How to find the greatest absolute term in a binomial expansion












-1












$begingroup$


I know that the ratio of consecutive terms should be ≥1 and I'm able to solve using that approach but I was wondering whether we could derive a general formula and how would it work?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 14 '18 at 15:30










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Thakur
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
















-1












$begingroup$


I know that the ratio of consecutive terms should be ≥1 and I'm able to solve using that approach but I was wondering whether we could derive a general formula and how would it work?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 14 '18 at 15:30










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Thakur
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:18














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I know that the ratio of consecutive terms should be ≥1 and I'm able to solve using that approach but I was wondering whether we could derive a general formula and how would it work?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I know that the ratio of consecutive terms should be ≥1 and I'm able to solve using that approach but I was wondering whether we could derive a general formula and how would it work?







binomial-theorem






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 14 '18 at 15:25









Sameer ThakurSameer Thakur

305




305












  • $begingroup$
    Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 14 '18 at 15:30










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Thakur
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:18


















  • $begingroup$
    Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 14 '18 at 15:30










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Thakur
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:18
















$begingroup$
Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 14 '18 at 15:30




$begingroup$
Have you read this math.stackexchange.com/questions/493903/… ?
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 14 '18 at 15:30












$begingroup$
Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
$endgroup$
– Sameer Thakur
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18




$begingroup$
Thanks but I want to find the greatest absolute term not the greatest coefficient
$endgroup$
– Sameer Thakur
Dec 14 '18 at 16:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

My instantaneous thought on this is that the first binomial coefficient proceeds from the zeroth (1) by multiplying it by $n$; and the second by multiplying that by $(n-1)/2$, ... , & thereafter by $(n-k)/(k+1)$; and you're also multiplying by $x$ each time ... so the maximum term will be at the stationary point, when $(n-k)x=k+1$, and the increase 'turns round' to become a decrease. So you would have $$k≈frac{nx-1}{x+1} ,$$ the "≈" taking account of the fact that it goes in integer steps, & $x$ need not be an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039494%2fhow-to-find-the-greatest-absolute-term-in-a-binomial-expansion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    My instantaneous thought on this is that the first binomial coefficient proceeds from the zeroth (1) by multiplying it by $n$; and the second by multiplying that by $(n-1)/2$, ... , & thereafter by $(n-k)/(k+1)$; and you're also multiplying by $x$ each time ... so the maximum term will be at the stationary point, when $(n-k)x=k+1$, and the increase 'turns round' to become a decrease. So you would have $$k≈frac{nx-1}{x+1} ,$$ the "≈" taking account of the fact that it goes in integer steps, & $x$ need not be an integer.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      My instantaneous thought on this is that the first binomial coefficient proceeds from the zeroth (1) by multiplying it by $n$; and the second by multiplying that by $(n-1)/2$, ... , & thereafter by $(n-k)/(k+1)$; and you're also multiplying by $x$ each time ... so the maximum term will be at the stationary point, when $(n-k)x=k+1$, and the increase 'turns round' to become a decrease. So you would have $$k≈frac{nx-1}{x+1} ,$$ the "≈" taking account of the fact that it goes in integer steps, & $x$ need not be an integer.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        My instantaneous thought on this is that the first binomial coefficient proceeds from the zeroth (1) by multiplying it by $n$; and the second by multiplying that by $(n-1)/2$, ... , & thereafter by $(n-k)/(k+1)$; and you're also multiplying by $x$ each time ... so the maximum term will be at the stationary point, when $(n-k)x=k+1$, and the increase 'turns round' to become a decrease. So you would have $$k≈frac{nx-1}{x+1} ,$$ the "≈" taking account of the fact that it goes in integer steps, & $x$ need not be an integer.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        My instantaneous thought on this is that the first binomial coefficient proceeds from the zeroth (1) by multiplying it by $n$; and the second by multiplying that by $(n-1)/2$, ... , & thereafter by $(n-k)/(k+1)$; and you're also multiplying by $x$ each time ... so the maximum term will be at the stationary point, when $(n-k)x=k+1$, and the increase 'turns round' to become a decrease. So you would have $$k≈frac{nx-1}{x+1} ,$$ the "≈" taking account of the fact that it goes in integer steps, & $x$ need not be an integer.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 '18 at 17:55









        AmbretteOrriseyAmbretteOrrisey

        54210




        54210






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039494%2fhow-to-find-the-greatest-absolute-term-in-a-binomial-expansion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa