Double Binomial Sum












0












$begingroup$


I've been tackling the following problem from Concrete Mathematics (Graham et al., chapter 5).




enter image description here




I turned to the answers at some point -- which alas, I have trouble understanding!



Can you provide an answer that elaborates most important steps. For example how is floor-square op replaced by factor $2 k + 1$ and loosened constraint on $j$?




enter image description here











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I've been tackling the following problem from Concrete Mathematics (Graham et al., chapter 5).




    enter image description here




    I turned to the answers at some point -- which alas, I have trouble understanding!



    Can you provide an answer that elaborates most important steps. For example how is floor-square op replaced by factor $2 k + 1$ and loosened constraint on $j$?




    enter image description here











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I've been tackling the following problem from Concrete Mathematics (Graham et al., chapter 5).




      enter image description here




      I turned to the answers at some point -- which alas, I have trouble understanding!



      Can you provide an answer that elaborates most important steps. For example how is floor-square op replaced by factor $2 k + 1$ and loosened constraint on $j$?




      enter image description here











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I've been tackling the following problem from Concrete Mathematics (Graham et al., chapter 5).




      enter image description here




      I turned to the answers at some point -- which alas, I have trouble understanding!



      Can you provide an answer that elaborates most important steps. For example how is floor-square op replaced by factor $2 k + 1$ and loosened constraint on $j$?




      enter image description here








      combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 24 '18 at 17:10









      BoLeBoLe

      232110




      232110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          First, replace $k-j$ by $ell$,




          Summing over all integers $0le j le k$ is the same as summing over integers $0le j$ and $0le ell$, where $ell$ is serving the role of $k-j$. The result is



          $$sum_{j,ellge 0} binom{-1}{j-lfloorsqrt{ ell} rfloor}binom{j}m frac1{2^j}$$




          then replace $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ by $k$.




          As $ell$ ranges over positive integers, the quantity $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ does as well, except that the value of $k$ is attained a total of $2k+1$ times. For example, there are $5$ numbers whose square root rounded down is $2$, and those are $4,5,6,7,8$. In this step, we collect all these repeated terms in to one term; the $k$ represents the square root, and $2k+1$ is the number of $ell$ which make that square root.




          Now, sum over $k$,




          Ignoring terms which do not depend on $k$, the summation over $k$ looks like
          $$
          sum_{k} binom{-1}{j-k} (2k+1) = (2j+1)-(2j-1)+(2j-3)-dotspm 1
          $$

          In words, since $binom{-1}{j-k}=(-1)^{j-k}$ whenever $j-kge 0$, and $0$ otherwise, this summation is the alternating sum of the first $j+1$ odd numbers. A little thought shows that this sum is equal to $j+1$; one way to prove this is to break into cases based on whether $j$ is even or odd, then perform all of the adjacent subtractions, leaving a sum of $lfloor j/2rfloor$ two's.




          Absorb the $j+1$ and apply $(5.57)$.




          I think you can take it from here? The absorption identity is $binom{n}k(n+1)=binom{n+1}{k+1}(k+1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
            $endgroup$
            – BoLe
            Dec 25 '18 at 13:50












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051459%2fdouble-binomial-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          First, replace $k-j$ by $ell$,




          Summing over all integers $0le j le k$ is the same as summing over integers $0le j$ and $0le ell$, where $ell$ is serving the role of $k-j$. The result is



          $$sum_{j,ellge 0} binom{-1}{j-lfloorsqrt{ ell} rfloor}binom{j}m frac1{2^j}$$




          then replace $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ by $k$.




          As $ell$ ranges over positive integers, the quantity $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ does as well, except that the value of $k$ is attained a total of $2k+1$ times. For example, there are $5$ numbers whose square root rounded down is $2$, and those are $4,5,6,7,8$. In this step, we collect all these repeated terms in to one term; the $k$ represents the square root, and $2k+1$ is the number of $ell$ which make that square root.




          Now, sum over $k$,




          Ignoring terms which do not depend on $k$, the summation over $k$ looks like
          $$
          sum_{k} binom{-1}{j-k} (2k+1) = (2j+1)-(2j-1)+(2j-3)-dotspm 1
          $$

          In words, since $binom{-1}{j-k}=(-1)^{j-k}$ whenever $j-kge 0$, and $0$ otherwise, this summation is the alternating sum of the first $j+1$ odd numbers. A little thought shows that this sum is equal to $j+1$; one way to prove this is to break into cases based on whether $j$ is even or odd, then perform all of the adjacent subtractions, leaving a sum of $lfloor j/2rfloor$ two's.




          Absorb the $j+1$ and apply $(5.57)$.




          I think you can take it from here? The absorption identity is $binom{n}k(n+1)=binom{n+1}{k+1}(k+1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
            $endgroup$
            – BoLe
            Dec 25 '18 at 13:50
















          1












          $begingroup$


          First, replace $k-j$ by $ell$,




          Summing over all integers $0le j le k$ is the same as summing over integers $0le j$ and $0le ell$, where $ell$ is serving the role of $k-j$. The result is



          $$sum_{j,ellge 0} binom{-1}{j-lfloorsqrt{ ell} rfloor}binom{j}m frac1{2^j}$$




          then replace $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ by $k$.




          As $ell$ ranges over positive integers, the quantity $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ does as well, except that the value of $k$ is attained a total of $2k+1$ times. For example, there are $5$ numbers whose square root rounded down is $2$, and those are $4,5,6,7,8$. In this step, we collect all these repeated terms in to one term; the $k$ represents the square root, and $2k+1$ is the number of $ell$ which make that square root.




          Now, sum over $k$,




          Ignoring terms which do not depend on $k$, the summation over $k$ looks like
          $$
          sum_{k} binom{-1}{j-k} (2k+1) = (2j+1)-(2j-1)+(2j-3)-dotspm 1
          $$

          In words, since $binom{-1}{j-k}=(-1)^{j-k}$ whenever $j-kge 0$, and $0$ otherwise, this summation is the alternating sum of the first $j+1$ odd numbers. A little thought shows that this sum is equal to $j+1$; one way to prove this is to break into cases based on whether $j$ is even or odd, then perform all of the adjacent subtractions, leaving a sum of $lfloor j/2rfloor$ two's.




          Absorb the $j+1$ and apply $(5.57)$.




          I think you can take it from here? The absorption identity is $binom{n}k(n+1)=binom{n+1}{k+1}(k+1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
            $endgroup$
            – BoLe
            Dec 25 '18 at 13:50














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$


          First, replace $k-j$ by $ell$,




          Summing over all integers $0le j le k$ is the same as summing over integers $0le j$ and $0le ell$, where $ell$ is serving the role of $k-j$. The result is



          $$sum_{j,ellge 0} binom{-1}{j-lfloorsqrt{ ell} rfloor}binom{j}m frac1{2^j}$$




          then replace $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ by $k$.




          As $ell$ ranges over positive integers, the quantity $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ does as well, except that the value of $k$ is attained a total of $2k+1$ times. For example, there are $5$ numbers whose square root rounded down is $2$, and those are $4,5,6,7,8$. In this step, we collect all these repeated terms in to one term; the $k$ represents the square root, and $2k+1$ is the number of $ell$ which make that square root.




          Now, sum over $k$,




          Ignoring terms which do not depend on $k$, the summation over $k$ looks like
          $$
          sum_{k} binom{-1}{j-k} (2k+1) = (2j+1)-(2j-1)+(2j-3)-dotspm 1
          $$

          In words, since $binom{-1}{j-k}=(-1)^{j-k}$ whenever $j-kge 0$, and $0$ otherwise, this summation is the alternating sum of the first $j+1$ odd numbers. A little thought shows that this sum is equal to $j+1$; one way to prove this is to break into cases based on whether $j$ is even or odd, then perform all of the adjacent subtractions, leaving a sum of $lfloor j/2rfloor$ two's.




          Absorb the $j+1$ and apply $(5.57)$.




          I think you can take it from here? The absorption identity is $binom{n}k(n+1)=binom{n+1}{k+1}(k+1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          First, replace $k-j$ by $ell$,




          Summing over all integers $0le j le k$ is the same as summing over integers $0le j$ and $0le ell$, where $ell$ is serving the role of $k-j$. The result is



          $$sum_{j,ellge 0} binom{-1}{j-lfloorsqrt{ ell} rfloor}binom{j}m frac1{2^j}$$




          then replace $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ by $k$.




          As $ell$ ranges over positive integers, the quantity $lfloor sqrt ell rfloor$ does as well, except that the value of $k$ is attained a total of $2k+1$ times. For example, there are $5$ numbers whose square root rounded down is $2$, and those are $4,5,6,7,8$. In this step, we collect all these repeated terms in to one term; the $k$ represents the square root, and $2k+1$ is the number of $ell$ which make that square root.




          Now, sum over $k$,




          Ignoring terms which do not depend on $k$, the summation over $k$ looks like
          $$
          sum_{k} binom{-1}{j-k} (2k+1) = (2j+1)-(2j-1)+(2j-3)-dotspm 1
          $$

          In words, since $binom{-1}{j-k}=(-1)^{j-k}$ whenever $j-kge 0$, and $0$ otherwise, this summation is the alternating sum of the first $j+1$ odd numbers. A little thought shows that this sum is equal to $j+1$; one way to prove this is to break into cases based on whether $j$ is even or odd, then perform all of the adjacent subtractions, leaving a sum of $lfloor j/2rfloor$ two's.




          Absorb the $j+1$ and apply $(5.57)$.




          I think you can take it from here? The absorption identity is $binom{n}k(n+1)=binom{n+1}{k+1}(k+1)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:44









          Mike EarnestMike Earnest

          28.4k22153




          28.4k22153












          • $begingroup$
            This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
            $endgroup$
            – BoLe
            Dec 25 '18 at 13:50


















          • $begingroup$
            This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
            $endgroup$
            – BoLe
            Dec 25 '18 at 13:50
















          $begingroup$
          This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
          $endgroup$
          – BoLe
          Dec 25 '18 at 13:50




          $begingroup$
          This makes everything clear. I wish I hadn't been intimidated by the whole problem. It's not that hard to proceed once you think well about the index domains.
          $endgroup$
          – BoLe
          Dec 25 '18 at 13:50


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051459%2fdouble-binomial-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa