A tech meeting intended for everyone in the group only opens to some of the members
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
-2
The manager arranged a meeting to discuss something new in the area, which is supposedly for everyone in the group. Instead the manager only asks for specific members in the group to attend the meeting. Is this a bad sign for people that are not invited to attend?
meetings
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
add a comment |
-2
The manager arranged a meeting to discuss something new in the area, which is supposedly for everyone in the group. Instead the manager only asks for specific members in the group to attend the meeting. Is this a bad sign for people that are not invited to attend?
meetings
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
6
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
1
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07
add a comment |
-2
-2
-2
The manager arranged a meeting to discuss something new in the area, which is supposedly for everyone in the group. Instead the manager only asks for specific members in the group to attend the meeting. Is this a bad sign for people that are not invited to attend?
meetings
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
The manager arranged a meeting to discuss something new in the area, which is supposedly for everyone in the group. Instead the manager only asks for specific members in the group to attend the meeting. Is this a bad sign for people that are not invited to attend?
meetings
meetings
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
asked Apr 17 at 3:08
F SoF So
204
204
6
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
1
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07
add a comment |
6
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
1
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07
6
6
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
1
1
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134073%2fa-tech-meeting-intended-for-everyone-in-the-group-only-opens-to-some-of-the-memb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134073%2fa-tech-meeting-intended-for-everyone-in-the-group-only-opens-to-some-of-the-memb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
Why do you think the meeting is intended for everyone if only a subset are invited? It's pretty common that things get discussed with different subsets of team members at different points in time. Is there something common about the people invited (i.e. are they the senior folks, experts in X, people in a particular role, etc.)?
– Justin Cave
Apr 17 at 3:25
1
Another consideration: are the people not invited currently working on something with a close deadline?
– solarflare
Apr 17 at 4:47
Can you please elaborate what you mean by "bad sign"? They will get fired? Not get to work with the tech? Not respected? Also, as previously requested, please elaborate on what is meant by "which is supposedly for everyone in the group"? What does this mean? Supposedly everyone was meant to be invited? Everyone is meant to work on the tech?
– Gregory Currie
Apr 17 at 5:45
@JustinCave: you should transform your comment into a proper answer. While your question is valid, the rest applies regardless.
– virolino
Apr 17 at 7:07