Prove the inequality $(1 + x)^{1/pi} 0$
$begingroup$
Prove the inequality $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}$ for $x > 0$
The inequality looks very straightforward to prove; however, I have been struggling for a while. The first thing that came to my mind was the Binomial Series, but there are both positive and negative terms in there, so it is not clear that the result follows.
I also tried defining a function $f(x)$ and taking derivatives, but that's not valid since the power rule only holds for rationals and $1/pi$ is irrational.
EDIT: this also looks a lot like Bernoulli's inequality; however, I think the exponent has to be an integer in that.
Let $f(x) = frac{1}{pi}log(1 + x) - log(1 + frac{x}{pi})$, and note that $f(0) = 0$. So, by showing that $f$ is decreasing, our result will follow. We have
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{pi} frac{1}{1 + x} -frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} cdot frac{1}{pi} $$
$$ frac{1}{pi}left(frac{1}{1 + x} - frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}}right) < 0 $$
$$Longleftrightarrow frac{1}{1 + x} < frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} $$
$$ Longleftrightarrow 1 + x > 1 + x/pi $$
$$x > x/pi, $$
which is clearly true since $x > 0$.
So, since we have shown that the logarithm of the function is negative for $x > 0$, it follows that the function itself is decreasing.
real-analysis inequality real-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove the inequality $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}$ for $x > 0$
The inequality looks very straightforward to prove; however, I have been struggling for a while. The first thing that came to my mind was the Binomial Series, but there are both positive and negative terms in there, so it is not clear that the result follows.
I also tried defining a function $f(x)$ and taking derivatives, but that's not valid since the power rule only holds for rationals and $1/pi$ is irrational.
EDIT: this also looks a lot like Bernoulli's inequality; however, I think the exponent has to be an integer in that.
Let $f(x) = frac{1}{pi}log(1 + x) - log(1 + frac{x}{pi})$, and note that $f(0) = 0$. So, by showing that $f$ is decreasing, our result will follow. We have
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{pi} frac{1}{1 + x} -frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} cdot frac{1}{pi} $$
$$ frac{1}{pi}left(frac{1}{1 + x} - frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}}right) < 0 $$
$$Longleftrightarrow frac{1}{1 + x} < frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} $$
$$ Longleftrightarrow 1 + x > 1 + x/pi $$
$$x > x/pi, $$
which is clearly true since $x > 0$.
So, since we have shown that the logarithm of the function is negative for $x > 0$, it follows that the function itself is decreasing.
real-analysis inequality real-numbers
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove the inequality $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}$ for $x > 0$
The inequality looks very straightforward to prove; however, I have been struggling for a while. The first thing that came to my mind was the Binomial Series, but there are both positive and negative terms in there, so it is not clear that the result follows.
I also tried defining a function $f(x)$ and taking derivatives, but that's not valid since the power rule only holds for rationals and $1/pi$ is irrational.
EDIT: this also looks a lot like Bernoulli's inequality; however, I think the exponent has to be an integer in that.
Let $f(x) = frac{1}{pi}log(1 + x) - log(1 + frac{x}{pi})$, and note that $f(0) = 0$. So, by showing that $f$ is decreasing, our result will follow. We have
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{pi} frac{1}{1 + x} -frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} cdot frac{1}{pi} $$
$$ frac{1}{pi}left(frac{1}{1 + x} - frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}}right) < 0 $$
$$Longleftrightarrow frac{1}{1 + x} < frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} $$
$$ Longleftrightarrow 1 + x > 1 + x/pi $$
$$x > x/pi, $$
which is clearly true since $x > 0$.
So, since we have shown that the logarithm of the function is negative for $x > 0$, it follows that the function itself is decreasing.
real-analysis inequality real-numbers
$endgroup$
Prove the inequality $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}$ for $x > 0$
The inequality looks very straightforward to prove; however, I have been struggling for a while. The first thing that came to my mind was the Binomial Series, but there are both positive and negative terms in there, so it is not clear that the result follows.
I also tried defining a function $f(x)$ and taking derivatives, but that's not valid since the power rule only holds for rationals and $1/pi$ is irrational.
EDIT: this also looks a lot like Bernoulli's inequality; however, I think the exponent has to be an integer in that.
Let $f(x) = frac{1}{pi}log(1 + x) - log(1 + frac{x}{pi})$, and note that $f(0) = 0$. So, by showing that $f$ is decreasing, our result will follow. We have
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{pi} frac{1}{1 + x} -frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} cdot frac{1}{pi} $$
$$ frac{1}{pi}left(frac{1}{1 + x} - frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}}right) < 0 $$
$$Longleftrightarrow frac{1}{1 + x} < frac{1}{1 + frac{x}{pi}} $$
$$ Longleftrightarrow 1 + x > 1 + x/pi $$
$$x > x/pi, $$
which is clearly true since $x > 0$.
So, since we have shown that the logarithm of the function is negative for $x > 0$, it follows that the function itself is decreasing.
real-analysis inequality real-numbers
real-analysis inequality real-numbers
edited Dec 14 '18 at 16:06
joseph
asked Dec 14 '18 at 15:38
josephjoseph
496111
496111
1
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02
1
1
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
1
1
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Answer to the original question: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} > 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
The inequality is not true, indeed for $x=1$ we have
$$(1 + 1)^{1/pi}approx 1.247$$
$$1 + frac{1}{pi}approx 1.318$$
indeed for $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
Answer after editing: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
For $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
and equality holds only for $r=0,1$ or $x=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Defining $$f(x)=frac{1}{pi}ln(1+x)-lnleft(1+frac{x}{pi}right)$$ and now use calculus. For $$x>0$$ we get $$xleft(1-frac{1}{pi}right)>0$$ which is true.
$$x=0$$ gives the maximum of our function. The first derivative of our $$f(x)$$ is given by
$$frac{1}{pi(1+x)}-frac{1}{1+frac{x}{pi}}cdot frac{1}{pi}$$
solving $$f'(x)=0$$ we get $$1+frac{x}{pi}-1-x=0$$ and $$frac{x}{pi}-x=0$$ is $$xleft(frac{1}{pi}-1right)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is not true, because for $0<r<1$ we have that
$$(1+x)^r<1+rx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers.
Define $f(x)=(1+x)^p-1-px; 0<p<1, xge0$
$displaystyle f(0)=0, f'(x)=p(1+x)^{p-1}-p=frac p{(1+x)^{1-p}}-ple0$
Therefore, $f(x)le0, forall xge0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039511%2fprove-the-inequality-1-x1-pi-1-fracx-pi-for-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Answer to the original question: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} > 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
The inequality is not true, indeed for $x=1$ we have
$$(1 + 1)^{1/pi}approx 1.247$$
$$1 + frac{1}{pi}approx 1.318$$
indeed for $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
Answer after editing: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
For $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
and equality holds only for $r=0,1$ or $x=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Answer to the original question: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} > 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
The inequality is not true, indeed for $x=1$ we have
$$(1 + 1)^{1/pi}approx 1.247$$
$$1 + frac{1}{pi}approx 1.318$$
indeed for $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
Answer after editing: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
For $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
and equality holds only for $r=0,1$ or $x=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Answer to the original question: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} > 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
The inequality is not true, indeed for $x=1$ we have
$$(1 + 1)^{1/pi}approx 1.247$$
$$1 + frac{1}{pi}approx 1.318$$
indeed for $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
Answer after editing: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
For $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
and equality holds only for $r=0,1$ or $x=0$.
$endgroup$
Answer to the original question: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} > 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
The inequality is not true, indeed for $x=1$ we have
$$(1 + 1)^{1/pi}approx 1.247$$
$$1 + frac{1}{pi}approx 1.318$$
indeed for $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
Answer after editing: $(1 + x)^{1/pi} < 1 + frac{x}{pi}, , x>0$
For $0le rle 1$ the following Bernoulli's inequality holds as $xge -1$
$$(1+x)^r le 1+rx$$
and equality holds only for $r=0,1$ or $x=0$.
edited Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:42
gimusigimusi
92.9k84494
92.9k84494
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
does my way work too ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph I'll check that.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
$begingroup$
@joseph Yes it looks fine!
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Defining $$f(x)=frac{1}{pi}ln(1+x)-lnleft(1+frac{x}{pi}right)$$ and now use calculus. For $$x>0$$ we get $$xleft(1-frac{1}{pi}right)>0$$ which is true.
$$x=0$$ gives the maximum of our function. The first derivative of our $$f(x)$$ is given by
$$frac{1}{pi(1+x)}-frac{1}{1+frac{x}{pi}}cdot frac{1}{pi}$$
solving $$f'(x)=0$$ we get $$1+frac{x}{pi}-1-x=0$$ and $$frac{x}{pi}-x=0$$ is $$xleft(frac{1}{pi}-1right)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Defining $$f(x)=frac{1}{pi}ln(1+x)-lnleft(1+frac{x}{pi}right)$$ and now use calculus. For $$x>0$$ we get $$xleft(1-frac{1}{pi}right)>0$$ which is true.
$$x=0$$ gives the maximum of our function. The first derivative of our $$f(x)$$ is given by
$$frac{1}{pi(1+x)}-frac{1}{1+frac{x}{pi}}cdot frac{1}{pi}$$
solving $$f'(x)=0$$ we get $$1+frac{x}{pi}-1-x=0$$ and $$frac{x}{pi}-x=0$$ is $$xleft(frac{1}{pi}-1right)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Defining $$f(x)=frac{1}{pi}ln(1+x)-lnleft(1+frac{x}{pi}right)$$ and now use calculus. For $$x>0$$ we get $$xleft(1-frac{1}{pi}right)>0$$ which is true.
$$x=0$$ gives the maximum of our function. The first derivative of our $$f(x)$$ is given by
$$frac{1}{pi(1+x)}-frac{1}{1+frac{x}{pi}}cdot frac{1}{pi}$$
solving $$f'(x)=0$$ we get $$1+frac{x}{pi}-1-x=0$$ and $$frac{x}{pi}-x=0$$ is $$xleft(frac{1}{pi}-1right)=0$$
$endgroup$
Defining $$f(x)=frac{1}{pi}ln(1+x)-lnleft(1+frac{x}{pi}right)$$ and now use calculus. For $$x>0$$ we get $$xleft(1-frac{1}{pi}right)>0$$ which is true.
$$x=0$$ gives the maximum of our function. The first derivative of our $$f(x)$$ is given by
$$frac{1}{pi(1+x)}-frac{1}{1+frac{x}{pi}}cdot frac{1}{pi}$$
solving $$f'(x)=0$$ we get $$1+frac{x}{pi}-1-x=0$$ and $$frac{x}{pi}-x=0$$ is $$xleft(frac{1}{pi}-1right)=0$$
edited Dec 14 '18 at 16:14
answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:42
Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner
76.8k42866
76.8k42866
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
hi, i tried your way. i edited my original post. can you check it please
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:52
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
$begingroup$
how did you get $x(1 - 1/pi)$?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is not true, because for $0<r<1$ we have that
$$(1+x)^r<1+rx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is not true, because for $0<r<1$ we have that
$$(1+x)^r<1+rx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequality is not true, because for $0<r<1$ we have that
$$(1+x)^r<1+rx$$
$endgroup$
The inequality is not true, because for $0<r<1$ we have that
$$(1+x)^r<1+rx$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:42
BotondBotond
5,9252832
5,9252832
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers.
Define $f(x)=(1+x)^p-1-px; 0<p<1, xge0$
$displaystyle f(0)=0, f'(x)=p(1+x)^{p-1}-p=frac p{(1+x)^{1-p}}-ple0$
Therefore, $f(x)le0, forall xge0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers.
Define $f(x)=(1+x)^p-1-px; 0<p<1, xge0$
$displaystyle f(0)=0, f'(x)=p(1+x)^{p-1}-p=frac p{(1+x)^{1-p}}-ple0$
Therefore, $f(x)le0, forall xge0$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers.
Define $f(x)=(1+x)^p-1-px; 0<p<1, xge0$
$displaystyle f(0)=0, f'(x)=p(1+x)^{p-1}-p=frac p{(1+x)^{1-p}}-ple0$
Therefore, $f(x)le0, forall xge0$
$endgroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers.
Define $f(x)=(1+x)^p-1-px; 0<p<1, xge0$
$displaystyle f(0)=0, f'(x)=p(1+x)^{p-1}-p=frac p{(1+x)^{1-p}}-ple0$
Therefore, $f(x)le0, forall xge0$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:49
Shubham JohriShubham Johri
5,204718
5,204718
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039511%2fprove-the-inequality-1-x1-pi-1-fracx-pi-for-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
If I'm not wrong, it's "Bernoulli" and not "Beronulli"
$endgroup$
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
Power rule is valid for all real powers
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 14 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
What precise statement do you call "Bernoulli's Inequality"? There's a very simple one and a very sweeping one.
$endgroup$
– Robert Wolfe
Dec 14 '18 at 15:48
$begingroup$
is my original post attempt correct ?
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You should indicate the editing when the nature of the question change completely, even for a typo.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 16:02