Upper bound for the number of solutions of a Diophantine equation
$begingroup$
Consider the Diophantine equation
$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.
For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?
To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.
$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,
$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$
I would be very grateful for any suggestion!
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the Diophantine equation
$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.
For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?
To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.
$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,
$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$
I would be very grateful for any suggestion!
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations
New contributor
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the Diophantine equation
$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.
For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?
To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.
$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,
$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$
I would be very grateful for any suggestion!
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations
New contributor
$endgroup$
Consider the Diophantine equation
$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.
For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?
To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.
$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,
$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$
I would be very grateful for any suggestion!
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
András Bátkai
3,81642342
3,81642342
New contributor
asked yesterday
Marcelo NogueiraMarcelo Nogueira
253
253
New contributor
New contributor
10
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday
add a comment |
10
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday
10
10
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.
Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)
For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.
For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.
The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.
tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.
Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)
For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.
For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.
The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.
tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.
Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)
For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.
For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.
The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.
tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.
Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)
For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.
For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.
The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.
tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields
New contributor
$endgroup$
First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.
Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)
For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.
For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.
The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.
tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered yesterday
NellNell
1015
1015
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
add a comment |
Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
10
$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
yesterday