Uniqueness of Neumann conditions for Laplace equations
$begingroup$
I know that generally Neumann problem only has unique solutions up to constants. But what about this case (which was brought to me by my friend): If $Omega$ is a bounded region and its boundary is $C^2$, $gin C(partial Omega)$ is such that $partial_nu u=g$ on $partialOmega$, $Delta u=0$ on $Omega$. Then does it admit a unique solution?
pde
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that generally Neumann problem only has unique solutions up to constants. But what about this case (which was brought to me by my friend): If $Omega$ is a bounded region and its boundary is $C^2$, $gin C(partial Omega)$ is such that $partial_nu u=g$ on $partialOmega$, $Delta u=0$ on $Omega$. Then does it admit a unique solution?
pde
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
1
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that generally Neumann problem only has unique solutions up to constants. But what about this case (which was brought to me by my friend): If $Omega$ is a bounded region and its boundary is $C^2$, $gin C(partial Omega)$ is such that $partial_nu u=g$ on $partialOmega$, $Delta u=0$ on $Omega$. Then does it admit a unique solution?
pde
$endgroup$
I know that generally Neumann problem only has unique solutions up to constants. But what about this case (which was brought to me by my friend): If $Omega$ is a bounded region and its boundary is $C^2$, $gin C(partial Omega)$ is such that $partial_nu u=g$ on $partialOmega$, $Delta u=0$ on $Omega$. Then does it admit a unique solution?
pde
pde
asked Dec 8 '13 at 4:51
XuxuXuxu
561413
561413
1
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
1
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
1
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43
1
1
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
1
1
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not.
We need a smoothness condition on the boundary just so that $partial_nu u$ makes sense. This is the probably reason why you see that condition.
Otherwise, your question is unclear. You asked
Then does it admit a unique solution?
to which Stephen Montgomery-Smith gave the negative answer, to which you replied that you already know that. What exactly do you want?
If you want to know how one proves the uniqueness up to constants: let $u$ be the difference of two solutions, let $v=u^2$ and notice that $Delta v = |nabla u|^2$. Since the normal derivative of $u$ vanishes on the boundary, so does the normal derivative of $v$. By the divergence theorem, $int_{Omega} Delta v =0$. Hence $nabla uequiv 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f597750%2funiqueness-of-neumann-conditions-for-laplace-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not.
We need a smoothness condition on the boundary just so that $partial_nu u$ makes sense. This is the probably reason why you see that condition.
Otherwise, your question is unclear. You asked
Then does it admit a unique solution?
to which Stephen Montgomery-Smith gave the negative answer, to which you replied that you already know that. What exactly do you want?
If you want to know how one proves the uniqueness up to constants: let $u$ be the difference of two solutions, let $v=u^2$ and notice that $Delta v = |nabla u|^2$. Since the normal derivative of $u$ vanishes on the boundary, so does the normal derivative of $v$. By the divergence theorem, $int_{Omega} Delta v =0$. Hence $nabla uequiv 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not.
We need a smoothness condition on the boundary just so that $partial_nu u$ makes sense. This is the probably reason why you see that condition.
Otherwise, your question is unclear. You asked
Then does it admit a unique solution?
to which Stephen Montgomery-Smith gave the negative answer, to which you replied that you already know that. What exactly do you want?
If you want to know how one proves the uniqueness up to constants: let $u$ be the difference of two solutions, let $v=u^2$ and notice that $Delta v = |nabla u|^2$. Since the normal derivative of $u$ vanishes on the boundary, so does the normal derivative of $v$. By the divergence theorem, $int_{Omega} Delta v =0$. Hence $nabla uequiv 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not.
We need a smoothness condition on the boundary just so that $partial_nu u$ makes sense. This is the probably reason why you see that condition.
Otherwise, your question is unclear. You asked
Then does it admit a unique solution?
to which Stephen Montgomery-Smith gave the negative answer, to which you replied that you already know that. What exactly do you want?
If you want to know how one proves the uniqueness up to constants: let $u$ be the difference of two solutions, let $v=u^2$ and notice that $Delta v = |nabla u|^2$. Since the normal derivative of $u$ vanishes on the boundary, so does the normal derivative of $v$. By the divergence theorem, $int_{Omega} Delta v =0$. Hence $nabla uequiv 0$.
$endgroup$
whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not.
We need a smoothness condition on the boundary just so that $partial_nu u$ makes sense. This is the probably reason why you see that condition.
Otherwise, your question is unclear. You asked
Then does it admit a unique solution?
to which Stephen Montgomery-Smith gave the negative answer, to which you replied that you already know that. What exactly do you want?
If you want to know how one proves the uniqueness up to constants: let $u$ be the difference of two solutions, let $v=u^2$ and notice that $Delta v = |nabla u|^2$. Since the normal derivative of $u$ vanishes on the boundary, so does the normal derivative of $v$. By the divergence theorem, $int_{Omega} Delta v =0$. Hence $nabla uequiv 0$.
answered Dec 9 '13 at 13:26
Post No BullsPost No Bulls
6,64121783
6,64121783
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f597750%2funiqueness-of-neumann-conditions-for-laplace-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Why isn't $u+c$ not also a solution if $c$ is constant? Am I missing something? Or are you asking about existence instead of uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@StephenMontgomery-Smith I already know this. I am merely wondering whether the condition on boundary of the domain has effects on the uniqueness or not. If not, what conditions else might guarantee uniqueness?
$endgroup$
– Xuxu
Dec 8 '13 at 7:03
1
$begingroup$
The point I was making is that is it very easy to see that $u+c$ is also a solution. You should be able to immediately see that your conditions don't imply uniqueness.
$endgroup$
– Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Dec 8 '13 at 15:43