Can the discrete variable be a negative number?












4












$begingroup$


I read in a book "An Introduction to Statistical Concepts [3 ed.] p.8):




A numerical variable is a quantitative variable. Numerical variables can further be classified as either discrete or continuous. A discrete variable is defined as a variable that can only take on certain values. For example, the number of children in a family can only take on certain values. Many values are not possible, such as negative values (e.g., the Joneses cannot have −2 children) or decimal values (e.g., the Smiths cannot have 2.2 children). In contrast, a continuous variable is defined as a variable that can take on any value within a certain range given a precise enough measurement instrument.




Question: Does this mean that a discrete variable cannot be a negative number? If a discrete variable cannot be a negative number then please explain why?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 28 at 2:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 28 at 8:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    Mar 28 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Mar 29 at 0:13












  • $begingroup$
    The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    Mar 29 at 14:33
















4












$begingroup$


I read in a book "An Introduction to Statistical Concepts [3 ed.] p.8):




A numerical variable is a quantitative variable. Numerical variables can further be classified as either discrete or continuous. A discrete variable is defined as a variable that can only take on certain values. For example, the number of children in a family can only take on certain values. Many values are not possible, such as negative values (e.g., the Joneses cannot have −2 children) or decimal values (e.g., the Smiths cannot have 2.2 children). In contrast, a continuous variable is defined as a variable that can take on any value within a certain range given a precise enough measurement instrument.




Question: Does this mean that a discrete variable cannot be a negative number? If a discrete variable cannot be a negative number then please explain why?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 28 at 2:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 28 at 8:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    Mar 28 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Mar 29 at 0:13












  • $begingroup$
    The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    Mar 29 at 14:33














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I read in a book "An Introduction to Statistical Concepts [3 ed.] p.8):




A numerical variable is a quantitative variable. Numerical variables can further be classified as either discrete or continuous. A discrete variable is defined as a variable that can only take on certain values. For example, the number of children in a family can only take on certain values. Many values are not possible, such as negative values (e.g., the Joneses cannot have −2 children) or decimal values (e.g., the Smiths cannot have 2.2 children). In contrast, a continuous variable is defined as a variable that can take on any value within a certain range given a precise enough measurement instrument.




Question: Does this mean that a discrete variable cannot be a negative number? If a discrete variable cannot be a negative number then please explain why?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I read in a book "An Introduction to Statistical Concepts [3 ed.] p.8):




A numerical variable is a quantitative variable. Numerical variables can further be classified as either discrete or continuous. A discrete variable is defined as a variable that can only take on certain values. For example, the number of children in a family can only take on certain values. Many values are not possible, such as negative values (e.g., the Joneses cannot have −2 children) or decimal values (e.g., the Smiths cannot have 2.2 children). In contrast, a continuous variable is defined as a variable that can take on any value within a certain range given a precise enough measurement instrument.




Question: Does this mean that a discrete variable cannot be a negative number? If a discrete variable cannot be a negative number then please explain why?







distributions discrete-data






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 2:20









Sycorax

42.2k12111207




42.2k12111207










asked Mar 28 at 2:03









vasili111vasili111

2341312




2341312








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 28 at 2:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 28 at 8:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    Mar 28 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Mar 29 at 0:13












  • $begingroup$
    The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    Mar 29 at 14:33














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 28 at 2:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 28 at 8:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    Mar 28 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Mar 29 at 0:13












  • $begingroup$
    The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    Mar 29 at 14:33








2




2




$begingroup$
consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
$endgroup$
– Glen_b
Mar 28 at 2:20






$begingroup$
consider "$X_t$" is "number of goals scored in match $t$" and let $Y_t=X_t-X_{t-1}$. (i.e. the change in goals scored from the previous game). $Y_t$ is discrete but can clearly be negative.
$endgroup$
– Glen_b
Mar 28 at 2:20






1




1




$begingroup$
I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
$endgroup$
– innisfree
Mar 28 at 8:27






$begingroup$
I guess in means in particular contexts certain values aren't possible. But in general a discrete variable could be negative or a decimal, irrational, etc etc.
$endgroup$
– innisfree
Mar 28 at 8:27






1




1




$begingroup$
@Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Mar 28 at 11:30




$begingroup$
@Glen_b: Or the more common "goal difference" defined as goals scored by one team versus goals scored by their opponent. The sign of this difference defines the winner of the game.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Mar 28 at 11:30












$begingroup$
If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
Mar 29 at 0:13






$begingroup$
If I toss a coin 5 times the possible fractions of heads are 0/5, 1/5, ..., 4/5, 5/5 which are just as discrete as the corresponding counts 0 to 5.
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
Mar 29 at 0:13














$begingroup$
The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
$endgroup$
– whuber
Mar 29 at 14:33




$begingroup$
The quoted definition is out-and-out wrong: it characterizes variables supported on a proper subset of the real numbers, not discrete variables.
$endgroup$
– whuber
Mar 29 at 14:33










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Your intuition is correct -- a discrete variable can take on negative values.



The example is just an example: a person can't have $-2$ children, but the difference in scores between Home and Away sports teams can be $-2$ when the Home team is behind by two points.



Discrete variables with negative values exist all over the place. Two prominent examples:




  • Rademacher distribution

  • Skellam distribution






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 28 at 23:29








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 28 at 23:37



















1












$begingroup$

The difference between continuous and discrete variables is not a mathematical essential one like the difference between natural and real numbers. It's just a matter of practicality: we use different tools to address each one because we are interested on answering different questions.



Basically, in discrete variables we are interested in the frequency of each value, but in continuous variables we are just interested in frequency of intervals. Then, we treat as continuous variables the variables when two or more cases getting the same value is just an anecdote - unlikely and/or uninteresting - and we model it as being able to get any real value in an interval. Otherwise, we model the variable as being a discrete variable with just a finite or numerable possible values.



For example: monetary quantities (prices, income, GDP and so) are usually modeled as continuous variables. However, they actually can only take a numerable set of values, because we just record monetary values up to some precision - usually 1 cent.



Some Euro area countries previous currency were valued less than 1 euro cent (e.g. Spanish peseta and Italian lira). In those countries cents had fallen in disuse long ago and all prices and wages were natural numbers, but when Euro was introduced they got a couple of decimal figures. Sometimes my students say that prices in pesetas were discrete variables but prices in euros are continuous ones, but that's plainly wrong because we are interested in the same questions and use the same statistical tools for both.



In summary and returning to the question: The difference between discrete an continuous variables are just a matter of convenience and you can treat a variable as discrete even if it takes negative values. You just need it to take few enough values to be interested in frequency of each one.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399832%2fcan-the-discrete-variable-be-a-negative-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    Your intuition is correct -- a discrete variable can take on negative values.



    The example is just an example: a person can't have $-2$ children, but the difference in scores between Home and Away sports teams can be $-2$ when the Home team is behind by two points.



    Discrete variables with negative values exist all over the place. Two prominent examples:




    • Rademacher distribution

    • Skellam distribution






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – usεr11852
      Mar 28 at 23:29








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 28 at 23:37
















    7












    $begingroup$

    Your intuition is correct -- a discrete variable can take on negative values.



    The example is just an example: a person can't have $-2$ children, but the difference in scores between Home and Away sports teams can be $-2$ when the Home team is behind by two points.



    Discrete variables with negative values exist all over the place. Two prominent examples:




    • Rademacher distribution

    • Skellam distribution






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – usεr11852
      Mar 28 at 23:29








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 28 at 23:37














    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    Your intuition is correct -- a discrete variable can take on negative values.



    The example is just an example: a person can't have $-2$ children, but the difference in scores between Home and Away sports teams can be $-2$ when the Home team is behind by two points.



    Discrete variables with negative values exist all over the place. Two prominent examples:




    • Rademacher distribution

    • Skellam distribution






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Your intuition is correct -- a discrete variable can take on negative values.



    The example is just an example: a person can't have $-2$ children, but the difference in scores between Home and Away sports teams can be $-2$ when the Home team is behind by two points.



    Discrete variables with negative values exist all over the place. Two prominent examples:




    • Rademacher distribution

    • Skellam distribution







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 28 at 23:36

























    answered Mar 28 at 2:16









    SycoraxSycorax

    42.2k12111207




    42.2k12111207








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – usεr11852
      Mar 28 at 23:29








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 28 at 23:37














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – usεr11852
      Mar 28 at 23:29








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 28 at 23:37








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 28 at 23:29






    $begingroup$
    (+1) To mention a somewhat simpler example: In certain sports (e.g. association football, ice hockey, Gaelic football, etc.) the goal difference between the home team and the visiting team can naturally modelled as a Skellam distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 28 at 23:29






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 28 at 23:37




    $begingroup$
    @usεr11852 Yes, I should have turned to my knowledge of Gaelic football. ;-) Your point is well taken and I've revised the example.
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 28 at 23:37













    1












    $begingroup$

    The difference between continuous and discrete variables is not a mathematical essential one like the difference between natural and real numbers. It's just a matter of practicality: we use different tools to address each one because we are interested on answering different questions.



    Basically, in discrete variables we are interested in the frequency of each value, but in continuous variables we are just interested in frequency of intervals. Then, we treat as continuous variables the variables when two or more cases getting the same value is just an anecdote - unlikely and/or uninteresting - and we model it as being able to get any real value in an interval. Otherwise, we model the variable as being a discrete variable with just a finite or numerable possible values.



    For example: monetary quantities (prices, income, GDP and so) are usually modeled as continuous variables. However, they actually can only take a numerable set of values, because we just record monetary values up to some precision - usually 1 cent.



    Some Euro area countries previous currency were valued less than 1 euro cent (e.g. Spanish peseta and Italian lira). In those countries cents had fallen in disuse long ago and all prices and wages were natural numbers, but when Euro was introduced they got a couple of decimal figures. Sometimes my students say that prices in pesetas were discrete variables but prices in euros are continuous ones, but that's plainly wrong because we are interested in the same questions and use the same statistical tools for both.



    In summary and returning to the question: The difference between discrete an continuous variables are just a matter of convenience and you can treat a variable as discrete even if it takes negative values. You just need it to take few enough values to be interested in frequency of each one.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The difference between continuous and discrete variables is not a mathematical essential one like the difference between natural and real numbers. It's just a matter of practicality: we use different tools to address each one because we are interested on answering different questions.



      Basically, in discrete variables we are interested in the frequency of each value, but in continuous variables we are just interested in frequency of intervals. Then, we treat as continuous variables the variables when two or more cases getting the same value is just an anecdote - unlikely and/or uninteresting - and we model it as being able to get any real value in an interval. Otherwise, we model the variable as being a discrete variable with just a finite or numerable possible values.



      For example: monetary quantities (prices, income, GDP and so) are usually modeled as continuous variables. However, they actually can only take a numerable set of values, because we just record monetary values up to some precision - usually 1 cent.



      Some Euro area countries previous currency were valued less than 1 euro cent (e.g. Spanish peseta and Italian lira). In those countries cents had fallen in disuse long ago and all prices and wages were natural numbers, but when Euro was introduced they got a couple of decimal figures. Sometimes my students say that prices in pesetas were discrete variables but prices in euros are continuous ones, but that's plainly wrong because we are interested in the same questions and use the same statistical tools for both.



      In summary and returning to the question: The difference between discrete an continuous variables are just a matter of convenience and you can treat a variable as discrete even if it takes negative values. You just need it to take few enough values to be interested in frequency of each one.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The difference between continuous and discrete variables is not a mathematical essential one like the difference between natural and real numbers. It's just a matter of practicality: we use different tools to address each one because we are interested on answering different questions.



        Basically, in discrete variables we are interested in the frequency of each value, but in continuous variables we are just interested in frequency of intervals. Then, we treat as continuous variables the variables when two or more cases getting the same value is just an anecdote - unlikely and/or uninteresting - and we model it as being able to get any real value in an interval. Otherwise, we model the variable as being a discrete variable with just a finite or numerable possible values.



        For example: monetary quantities (prices, income, GDP and so) are usually modeled as continuous variables. However, they actually can only take a numerable set of values, because we just record monetary values up to some precision - usually 1 cent.



        Some Euro area countries previous currency were valued less than 1 euro cent (e.g. Spanish peseta and Italian lira). In those countries cents had fallen in disuse long ago and all prices and wages were natural numbers, but when Euro was introduced they got a couple of decimal figures. Sometimes my students say that prices in pesetas were discrete variables but prices in euros are continuous ones, but that's plainly wrong because we are interested in the same questions and use the same statistical tools for both.



        In summary and returning to the question: The difference between discrete an continuous variables are just a matter of convenience and you can treat a variable as discrete even if it takes negative values. You just need it to take few enough values to be interested in frequency of each one.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The difference between continuous and discrete variables is not a mathematical essential one like the difference between natural and real numbers. It's just a matter of practicality: we use different tools to address each one because we are interested on answering different questions.



        Basically, in discrete variables we are interested in the frequency of each value, but in continuous variables we are just interested in frequency of intervals. Then, we treat as continuous variables the variables when two or more cases getting the same value is just an anecdote - unlikely and/or uninteresting - and we model it as being able to get any real value in an interval. Otherwise, we model the variable as being a discrete variable with just a finite or numerable possible values.



        For example: monetary quantities (prices, income, GDP and so) are usually modeled as continuous variables. However, they actually can only take a numerable set of values, because we just record monetary values up to some precision - usually 1 cent.



        Some Euro area countries previous currency were valued less than 1 euro cent (e.g. Spanish peseta and Italian lira). In those countries cents had fallen in disuse long ago and all prices and wages were natural numbers, but when Euro was introduced they got a couple of decimal figures. Sometimes my students say that prices in pesetas were discrete variables but prices in euros are continuous ones, but that's plainly wrong because we are interested in the same questions and use the same statistical tools for both.



        In summary and returning to the question: The difference between discrete an continuous variables are just a matter of convenience and you can treat a variable as discrete even if it takes negative values. You just need it to take few enough values to be interested in frequency of each one.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 28 at 12:00









        PerePere

        4,6871820




        4,6871820






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399832%2fcan-the-discrete-variable-be-a-negative-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa