.6539 & 74.9967 \
    80 & 21.7844 & 79.9969 \
    85 & 22.9053 & 84.9971 \
    90 & 24.0173 & 89.9972 \
    95 & 25.1209 & 94.9974 \
    100 & 26.2167 & 99.9975
    end{array}
    right)$$



    If $x$ is mall, using simple Padé approximants, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{1+frac{29 }{24}(x-1)+frac{61}{192} (x-1)^2}{1+frac{17
    }{24} (x-1)+frac{5}{192} (x-1)^2}$$
    leading to
    $$x=frac{55-63k-4 sqrt{229 k^2-194 k+109}}{5 k-61}qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 2$$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    1.0 & 1.00000 & 1.00000 \
    1.5 & 1.23734 & 1.50004 \
    2.0 & 1.45679 & 2.00079 \
    2.5 & 1.66450 & 2.50377 \
    3.0 & 1.86362 & 3.01071 \
    3.5 & 2.05604 & 3.52325 \
    4.0 & 2.24303 & 4.04282 \
    4.5 & 2.42546 & 4.57073 \
    5.0 & 2.60401 & 5.10818
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    We have
    $$text{agm}(1,x)=frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}$$ Suing series expansions for large values of $x$, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{pi x}{4log (2)+2 log left({x}right)}+frac{1-pi log
    left({4 x}right)}{8 x log ^2left({4
    x}right)}+Oleft(frac{1}{x^3}right)$$
    So, if we consider the first term only and solve for $x$ we have, as an approximation,
    $$x=-frac{2,k }{pi },W_{-1}left(-frac{pi }{8,k}right)qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 1$$ where appears the second branch of Lambert function.



    To check how good or bad is this approximation, give $x$ a value, compute $text{agm}(1,x)$ and apply $(1)$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    5 & 2.60401 & 4.94933 \
    10 & 4.25041 & 9.97492 \
    15 & 5.74991 & 14.9833 \
    20 & 7.16581 & 19.9875 \
    25 & 8.52468 & 24.9900 \
    30 & 9.84096 & 29.9917 \
    35 & 11.1236 & 34.9929 \
    40 & 12.3787 & 39.9937 \
    45 & 13.6105 & 44.9944 \
    50 & 14.8223 & 49.9950 \
    55 & 16.0167 & 54.9955 \
    60 & 17.1955 & 59.9958 \
    65 & 18.3605 & 64.9962 \
    70 & 19.5129 & 69.9964 \
    75 & 20.6539 & 74.9967 \
    80 & 21.7844 & 79.9969 \
    85 & 22.9053 & 84.9971 \
    90 & 24.0173 & 89.9972 \
    95 & 25.1209 & 94.9974 \
    100 & 26.2167 & 99.9975
    end{array}
    right)$$



    If $x$ is mall, using simple Padé approximants, we have
    $$frac{pi (1+x)}{4 Kleft(left(frac{1-x}{1+x}right)^2right)}=frac{1+frac{29 }{24}(x-1)+frac{61}{192} (x-1)^2}{1+frac{17
    }{24} (x-1)+frac{5}{192} (x-1)^2}$$
    leading to
    $$x=frac{55-63k-4 sqrt{229 k^2-194 k+109}}{5 k-61}qquad text{where} qquad k=text{agm}(1,x)tag 2$$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{given} & text{agm}(1,x) & x_{calc} \
    1.0 & 1.00000 & 1.00000 \
    1.5 & 1.23734 & 1.50004 \
    2.0 & 1.45679 & 2.00079 \
    2.5 & 1.66450 & 2.50377 \
    3.0 & 1.86362 & 3.01071 \
    3.5 & 2.05604 & 3.52325 \
    4.0 & 2.24303 & 4.04282 \
    4.5 & 2.42546 & 4.57073 \
    5.0 & 2.60401 & 5.10818
    end{array}
    right)$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 24 '18 at 6:37

























    answered Dec 24 '18 at 6:02









    Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

    126k1158134




    126k1158134












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:22












    • $begingroup$
      I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:41










    • $begingroup$
      @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:21










    • $begingroup$
      You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:41












    • $begingroup$
      Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 25 '18 at 2:42


















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:22












    • $begingroup$
      I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 16:41










    • $begingroup$
      @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:21










    • $begingroup$
      You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:41












    • $begingroup$
      Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
      $endgroup$
      – Claude Leibovici
      Dec 25 '18 at 2:42
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:22






    $begingroup$
    Thank you this is what i was looking for, will this method also work for complex numbers? And is it possible to get more precise results using your formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:22














    $begingroup$
    I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:41




    $begingroup$
    I'm assuming you would get more precise results by inputing more precise results.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:41












    $begingroup$
    @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:21




    $begingroup$
    @user10560552. I am not sure to understand what you mean. I did not input anything. Do you want something better ? I can build an empirical model. Let me know the range to cover. Cheers & Merry Xmas
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:21












    $begingroup$
    You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:41






    $begingroup$
    You don't have to go through that much trouble. Sorry my comment was not clear. What I meant is if i use your second equation and $k=1.4567910310469068692$ instead of $k=1.45679$ would i get a more precise result.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:41














    $begingroup$
    Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 25 '18 at 2:42




    $begingroup$
    Let me clarify : for building the tablle, for a given $x$, $text{agm}(1,x)$ is exactly computed with illimited precision; so when table contains $k=1.45679$ is is the shorcut writing of $k=1.4567910310469068692$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 25 '18 at 2:42











    2












    $begingroup$

    From standard facts, such as in the Wikipedia article Arithmetic-geometric mean, $, textrm{agm}(1,k) = frac{pi/2}{K(k')},$ where $,k,$ is the modulus, $,k'=sqrt{1-k^2},$ is the complementary modulus, and $,K(k),$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. In order to find $,textrm{agm}^{-1},$ you need to find the inverse of $,K().,$ This involves the Jacobi amplitude function described in the Jacobi elliptic functions article.



    As a practical matter, I suggest restricting to $,0<k<1,$ although there is analytic continuation, but you may run into branch cuts or worse.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:06












    • $begingroup$
      Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:21
















    2












    $begingroup$

    From standard facts, such as in the Wikipedia article Arithmetic-geometric mean, $, textrm{agm}(1,k) = frac{pi/2}{K(k')},$ where $,k,$ is the modulus, $,k'=sqrt{1-k^2},$ is the complementary modulus, and $,K(k),$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. In order to find $,textrm{agm}^{-1},$ you need to find the inverse of $,K().,$ This involves the Jacobi amplitude function described in the Jacobi elliptic functions article.



    As a practical matter, I suggest restricting to $,0<k<1,$ although there is analytic continuation, but you may run into branch cuts or worse.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:06












    • $begingroup$
      Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:21














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    From standard facts, such as in the Wikipedia article Arithmetic-geometric mean, $, textrm{agm}(1,k) = frac{pi/2}{K(k')},$ where $,k,$ is the modulus, $,k'=sqrt{1-k^2},$ is the complementary modulus, and $,K(k),$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. In order to find $,textrm{agm}^{-1},$ you need to find the inverse of $,K().,$ This involves the Jacobi amplitude function described in the Jacobi elliptic functions article.



    As a practical matter, I suggest restricting to $,0<k<1,$ although there is analytic continuation, but you may run into branch cuts or worse.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    From standard facts, such as in the Wikipedia article Arithmetic-geometric mean, $, textrm{agm}(1,k) = frac{pi/2}{K(k')},$ where $,k,$ is the modulus, $,k'=sqrt{1-k^2},$ is the complementary modulus, and $,K(k),$ is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. In order to find $,textrm{agm}^{-1},$ you need to find the inverse of $,K().,$ This involves the Jacobi amplitude function described in the Jacobi elliptic functions article.



    As a practical matter, I suggest restricting to $,0<k<1,$ although there is analytic continuation, but you may run into branch cuts or worse.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 24 '18 at 6:03

























    answered Dec 24 '18 at 4:42









    SomosSomos

    15.1k11437




    15.1k11437












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:06












    • $begingroup$
      Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:21


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:06












    • $begingroup$
      Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – user10560552
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:21
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:06






    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the quick and helpful response.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:06














    $begingroup$
    Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:21




    $begingroup$
    Just a question, is this formula still viable with complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user10560552
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:21











    1












    $begingroup$

    $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{2x_n(1+x_n)(agm(1,x_n)-y)}{agm(1,x_n)(1+x_n)(1-frac{4}{(1+x_n)^2}sum_{k=0}^{infty}2^{k-1}c_k^2)-x_n}$$ and $c_k^2=a_{k+1}^2-b_{k+1}^2$ using the AGM iteration, $lim_{nto infty}$ $x_n=agm^{-1}(y)$. For $x_0$ use $frac{pi}{2ln(frac{4}{x})}$ for $0<y<1$ and for larger values use $2x$ as $x_0$. Its also convergent for complex numbers.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{2x_n(1+x_n)(agm(1,x_n)-y)}{agm(1,x_n)(1+x_n)(1-frac{4}{(1+x_n)^2}sum_{k=0}^{infty}2^{k-1}c_k^2)-x_n}$$ and $c_k^2=a_{k+1}^2-b_{k+1}^2$ using the AGM iteration, $lim_{nto infty}$ $x_n=agm^{-1}(y)$. For $x_0$ use $frac{pi}{2ln(frac{4}{x})}$ for $0<y<1$ and for larger values use $2x$ as $x_0$. Its also convergent for complex numbers.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{2x_n(1+x_n)(agm(1,x_n)-y)}{agm(1,x_n)(1+x_n)(1-frac{4}{(1+x_n)^2}sum_{k=0}^{infty}2^{k-1}c_k^2)-x_n}$$ and $c_k^2=a_{k+1}^2-b_{k+1}^2$ using the AGM iteration, $lim_{nto infty}$ $x_n=agm^{-1}(y)$. For $x_0$ use $frac{pi}{2ln(frac{4}{x})}$ for $0<y<1$ and for larger values use $2x$ as $x_0$. Its also convergent for complex numbers.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{2x_n(1+x_n)(agm(1,x_n)-y)}{agm(1,x_n)(1+x_n)(1-frac{4}{(1+x_n)^2}sum_{k=0}^{infty}2^{k-1}c_k^2)-x_n}$$ and $c_k^2=a_{k+1}^2-b_{k+1}^2$ using the AGM iteration, $lim_{nto infty}$ $x_n=agm^{-1}(y)$. For $x_0$ use $frac{pi}{2ln(frac{4}{x})}$ for $0<y<1$ and for larger values use $2x$ as $x_0$. Its also convergent for complex numbers.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 23 at 1:59









        user10560552user10560552

        536




        536






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050921%2fhow-to-calculate-the-inverse-agm1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa