Solve for $lambda(x): mathbb N to mathbb N$ given two cases.
$begingroup$
Solve for $lambda:Bbb NtoBbb N$ in $lambda(x)=begin{cases}
x+1 & xin2Bbb N \
2lambda(lfloor x/2rfloor) & xin2Bbb N+1
end{cases}$
I know that an answer is $lambda(x)=x+1$, but is it the only one?
We know it is true for $xin2Bbb N$, but what about $xin 2Bbb N+1$?
Let $x=2k+1$ for some $kin Bbb N$.
Then $lambda(2k+1)=2lambda(lfloor (2k+1)/2rfloor)=2lambda(lfloor k+1/2rfloor)=2lambda(k)$
But now we are in the same scenario, having to check the parity of $k$ to be able to progress.
Is there a way to prove this, maybe inductively? Thanks.
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solve for $lambda:Bbb NtoBbb N$ in $lambda(x)=begin{cases}
x+1 & xin2Bbb N \
2lambda(lfloor x/2rfloor) & xin2Bbb N+1
end{cases}$
I know that an answer is $lambda(x)=x+1$, but is it the only one?
We know it is true for $xin2Bbb N$, but what about $xin 2Bbb N+1$?
Let $x=2k+1$ for some $kin Bbb N$.
Then $lambda(2k+1)=2lambda(lfloor (2k+1)/2rfloor)=2lambda(lfloor k+1/2rfloor)=2lambda(k)$
But now we are in the same scenario, having to check the parity of $k$ to be able to progress.
Is there a way to prove this, maybe inductively? Thanks.
functions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solve for $lambda:Bbb NtoBbb N$ in $lambda(x)=begin{cases}
x+1 & xin2Bbb N \
2lambda(lfloor x/2rfloor) & xin2Bbb N+1
end{cases}$
I know that an answer is $lambda(x)=x+1$, but is it the only one?
We know it is true for $xin2Bbb N$, but what about $xin 2Bbb N+1$?
Let $x=2k+1$ for some $kin Bbb N$.
Then $lambda(2k+1)=2lambda(lfloor (2k+1)/2rfloor)=2lambda(lfloor k+1/2rfloor)=2lambda(k)$
But now we are in the same scenario, having to check the parity of $k$ to be able to progress.
Is there a way to prove this, maybe inductively? Thanks.
functions
$endgroup$
Solve for $lambda:Bbb NtoBbb N$ in $lambda(x)=begin{cases}
x+1 & xin2Bbb N \
2lambda(lfloor x/2rfloor) & xin2Bbb N+1
end{cases}$
I know that an answer is $lambda(x)=x+1$, but is it the only one?
We know it is true for $xin2Bbb N$, but what about $xin 2Bbb N+1$?
Let $x=2k+1$ for some $kin Bbb N$.
Then $lambda(2k+1)=2lambda(lfloor (2k+1)/2rfloor)=2lambda(lfloor k+1/2rfloor)=2lambda(k)$
But now we are in the same scenario, having to check the parity of $k$ to be able to progress.
Is there a way to prove this, maybe inductively? Thanks.
functions
functions
edited Dec 16 '18 at 22:58
Namaste
1
1
asked Dec 16 '18 at 22:50
GarmekainGarmekain
1,502720
1,502720
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Does the base-2 expansion of the input $x$ tell you anything?
Solution:
The base-2 expansion of the input $x$ has $m$ trailing 1s: $$x equiv ( d_1 ldots d_n 0 underbrace{1 cdots 1}_m )_2.$$ Note that $x$ is even if and only if $m = 0$. If $m geq 1$, the operation $lfloor x / 2 rfloor$ is equivalent to removing the last trailing 1 from the above expansion. Therefore, begin{multline*}lambda(x) = 2^m lambda( (d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 ) = 2^m left[(d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 + 1 right] \ = 2^m (d_1 ldots d_n 1)_2 = (d_1 ldots d_n 1 underbrace{0 cdots 0}_m)_2 = x + 1.end{multline*}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043294%2fsolve-for-lambdax-mathbb-n-to-mathbb-n-given-two-cases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Does the base-2 expansion of the input $x$ tell you anything?
Solution:
The base-2 expansion of the input $x$ has $m$ trailing 1s: $$x equiv ( d_1 ldots d_n 0 underbrace{1 cdots 1}_m )_2.$$ Note that $x$ is even if and only if $m = 0$. If $m geq 1$, the operation $lfloor x / 2 rfloor$ is equivalent to removing the last trailing 1 from the above expansion. Therefore, begin{multline*}lambda(x) = 2^m lambda( (d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 ) = 2^m left[(d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 + 1 right] \ = 2^m (d_1 ldots d_n 1)_2 = (d_1 ldots d_n 1 underbrace{0 cdots 0}_m)_2 = x + 1.end{multline*}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Does the base-2 expansion of the input $x$ tell you anything?
Solution:
The base-2 expansion of the input $x$ has $m$ trailing 1s: $$x equiv ( d_1 ldots d_n 0 underbrace{1 cdots 1}_m )_2.$$ Note that $x$ is even if and only if $m = 0$. If $m geq 1$, the operation $lfloor x / 2 rfloor$ is equivalent to removing the last trailing 1 from the above expansion. Therefore, begin{multline*}lambda(x) = 2^m lambda( (d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 ) = 2^m left[(d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 + 1 right] \ = 2^m (d_1 ldots d_n 1)_2 = (d_1 ldots d_n 1 underbrace{0 cdots 0}_m)_2 = x + 1.end{multline*}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Does the base-2 expansion of the input $x$ tell you anything?
Solution:
The base-2 expansion of the input $x$ has $m$ trailing 1s: $$x equiv ( d_1 ldots d_n 0 underbrace{1 cdots 1}_m )_2.$$ Note that $x$ is even if and only if $m = 0$. If $m geq 1$, the operation $lfloor x / 2 rfloor$ is equivalent to removing the last trailing 1 from the above expansion. Therefore, begin{multline*}lambda(x) = 2^m lambda( (d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 ) = 2^m left[(d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 + 1 right] \ = 2^m (d_1 ldots d_n 1)_2 = (d_1 ldots d_n 1 underbrace{0 cdots 0}_m)_2 = x + 1.end{multline*}
$endgroup$
Hint: Does the base-2 expansion of the input $x$ tell you anything?
Solution:
The base-2 expansion of the input $x$ has $m$ trailing 1s: $$x equiv ( d_1 ldots d_n 0 underbrace{1 cdots 1}_m )_2.$$ Note that $x$ is even if and only if $m = 0$. If $m geq 1$, the operation $lfloor x / 2 rfloor$ is equivalent to removing the last trailing 1 from the above expansion. Therefore, begin{multline*}lambda(x) = 2^m lambda( (d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 ) = 2^m left[(d_1 ldots d_n 0)_2 + 1 right] \ = 2^m (d_1 ldots d_n 1)_2 = (d_1 ldots d_n 1 underbrace{0 cdots 0}_m)_2 = x + 1.end{multline*}
edited Dec 16 '18 at 23:26
answered Dec 16 '18 at 23:01
parsiadparsiad
18.3k32453
18.3k32453
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
$begingroup$
Exactly. But how can it be proved that $x+1$ is the only solution for $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:02
1
1
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Try looking at the base-2 expansion of $23$, $lfloor 23 / 2 rfloor = 11$, $lfloor 11 / 2 rfloor = 5$, and $lfloor 5 / 2 rfloor = 2$. You should be able to spot a pattern that you can generalize from.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does the fact that "eventually it will reach an even number, because no binary expansion of all 1s exist" do the work? I feel it lacks something, hence the question.
$endgroup$
– Garmekain
Dec 16 '18 at 23:07
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
It will eventually reach an even number simply because $lfloor 1 / 2 rfloor = 0$ and $0$ is even.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 16 '18 at 23:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043294%2fsolve-for-lambdax-mathbb-n-to-mathbb-n-given-two-cases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Best not to format "cases" in a title.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:54
$begingroup$
Garmekain ^^^^^
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Dec 16 '18 at 22:59